Abstract
Human heading perception from optic flow is accurate for directions close to the straight-ahead and systematic biases emerge in the periphery (Sun, Zhang, Alais, & Li, 2020; Cuturi & Macneilage, 2013). In pursuit of the underlying neural mechanisms, primate brain area MSTd has been a focus because of its causal link with heading perception (Gu, Deangelis, & Angelaki, 2012). Computational models generally explain heading sensitivity in individual MSTd neurons as a feedforward integration of motion signals from area MT that resemble full-field optic flow patterns consistent with the preferred heading direction (Mineault, Khawaja, Butts, & Pack, 2012; Britten, 2008). In the present simulation study, we quantified within the structure of this feedforward model how physiological properties of MT and MSTd shape heading signals. We found that known physiological tuning characteristics generally supported the accuracy of heading estimation, but not always. A weak-to-moderate overrepresentation of peripheral headings in MSTd garnered the highest accuracy and precision out of the models that we tested. The model also performed well when noise corrupted high proportions of the optic flow vectors. Such a peripheral MSTd model performed well when units possessed a range of receptive field sizes and were strongly direction tuned. Physiological biases in MT direction tuning toward the radial direction also supported heading estimation, but the tendency for MT preferred speed and receptive field size to scale with eccentricity did not. Our findings help elucidate the extent to which different physiological tuning properties influence the accuracy and precision of neural heading signals.
Significance Statement
Using vision to perceive direction of self-motion (heading) lies at the heart of our ability to effectively move through the world. Prior work has shown that monkey brain area MSTd is involved in heading perception. We simulated in a computational model how physiological tuning properties of areas MT and MSTd influence neural heading signals. We found that a neural representation of heading biased toward the periphery, in combination with other factors, best supported the accuracy and precision of heading estimates. We draw on existing models and known physiology to promote the broad applicability of our findings. Our analysis helps improve our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying heading perception.
Footnotes
Authors report no conflict of interest
This work was supported by Colby Academic Research Assistants / Presidential Scholar program (to SY), Colby Summer Research Assistant Program (to SY), and Office of Naval Research Grant ONR N00014-18-1-2283 (to OWL).
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
Jump to comment: