Abstract
Throughout the nervous system, the organization of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs within a neuron’s receptive field shapes its output computation. In some cases, multiple motifs of synaptic organization can contribute to a single computation. Here, we compare two of these mechanisms performed by two morphologically distinct direction selective retinal ganglion cells (DSGCs): directionally tuned inhibition and spatially offset inhibition. Using drifting stimuli, we found that DSGCs that have asymmetric dendrites exhibited stronger directionally tuned inhibition than symmetric DSGCs. Using stationary stimuli to map receptive fields, we found that DSGCs with both symmetric and asymmetric dendrites exhibited similar spatially offset inhibition. Interestingly, we observed that excitatory and inhibitory synapses for both cell types were locally correlated in strength. This result indicates that in the mouse retina, dendritic morphology influences the amount of tuned inhibition attained through asymmetric wiring but does not dictate the synaptic organization of excitation relative to inhibition.
SIGNFICANCE STATEMENT
Neural circuit function is dependent on the detailed organization of excitatory and inhibitory synapses onto dendrites. Here we use a classic neural circuit - the direction selective circuit of the retina - to assess how changes in dendritic shape impact the synaptic organization. We find the direction selective cells of the retina that have asymmetric dendrites have similar synaptic organization to those that have symmetric dendrites, indicating the the shape of dendrites does not dictate the final computation of the neurons.
Footnotes
Authors report no conflict of interest.
Funding sources NIH F31 NS106756. NIH R01EY019498; NIH R01EY013528; NIH P30EY003176.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
Jump to comment: