Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
  • My alerts

eNeuro

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
PreviousNext
Methods/New Tools, Novel Tools and Methods

A novel 3-choice touchscreen task to examine spatial attention and orienting responses in rodents

Faraj L. Haddad, Maryam Ghahremani, Cleusa De Oliveira, Ella Doornaert, Kevin D. Johnston, Stefan Everling and Susanne Schmid
eNeuro 31 March 2021, ENEURO.0032-20.2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0032-20.2021
Faraj L. Haddad
1Graduate Program in Neuroscience, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
2Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maryam Ghahremani
1Graduate Program in Neuroscience, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
4Robarts Research Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cleusa De Oliveira
2Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ella Doornaert
2Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin D. Johnston
1Graduate Program in Neuroscience, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
3Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kevin D. Johnston
Stefan Everling
1Graduate Program in Neuroscience, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
3Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
4Robarts Research Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stefan Everling
Susanne Schmid
1Graduate Program in Neuroscience, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
2Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario
5Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Susanne Schmid
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mammalian orienting behaviour consists of coordinated movements of the eyes, head, pinnae, vibrissae, or body to attend to an external stimulus. The present study aimed to develop a novel operant task using a touch-screen system to measure spatial attention. In this task, rats were trained to nose-poke a light stimulus presented in one of three locations. The stimulus was presented more frequently in the center location to develop spatial attention bias towards the center stimulus. Changes in orienting responses were detected by measuring the animals' response accuracy and latency to stimuli at the lateral locations, following reversible unilateral chemogenetic inactivation of the superior colliculus (SC). Additionally, spontaneous turning and rotation behaviour was measured using an open field test (OFT). Our results show that right SC inactivation significantly increased the whole body turn angle in the OFT, in line with previous literature that indicated an ipsiversive orientating bias and the presence of contralateral neglect following unilateral SC lesions. In the touch screen orienting task, unilateral SC inactivation significantly increased bias towards the ipsilateral side, as measured by response frequency in various experimental conditions, and a very large left-shift of a respective psychometric function. Our results demonstrate that this novel touchscreen task is able to detect changes spatial attention and orienting responses, due to e.g. experimental manipulations or injury, with very high sensitivity while taking advantage of the touch screen technology that allows for high transferability of the task between labs and for open source data sharing through mousebytes.ca.

Significance

Touch-screen rodent testing is a novel translational method of behavioural testing that is more comparable to test batteries used in humans, such as the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Its standardized approach in closed boxes allows for better comparability of data between labs and for open source data sharing at the affiliated platform “mousebytes.ca”. The goal of this study was to expand the toolbox for touch-screen boxes to investigate orienting behavior and spatial attention. Unilateral reversible chemogenetic inhibition of the SC revealed an ipsiversive orientating bias and the presence of neglect-like effects for contralateral visual stimuli, demonstrating that this novel task is highly sensitive to detect disruptions of spatial attention associated with psychiatric disorders, brain injury, or experimental manipulations.

  • orienting behaviour
  • rat
  • superior colliculus
  • touch-screen

Footnotes

  • Authors report no conflict of interest

  • This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant FRN148365 to SE), the J&J Memorial Fund (FH) and the Canada First Research Excellence Fund (BrainsCAN, SS and SE), and the Natural Science and Engineering Council (SS).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A novel 3-choice touchscreen task to examine spatial attention and orienting responses in rodents
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A novel 3-choice touchscreen task to examine spatial attention and orienting responses in rodents
Faraj L. Haddad, Maryam Ghahremani, Cleusa De Oliveira, Ella Doornaert, Kevin D. Johnston, Stefan Everling, Susanne Schmid
eNeuro 31 March 2021, ENEURO.0032-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0032-20.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
A novel 3-choice touchscreen task to examine spatial attention and orienting responses in rodents
Faraj L. Haddad, Maryam Ghahremani, Cleusa De Oliveira, Ella Doornaert, Kevin D. Johnston, Stefan Everling, Susanne Schmid
eNeuro 31 March 2021, ENEURO.0032-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0032-20.2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • orienting behaviour
  • rat
  • superior colliculus
  • touch-screen

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Methods/New Tools

  • Real-time closed-loop feedback in behavioral time scales using DeepLabCut
  • Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
Show more Methods/New Tools

Novel Tools and Methods

  • Real-time closed-loop feedback in behavioral time scales using DeepLabCut
  • Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
  • An open source platform for presenting dynamic visual stimuli
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.