Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
  • My alerts

eNeuro

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
PreviousNext
New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Novel influences of sex and APOE genotype on spinal plasticity and recovery of function after spinal cord injury

Lydia E. Strattan, Daimen R. Britsch, Chris M. Calulot, Rachel S. J. Maggard, Erin L. Abner, Lance A. Johnson and Warren J. Alilain
eNeuro 3 February 2021, ENEURO.0464-20.2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0464-20.2021
Lydia E. Strattan
1Department of Neuroscience, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daimen R. Britsch
2Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris M. Calulot
2Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel S. J. Maggard
1Department of Neuroscience, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin L. Abner
3Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
4Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
5Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lance A. Johnson
3Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
6Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Warren J. Alilain
1Department of Neuroscience, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
2Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Spinal cord injuries can abolish both motor and sensory function throughout the body. Spontaneous recovery after injury is limited and can vary substantially between individuals. Despite an abundance of therapeutic approaches that have shown promise in preclinical models, there is currently a lack of effective treatment strategies that have been translated to restore function after SCI in the human population. We hypothesized that sex and genetic background of injured individuals could impact how they respond to treatment strategies, presenting a barrier to translating therapies that are not tailored to the individual. One gene of particular interest is APOE, which has been extensively studied in the brain due to its allele-specific influences on synaptic plasticity, metabolism, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. Despite its prominence as a therapeutic target in brain injury and disease, little is known about how it influences neural plasticity and repair processes in the spinal cord. Utilizing humanized mice, we examined how the ε3 and ε4 alleles of APOE influence the efficacy of therapeutic intermittent hypoxia (IH) in inducing spinally-mediated plasticity after cervical SCI. IH is sufficient to enhance plasticity and restore motor function after experimental SCI in genetically similar rodent populations, but its effect in human subjects is more variable (Golder, 2005; Hayes et al., 2014). Our results demonstrate that both sex and APOE genotype determine the extent of respiratory motor plasticity that is elicited by IH, highlighting the importance of considering these clinically relevant variables when translating therapeutic approaches for the SCI community.

Significance Statement There is currently a critical need for therapeutics that restore motor and sensory function effectively after cervical spinal cord injury. Although many therapeutic approaches, including intermittent hypoxia, are being investigated for their potential to enhance spinal plasticity and improve motor outcomes after SCI, it is unknown whether the efficacy of these treatment strategies is influenced by individuals’ genetic background. Here we show that APOE genotype and sex both play a role in determining the propensity for motor plasticity in humanized mice after cervical SCI. These results indicate that sex and genetic background dictate how individuals respond to therapeutic approaches, thereby emphasizing the importance of developing personalized medicine for the diverse SCI population.

  • apolipoprotein E
  • breathing
  • genetics
  • plasticity
  • spinal cord injury

Footnotes

  • Authors report no conflict of interest.

  • This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1839289. This work was also supported by the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation (598741), and the NIH R01(NS101105).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel influences of sex and APOE genotype on spinal plasticity and recovery of function after spinal cord injury
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Novel influences of sex and APOE genotype on spinal plasticity and recovery of function after spinal cord injury
Lydia E. Strattan, Daimen R. Britsch, Chris M. Calulot, Rachel S. J. Maggard, Erin L. Abner, Lance A. Johnson, Warren J. Alilain
eNeuro 3 February 2021, ENEURO.0464-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0464-20.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Novel influences of sex and APOE genotype on spinal plasticity and recovery of function after spinal cord injury
Lydia E. Strattan, Daimen R. Britsch, Chris M. Calulot, Rachel S. J. Maggard, Erin L. Abner, Lance A. Johnson, Warren J. Alilain
eNeuro 3 February 2021, ENEURO.0464-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0464-20.2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • apolipoprotein E
  • breathing
  • genetics
  • plasticity
  • spinal cord injury

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Altered phosphorylation of the proteasome subunit Rpt6 has minimal impact on synaptic plasticity and learning
  • Social Experience Interacts with Serotonin to Affect Functional Connectivity in the Social Behavior Network following Playback of Social Vocalizations in Mice
  • Effects of optogenetic suppression of cortical input on primate thalamic neuronal activity during goal-directed behavior
Show more New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Altered phosphorylation of the proteasome subunit Rpt6 has minimal impact on synaptic plasticity and learning
  • Social Experience Interacts with Serotonin to Affect Functional Connectivity in the Social Behavior Network following Playback of Social Vocalizations in Mice
  • Effects of optogenetic suppression of cortical input on primate thalamic neuronal activity during goal-directed behavior
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.