Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
New Research, Integrative Systems

Parvalbumin interneurons are differentially connected to principal cells in inhibitory feedback microcircuits along the dorso-ventral axis of the medial entorhinal cortex

Sabine Grosser, Federico J Barreda, Prateep Beed, Dietmar Schmitz, Sam A Booker and Imre Vida
eNeuro 2 February 2021, ENEURO.0354-20.2020; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0354-20.2020
Sabine Grosser
1Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federico J Barreda
1Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
2Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, 10115 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prateep Beed
3Neurowissenschaftliches Forschungszentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
4Berlin Institute of Health, 10178 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dietmar Schmitz
4Berlin Institute of Health, 10178 Berlin, Germany
5NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, 10117 Berlin, Germany
6DZNE - German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sam A Booker
1Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
7Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences
8Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain
9Patrick Wild Centre for Autism Research, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9XD Edinburgh, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sam A Booker
Imre Vida
1Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
5NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Imre Vida
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The medial entorhinal cortex (mEC) shows a high degree of spatial tuning, predominantly grid-cell activity, which is reliant on robust, dynamic inhibition provided by local interneurons (INs). In fact, feedback inhibitory microcircuits involving fast-spiking parvalbumin (PV) basket cells (BCs) are believed to contribute dominantly to the emergence of grid-field firing in principal cells (PrCs). However, the strength of PV BC-mediated inhibition onto PrCs is not uniform in this region, but high in the dorsal and weak in the ventral mEC. This is in good correlation with divergent grid field sizes, but the underlying morphological and physiological mechanisms remain unknown. In this study, we examined PV BCs in layer 2/3 of the mEC characterizing their intrinsic physiology, morphology, and synaptic connectivity in the juvenile rat. We show that while intrinsic physiology and morphology are broadly similar over the dorso-ventral axis, PV BCs form more connections onto local PrCs in the dorsal mEC, independent of target cell type. In turn, the major PrC subtypes, pyramidal (PC) and stellate cells (SC), form connections onto PV BCs with lower, but equal probability. These data thus identify inhibitory connectivity as source of the gradient of inhibition, plausibly explaining divergent grid field formation along this dorso-ventral axis of the mEC.

Significance Statement Inhibition by parvalbumin basket cells (PV BCs) is essential for the emergence of grid firing in principal cells (PrCs) in the medial entorhinal cortex (mEC).The strength of PV BC-mediated inhibition decreases along the dorso-ventral axis, in correlation with the grid field size of spatially tuned PrCs. In this study, to identify underlying cellular mechanisms, we combined electrophysiological recordings and neuroanatomical analysis investigating properties and connectivity of PV BCs in layer 2/3 of the rat mEC. While morphological and physiological properties were largely uniform, IN-PrC connectivity was higher in the dorsal than ventral mEC. Thus, our results indentify a difference in PV BC connectivity as source of the inhibitory gradient in the mEC with implications for grid size modulation.

  • Entorhinal cortex
  • Feedback inhibition
  • GABAergic interneurons
  • Microcircuit
  • Morphology
  • Synapse

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG EXC 257, to D.S. and I.V, GRK 1589/2 to I.V.)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Parvalbumin interneurons are differentially connected to principal cells in inhibitory feedback microcircuits along the dorso-ventral axis of the medial entorhinal cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Parvalbumin interneurons are differentially connected to principal cells in inhibitory feedback microcircuits along the dorso-ventral axis of the medial entorhinal cortex
Sabine Grosser, Federico J Barreda, Prateep Beed, Dietmar Schmitz, Sam A Booker, Imre Vida
eNeuro 2 February 2021, ENEURO.0354-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0354-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Parvalbumin interneurons are differentially connected to principal cells in inhibitory feedback microcircuits along the dorso-ventral axis of the medial entorhinal cortex
Sabine Grosser, Federico J Barreda, Prateep Beed, Dietmar Schmitz, Sam A Booker, Imre Vida
eNeuro 2 February 2021, ENEURO.0354-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0354-20.2020
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • entorhinal cortex
  • feedback inhibition
  • GABAergic interneurons
  • microcircuit
  • morphology
  • synapse

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Integrative Systems

  • Functional connectome correlates of laterality preferences: Insights into Hand, Foot, and Eye Dominance Across the Lifespan
  • Alpha-Frequency Stimulation Enhances Synchronization of Alpha Oscillations with Default Mode Network Connectivity
  • Characteristics of Spontaneous Anterior–Posterior Oscillation-Frequency Convergences in the Alpha Band
Show more Integrative Systems

Subjects

  • Integrative Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.