Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
Next
New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Automatic Online Motor Control Is Intact in Parkinson’s Disease with and without Perceptual Awareness

Kate E. Merritt, Ken N. Seergobin, Daniel A. Mendonça, Mary E. Jenkins, Melvyn A. Goodale and Penny A. MacDonald
eNeuro 29 September 2017, ENEURO.0215-17.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0215-17.2017
Kate E. Merritt
1The Brain and Mind Institute, the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kate E. Merritt
Ken N. Seergobin
1The Brain and Mind Institute, the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel A. Mendonça
2Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary E. Jenkins
2Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mary E. Jenkins
Melvyn A. Goodale
1The Brain and Mind Institute, the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Canada
3Department of Psychology, the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Melvyn A. Goodale
Penny A. MacDonald
1The Brain and Mind Institute, the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Canada
2Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
3Department of Psychology, the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In the double-step paradigm, healthy human participants automatically correct reaching movements when targets are displaced. Motor deficits are prominent in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. In the lone investigation of online motor correction in PD using the double-step task, Desmurget et al., (2004) found that PD patients performed unconscious adjustments appropriately but seemed impaired for consciously-perceived modifications. Conscious perception of target movement was achieved by linking displacement to movement onset. PD-related bradykinesia disproportionately prolonged preparatory phases for movements to original target locations for patients, potentially accounting for deficits. Eliminating this confound in a double-step task, we evaluated the effect of conscious awareness of trajectory change on online motor corrections in PD. On and off dopaminergic therapy, PD patients (n = 14) and healthy controls (n = 14) reached to peripheral visual targets that remained stationary or unexpectedly moved during an initial saccade. Saccade latencies in PD are comparable to controls’. Hence, target displacements occurred at equal times across groups. Target jump size affected conscious awareness, confirmed in an independent target displacement judgment task. Small jumps were subliminal but large target displacements were consciously perceived. Contrary to the previous result, PD patients performed online motor corrections normally and automatically, irrespective of conscious perception. Patients evidenced equivalent movement durations for jump and stay trials, and trajectories for patients and controls were identical, irrespective of conscious perception. Dopaminergic therapy had no effect on performance. In summary, online motor control is intact in PD, unaffected by conscious perceptual awareness. The basal ganglia are not implicated in online corrective responses.

Significance Statement We directly investigated a) the ability of PD patients to perform online motor corrections and b) whether these corrections are affected by conscious awareness of target displacements. Contrary to a previously-published report by Desmurget et al. 2004, we found that after controlling for the confounding effects of PD-related bradykinesia, automatic, in-flight motor control is intact in PD patients, unaffected by conscious awareness. Further, dopaminergic therapy had no effect on these smooth, in-flight corrections. Despite prominent motor symptoms, our findings suggest that PD patients have intact automatic online motor control. Our results further imply that the striatum and basal ganglia do not mediate online motor corrections.

  • Basal Ganglia
  • Bradykinesia
  • Dopaminergic Therapy
  • Online Motor Control
  • Parkinson’s Disease

Footnotes

  • Authors report no conflict of interest.

  • This research was supported by a Canada Research Chair (CRC) Tier 2 in Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging to PAM, a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant to PAM, a CRC Tier 1 in Visual Neuroscience, a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant to MAG, an Ontario Graduate Scholarship to KEM, an NSERC Graduate Scholarship to KEM.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Automatic Online Motor Control Is Intact in Parkinson’s Disease with and without Perceptual Awareness
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Automatic Online Motor Control Is Intact in Parkinson’s Disease with and without Perceptual Awareness
Kate E. Merritt, Ken N. Seergobin, Daniel A. Mendonça, Mary E. Jenkins, Melvyn A. Goodale, Penny A. MacDonald
eNeuro 29 September 2017, ENEURO.0215-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0215-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Automatic Online Motor Control Is Intact in Parkinson’s Disease with and without Perceptual Awareness
Kate E. Merritt, Ken N. Seergobin, Daniel A. Mendonça, Mary E. Jenkins, Melvyn A. Goodale, Penny A. MacDonald
eNeuro 29 September 2017, ENEURO.0215-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0215-17.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • basal ganglia
  • bradykinesia
  • Dopaminergic Therapy
  • Online Motor Control
  • Parkinson’s disease

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Odor Experience Stabilizes Glomerular Output Representations in Two Mouse Models of Autism
  • Neural Response Attenuates with Decreasing Inter-Onset Intervals Between Sounds in a Natural Soundscape
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.