Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
Next
New Research, Cognition and Behavior

Language in context: MEG evidence for modality general and specific responses to reference resolution

Christian Brodbeck, Laura Gwilliams and Liina Pylkkänen
eNeuro 15 December 2016, ENEURO.0145-16.2016; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0145-16.2016
Christian Brodbeck
1Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA
3NYU Abu Dhabi Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, PO Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christian Brodbeck
Laura Gwilliams
1Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA
3NYU Abu Dhabi Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, PO Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura Gwilliams
Liina Pylkkänen
1Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA
2Department of Linguistics, New York University, 10 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA
3NYU Abu Dhabi Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, PO Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Liina Pylkkänen
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Successful language comprehension critically depends on our ability to link linguistic ex-pressions to the entities they refer to. Without reference resolution, newly encountered language cannot be related to previously acquired knowledge. The human experience in-cludes many different types of referents, some visual, some auditory, some very abstract. Does the neural basis of reference resolution depend on the nature of the referents or do our brains utilize a modality general mechanism for linking meanings to referents? Here we report evidence for both. Using MEG, we varied both the modality of referents, which consisted either of visual or auditory objects, and the point at which reference resolution was possible within sentences. Source localized MEG responses revealed brain activity as-sociated with reference resolution that was independent of the modality of the referents, localized to the medial parietal lobe and starting around 415 ms after onset of reference resolving words. A modality-specific response to reference resolution in auditory domains was also found in the vicinity of auditory cortex. Our results suggest that referential lan-guage processing cannot be reduced to processing in classical language regions and repre-sentations of the referential domain in modality-specific neural systems. Instead, our re-sults suggest that reference resolution engages medial parietal cortex which supports a mechanism for referential processing regardless of the content modality.

Significance Statement Reference resolution is an elementary mechanism for language comprehension, connecting language meaning to pre-existing knowledge. It is unknown whether reference resolution depends on brain mechanisms specific to the modality of the referents, for example whether they are visual or auditory objects, or whether our brains utilize a modality gen-eral mechanism for linking meanings to referents. Here we show using source localized MEG that reference resolution is associated with a response in the medial parietal lobe, in-dependent of referent modality, supporting a modality-general mechanism for reference resolution. An additional response associated with resolving reference to auditory objects in auditory cortex suggests that modality-specific representations of the referents are also involved.

  • Language comprehension
  • MEG
  • Reference
  • Situation model
  • Visual world

Footnotes

  • Conflict of Interest: Authors report no conflict of interest

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Language in context: MEG evidence for modality general and specific responses to reference resolution
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Language in context: MEG evidence for modality general and specific responses to reference resolution
Christian Brodbeck, Laura Gwilliams, Liina Pylkkänen
eNeuro 15 December 2016, ENEURO.0145-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0145-16.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Language in context: MEG evidence for modality general and specific responses to reference resolution
Christian Brodbeck, Laura Gwilliams, Liina Pylkkänen
eNeuro 15 December 2016, ENEURO.0145-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0145-16.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • language comprehension
  • MEG
  • reference
  • situation model
  • visual world

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Environmental Enrichment Attenuates Fentanyl-Seeking Behavior and Protects Against Stress-Induced Reinstatement in Both Male and Female Rats
  • Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Pre-speech Semantic Category Decoding: An intracranial EEG Study.
  • Effects of TMS on the decoding and electrophysiology of priority in working memory
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.