Abstract
The Frontal Eye Fields (FEF) participate in both working memory and sensorimotor transformations for saccades, but their role in integrating these functions through time remains unclear. Here, we tracked FEF spatial codes through time using a novel analytic method applied to the classic memory-delay saccade task. Three-dimensional recordings of head-unrestrained gaze shifts were made in two monkeys trained to make gaze shifts toward briefly flashed targets after a variable delay (450-1500 ms). A preliminary analysis of visual and motor response fields in 74 FEF neurons eliminated most potential models for spatial coding at the neuron population level, as in our previous study (Sajad et al., 2015). We then focused on the spatiotemporal transition from an eye-centered target code (T; preferred in the visual response) to an eye-centered intended gaze position code (G; preferred in the movement response) during the memory delay interval. We treated neural population codes as a continuous spatiotemporal variable by dividing the space spanning T and G into intermediate T-G models and dividing the task into discrete steps through time. We found that FEF delay activity, especially in visuomovement cells, progressively transitions from T through intermediate T-G codes that approach, but do not reach, G. This was followed by a final discrete transition from these intermediate T-G delay codes to a ‘pure’ G code in movement cells without delay activity. These results demonstrate that FEF activity undergoes a series of sensory-memory-motor transformations, including a dynamically evolving spatial memory signal and an imperfect memory-to-motor transformation.
Significance Statement: Gaze-related signals in frontal cortex are often used as an experimental model for visual working memory. However, the spatial codes employed during the delay between target-related visual activity and intended gaze-related motor activity remain unknown. Here, we show that frontal eye field delay activity (particularly in visuomovement neurons) shows a progressive transition through intermediate target-gaze codes, with a further jump to coding intended gaze position in movement neurons with no delay response. Since our analytic method is based on fitting neural activity against variable behavioral errors, this suggests that such errors accumulate during the memory delay, and further escalate during the final memory-to-motor transformation. Any of these vulnerable processes might be further degraded by diseases that affect frontal cortex.
Footnotes
↵1 Authors report no conflict of interests.
↵2 A.S. and J.D.C. designed research; A.S., M.S., X.Y., and H.W. performed research; A.S. analyzed data; A.S., M.S., X.Y., H.W., and J.D.C. wrote the paper.
↵3 This study was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research to J.D. Crawford. J.D. Crawford was supported by the Canada Research Chair Program. A. Sajad was supported by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship, a Queen Elizabeth Scholarship, and a York Provost Dissertation Award. M. Sadeh was supported by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship.
Jump to comment: