Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
Next
New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Long-latency feedback coordinates upper-limb and hand muscles during object manipulation tasks

F. Crevecoeur, J.-L. Thonnard, P. Lefèvre and S. H. Scott
eNeuro 25 February 2016, ENEURO.0129-15.2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0129-15.2016
F. Crevecoeur
1Institute of Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
2Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F. Crevecoeur
J.-L. Thonnard
2Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
3Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Lefèvre
1Institute of Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
2Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Lefèvre
S. H. Scott
4Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Canada
5Department of Biomedical and Molecular Science, Queen’s University, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Suppose that someone bumps into your arm at a party while you are holding a glass of wine. Motion of the disturbed arm will engage rapid and goal-directed feedback responses in the upper-limb. While such responses can rapidly counter the perturbation, it is also clearly desirable not to destabilize your grasp and/or spill the wine. Here we investigated how healthy humans maintain a stable grasp following perturbations by using a paradigm that requires spatial tuning of the motor response dependent on the location of a virtual target. Our results highlight a synchronized expression of target-directed feedback in shoulder and hand muscles occurring at ∼60ms. Considering that conduction delays are longer for the more distal hand muscles, these results suggest that target-directed responses in hand muscles were initiated before those for the shoulder muscles. These results show that long-latency feedback can coordinate upper limb and hand muscles during object manipulation tasks.

Significance Statement: Skilled object manipulation relies on fine control of finger forces applied on the held objects. A prevailing hypothesis suggests the nervous system predicts the consequence of motor commands to anticipate self-generated loads arising when we move the objects around. Here we show that following an external perturbation, motor responses in upper-limb and hand muscles expressed synchronized, target-directed modulation in ∼60ms. This finding cannot be explained by internal predictions from forward models, as processing and conduction times expected in this framework imply measurable delays between the expression of flexible feedback in upper-limb and hand muscles. Instead, our results suggest that in such context, stable control of grasp is also mediated by goal-directed feedback coordination of upper-limb and hand muscles.

  • feedback control
  • grip force control
  • motor prediction
  • object manipulation

Footnotes

  • ↵1 SHS is associated with BKIN technologies that commercializes the robot that was used.

  • ↵3 Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research) [501100002661].

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Long-latency feedback coordinates upper-limb and hand muscles during object manipulation tasks
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Long-latency feedback coordinates upper-limb and hand muscles during object manipulation tasks
F. Crevecoeur, J.-L. Thonnard, P. Lefèvre, S. H. Scott
eNeuro 25 February 2016, ENEURO.0129-15.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0129-15.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Long-latency feedback coordinates upper-limb and hand muscles during object manipulation tasks
F. Crevecoeur, J.-L. Thonnard, P. Lefèvre, S. H. Scott
eNeuro 25 February 2016, ENEURO.0129-15.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0129-15.2016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • feedback control
  • grip force control
  • motor prediction
  • object manipulation

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Recommendations emerging from carbon emissions estimations of the Society for Neuroscience annual meeting
  • Lateralization and time-course of cortical phonological representations during syllable production
  • Protein kinase A-dependent plasticity of local inhibitory synapses from hilar somatostatin-expressing neurons
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Lateralization and time-course of cortical phonological representations during syllable production
  • Pupil size is sensitive to low-level stimulus features, independent of arousal-related modulation
  • The Antiarrhythmic Drug Flecainide Enhances Aversion to HCl in Mice
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.