Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
Next
Negative Results, Neuronal Excitability

No evidence for sex differences in the electrophysiological properties and excitatory synaptic input onto nucleus accumbens shell medium spiny neurons

Jaime A. Willett, Tyler Will, Caitlin A. Hauser, David M. Dorris, Jinyan Cao and John Meitzen
eNeuro 4 February 2016, ENEURO.0147-15.2016; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0147-15.2016
Jaime A. Willett
1Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
2W.M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
3Graduate Program in Physiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tyler Will
1Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caitlin A. Hauser
1Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Dorris
1Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David M. Dorris
Jinyan Cao
1Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
2W.M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Meitzen
1Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
2W.M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
4Center for Human Health and the Environment, Comparative Medicine Institute, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Sex differences exist in how the brain regulates motivated behavior and reward, both in normal and pathological contexts. Investigations into the underlying neural mechanisms have targeted the striatal brain regions, including the dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens core and shell. These investigations yield accumulating evidence of sexually different electrophysiological properties, excitatory synaptic input, and sensitivity to neuromodulator/hormone action in select striatal regions both before and after puberty. It is unknown whether the electrical properties of neurons in the nucleus accumbens shell differ by sex, and whether sex differences in excitatory synaptic input are present before puberty. To test the hypothesis that these properties differ by sex, we performed whole-cell patch clamp recordings on male and female medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in acute brain slices obtained from prepubertal rat nucleus accumbens shell. We analyzed passive and active electrophysiological properties, and miniature excitatory synaptic currents (mEPSC). No sex differences were detected; this includes those properties such as intrinsic excitability, action potential afterhyperpolarization, threshold, and mEPSC frequency that have been found to differ by sex in other striatal regions and/or developmental periods. These findings indicate that unlike other striatal brain regions, the electrophysiological properties of nucleus accumbens shell MSNs do not differ by sex. Overall, it appears that sex differences in striatal function, including motivated behavior and reward, are likely mediated by other factors and striatal regions.

Significance Statement: Genetic sex and steroid sex hormone exposure modulate striatal function. Sex differences in the electrophysiological properties of medium spiny neurons (MSNs), the principal striatal neuron type, have been identified in two striatal regions: the dorsal striatum and the nucleus accumbens core. The extent of sex differences in the third striatal region, the nucleus accumbens shell, is unclear. We tested whether MSN intrinsic electrophysiological properties and miniature excitatory synaptic currents (mEPSC) differ by sex. Our data support that nucleus accumbens shell MSN properties do not differ by sex. This study provides novel insight showing that the neurobiological mechanisms underlying sex differences in striatal function are likely mediated by other striatal regions and/or processes.

  • genetic sex
  • intrinsic electrophysiological properties
  • males and female rats
  • medium spiny neuron
  • mEPSC
  • striatum

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Authors report no conflict of interest.

  • ↵3 NC State University Start-up Funds (JM), NC State Faculty Research and Professional Development Grant (JM), HHMI Undergraduate Science Education grant (CH, PI: Dr. Damien Shea), NC State Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (TW), NC State Physiology First Year Fellowship (JW).

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
No evidence for sex differences in the electrophysiological properties and excitatory synaptic input onto nucleus accumbens shell medium spiny neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
No evidence for sex differences in the electrophysiological properties and excitatory synaptic input onto nucleus accumbens shell medium spiny neurons
Jaime A. Willett, Tyler Will, Caitlin A. Hauser, David M. Dorris, Jinyan Cao, John Meitzen
eNeuro 4 February 2016, ENEURO.0147-15.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0147-15.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
No evidence for sex differences in the electrophysiological properties and excitatory synaptic input onto nucleus accumbens shell medium spiny neurons
Jaime A. Willett, Tyler Will, Caitlin A. Hauser, David M. Dorris, Jinyan Cao, John Meitzen
eNeuro 4 February 2016, ENEURO.0147-15.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0147-15.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • genetic sex
  • intrinsic electrophysiological properties
  • males and female rats
  • medium spiny neuron
  • mEPSC
  • striatum

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Data associated with this article deposited in Dryad
    John E Meitzen
    Published on: 05 June 2024
  • Published on: (5 June 2024)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Data associated with this article deposited in Dryad
    RE: Data associated with this article deposited in Dryad
    • John E Meitzen, Professor, North Carolina State University

    Hi,
    The data associated with this article have been placed into the Dryad Data Repository.

    https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.m905qfv5j

    Thanks much,
    John Meitzen, Ph.D.

    Competing Interests: None declared.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Negative Results

  • Closed-Loop Acoustic Stimulation Enhances Sleep Oscillations But Not Memory Performance
  • Cyfip1 Haploinsufficiency Does Not Alter GABAA Receptor δ-Subunit Expression and Tonic Inhibition in Dentate Gyrus PV+ Interneurons and Granule Cells
  • Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment Does Not Reduce Abuse-Related Effects of Opioid Drugs
Show more Negative Results

Neuronal Excitability

  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
  • Variation in the Involvement of Hippocampal Pyramidal Cell Subtypes in Spatial Learning Tasks
  • Dentate Granule Cell Capacitance Is Stable across the Light/Dark Cycle
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.