Figure 2. Attentional performance of GTs, INTs, and STs. Unless noted otherwise, these and subsequent data figures show individual values, means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Furthermore, figures depict the results of post hoc multiple comparisons (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; see Results for ANOVAs, effect sizes, and other major statistical findings). a, A main effect of phenotype on the relative number of hits reflected that GTs scored more hits than INTs and STs. b, Across all phenotypes, fewer hits were scored to 50- and 25-ms signals when compared with longest signals. Moreover, STs had fewer hits to the longest signals when compared with GTs. c, The relative number of correct rejections did not differ between GTs and STs but was unexpectedly higher in INT relative to GTs (see Results for a follow-up of this finding on response bias). d, depicts the significant correlation between the relative number of hits to longest signals and PCA scores. More positive PCA scores (greater expression of sign-tracking behavior) predicted lower detection rates.