Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Development

A Prospective Study of the Impact of Severe Childhood Deprivation on Brain White Matter in Adult Adoptees: Widespread Localized Reductions in Volume But Unaffected Microstructural Organization

Nuria K. Mackes, Mitul A. Mehta, Ahmad Beyh, Richard O. Nkrumah, Dennis Golm, Sagari Sarkar, Graeme Fairchild, Flavio Dell’Acqua, Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke and on behalf of the ERA Young Adult Follow-Up Team
eNeuro 14 November 2022, 9 (6) ENEURO.0188-22.2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0188-22.2022
Nuria K. Mackes
1Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitul A. Mehta
2Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ahmad Beyh
3Department of Forensic & Neurodevelopmental Sciences. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ahmad Beyh
Richard O. Nkrumah
4Department of Neuroimaging, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim J5 68159, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis Golm
5Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1PS, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sagari Sarkar
6Cognitive Neuroscience & Neuropsychiatry, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graeme Fairchild
7Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Flavio Dell’Acqua
3Department of Forensic & Neurodevelopmental Sciences. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke
8Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
9Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Early childhood neglect can impact brain development across the lifespan. Using voxel-based approaches we recently reported that severe and time-limited institutional deprivation in early childhood was linked to substantial reductions in total brain volume in adulthood, >20 years later. Here, we extend this analysis to explore deprivation-related regional white matter volume and microstructural organization using diffusion-based techniques. A combination of tensor-based morphometry (TBM) analysis and tractography was conducted on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data from 59 young adults who spent between 3 and 41 months in the severely depriving Romanian institutions of the 1980s before being adopted into United Kingdom families, and 20 nondeprived age-matched United Kingdom controls. Independent of total volume, institutional deprivation was associated with smaller volumes in localized regions across a range of white matter tracts including (1) long-ranging association fibers such as bilateral inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), bilateral inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), left superior longitudinal fasciculi (SLFs), and left arcuate fasciculus; (2) tracts of the limbic circuitry including fornix and cingulum; and (3) projection fibers with the corticospinal tract particularly affected. Tractographic analysis found no evidence of altered microstructural organization of any tract in terms of hindrance modulated orientational anisotropy (HMOA), fractional anisotropy (FA), or mean diffusivity (MD). We provide further evidence for the effects of early neglect on brain development and their persistence in adulthood despite many years of environmental enrichment associated with successful adoption. Localized white matter effects appear limited to volumetric changes with microstructural organization unaffected.

  • brain imaging
  • early adversity
  • institutional deprivation
  • plasticity
  • tractography
  • white matter structure

Significance Statement

Millions of children worldwide live in institutions under depriving conditions. Institutional deprivation has been linked to neurodevelopmental and mental health problems that often persist into adulthood. In this study, young adult adoptees who had experienced institutional deprivation as small children had smaller local volumes in multiple white matter tracts compared with nondeprived adoptees, based on diffusion tensor imaging. On the other hand, there were no deprivation-related difference in hindrance-modulated orientational anisotropy (HMOA) and fractional anisotropy (FA). This suggests that volumetric white matter alterations following deprivation persist into young adulthood, >20 years after the depriving conditions have ended, while microstructural white matter organization was either unaffected or had normalized by young adulthood.

Introduction

Experience-dependent changes in white matter organization and structure are an important mechanism of neuroplasticity (Fields, 2005). White matter tracts connect brain regions and play a crucial role in efficient neural communication. Previous studies have demonstrated white matter alterations in tracts linked to learning and cognitive development following a range of different environmental experiences (Bengtsson et al., 2005; Sampaio-Baptista et al., 2013; Chorghay et al., 2018; Huber et al., 2018). Plasticity is particularly high during early postnatal development, when myelination on a micro-level, and white matter volume on a macro-level, increase substantially (Dubois et al., 2014; Gilmore et al., 2018). While this early plasticity is central to healthy development, it might also leave the brain particularly vulnerable to adverse experiences such as maltreatment during this period (Rutter et al., 2004). Human studies have linked early maltreatment to neurodevelopmental and mental health problems later in life (Gilbert et al., 2009), which may result from long-lasting exposure-induced changes in brain structure including white matter volume and microstructural organization (McCrory et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2012; Benedetti et al., 2014). However, most reports of such associations rely on observational and/or cross-sectional designs, many using retrospective accounts of maltreatment, which limit the authors’ ability to infer a causal relationship between maltreatment exposure and brain alterations (Sonuga-Barke et al., 2017). In fact, retrospective accounts of early adversity may capture processes largely separate from those measured by prospective studies (Danese, 2020). Where maltreatment occurred within biological families, interpretation is further complicated by the possibility of passive gene-environment correlations (Rutter, 2007).

Here, we report findings from a study focused on a specific population to address some of these limitations to strengthen casual inference. The English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) study followed up children who had suffered extreme neglect in the Romanian institutions that existed toward the end of the Ceaușescu regime (i.e., a nonfamilial setting) for up to 43 months (i.e., a limited developmental period) before being adopted into well-functioning United Kingdom families, an abrupt change from a depriving to an enriching and nurturing environment (Rutter, 1998). The adoptees have recently been followed up in early adulthood and their brain structure has been assessed. Surface-based analyses showed that, compared with nondeprived United Kingdom adult adoptees, adoptees suffering institutional deprivation had substantially smaller total brain volume, effects equally marked for white and gray matter (Mackes et al., 2020). We also found localized deprivation-related variations in cortical gray matter volume in the inferior frontal, inferior temporal, and the medial prefrontal regions (Mackes et al., 2020).

In the present paper, we extend our analysis to white matter alterations using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) approaches to test whether deprivation is also associated with localized, tract-specific alterations in volume or microstructural organization. First, we used tensor-based morphometry (TBM) to create individual maps of local white matter volumetric deformations and identify the specific tracts implicated. The structural organization of affected tracts was then examined at the microstructural level using three metrics: hindrance-modulated orientational anisotropy (HMOA), fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean diffusivity (MD). HMOA is relatively novel approach that has been shown to be sensitive to changes in fiber diffusivity and microstructural organization and more likely to detect such changes compared with other DTI indices (Dell’Acqua et al., 2013).

Although no studies have yet examined adult white matter sequelae of early childhood institutional deprivation, there is evidence of an association between early deprivation and alterations to white matter structure in childhood and in adolescence. Smaller corpus callosum has been reported following institutional deprivation (Sheridan et al., 2012) and early maltreatment more generally (Teicher and Samson, 2016). Institutional deprivation has been linked to lower FA particularly in late-developing association fibers such as fornix, cingulum, uncinate, and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculi (IFOF; Eluvathingal et al., 2006; Hanson et al., 2013; Bick et al., 2015). Based on these prior studies, we hypothesized that childhood deprivation would be associated with long-term effects on adult white matter across multiple tracts seen in both localized smaller volume and alterations in microstructural organization.

Finally, we performed exploratory analyses to test whether changes in white matter tract volumes might be associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes shown to have persistent links with early deprivation in previous ERA follow-ups (Kennedy et al., 2016; Sonuga-Barke et al., 2017). These were symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), disinhibited social engagement (DSE), and intelligence quotient (IQ). We hypothesized that white matter tracts that have previously been implicated in neurodevelopmental conditions in samples drawn from the general population would also be predictive in this group (Cortese et al., 2013; van Ewijk et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2017).

Materials and Methods

Participants

A total of 165 Romanian adoptees and 52 nondeprived United Kingdom adoptees were included in the original ERA sample. Out of these, 81 Romanian and 23 United Kingdom adoptees took part in the ERA Brain Imaging Study (ERABIS). Eleven Romanian adoptees who had never been institutionalized were excluded from analysis because significantly higher variance in total brain volume indicated that their preadoptive environment might not be comparable (Mackes et al., 2020). Diffusion data of 11 Romanian adoptees and three United Kingdom adoptees were either not collected (because of scanner failure or meeting scanner exclusion criteria) or failed quality control checks. The final sample comprised 59 Romanian adoptees (35.8% of the original sample, 50.8% female, mean age = 25.3 years, age range = 23–28 years) and 20 United Kingdom adoptees (38.5% of the original sample, 40.0% female, mean age = 24.4 years, age range = 23–26 years). As Romanian adoptees typically entered the institutions in the first weeks of life, deprivation duration was measured as the age (in months) at which adoptees first entered the United Kingdom to join their adoptive families. Deprivation duration ranged between 3 and 41 months for the Romanian adoptees included in ERABIS. Diffusion data were collected at the KCL Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences at, London. All participants gave written informed consent to participate. They received a £100 Amazon shopping voucher as reimbursement for their time. Ethical approval was granted by the ethics committee of the University of Southampton and the Camberwell-St. Giles NHS Research Ethics Committee (Ethics No. 14/LO/0477).

Procedure

We recruited and screened participants via mail and phone. The study protocol included two MRI scanning sessions, each lasting ∼1 h. Scans were typically performed on consecutive days. Before each session, participants were familiarized with the scanning environment in a mock scanner. In most cases, the diffusion scan was acquired during the first scanning session. The protocol also comprised neuropsychological testing and a questionnaire session. In total, the study took ∼8 h to complete.

Parents completed the Conners CBRS, SCQ, and the DSE interview questions during the previous follow-up study, the ERA Young Adult Follow-Up, when participants were aged between 22 and 26 years. These were used to explore the relationship between deprivation related white matter changes and adult neurodevelopmental symptoms of ADHD, ASD, and DSE which have been shown to be associated with deprivation in previous analyses (Sonuga-Barke et al., 2017).

Measures

Subnutrition

Weight was recorded when children first arrived in the United Kingdom shortly after leaving institutions (Sonuga-Barke et al., 2008). Approximately 69% of the Romanian adoptees weighed <1.5 SDs below United Kingdom norms at that time. Weight at United Kingdom entry (in SD relative to age-matched and sex-matched United Kingdom norms) was used as a continuous variable as an index for subnutrition in the Romanian institutions.

ADHD symptoms

A total of 20 parent-rated items of the Conners Comprehensive Behaviour Rating Scales (Conners CBRS) were used to measure ADHD symptoms (Conners et al., 2011). The resulting symptom count (0–18 scale) represents the 18 DSM-5 ADHD symptoms. Items were adapted for young adults with permission from the copyright holders (Kennedy et al., 2016).

ASD symptoms

We measured ASD symptoms with 15 items of the parent-rated Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ; 0–15 scale). Items were selected because they were considered developmentally appropriate for young adulthood (Rutter et al., 2003; Sonuga-Barke et al., 2017).

DSE symptoms

DSE symptoms were measured based on parents’ responses to interview questions which assessed the concepts of being “too friendly toward strangers,” showing “inappropriate intrusiveness,” and being “unaware of social boundaries.” Each symptom was rated as endorsed or not endorsed (0–3 scale; Sonuga-Barke et al., 2017).

IQ

IQ was assessed with the full version of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition (WASI-II), which is a widely-used and reliable test of general intelligence (Wechsler, 2011).

Diffusion data acquisition

All diffusion images were acquired on a General Electric MR750 3.0 Tesla scanner with a 12-channel head coil. Diffusion scans and their reverse phase images were acquired using spin-echo EPI (TR/TE = 11 650/70 ms, slice thickness = 2.0 mm, field of view = 256 mm, matrix size = 128 × 128, 72 slices). The reverse phase data included b0 images only and were collected to allow for distortion correction. Diffusion data were collected along 60 diffusion directions with a b-value of 1500 s/mm2.

Diffusion data preprocessing

All images were controlled for quality. The preprocessing steps included de-noising (using Marchenko–Pastur distribution principal component analysis (Veraart et al., 2016), Gibbs ringing artifact correction (Kellner et al., 2016), and estimation of the susceptibility distortion field (Andersson et al., 2003). Distortion caused by head movement and eddy currents was corrected by using the Eddy toolbox in FSL including replacement of outliers (Andersson et al., 2016; Andersson and Sotiropoulos, 2016). Finally, the diffusion tensor was fitted using a nonlinear least squares algorithm in the DIFFCALC module, which is part of the TORTOISE software (Pierpaoli, 2018).

Diffusion data analysis

Diffusion TBM (D-TBM; Sadeghi et al., 2018) uses log-transformed Jacobian deformation maps to measure local regional morphologic brain changes (Ashburner, 2007). Deformation maps are computed by diffeomorphically registering a participant’s MR image onto a group template. While most TBM approaches use T1-weighted structural images, these are not well suited to measure deformation in white matter regions because of signal homogeneity in these regions. D-TBM instead registers individual diffusion tensor images to a diffusion tensor template (Sadeghi et al., 2018). This approach is more sensitive in detecting morphometric alterations in white matter pathways compared with T1 map-based, or even FA map-based, TBM approaches (Hutchinson et al., 2018; Sadeghi et al., 2018).

Nonlinear registration of individual diffusion tensor maps to a group diffusion tensor template was performed using DR-TAMAS (Irfanoglu et al., 2016). The diffusion tensor template was based on a NatBrainLab dataset of 35 healthy adults aged between 20 and 30 years (www.natbrainlab.co.uk). A template independent of this study’s sample was chosen to prevent bias during group comparison. The transformation of each subject’s DT image to common space was based on an affine followed by a nonlinear warp. For each participant, a log-transformed map of the Jacobian determinant of the resulting warp field was computed. This calculation excluded the global affine term from the final Jacobian determinant to prevent local transformation values from representing any global scaling effects, as a previous ERA study showed that institutionalization was associated with smaller total white matter volume (Mackes et al., 2020). The Jacobian determinant encodes the scale of any volumetric expansion or contraction that occurred during registration. The resulting individual log-transformed maps therefore represent local brain volume differences relative to the template. Positive values indicate that an individual voxel is relatively bigger compared with the template, while negative values indicate the opposite.

Tractography

Based on the D-TBM analysis, we discovered a number of tracts that showed alterations in local morphometry following institutional deprivation. We identified the following tracts that showed an overlap with the statistical clusters in the D-TBM analysis: left and right inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), left and right IFOF, left superior longitudinal fasciculi (SLFs) I–III, left arcuate fasciculus, fornix, cingulum, left and right precentral and left and right postcentral corticospinal tracts. We performed manually guided dissections for these 14 tracts. The inclusion and exclusion ROIs for each tract have been detailed in previous papers (Catani and Thiebaut de Schotten, 2008; De Schotten et al., 2011; Howells et al., 2018).

First, spherical deconvolution modeling of the diffusion data was performed using StarTrack (https://www.mr-startrack.com) according to the following parameters: fiber response (α) = 1.5; number of iterations = 400; minimum peak amplitude = 0.0015; spatial regularization extent = 16. Deterministic tractography was then performed using the Euler algorithm and the following parameters: minimum HMOA threshold = 0.002; minimum angle threshold = 35 degrees; step size = 1 mm; minimum/maximum streamline length = 20/300 mm.

Tractography dissections, blind to the participants deprivation status, were then performed through the MegaTrack framework (Dell’Acqua et al., 2015). First, each participant’s tractogram was mapped to the space of the symmetric MNI template (https://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca) by combining the tensor-based spatial transformations computed previously and a single transformation between the tensor template and the symmetric MNI template. The tractograms of all participants were then concatenated into a single group tractogram in which each streamline was assigned a unique subject-streamline ID (SSID). During concatenation, streamlines of the right hemisphere were symmetrically flipped into the left hemisphere to ensure that dissections were not biased to either hemisphere. This final tractogram was then manually dissected in TrackVis (http://trackvis.org). Using the assigned SSIDs, each subject’s dissected streamlines were selected in their native space without the need for additional spatial transformations, and macrostructural (volume) and microstructural diffusion metrics (HMOA, FA, and MD) were extracted.

For left SLFs II and III, diffusion metrics of two participants could not be extracted and were imputed based on diffusion metrics of the other tracts (using predictive mean matching with 200 iterations). Diffusion metrics were also imputed for left SLF I and left and right postcentral corticospinal tracts for one participant.

Statistical analysis

Whole-brain analyses

For the whole-brain analyses we used the randomize toolbox in FSL (Winkler et al., 2014). We examined local white matter differences by investigating D-TBM log-Jacobian maps. We first tested for group differences between United Kingdom and Romanian adoptees using two-sample unpaired t tests. We then entered deprivation duration and subnutrition as predictors in separate regression models within the Romanian adoptees group. For all analyses, sex was entered as a covariate. A brain mask including only voxels with FA values ≥0.20 was applied to assure that analyses were restricted to white matter. For each analysis, 5000 nonparametric permutation tests were performed, threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) was applied and the family-wise error rate (FWE) was controlled for to correct for multiple comparisons. Statistical maps were transformed into MNI space for labeling.

Region of interest analyses

Volume, HMOA, FA, and MD of each dissected tract showing significant volumetric effects at the whole-brain level were included as potential predictors in elastic net regression models, to test whether macrostructure and microstructure of these tracts were associated with institutionalization, deprivation duration or subnutrition experienced in the institutions. One elastic net regression model for each metric (volume, HMOA, FA, and MD) and deprivation measure (institutionalization, deprivation duration, subnutrition) was designed (12 models in total). Elastic net regression seeks to optimize the model by finding a balance between accuracy and parsimony (Zou and Hastie, 2003). It does so by adding a penalty term to the ordinary least squares regression model. Elastic net regression models are ideally suited for analyses such as ours, where predictors show collinearity (by shrinking estimates of collinear predictors) and not all predictors might be informative (by selecting informative variables and setting others to zero). In elastic net models, the penalty is controlled by α (α) and ranges between ridge (α = 0, penalization of norm 2) and lasso (α = 1, penalization of norm 1). The tuning parameter λ controls the overall strength of the penalty, with coefficients in the model shrinking more strongly as λ increases. We performed cross-validation to obtain optimal λ and α values. The initial range for α was between 0.2 and 1 in 0.1 steps. The initial range for λ was between 0.0001 and 10, increasing on a logarithmic scale with 300 values in total. For each level of α, the following calculations were performed: the dataset was randomly split into three folds with equal sample sizes. The model fit for each of the 300 λ values was computed with iteratively one of the folds omitted. The average mean squared error across folds was calculated for each λ. This cross-validation step was repeated 100 times. The λ with the lowest average mean squared error across all cross-validation iterations was selected for the final model at each level of α. Finally, the α with the lowest average mean squared error overall (and its corresponding λ value) were selected. For institutionalization, the model was specified as binomial, while it was Gaussian for deprivation duration and subnutrition.

Exploratory investigation of white matter tract volume and neurodevelopmental symptoms

We next tested whether volume of the selected tracts of interest predicted neurodevelopmental outcomes (IQ, ADHD, ASD, and DSE symptoms). We only included Romanian adoptees in these analyses to test whether white matter tracts predicted adult deprivation-related outcomes. We focused on volume, rather than HMOA, FA, and MD, as we were interested in deprivation-related associations only and previous analyses in this paper had shown no significant relationship between deprivation and the latter measures. Elastic net regressions were trained and cross-validated as described above. For IQ, the model was specified as Gaussian, while it was Poisson for ADHD, ASD, and DSE symptom counts.

Results

Whole-brain D-TBM

Results were derived from whole-brain log-transformed maps of Jacobian determinants obtained when normalizing a participant’s brain to a standard template brain. Determinants therefore represent individual differences from template in local brain volume with higher values indicating larger local volume compared with the template. Institutional deprivation was associated with significantly smaller local white matter volume in multiple statistical clusters across the brain (Table 1). The biggest cluster spanned multiple white matter regions, starting caudally in the left middle cerebellar peduncle and bilateral brain stem (Fig. 1, z coordinate = −29), following the rostral line to intersect with the left iILF and IFOF (Fig. 1, z = 6). More superiorly, the cluster also overlapped with segments I, II, and III of the left SLF (SLF-I, SLF-II, SLF-III), as well as the long segment of the left arcuate fasciculus (Fig. 1, z = 21). The second biggest cluster included white matter of the bilateral thalamus as well as the fornix (Fig. 1, z = 13), spanning laterally to overlap with right ILF and IFOF (but not the SLF; Fig. 1, z = 6). The third cluster showed overlap with the posterior section of the cingulum (Fig. 1, z = 28). The remaining clusters were confined to small areas overlapping with left ILF, left IFOF, left cingulum and left SLF. Romanian adoptees showed larger local white matter volume in a small cluster that overlapped with the left uncinate fasciculus (Fig. 1, z = −16).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Clusters showing significant differences between deprived Romanian adoptees and nondeprived United Kingdom adoptees in local white matter volumes (all pFWE < 0.05)

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Clusters showing significant differences between deprived Romanian adoptees and nondeprived United Kingdom adoptees in the log-transformed Jacobian determinant of local white matter deformations. Statistical clusters that were smaller in volume in the deprived group (compared with the nondeprived group) are shown in blue, while regions that were bigger are shown in red. Statistical maps are shown as an overlay on a white matter map of the general population with whiter areas indicating higher FA. The FA map was also used as a binarized mask (threshold FA ≥ 0.20) for statistical analysis to assure that only white matter was included. The first two rows show axial slices. The last row shows a sagittal view, a coronal view and a 3D rendering. L, left; R, right; A, anterior; P, posterior; FA, fractional anisotropy. The figure was created using the software MRIcroGL (https://www.nitrc.org/projects/mricrogl/) and ParaView (https://www.paraview.org/).

Within the Romanian adoptees, there was no significant association between deprivation duration or subnutrition (as indexed by weight at first entry into the United Kingdom) and local white matter volume as measured here by log-transformed Jacobian deformation values (Table 1).

Tract of interest analysis

Having identified deprivation-related white matter tract deformations at the whole-brain level, we investigated the macrostructure and microstructure of these tracts. We isolated the left and right ILF, left and right IFOF, fornix, left uncinate fasciculus, left arcuate fasciculus, left SLF-I, SLF-II, and SLF-III, as well as left and right corticospinal tracts (CST), divided into precentral (primary motor) and postcentral (somatosensory) CST. For these 14 tracts, we calculated individual tract volumes, HMOA, FA, and MD. For volume we report the final cross-validated elastic net model (i.e., with the lowest mean squared error, R2 = 0.152, n = 79, α = 0.4, λ = 0.11). For this model, tractography-based results aligned with the findings of the D-TBM analysis: after regressing out total white matter volume, Romanian adoptees had lower white matter volume in the fornix (b = −0.160), left SLF-III (b = −0.147), left postcentral CST (b = −0.137), left SLF-I (b = −0.059), left SLF-II (b = −0.035), left IFOF (b = −0.022), right precentral CST (b = −0.012), and bigger white matter volumes of the left uncinate (b = 0.324) and left precentral CST (b = 0.218). White matter volumes were not associated with deprivation duration or subnutrition.

There was no association between HMOA, FA, and MD values and institutional deprivation (n = 79), duration of that deprivation (n = 59, Romanian adoptees only) nor subnutrition (n = 53 with available data) based on cross-validated elastic net models.

In exploratory cross-validated elastic net analyses, there was also no association between white matter tract volumes and IQ (n = 54), symptoms of ADHD (n = 47), ASD (n = 44), or DSE (n = 46).

Discussion

This study provides evidence that early time-limited childhood institutional deprivation is associated with widespread localized alterations in white matter volume in young adulthood, even in individuals whose exposure to deprivation ended >20 years previously following their adoption into supportive and well-functioning households. These findings are in line with the hypothesis that severe early adverse experiences can have a long-lasting impact on brain development, that may persist even after many years of high-quality care (Rutter et al., 2004; Teicher and Samson, 2016). We found clusters with smaller local white matter volumes in previously deprived Romanian adoptees compared with nondeprived United Kingdom adoptees in multiple white matter tracts, most prominently the bilateral IFOF, bilateral iILF, fornix, left cingulum, left SLF, and bilateral corticospinal tract. There was one cluster in the left uncinate fasciculus that showed greater volume in Romanian adoptees. These findings were independent of previously observed differences in total white matter volume (Mackes et al., 2020). Given the greater number and more widespread distribution of localized effects compared with our gray matter findings (Mackes et al., 2020), it may be the case that deprivation-related alterations in white matter volume show higher region-specific variability compared with gray matter.

Long-ranging association fibers such as ILF, IFOF,SLF, and cingulum seemed particularly affected by deprivation suggesting they might be especially sensitive to early adversity because of their protracted postnatal development, with fronto-temporal connections being the last to mature (Dubois et al., 2014). In addition to association fibers, however, our study also found deformation in regions that contain projection fibers such as the thalamus, brain stem and cerebellum. Projection fibers connect these brain regions with the cortex and they develop relatively early compared with association fibers, with most dramatic increases in volume prenatally and in the first year postnatally (Geng et al., 2012; Dubois et al., 2014). This might indicate that profound deprivation very early in life, which in this study mostly started when infants were placed into institutions right after birth (Rutter et al., 2004), has a profound effect on white matter development affecting not only late-developing but also early-developing white matter tracts. The fact that tractography and D-TBM approaches both found the same pattern of morphologic changes is consistent with the hypothesis that deprivation negatively impacts the number of axons and fiber bundle cross-sectional size in the affected tracts (Raffelt et al., 2017).

Despite these volumetric effects, we found no evidence of deprivation-related alterations in microstructural organization of the affected tracts as indexed by HMOA, MD, and FA. One hypothesis is that underlying microstructural properties such as fiber density (Dell’Acqua et al., 2013) are less sensitive to institutional deprivation, potentially because fiber bundle size increases more substantially than fiber density in early childhood (Dimond et al., 2020). However, these findings appear to contradict the findings of previous studies of institutional deprivation effects on white matter microstructure in children. These studies reported changes in FA in the corpus callosum, external capsule, and retrolenticular internal capsule (Bick et al., 2015), as well as IFOF, ILF, corticospinal tract, cingulum, corona radiata and cerebellum, and thalamus (Hanson et al., 2013) and also uncinate fasciculus (Eluvathingal et al., 2006).

How can we explain these differences in findings? First, it is possible that prior findings linking deprivation to white matter microstructure are false positives resulting from, for instance, the use of exploratory a priori tract-of-interest analyses with insufficient correction for multiple testing. A second possibility is that the microstructural effects are small in scale compared with the morphologic effects and the current study was underpowered to detect them. A third possibility is that microstructural deprivation-related changes that present as lower FA during childhood and adolescence in previous studies may have resolved by young adulthood because of enrichment in the adoptive environment while macrostructural volumetric alterations as indexed by Jacobian deformation values are more persistent. Indeed, there is growing evidence that neurobiological systems can be recalibrated during adolescence opening up the possibility that some effects of early exposure to adversity can be corrected by exposure to positive adolescent experiences (Gunnar et al., 2019; Perry et al., 2022). That this could affect microstructural organization independent of volumes is supported by lifespan studies which show that developmental trajectories of tract volume and FA or MD are also only weakly correlated (Taki et al., 2013; Scherf et al., 2014).

We found scant evidence of alterations in the corpus callosum, a region that has previously been identified as sensitive to early maltreatment (McCrory et al., 2010; Teicher and Samson, 2016). One potential reason might be that changes in corpus callosum volume were present in childhood but have since normalized or recovered. This interpretation would be in line with findings from the Bucharest Early Intervention Project, which indicated a higher potential for recovery and plasticity in corpus callosum volume in children who had previously been institutionalized compared with gray matter regions (Sheridan et al., 2012).

What is the likely functional significance of these deprivation-related white matter alterations? We know that the affected tracts are involved in a wide range of cognitive processes important for daily functioning (Urbanski et al., 2008; Volle et al., 2008; Saur et al., 2010; Moritz-Gasser et al., 2013; Duffau et al., 2014; Budisavljevic et al., 2017; Herbet et al., 2017) and that our cohort present with cognitive impairments and continuing neurodevelopmental problems (Sonuga-Barke et al., 2017; Golm et al., 2021). However, in our exploratory analyses, we did not find an association between white matter tract volumes and neurodevelopmental outcomes within the Romanian adoptees group. As our brain imaging sample size was relatively small, it is possible that we were not powered enough to detect potentially more subtle effects.

We did not find any linear association between deprivation duration and local white matter deformation or DTI indices. This finding mirrors those reported on neuropsychological functioning in the same sample, where deficits were present regardless of the duration of the depriving experience (Golm et al., 2021). This suggests that extremely depriving conditions such as the ones encountered in Ceaușescu-era Romanian institutions can be associated with long-term changes in local white matter volume even if exposure lasted not more than a few months. Together with the aforementioned lack of association with neurodevelopmental symptoms, these findings also imply a nondeterministic relationship between white matter changes and neurodevelopmental outcomes where a step-wise increase was reported at six months of deprivation duration (Sonuga-Barke et al., 2017; Golm et al., 2021).

This study had many strengths. By harnessing the prospective longitudinal design of ERA, this study was able to overcome the limitations often associated with observational studies. For instance, adversity was limited to a precisely timed period, thereby allowing us to study the effects of adversity during the first months or years of life without subsequent deprivation in later development and without the risks of familial confounding (Sonuga-Barke et al., 2017). Second, by combining a D-TBM analysis with a tractography-based approach we were able to perform a whole-brain-based analysis while also being able to systematically investigate underlying macrostructure and microstructural alterations.

This study also had limitations. First, despite the strengths of the adoption study design, a lack of experimental manipulation limits our ability to draw definitive causal inferences about the effects of institutional deprivation on brain development. It is theoretically possible that Romanian adoptees show smaller local white matter volumes in specific areas compared with United Kingdom adoptees for other reasons than deprivation. A previous examination of underlying factors found no evidence that adoptees with smaller total brain volume were at increased genetic (as indexed by polygenic scores for intracranial volume) or prenatal (as indexed by birth weight) risk (Mackes et al., 2020). Consequently, we think it is unlikely that these factors are driving the differences in local white matter volume. This is also in line with the historic background of the ERA study, where institutionalization and timing of adoption were largely determined by external factors (i.e., the timing of the fall of the Ceauşescu regime). Second, as mentioned above, because of a relatively small sample size we might have had insufficient power to detect more subtle effects that might be associated with institutionalization, deprivation duration or subnutrition. Nevertheless the sample size was bigger than those of other studies investigating white matter (micro)structure in postinstitutionalized children (Hanson et al., 2013; Bick et al., 2015). Third, while the ERA study is longitudinal, the brain imaging aspect of the study was cross-sectional. Longitudinal imaging assessments are needed to identify how brain developmental trajectories are altered by institutionalization.

In conclusion, this study has shown that early institutional deprivation is associated with widespread localized white matter alterations in young adult adoptees, >20 years after they were removed from the institutions. Previously-institutionally deprived adoptees showed smaller volume in multiple white matter tracts compared with noninstitutionalized adoptees, while there were no group differences in microstructural organization. Our findings support the hypothesis that extreme adversity early in life can have a long-lasting impact on macrostructural white matter development despite later environmental enrichment.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments: We thank the continued support and dedication of the families who took part in the ERA. We also thank Niall Bourke for his assistance with data collection.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • The ERABIS was supported by the Medical Research Council Grant MR/K022474/1. Economic and Social Research Council Grant RES-062-23-3300 supported the Young Adult Follow-Up. This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network. M.A.M. was supported in part by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London, Maudsley National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, and King’s College London.

  • ↵† The ERA Young Adult Follow-Up Team is Edmund Sonuga-Barke, Mark Kennedy, Jana Kreppner, Nicky Knights, Robert Kumsta, Barbara Maughan, and Wolff Schlotz.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Andersson JLR, Sotiropoulos SN (2016) An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage 125:1063–1078. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019 pmid:26481672
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Andersson JLR, Skare S, Ashburner J (2003) How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 20:870–888. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 pmid:14568458
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Andersson JLR, Graham MS, Zsoldos E, Sotiropoulos SN (2016) Incorporating outlier detection and replacement into a non-parametric framework for movement and distortion correction of diffusion MR images. Neuroimage 141:556–572. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.058 pmid:27393418
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Ashburner J (2007) A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38:95–113. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007 pmid:17761438
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Benedetti F, Bollettini I, Radaelli D, Poletti S, Locatelli C, Falini A, Smeraldi E, Colombo C (2014) Adverse childhood experiences influence white matter microstructure in patients with bipolar disorder. Psychol Med 44:3069–3082. doi:10.1017/S0033291714000506 pmid:25065766
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Bengtsson SL, Nagy Z, Skare S, Forsman L, Forssberg H, Ullén F (2005) Extensive piano practicing has regionally specific effects on white matter development. Nat Neurosci 8:1148–1150. doi:10.1038/nn1516 pmid:16116456
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Bick J, Zhu T, Stamoulis C, Fox NA, Zeanah C, Nelson CA (2015) Effect of early institutionalization and foster care on long-term white matter development: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 169:211–219. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3212 pmid:25622303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Budisavljevic S, Dell’Acqua F, Zanatto D, Begliomini C, Miotto D, Motta R, Castiello U (2017) Asymmetry and structure of the fronto-parietal networks underlie visuomotor processing in humans. Cereb Cortex 27:1532–1544. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv348 pmid:26759477
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Catani M, Thiebaut de Schotten M (2008) A diffusion tensor imaging tractography atlas for virtual in vivo dissections. Cortex 44:1105–1132. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.004 pmid:18619589
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Chorghay Z, Káradóttir RT, Ruthazer ES (2018) White matter plasticity keeps the brain in tune: axons conduct while glia wrap. Front Cell Neurosci 12:428. doi:10.3389/fncel.2018.00428 pmid:30519159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Conners CK, Pitkanen J, Rzepa SR (2011) Conners comprehensive behavior rating scale. New York: Springer.
  12. ↵
    Cortese S, Imperati D, Zhou J, Proal E, Klein RG, Mannuzza S, Ramos-Olazagasti MA, Milham MP, Kelly C, Castellanos FX (2013) White matter alterations at 33-year follow-up in adults with childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 74:591–598. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.02.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Danese A (2020) Annual research review: rethinking childhood trauma-new research directions for measurement, study design and analytical strategies. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 61:236–250. doi:10.1111/jcpp.13160 pmid:31762042
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Dell’Acqua F, Simmons A, Williams SC, Catani M (2013) Can spherical deconvolution provide more information than fiber orientations? Hindrance modulated orientational anisotropy, a true-tract specific index to characterize white matter diffusion. Hum Brain Mapp 34:2464–2483. doi:10.1002/hbm.22080 pmid:22488973
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Dell’Acqua F, Lacerda L, Barrett R, D’Anna L, Tsermentseli S, Goldstein L, Catani M (2015) Megatrack: A fast and effective strategy for group comparison and supervised analysis of large-scale tractography datasets. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 23rd Annual General Meeting. Toronto, Canada.
  16. ↵
    De Schotten MT, Dell’Acqua F, Forkel SJ, Simmons A, Vergani F, Murphy D, Catani M (2011) A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nat Neurosci 14:1245–1246. doi:10.1038/nn.2905 pmid:21926985
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Dimond D, Rohr CS, Smith RE, Dhollander T, Cho I, Lebel C, Dewey D, Connelly A, Bray S (2020) Early childhood development of white matter fiber density and morphology. Neuroimage 210:116552. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116552 pmid:31972280
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Dubois J, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Kulikova S, Poupon C, Hüppi PS, Hertz-Pannier L (2014) The early development of brain white matter: a review of imaging studies in fetuses, newborns and infants. Neuroscience 276:48–71. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.044 pmid:24378955
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Duffau H, Moritz-Gasser S, Mandonnet E (2014) A re-examination of neural basis of language processing: proposal of a dynamic hodotopical model from data provided by brain stimulation mapping during picture naming. Brain Lang 131:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.011 pmid:23866901
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Eluvathingal TJ, Chugani HT, Behen ME, Juhász C, Muzik O, Maqbool M, Chugani DC, Makki M (2006) Abnormal brain connectivity in children after early severe socioemotional deprivation: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Pediatrics 117:2093–2100. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1727 pmid:16740852
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Fields RD (2005) Myelination: an overlooked mechanism of synaptic plasticity? Neuroscientist 11:528–531. doi:10.1177/1073858405282304 pmid:16282593
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Geng X, Gouttard S, Sharma A, Gu H, Styner M, Lin W, Gerig G, Gilmore JH (2012) Quantitative tract-based white matter development from birth to age 2years. Neuroimage 61:542–557. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.057 pmid:22510254
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson S (2009) Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet 373:68–81. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Gilmore JH, Knickmeyer RC, Gao W (2018) Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood. Nat Rev Neurosci 19:123–137. doi:10.1038/nrn.2018.1 pmid:29449712
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Golm D, Sarkar S, Mackes NK, Fairchild G, Mehta MA, Rutter M, Sonuga-Barke EJ; ERA Young Adult Follow Up Study Team (2021) The impact of childhood deprivation on adult neuropsychological functioning is associated with ADHD symptom persistence. Psychol Med 51:2675–2684. doi:10.1017/S0033291720001294
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    Gunnar MR, DePasquale CE, Reid BM, Donzella B, Miller BS (2019) Pubertal stress recalibration reverses the effects of early life stress in postinstitutionalized children. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:23984–23988. doi:10.1073/pnas.1909699116 pmid:31712449
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Hanson JL, Adluru N, Chung MK, Alexander AL, Davidson RJ, Pollak SD (2013) Early neglect is associated with alterations in white matter integrity and cognitive functioning. Child Dev 84:1566–1578. doi:10.1111/cdev.12069 pmid:23480812
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Herbet G, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H (2017) Direct evidence for the contributive role of the right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus in non-verbal semantic cognition. Brain Struct Funct 222:1597–1610. doi:10.1007/s00429-016-1294-x pmid:27568379
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Howells H, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell’Acqua F, Beyh A, Zappalà G, Leslie A, Simmons A, Murphy DG, Catani M (2018) Frontoparietal tracts linked to lateralized hand preference and manual specialization. Cereb Cortex 28:2482–2494. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy040 pmid:29688293
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Huang H, Gundapuneedi T, Rao U (2012) White matter disruptions in adolescents exposed to childhood maltreatment and vulnerability to psychopathology. Neuropsychopharmacology 37:2693–2701. doi:10.1038/npp.2012.133 pmid:22850736
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Huber E, Donnelly PM, Rokem A, Yeatman JD (2018) Rapid and widespread white matter plasticity during an intensive reading intervention. Nat Commun 9:2260. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04627-5 pmid:29884784
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Hutchinson EB, Schwerin SC, Radomski KL, Sadeghi N, Komlosh ME, Irfanoglu MO, Juliano SL, Pierpaoli C (2018) Detection and distinction of mild brain injury effects in a ferret model using diffusion tensor MRI (DTI) and DTI-driven tensor-based morphometry (D-TBM). Front Neurosci 12:573. doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00573
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Irfanoglu MO, Nayak A, Jenkins J, Hutchinson EB, Sadeghi N, Thomas CP, Pierpaoli C (2016) DR-TAMAS: diffeomorphic registration for tensor accurate alignment of anatomical structures. Neuroimage 132:439–454. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.066 pmid:26931817
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Kellner E, Dhital B, Kiselev VG, Reisert M (2016) Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts. Magn Reson Med 76:1574–1581. doi:10.1002/mrm.26054 pmid:26745823
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Kennedy M, Kreppner J, Knights N, Kumsta R, Maughan B, Golm D, Rutter M, Schlotz W, Sonuga-Barke EJ (2016) Early severe institutional deprivation is associated with a persistent variant of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: clinical presentation, developmental continuities and life circumstances in the English and Romanian Adoptees study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 57:1113–1125. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12576 pmid:27264475
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Mackes NK, Golm D, Sarkar S, Kumsta R, Rutter M, Fairchild G, Mehta MA, Sonuga-Barke EJS; ERA Young Adult Follow-Up Team (2020) Early childhood deprivation is associated with alterations in adult brain structure despite subsequent environmental enrichment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:641–649. doi:10.1073/pnas.1911264116 pmid:31907309
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    McCrory EJ, De Brito SA, Viding E (2010) Research review: the neurobiology and genetics of maltreatment and adversity. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51:1079–1095. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02271.x pmid:20546078
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Moritz-Gasser S, Herbet G, Duffau H (2013) Mapping the connectivity underlying multimodal (verbal and non-verbal) semantic processing: a brain electrostimulation study. Neuropsychologia 51:1814–1822. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.007 pmid:23778263
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Perry NB, Donzella B, Gunnar MR (2022) Pubertal stress recalibration and later social and emotional adjustment among adolescents: the role of early life stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 135:105578. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105578 pmid:34741981
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Raffelt DA, Tournier JD, Smith RE, Vaughan DN, Jackson G, Ridgway GR, Connelly A (2017) Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis. Neuroimage 144:58–73. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.029 pmid:27639350
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Rutter M (1998) Developmental catch-up, and deficit, following adoption after severe global early privation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 39:465–476. pmid:9599775
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Rutter M (2007) Proceeding from observed correlation to causal inference: the use of natural experiments. Perspect Psychol Sci 2:377–395. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00050.x pmid:26151974
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Rutter M, Bailey A, Lord C (2003) The social communication questionnaire. Torrance: Western Psychological Services.
  44. ↵
    Rutter M, O’Connor TG; English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team (2004) Are there biological programming effects for psychological development? Findings from a study of Romanian adoptees. Dev Psychol 40:81–94. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.81 pmid:14700466
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Sadeghi N, Arrigoni F, D’Angelo MG, Thomas C, Irfanoglu MO, Hutchinson EB, Nayak A, Modi P, Bassi MT, Pierpaoli C (2018) Tensor-based morphometry using scalar and directional information of diffusion tensor MRI data (DTBM): application to hereditary spastic paraplegia. Hum Brain Mapp 39:4643–4651. doi:10.1002/hbm.24278 pmid:30253021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Sampaio-Baptista C, Khrapitchev AA, Foxley S, Schlagheck T, Scholz J, Jbabdi S, DeLuca GC, Miller KL, Taylor A, Thomas N, Kleim J, Sibson NR, Bannerman D, Johansen-Berg H (2013) Motor skill learning induces changes in white matter microstructure and myelination. J Neurosci 33:19499–19503. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3048-13.2013 pmid:24336716
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Saur D, Schelter B, Schnell S, Kratochvil D, Küpper H, Kellmeyer P, Kümmerer D, Klöppel S, Glauche V, Lange R, Mader W, Feess D, Timmer J, Weiller C (2010) Combining functional and anatomical connectivity reveals brain networks for auditory language comprehension. Neuroimage 49:3187–3197. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.009 pmid:19913624
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Scherf SK, Thomas C, Doyle J, Behrmann M (2014) Emerging structure–function relations in the developing face processing system. Cereb Cortex 24:2964–2980. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht152 pmid:23765156
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Sheridan MA, Fox NA, Zeanah CH, McLaughlin KA, Nelson CA 3rd. (2012) Variation in neural development as a result of exposure to institutionalization early in childhood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:12927–12932. doi:10.1073/pnas.1200041109 pmid:22826224
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Sonuga-Barke EJS, Beckett C, Kreppner J, Castle J, Colvert E, Stevens S, Hawkins A, Rutter M (2008) Is sub-nutrition necessary for a poor outcome following early institutional deprivation? Dev Med Child Neurol 50:664–671. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03065.x pmid:18754915
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Sonuga-Barke EJS, Kennedy M, Kumsta R, Knights N, Golm D, Rutter M, Maughan B, Schlotz W, Kreppner J (2017) Child-to-adult neurodevelopmental and mental health trajectories after early life deprivation: the young adult follow-up of the longitudinal English and Romanian Adoptees study. Lancet 389:1539–1548. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30045-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. ↵
    Taki Y, Thyreau B, Hashizume H, Sassa Y, Takeuchi H, Wu K, Kotozaki Y, Nouchi R, Asano M, Asano K, Fukuda H, Kawashima R (2013) Linear and curvilinear correlations of brain white matter volume, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity with age using voxel-based and region-of-interest analyses in 246 healthy children. Hum Brain Mapp 34:1842–1856. doi:10.1002/hbm.22027 pmid:22438164
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    Teicher MH, Samson JA (2016) Annual research review: enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 57:241–266. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12507 pmid:26831814
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Urbanski M, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Rodrigo S, Catani M, Oppenheim C, Touzé E, Chokron S, Méder JF, Lévy R, Dubois B, Bartolomeo P (2008) Brain networks of spatial awareness: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging tractography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:598–601. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.126276 pmid:17991702
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    van Ewijk H, Heslenfeld DJ, Zwiers MP, Faraone SV, Luman M, Hartman CA, Hoekstra PJ, Franke B, Buitelaar JK, Oosterlaan J (2014) Different mechanisms of white matter abnormalities in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 53:790–799.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2014.05.001 pmid:24954828
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Veraart J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D, Ades-aron B, Sijbers J, Fieremans E (2016) Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage 142:394–406. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.016 pmid:27523449
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Volle E, Kinkingnéhun S, Pochon J-B, Mondon K, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Seassau M, Duffau H, Samson Y, Dubois B, Levy R (2008) The functional architecture of the left posterior and lateral prefrontal cortex in humans. Cereb Cortex 18:2460–2469. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn010 pmid:18308710
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Wechsler D (2011) Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence, Ed 2 (WASI-II). San Antonio: NCS Pearson.
  59. ↵
    Winkler AM, Ridgway GR, Webster MA, Smith SM, Nichols TE (2014) Permutation inference for the general linear model. Neuroimage 92:381–397. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060 pmid:24530839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Wu ZM, Bralten J, Cao QJ, Hoogman M, Zwiers MP, An L, Sun L, Yang L, Zang YF, Franke B, Wang YF (2017) White matter microstructural alterations in children with ADHD: categorical and dimensional perspectives. Neuropsychopharmacology 42:572–580. doi:10.1038/npp.2016.223 pmid:27681441
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Zou H, Hastie T (2003) Regression shrinkage and selection via the elastic net, with applications to microarrays. J Royal Statistical Soc B 67:301–320. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Susanne Wolf, Charite University Hospital

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: NONE. Note: If this manuscript was transferred from JNeurosci and a decision was made to accept the manuscript without peer review, a brief statement to this effect will instead be what is listed below.

The current manuscript adds to a growing body of literature investigating the enduring effects of early life deprivation based on studies of children adopted from Romanian institutions by investigating the macro and microstructure of their white matter tracts.

Overall, the paper is well written and contains a nuanced discussion of the effects and lack of effects of early deprivation on white matter structure in the brain that the authors discovered.

I have very few comments to be addressed before publication:

1. line 111 “Here we report findings of a natural experiment...”

While I understand the point the authors are making, referring to the study design as a ‘natural experiment’ is awkward and seems inappropriate considering the experiences of the experimental group. I suggest changing this wording to “Here we report findings from a study focused on a specific population in order to address some of these limitations to strengthen casual inference.”

2. line 136 “Although no studies have examined adult white matter sequelae of early childhood deprivation, there is evidence of an association with white matter structure in childhood and adolescence.” This line would benefit from clarification, I suggest : “Although no studies have yet examined adult white matter sequelae of early childhood deprivation, there is evidence of an association between early deprivation and alterations to white matter structure in childhood and in adolescence.”

3. Line 386 : “We dissected...” This could be more accurately phrased as “We isolated” as dissected more closely implies a physical removal of the ROIs

Author Response

We would like to express our gratitude to the reviewers for their helpful and positive comments. We have responded to each of their points below, and where appropriate highlight changes we have made to the manuscript in response to their comments.

We feel the manuscript is now stronger as a result of addressing the reviewers’ comments.

Thank you for further considering this manuscript for publication in eNeuro. We look forward to hearing from you in due course.

Yours sincerely, Nuria K. Mackes & Edmund Sonuga-Barke, on behalf of all co-authors.

Synthesis of Reviews

Synthesis Statement for Author (Required):

The current manuscript adds to a growing body of literature investigating the enduring effects of early life deprivation based on studies of children adopted from Romanian institutions by investigating the macro and microstructure of their white matter tracts.

Overall, the paper is well written and contains a nuanced discussion of the effects and lack of effects of early deprivation on white matter structure in the brain that the authors discovered.

I have very few comments to be addressed before publication:

Comment 1

Line 111 “Here we report findings of a natural experiment...”

While I understand the point the authors are making, referring to the study design as a ‘natural experiment’ is awkward and seems inappropriate considering the experiences of the experimental group. I suggest changing this wording to “Here we report findings from a study focused on a specific population in order to address some of these limitations to strengthen casual inference.”

Response

We thank the reviewer for asking for more caution with the wording. We have changed this sentence in line 111 as suggested.

Comment 2

Line 136 “Although no studies have examined adult white matter sequelae of early childhood deprivation, there is evidence of an association with white matter structure in childhood and adolescence.” This line would benefit from clarification, I suggest : "Although no studies have yet examined adult white matter sequelae of early childhood deprivation, there is evidence of an association between early deprivation and alterations to white matter structure in childhood and in adolescence.”

Response

This point is well taken. We have changed the sentence in line 136 accordingly.

Comment 3.

Line 386 : “We dissected...” This could be more accurately phrased as “We isolated” as dissected more closely implies a physical removal of the ROIs

Response

We thank the reviewer for raising this point. We have changed the sentence to “we isolated” as suggested.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 9 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 9, Issue 6
November/December 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Prospective Study of the Impact of Severe Childhood Deprivation on Brain White Matter in Adult Adoptees: Widespread Localized Reductions in Volume But Unaffected Microstructural Organization
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Prospective Study of the Impact of Severe Childhood Deprivation on Brain White Matter in Adult Adoptees: Widespread Localized Reductions in Volume But Unaffected Microstructural Organization
Nuria K. Mackes, Mitul A. Mehta, Ahmad Beyh, Richard O. Nkrumah, Dennis Golm, Sagari Sarkar, Graeme Fairchild, Flavio Dell’Acqua, Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke, on behalf of the ERA Young Adult Follow-Up Team
eNeuro 14 November 2022, 9 (6) ENEURO.0188-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0188-22.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
A Prospective Study of the Impact of Severe Childhood Deprivation on Brain White Matter in Adult Adoptees: Widespread Localized Reductions in Volume But Unaffected Microstructural Organization
Nuria K. Mackes, Mitul A. Mehta, Ahmad Beyh, Richard O. Nkrumah, Dennis Golm, Sagari Sarkar, Graeme Fairchild, Flavio Dell’Acqua, Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke, on behalf of the ERA Young Adult Follow-Up Team
eNeuro 14 November 2022, 9 (6) ENEURO.0188-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0188-22.2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • brain imaging
  • early adversity
  • institutional deprivation
  • Plasticity
  • tractography
  • white matter structure

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Capacity Limits Lead to Information Bottlenecks in Ongoing Rapid Motor Behaviors
  • Nonlinear Theta-Gamma Coupling between the Anterior Thalamus and Hippocampus Increases as a Function of Running Speed
  • Cnih3 Deletion Dysregulates Dorsal Hippocampal Transcription across the Estrous Cycle
Show more Research Article: New Research

Development

  • The mobility of neurofilaments in mature myelinated axons of adult mice
  • Development of the Functional Connectome Topology in Adolescence: Evidence from Topological Data Analysis
  • Dscam1: Is It a Ubiquitous Code for Dendritic Arborization?
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.