Extended Data Figure 2-1
Raw parameter values for all three experiments and statistical comparisons within experiments. Horizontal lines denote a significant post hoc comparison (p < 0.05; Dunn–Sidak corrected). For panels D, H, and L, drift values are relative to the first visual baseline session (i.e., 90° denotes a 90° CCW drift away from baseline) and the text gives the result of Holm–Bonferroni corrected v-tests for nonuniformity around a mean direction of 0°, a significant value here denotes clustering around 0° and thus a stable PFD (n.s. = p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). A, Peak firing rates in Experiment 1 (F(7,127) = 2.3, p = 0.0317, η2 = 0.11). B, Burst index in Experiment 1 (F(5,116) = 10.3, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.31). C, Directionality in Experiment 1 (F(5,82) = 17.6, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.52). D, PFD stability in Experiment 1. E, Peak firing rates in Experiment 2 (F(6,138) = 7.2, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.24). F, Burst index in Experiment 2 (F(4,104) = 5.3, p = 0.0006, η2 = 0.17). G, Directionality in Experiment 2 (F(6,138) = 112.2, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.83). H, PFD stability in Experiment 2. I, Peak firing rates in Experiment 3 (F(2,58) = 11.4, p = 0.0001, η2 = 0.28). J, Burst index in Experiment 3 (F(2,58) = 55.3, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.66). K, Directionality in Experiment 3 (F(2,58) = 68.8, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.70). L, PFD stability in Experiment 3. Download Figure 2-1, TIF file.