Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Frmpd1 Facilitates Trafficking of G-Protein Transducin and Modulates Synaptic Function in Rod Photoreceptors of Mammalian Retina

Christie K. Campla, Ulisse Bocchero, Ryan Strickland, Jacob Nellissery, Jayshree Advani, Irina Ignatova, Dhiraj Srivastava, Angel M. Aponte, Yuchen Wang, Jessica Gumerson, Kirill Martemyanov, Nikolai O. Artemyev, Johan Pahlberg and Anand Swaroop
eNeuro 30 September 2022, 9 (5) ENEURO.0348-22.2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0348-22.2022
Christie K. Campla
1Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christie K. Campla
Ulisse Bocchero
1Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
2Photoreceptor Physiology Group, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ulisse Bocchero
Ryan Strickland
1Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob Nellissery
1Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jayshree Advani
1Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irina Ignatova
2Photoreceptor Physiology Group, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dhiraj Srivastava
3Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angel M. Aponte
4Proteomics Core, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuchen Wang
5Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yuchen Wang
Jessica Gumerson
1Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirill Martemyanov
5Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kirill Martemyanov
Nikolai O. Artemyev
3Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242
6Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nikolai O. Artemyev
Johan Pahlberg
2Photoreceptor Physiology Group, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Johan Pahlberg
Anand Swaroop
1Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anand Swaroop
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Gross retinal morphology is unaltered in Frmpd1 and Gpsm2-knock-down mouse lines. Immunostaining of Post natal day 21 (P21) mouse retina sections was performed to assess various cell types. Primary antibodies were used to detect cones (Cone Arrestin), ganglion cells (Brn3a, arrows), bipolar cells (Pkcα), horizontal cells (Calbindin), and amacrine cells (Chat). Scale bar: 50 μm. ONL, outer nuclear layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Outer plexiform layer (OPL) synaptic morphology is unaltered in Frmpd1Δ1a mice. Morphologies of OPL synapses were examined by immunostaining using frozen retina sections from Post natal day 21 (P21) mice. Scale bar: 20 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Frmpd1 localizes to rod inner segments and synapses. A, In vivo electroporation workflow. FLAG-tagged full-length Frmpd1 and GFP expression constructs under control of ubiquitin promoter (pUb) were coinjected subretinally in neonatal mouse pups at P1 and introduced to the retina via electroporation. At P21, eyes were harvested and processed for immunohistochemistry. B, Frmpd1 localization in dark-adapted retina. Mice were dark-adapted overnight before eyes were harvested and processed for immunohistochemistry to detect both GFP and FLAG-tagged Frmpd1 protein using anti-FLAG antibody (i). Immunofluorescence staining for the FLAG-Frmpd1 shows clear localization to both the rod inner segments (open arrowheads) and synapses (closed arrowheads; ii, iii). C, Frmpd1 localization in light-adapted retina. Mice were light-adapted for 1 h before eyes were harvested and processed for immunohistochemistry to detect both GFP and FLAG-tagged Frmpd1 protein using anti-FLAG antibody (i). As in dark-adapted retina, FLAG-Frmpd1 immunofluorescence staining localized to both rod inner segments (open arrowheads) and synapses (closed arrowheads; ii, iii). OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer. Scale bar: 50 μm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Frmpd1 interacts with Gpsm2 in the retina. A, Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) of Frmpd1 and Gpsm2. HEK293 cells were co-transfected with 3′ FLAG-Frmpd1 and mCherry-Gpsm2 expression constructs. Frmpd1-containing protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody and probed with anti-RFP (mCherry) to detect Gpsm2. Gpsm2-containing protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with anti-RFP antibody and probed with anti-FLAG to detect Gpsm2. B, Colocalization of Frmpd1 and Gpsm2 in HEK293 cells. HEK293 cells were co-transfected with 3′ FLAG-Frmpd1 and mCherry-Gpsm2 expression constructs and stained with anti-FLAG (green) antibody to visualize Frmpd1. Gpsm2 is visualized by mCherry protein fluorescence (red). C, Left panel, IP of Gpsm2 complexes from retina. Mice were light-adapted for 1 h, then dark-adapted for 1 h. Gpsm2-containing protein complexes were immunoprecipitated from retina lysate using anti-Gpsm2 antibody; 10% of input lysate and 50% of immunoprecipitated protein complexes were processed for immunoblotting with anti-Frmpd1 antibody. Asterisks (*) represent nonspecific band staining. Right panel, IP of Frmpd1 complexes from retina. Lysates were prepared as described, and Frmpd1-containing protein complexes were immunoprecipitated from retina lysate using anti-Frmpd1 antibody; 10% of input lysate and 50% of immunoprecipitated protein complexes were processed for immunoblotting with anti-Gpsm2 antibody. Asterisks (*) represent nonspecific band staining. D, Immunoblot of proteins pulled down from retina lysates with anti-Frmpd1 (left panel) and anti-Gpsm2 (right panel) antibodies and probed with Gαt antibodies.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Frmpd1 forms a ternary complex with Gpsm2 and Gαt. A, In vitro interaction of Frmpd1 with Gpsm2 and Gαt*. Streptavidin resin beads with (+) and without (–) bound Avi-Gαt* were incubated with Gpsm2-FLAG and/or HA-thioredoxin tagged Frmpd1 fragment (residues 895–938 previously shown to contain Gpsm2 binding site). Immunoblots of pull down (PD) products from beads with (+) and without (–) bound Avi-Gαt* in presence of HA-thioredoxin-tagged Frmpd1 and/or Gpsm2-FLAG were probed with anti-HA and anti-FLAG antibodies. B, Steady state analysis of the Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI) data (as shown in Fig. 5) for the binding of Gpsm2 to the Avi-Trx tagged Frmpd1 895–938 coupled to a streptavidin biosensor in the presence (+) or absence (–) of Gαt*. Error bars show SEM. C, Kinetics of association and dissociation for Gpsm2 and Avi-thioredoxin tagged Frmpd1 895–938 coupled to a streptavidin biosensor as determined using Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI). Representative curves are shown for black fitting in A. D, Kinetics of association and dissociation for Gpsm2 and Avi-thioredoxin-tagged Frmpd1 895–938 coupled to a streptavidin biosensor in the presence of Gαt* as determined using BLI. Representative curves are shown for orange fitting in A.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Rod bipolar cells (RBCs) light responses in Frmpd1Δ1a and Gpsm2−/− mice display decreased sensitivity compared with wild-type during Gαt translocation. A, C, E, Representative dark-adapted response families of wild-type (A), Frmpd1Δ1a (C), and Gpsm2−/− (E) rods. B, D, F, Representative light response families of wild-type (B), Frmpd1Δ1a (D), and Gpsm2−/− (E) rods, following the Gαt translocation protocol. G, Intensity-response relationships for dark adapted (DA) (black) and translocated (wild-type, green; Frmpd1Δ1a, blue; Gpsm2−/−, orange) rods. Solid and dashed arrows indicate half maximal flash strength (I1/2) before and after translocation, respectively. H, J, L, Representative dark-adapted response families of wild-type (H), Frmpd1Δ1a (J), and Gpsm2−/− (L) RBCs. I, K, M, Representative response families of wild-type (I), Frmpd1Δ1a (K), and Gpsm2−/− (M) RBCs following the Gαt translocation protocol. N, Intensity-response relationships for DA and translocated RBCs with color coding as in G. Solid and dashed arrows indicate half maximal flash strength (I1/2) before and after translocation, respectively.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Frmpd1 facilitates dark-adapted (DA) return of Gαt to rod outer segments. A, Wild-type, Frmpd1Δ1a, and Gpsm2−/− mice were DA overnight, after which eyes were harvested and processed for immunohistochemistry to detect Gαt in DA retina. B, DA mice were exposed to bright light (∼1000 lux) for 1.5 h to detect Gαt translocation in light-adapted (LA) retina. C, Light-adapted mice were placed in darkness for 2 h to detect Gαt in the retina during the course of dark adaptation (2-h DA). D, Example of transducin quantification for immunofluorescence preparations. Five equal-sized squares (regions of interest, ROIs) (yellow square) for outer segment (OS; A) (A), inner segment (IS; B) (B), synaptic terminal (ST; C) and background (bkg; D) were chosen for each image analyzed (see Materials and Methods, Transducin quantification assay). The total fluorescence (Ftot) was estimated by summing the fluorescence (F) values of the ROIs within the three relevant photoreceptor layers Ftot = (A – D) + (B – D) + (C – D). Relative intensity of each layer was then calculated as a ratio of the total: outer segments fluorescence (FOS) = (A − D)/Ftot; inner segments fluorescence (FIS) = (B − D)/Ftot; synaptic terminal fluorescence (FST) = (C − D)/Ftot. E, Quantification of relative intensity of the retinal layers at 2-h DA. Statistical significance is denoted with an asterisk where p < 0.05. OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer. Scale bar: 20 μm.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Response recovery and dark adaptation is compromised in Frmpd1Δ1a and Gpsm2−/− mice. A, Mean dark-adapted electroretinogram (DA ERG) responses to 20-ms light flashes (arrow) of increasing strength for wild-type (green), Frmpd1Δ1a (blue), and Gpsm2−/− (orange) mice. B, Schematics of ERG parameters extraction: the latency (as time for the response to reach 10% of the maximum value), a-wave amplitude (from response baseline to the lowest deflection point), and b-wave amplitude (from the lowest deflection point to the maximum value). C, Intensity-response relationship of the dark-adapted (DA) a-wave (circles) and b-wave (squares) amplitudes. D, 10% latency of the DA a-wave as a function of light intensity. E, Recovery of the scotopic in vivo ERG a-wave response amplitude following the Gαt translocation protocol. Insets shows representative in vivo ERG a-wave responses at 30 and 60 min.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Rod and rod bipolar cell (RBC) response properties

    I1/2 (R*/rod)Imax (pA)TTP (ms)N
    DA Rods
     Wildtype15.1 ± 1.321.7 ± 2.3162 ± 1013
     Frmpd1Δ1a20.5 ± 2.215.6 ± 1.2164 ± 127
     Gpsm2-/-19.5 ± 123.4 ± 2.8168 ± 77
    TS Rods
     Wildtype200.6 ± 12.7 ± 0.752 ± 37
     Frmpd1Δ1a177.6 ± 7.83.7 ± 0.463 ± 74
     Gpsm2-/-206 ± 14.62.3 ± 0.553 ± 83
    DA RBCs
     Wildtype3.6 ± 0.2263 ± 24.4142 ± 529
     Frmpd1Δ1a4.1 ± 0.3254 ± 40135 ± 314
     Gpsm2-/-3.2 ± 0.3317 ± 55139 ± 45
    TS RBCs
     Wildtype19 ± 3.4181.2 ± 47.875 ± 35
     Frmpd1Δ1a57.3 ± 3.3***93 ± 24.880 ± 34
     Gpsm2-/-48.7 ± 5.4**89.3 ± 15.874 ± 35
    • Sensitivity (I1/2), maximum responses amplitude (Imax), and time to peaks (TTP) of wild-type, Frmpd1Δ1a, and Gpsm2−/− in both dark-adapted (DA) and translocated (TS) states. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, number of cells (N).

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Antibodies used for immunofluorescence, Co-Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting

    AntibodyHost
    species
    SourceDilution
    IHCImmunoblotImmuno-precipitation
    Brn3aMouseSanta Cruz; sc84291:1000--
    CalbindinRabbitCalbiochem; PC253L1:1000--
    Cav1.4RabbitA. Lee (Liu et al., 2013)1:1000--
    ChatGoatMillipore; AB144P1:200--
    Cone arrestinRabbitMillipore; AB152821:1000--
    Ctbp2MouseBD Biosciences; 6120441:1000--
    Elfn1RabbitK. Martemyanov (Cao et al., 2015)1:100--
    Elfn2RabbitThermo Fisher Scientific; PA5-435211:100--
    FlagRabbitCell Signaling; 23681:6001:1000-
    FlagMouseSigma; F18041:200-3 μg/1600 μg lysate
    Frmpd1RabbitAtlas Antibodies; HPA042934-1:10003 μg/1600 μg lysate
    Gpr179MousePrimm Biotech; Ab8871:250--
    Gpsm2RabbitMillipore; ABT174-1:500-
    Gpsm2GoatAntibodiesOnline; ABIN190875--3 μg/1600 μg lysate
    Lrit1MouseSanta Cruz; sc-3765081:100--
    Lrit3RabbitC. Zeitz (Neuillé et al., 2015)1:200--
    mGlur6SheepK. Martemyanov (Cao et al., 2011)1:200--
    PkcαRabbitSigma; P43341:1000--
    PmcaMouseAbcam; AB28251:200--
    PNA (AlexaFluor 647-conjugated)n/aLife Technologies; L324601:1000--
    RFPRabbitRockland Immunochem; 600-401-379-1:20003 μg/1600 μg lysate
    Rgs11RabbitK. Martemyanov (Cao et al., 2008)1:500--
    Transducin, alpha subunit (Gαt)RabbitProteintech; 55167-1-AP1:500--
    Transducin, alpha subunit (Gαt)RabbitSanta Cruz; sc389-1:250-
    Trpm1SheepK. Martemyanov (Cao et al., 2011)1:500--
    β-ActinMouseSigma; A5316-1:3000-
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 9 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 9, Issue 5
September/October 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Frmpd1 Facilitates Trafficking of G-Protein Transducin and Modulates Synaptic Function in Rod Photoreceptors of Mammalian Retina
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Frmpd1 Facilitates Trafficking of G-Protein Transducin and Modulates Synaptic Function in Rod Photoreceptors of Mammalian Retina
Christie K. Campla, Ulisse Bocchero, Ryan Strickland, Jacob Nellissery, Jayshree Advani, Irina Ignatova, Dhiraj Srivastava, Angel M. Aponte, Yuchen Wang, Jessica Gumerson, Kirill Martemyanov, Nikolai O. Artemyev, Johan Pahlberg, Anand Swaroop
eNeuro 30 September 2022, 9 (5) ENEURO.0348-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0348-22.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Frmpd1 Facilitates Trafficking of G-Protein Transducin and Modulates Synaptic Function in Rod Photoreceptors of Mammalian Retina
Christie K. Campla, Ulisse Bocchero, Ryan Strickland, Jacob Nellissery, Jayshree Advani, Irina Ignatova, Dhiraj Srivastava, Angel M. Aponte, Yuchen Wang, Jessica Gumerson, Kirill Martemyanov, Nikolai O. Artemyev, Johan Pahlberg, Anand Swaroop
eNeuro 30 September 2022, 9 (5) ENEURO.0348-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0348-22.2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • G-protein
  • phototransduction
  • rod photoreceptor
  • rod-rod bipolar signaling
  • transducin translocation
  • vision

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Opponent Learning with Different Representations in the Cortico-Basal Ganglia Circuits
  • Nonspiking Interneurons in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe Exhibit Spatially Restricted Activity
  • Pattern of Driver-Like Input onto Neurons of the Mouse Ventral Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Supramodal representation of the sense of body ownership in the human parieto-premotor and extrastriate cortices
  • Nonspiking Interneurons in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe Exhibit Spatially Restricted Activity
  • Pattern of Driver-Like Input onto Neurons of the Mouse Ventral Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.