Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleOpen Source Tools and Methods, Integrative Systems

Development of an Open Face Home Cage Running Wheel for Testing Activity-Based Anorexia and Other Applications

Nathan Godfrey, Kehan Chen, Temoor Tayyab, Gina Dimitropoulos, Frank P. MacMaster and Stephanie L. Borgland
eNeuro 14 October 2022, 9 (5) ENEURO.0246-22.2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0246-22.2022
Nathan Godfrey
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kehan Chen
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Temoor Tayyab
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gina Dimitropoulos
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank P. MacMaster
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie L. Borgland
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephanie L. Borgland
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Description of the running wheels and computer interface. A, Illustration indicating how data are collected and distance and velocity are calculated. B, Illustration of the Raspberry Pi motherboard connections. Image of the Raspberry Pi computer is adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi. C, Photograph of a mouse on the running wheel when connected to a fiber-optic patch cord. D, Photograph of a Green Line cage containing a mouse on the wheel with the power cord attached through the bottle holder. Water bottles are delivered via the food hopper for these experiments. Additional photographs of the wheel are located at https://github.com/borglandlab/RunningWheel.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Mice on an activity-based anorexia model with access to a running wheel have decreased probability of survival when food restricted. A, Description and time course of the following four groups: (1) Ad lib + dummy, (2) Ad lib + wheel, (3) FR + dummy, and (4) FR + wheel. B, FR mice with access to a running wheel (red) are removed from the study sooner when food restricted compared with Ad lib mice with a running wheel (black). Extended Data Figure 2-1 indicates that mice did not lose weight to the humane end point when on 6 h food restriction for up to 10 d. As such, we added a 3 h food restriction after 3 d of 6 h food restriction.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    FR Mice with access to a running wheel lose more body weight. A, Time course of daily body weight measurements taken at 9:00 A.M. each day during baseline, 6 h food restriction, and then 3 h food restriction. B, Body weight measurements from Ad lib (open bars) or FR (filled bars) mice with access to a dummy wheel or running wheel on day 11, the time point before some mice were removed from the study. C, Time course of food consumption each day during baseline, after the 3 h FR period or after the 6 h FR period. D, Food intake over the 24 h period preceding the time point before some mice were removed from the study from Ad lib (open bars) and FR (filled bars) mice. E, Daily water consumption during baseline, 3 h FR, and 6 h FR. FR increased water consumed in both groups regardless of access to the running wheel. F, Water consumption over the 24 h period preceding the time point before some mice were removed from the study from Ad lib (open bars) and FR (filled bars) mice that have access to a dummy or running wheel. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Symbols represent individual mice.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Distance traveled increases with food restriction. A, Daily distance traveled on the running wheel in Ad lib (open circles) or FR (filled circles) mice. B, Averaged distance traveled over 24 h measured on day 7 or day 11 from Ad lib (open bars) or FR (filled bars) mice. C, Daily anticipatory activity measured within the 3 h period before food delivery in Ad lib or FR mice. D, Averaged 3 h anticipatory activity measured on day 7 or day 11 from Ad lib (open bars) or FR (filled bars) mice. E, Daily distance traveled measured during the 3 h food availability period from Ad lib or FR mice. F, Averaged distance traveled during the first 3 h of the food availability period on day 7 or day 11 from Ad lib or FR mice. G, Time course of daily postprandial activity over 3 h after food access from Ad lib or FR mice. H, Averaged 3 h postprandial distance traveled on day 7 or day 11 from Ad lib or FR mice. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Symbols represent individual mice.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Circadian pattern of wheel running. A, Over a 24 h period, hourly wheel running is enhanced in FR mice (filled circles) compared with Ad lib mice (open circles) except during the food availability period. This data were recorded on day 10. Shaded boxes represent the dark cycle. Hashed lines represent the food availability period. B, Daily wheel running in Ad lib mice on day 10 as identified by clockwise running (open bars) and counterclockwise running (filled bars). C, Daily wheel running in FR mice on day 10 as identified by clockwise running (open bars) and counterclockwise running (filled bars). Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Symbols represent individual mice.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Averaged velocity is greater in FR mice. A, Daily velocity on the running wheel in Ad lib (open circles) or FR (filled circles) mice. B, Averaged velocity over 24 h measured on day 7 or day 11 from Ad lib (open bars) or FR (filled bars) mice. C, Daily velocity measured within the 3 h period before food delivery in Ad lib or FR mice. D, Averaged 3 h anticipatory velocity measured on day 7 or day 11 from Ad lib (open bars) or FR (filled bars) mice. E, Daily velocity measured during the 3 h food availability period from Ad lib or FR mice. F, Averaged velocity during the first 3 h of the food availability period on day 7 or day 11 from Ad lib or FR mice. G, Time course of daily postprandial velocity over 3 h after food access from Ad lib or FR mice. H, Averaged 3 h postprandial velocity on day 7 or day 11 from Ad lib or FR mice. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Symbols represent individual mice.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Figure 2-1

    FR Mice with access to a running wheel lose body weight but adapt food intake. A, Time course of daily body weight measurements taken at 9:00 A.M. each day during baseline and the 6 h food restriction. B, Body weight measurements from Ad lib (open bars, n = 4) or FR (filled bars, n = 4) mice with access to a dummy wheel or running wheel on day 11, the time point before one mouse was removed from the study due to dermatitis. Body weight was less in restricted mice (t(6) = 4.13, p = 0.0061). C, Time course of food consumption each day during baseline, after the 6 h FR period. D, Food intake over the 24 h period on day 11 from Ad lib (open bars, n = 4) and FR (filled bars, n = 4) mice was decreased in restricted mice (t(6) = 4.65, p = 0.0035). E, Daily distance traveled on the running wheel in Ad lib (open circles, n = 4) or FR (filled circles, n = 4) mice. F, Averaged distance traveled over 24 h measured on day 11 from Ad lib (open bars) or FR (filled bars) mice was not different between groups (t(6) = 2.4, p = 0.053). Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Symbols represent individual mice. Download Figure 2-1, EPS file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 9 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 9, Issue 5
September/October 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of an Open Face Home Cage Running Wheel for Testing Activity-Based Anorexia and Other Applications
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Development of an Open Face Home Cage Running Wheel for Testing Activity-Based Anorexia and Other Applications
Nathan Godfrey, Kehan Chen, Temoor Tayyab, Gina Dimitropoulos, Frank P. MacMaster, Stephanie L. Borgland
eNeuro 14 October 2022, 9 (5) ENEURO.0246-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0246-22.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Development of an Open Face Home Cage Running Wheel for Testing Activity-Based Anorexia and Other Applications
Nathan Godfrey, Kehan Chen, Temoor Tayyab, Gina Dimitropoulos, Frank P. MacMaster, Stephanie L. Borgland
eNeuro 14 October 2022, 9 (5) ENEURO.0246-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0246-22.2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • activity-based anorexia
  • locomotor activity
  • open behavior
  • open source
  • running wheels

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Open Source Tools and Methods

  • Ratphones: An Affordable Tool for Highly Controlled Sound Presentation in Freely Moving Rats
  • Evaluation and Validation of Commercially Available Dopamine Transporter Antibodies
  • FreiBox: A Versatile Open-Source Behavioral Setup for Investigating the Neuronal Correlates of Behavioral Flexibility via 1-Photon Imaging in Freely Moving Mice
Show more Open Source Tools and Methods

Integrative Systems

  • Running throughout Middle-Age Keeps Old Adult-Born Neurons Wired
  • Adult Neurogenesis Is Altered by Circadian Phase Shifts and the Duper Mutation in Female Syrian Hamsters
  • Physiological Condition-Dependent Changes in Ciliary GPCR Localization in the Brain
Show more Integrative Systems

Subjects

  • Integrative Systems
  • Open Source Tools and Methods

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.