Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: Confirmation, Sensory and Motor Systems

Intrasession and Intersession Reproducibility of Artificial Scotoma pRF Mapping Results at Ultra-High Fields

David Linhardt, Maximilian Pawloff, Michael Woletz, Allan Hummer, Martin Tik, Maria Vasileiadi, Markus Ritter, Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth and Christian Windischberger
eNeuro 6 September 2022, 9 (5) ENEURO.0087-22.2022; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0087-22.2022
David Linhardt
1High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David Linhardt
Maximilian Pawloff
2Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Woletz
1High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allan Hummer
1High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Tik
1High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Vasileiadi
1High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Ritter
2Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga
3BCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
2Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Windischberger
1High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) combined with population receptive field (pRF) mapping allows for associating positions on the visual cortex to areas on the visual field. Apart from applications in healthy subjects, this method can also be used to examine dysfunctions in patients suffering from partial visual field losses. While such objective measurement of visual deficits (scotoma) is of great importance for, e.g., longitudinal studies addressing treatment effects, it requires a thorough assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of the results obtained. In this study, we quantified the reproducibility of pRF mapping results within and across sessions in case of central visual field loss in a group of 15 human subjects. We simulated scotoma by masking a central area of 2° radius from stimulation to establish ground-truth conditions. This study was performed on a 7T ultra-high field MRI scanner for increased sensitivity. We found excellent intrasession and intersession reproducibility for the pRF center position (Spearman correlation coefficients for x, y: >0.95; eccentricity: >0.87; polar angle: >0.98), but only modest reproducibility for pRF size (Spearman correlation coefficients around 0.4). We further examined the scotoma detection performance using an automated method based on a reference dataset acquired with full-field stimulation. For the 2° artificial scotoma, the group-averaged scotoma sizes were estimated at between 1.92° and 2.19° for different sessions. We conclude that pRF mapping of visual field losses yields robust, reproducible measures of retinal function and suggest the use of pRF mapping as an objective method for monitoring visual deficits during therapeutic interventions or disease progression.

  • fMRI
  • high-resolution MRI
  • pRF mapping
  • retinotopy
  • scotoma

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Grant Numbers P35583, KLI 670, and P33180. G.L.-U. was supported by the Basque Government through the BERC 2022–2025 Program and by the Spanish State Research Agency through BCBL Severo Ochoa Excellence Accreditation CEX2020-001010-S and through project IJC2020-042887-I funded by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

View Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 9 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 9, Issue 5
September/October 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intrasession and Intersession Reproducibility of Artificial Scotoma pRF Mapping Results at Ultra-High Fields
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Intrasession and Intersession Reproducibility of Artificial Scotoma pRF Mapping Results at Ultra-High Fields
David Linhardt, Maximilian Pawloff, Michael Woletz, Allan Hummer, Martin Tik, Maria Vasileiadi, Markus Ritter, Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Christian Windischberger
eNeuro 6 September 2022, 9 (5) ENEURO.0087-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0087-22.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Intrasession and Intersession Reproducibility of Artificial Scotoma pRF Mapping Results at Ultra-High Fields
David Linhardt, Maximilian Pawloff, Michael Woletz, Allan Hummer, Martin Tik, Maria Vasileiadi, Markus Ritter, Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Christian Windischberger
eNeuro 6 September 2022, 9 (5) ENEURO.0087-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0087-22.2022
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • fMRI
  • high-resolution MRI
  • pRF mapping
  • retinotopy
  • scotoma

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: Confirmation

  • Altered Dopamine Signaling in Extinction-Deficient Mice
  • Spatially Extensive LFP Correlations Identify Slow-Wave Sleep in Marmoset Sensorimotor Cortex
  • Visual Speech Reduces Cognitive Effort as Measured by EEG Theta Power and Pupil Dilation
Show more Research Article: Confirmation

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Different But Complementary Motor Functions Reveal an Asymmetric Recalibration of Upper Limb Bimanual Coordination
  • Serotonergic Suppression of Sustained Synaptic Responses in Rat Oculomotor Neural Integrator Networks
  • Spatially Extensive LFP Correlations Identify Slow-Wave Sleep in Marmoset Sensorimotor Cortex
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.