Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: Negative Results, Cognition and Behavior

Lack of Causal Roles of Cannabinoid and Dopamine Neurotransmitter Systems in Orbitofrontal and Piriform Cortex in Fentanyl Relapse in Rats

Sarah M. Claypool, Sana Behdin, Sarah V. Applebey, Javier Orihuel, Zilu Ma and David J. Reiner
eNeuro 29 June 2022, 9 (4) ENEURO.0496-21.2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0496-21.2022
Sarah M. Claypool
Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sana Behdin
Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah V. Applebey
Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Javier Orihuel
Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zilu Ma
Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Reiner
Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Effect of fentanyl relapse on activity in OFC and Pir cells expressing Cnr1, Drd1, and Drd2. A, Timeline of experiment 1. B, Self-administration. Number of reinforced responses (food: 5 pellets/reinforcer; fentanyl 2.5 µg/kg/infusion) during the 6-h sessions. C, Discrete choice (voluntary reduction in self-administration). Number of food-reinforced responses and fentanyl infusions earned during the 3-h choice sessions (20 trials/session). D, Relapse tests. Number of active and inactive lever presses during the 60-min test session (left) and the 15-min time course (right). E, From left to right, Number of Fos+ cells per mm2, number of Cnr1+ cells per mm2, number of Fos+Cnr1 double-labeled cells in OFC and Pir, number of Cnr1+Vgat double-labeled cells per mm2, and number of Fos+Cnr1+Vgat triple-labeled cells per mm2 in OFC. Representative images showing Fos (white), Cnr1 (green), or Vgat (red)-expressing cells (20× magnification, scale bar = 25 µm). White arrow denotes Fos-positive cell, green arrow denotes Cnr1-positive cell, and red arrow denotes Vgat-positive cells. Double-labeled cells are denoted by both a white and green arrow. Triple-labeled cells are denoted by a white, green, and red arrow. F, From left to right, Number of Fos+ cells per mm2, number of Drd1+ and Drd2+ cells per mm2, and number of Fos+Drd1 and Fos+Drd2 double-labeled cells in OFC and Pir. Representative images showing Fos (white), or Drd1 (red), Drd2 (green; 20× magnification, scale bar = 25 µm). White arrow denotes Fos-positive cell, red arrow denotes Drd1-positive cell, and green arrow denotes Drd2-positive cell. Double-labeled cells are denoted by both a white and green or red arrow (n = 6–8 per group); *p ≤ 0.05, different from the No Test group (E, F). Data are mean ± SEM. Individual data are shown separately by sex (males = circles, females = triangles) in D–F. OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; Pir, piriform cortex.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Effect of CB1 receptor blockade in OFC on relapse to fentanyl seeking. A, Timeline of experiment 2. B, Self-administration. Number of reinforced responses (food: 5 pellets/reinforcer; fentanyl 2.5 µg/kg/infusion) during the 6-h sessions. C, Discrete choice (voluntary reduction in self-administration). Number of food-reinforced responses and fentanyl infusions earned during the 3-h choice sessions (20 trials/session). D, Relapse test. Number of active and inactive lever presses during the 3-h test session (left) and 1-h time course (right) after vehicle or AM251 injections (CB1 receptor antagonist). E, Reacquisition test. Number of fentanyl infusions (2.5 µg/kg/infusion) during the 6-h session (left) and 1-h time course (right) after vehicle or AM251 injections in OFC (n = 12–20 per dose, between-subjects design). Data are mean ± SEM. Individual data are shown separately by sex (males = circles, females = triangles) in D, E. F, Images showing placement of cannula into OFC at 1.25× magnification (scale bar = 1 mm). Vehicle placements are shown with white circles, 0.3 µg AM251 with gray circles, and 1.0 µg AM251 with black circles.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effect of CB1 receptor agonism in OFC on relapse to fentanyl seeking. A, Timeline of experiment 3. B, Self-administration. Number of reinforced responses (food: 5 pellets/reinforcer; fentanyl 2.5 µg/kg/infusion) during the 6-h sessions. C, Discrete choice (voluntary reduction in self-administration). Number of food-reinforced responses and fentanyl infusions earned during the 3-h choice sessions (20 trials/session). D, Relapse test. Number of inactive (left) and active (right) lever presses during the 3-h test session after vehicle or WIN55,212-2 OFC injections (CB1 receptor agonist). E, Reacquisition test. Number of fentanyl infusions (2.5 µg/kg/infusion) during the 6-h session after vehicle or WIN55,212-2 injections in OFC (n = 5 per group in D, n = 5–6 per group in E, mixed within/between-subjects design). Data are mean ± SEM. Individual data are shown separately by sex (males = circles, females = triangles) in D, E. F, Images showing placement of cannula into OFC at 1.25× magnification (scale bar = 1 mm). Placements are shown with white (vehicle/0.3 µg WIN55,212-2) or black (vehicle/1 µg WIN55,212-2) circles. G, Mean number of fentanyl infusions during last three sessions of training phase and four sessions of self-administration retraining. H, Number of food and fentanyl rewards during four choice sessions after fentanyl re-training.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Effect of dopamine D1 receptor blockade in Pir on relapse to fentanyl seeking. A, Timeline of experiment 4. B, Self-administration. Number of reinforced responses (food: 5 pellets/reinforcer; fentanyl 2.5 µg/kg/infusion) during the 6-h sessions. C, Discrete choice (voluntary reduction in self-administration). Number of food-reinforced responses and fentanyl infusions earned during the 3-h choice sessions (20 trials/session). D, Relapse test. Number of inactive (left) and active (right) lever presses during the 3-h test session after vehicle or SCH39166 injections in Pir. E, Reacquisition test. Number of fentanyl infusions (2.5 µg/kg/infusion) during the 6-h session after vehicle or SCH39166 injections in Pir (n = 8–11 per group in D, n = 8–12 per group in E, mixed within/between-subjects design). Data are mean ± SEM. Individual data are shown separately by sex (males = circles, females = triangles) in D, E. F, Images showing placement of cannula into Pir at 1.25× magnification (scale bar = 1 mm). Placements are shown with white (vehicle/1 µg SCH39166) or black (vehicle/3 µg SCH39166) circles. G, Mean number of fentanyl infusions during last three sessions of training phase and two sessions of self-administration retraining. H, Number of food and fentanyl rewards during four choice sessions after fentanyl retraining.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Statistical analysis for experiments 1–4 (SPSS GLM repeated-measures module)

    Figure numberFactor nameF valueP valuePartial Eta2
    Figure 1B, self-administration
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    With sex as a factor
    Food
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–6), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction
    Fentanyl
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–12), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction


    F(1,12) = 1.0
    F(5,60) = 1.1
    F(5,60) = 0.1

    F(1,12) = 0.7
    F(11,132) = 3.7
    F(11,132) = 1.4


    0.35
    0.37
    0.99

    0.43
    <0.001*
    0.20


    0.07
    0.08
    0.01

    0.05
    0.24
    0.10
    Figure 1C, discrete choice
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    With sex as a factor
    Preference score
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–12), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction


    F(1,12) = 4.8
    F(11,132) = 15.4
    F(11,132) = 1.0


    0.05*
    <0.001*
    0.45


    0.28
    0.56
    0.08
    Figure 1D, relapse test
    Total responding
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor
    Lever (active, inactive), within-subjects

    F(1,7) = 37.0

    <0.001*

    0.84
    Figure 1D, relapse test
    Time course
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor
    Session Time (15, 30, 45, 60), within-subjects
    Lever (active, inactive), within-subjects
    Session Time × Lever interaction

    F(3,21) = 11.1
    F(1,7) = 37.0
    F(3,21) = 9.6

    <0.001*
    <0.001*
    <0.001*

    0.61
    0.84
    0.58
    Figure 1F, Fos neuron counting 
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    OFC Cnr1: without sex as a factor
    Fos
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Cnr1
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Fos+Cnr1
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Pir Cnr1: without sex as a factor
    Fos
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Cnr1
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Fos+Cnr1
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    OFC Cnr1 and Vgat: without sex as a factor
    Cnr1+Vgat
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Fos+Cnr1+Vgat
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    OFC Drd1 and Drd2: without sex as a factor
    Fos
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Drd1
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Drd2
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Fos+Drd1
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Fos+Drd2
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Pir Drd1 and Drd2: without sex as a factor
    Fos
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Drd1
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Drd2
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Fos+Drd1
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects
    Fos+Drd2
    Test Condition (Test, No Test), between-subjects


    F(1,12) = 10.4

    F(1,12) = 2.4

    F(1,12) = 11.7


    F(1,12) = 5.1

    F(1,12) = 0.0

    F(1,12) = 1.6


    F(1,12) = 0.3

    F(1,12) = 6.2


    F(1,10) = 5.4

    F(1,10) = 2.9

    F(1,10) = 1.4

    F(1,10) = 1.6

    F(1,10) = 2.2


    F(1,12) = 7.2

    F(1,12) = 0.0

    F(1,12) = 1.7

    F(1,12) = 5.4

    F(1,12) = 1.7


    0.007*

    0.15

    0.005*


    0.04*

    0.89

    0.23


    0.57

    0.03*


    0.04*

    0.12

    0.27

    0.24

    0.17


    0.02*

    0.99

    0.22

    0.04*

    0.22


    0.47

    0.17

    0.49


    0.30

    0.00

    0.12


    0.03

    0.34


    0.35

    0.22

    0.12

    0.14

    0.18


    0.37

    0.00

    0.12

    0.31

    0.13
    Figure 2B, self-administration
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    With sex as a factor
    Food
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–6), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction
    Fentanyl
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–12), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction


    F(1,44) = 0.2
    F(5,220) = 12.4
    F(5,220) = 4.6

    F(1,44) = 0.8
    F(11,484) = 32.0
    F(11,484) = 0.7


    0.69
    <0.001*
    <0.001*

    0.38
    <0.001*
    0.74


    0.00
    0.22
    0.10

    0.02
    0.42
    0.02
    Figure 2C, discrete choice
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    With sex as a factor
    Preference score
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–12), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction


    F(1,44) = 12.3
    F(11,484) = 15.2
    F(11,484) = 1.7


    0.001*
    <0.001*
    0.07


    0.22
    0.26
    0.04
    Figure 2D, relapse test
    Total responding
    Mixed ANOVA
    With sex as a factor
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    AM251 Dose (0, 0.3, 1 µg), between-subjects
    Lever (active, inactive) within-subjects
    AM251 Dose × Lever interaction
    Sex × AM251 Dose interaction
    Sex × Lever interaction
    Sex × AM251 Dose × Lever interaction

    F(1,40) = 0.0
    F(2,40) = 1.0
    F(1,40) = 152.7
    F(2,40) = 0.9
    F(2,40) = 0.3
    F(1,40) = 0.0
    F(2,40) = 1.2

    0.94
    0.39
    <0.001*
    0.43
    0.74
    0.97
    0.31

    0.0
    0.05
    0.79
    0.04
    0.02
    0.0
    0.06
    Figure 2D, relapse test
    Time course
    Mixed-ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor
    AM251 Dose (0, 0.3, 1 µg), between-subjects
    Session Hour (1–3) within-subjects
    Lever (active, inactive), within-subjects
    AM251 Dose × Session Hour interaction
    AM251 Dose × Lever interaction
    Session Hour × Lever interaction
    AM251 Dose × Session Hour × Lever interaction

    F(2,43) = 1.1
    F(2,86) = 144.2
    F(1,43) = 160.4
    F(4,86) = 1.8
    F(2,43) = 1.0
    F(2,86) = 131.5
    F(4,86) = 1.4

    0.34
    <0.001*
    <0.001*
    0.14
    0.39
    <0.001*
    0.24

    0.05
    0.77
    0.79
    0.08
    0.04
    0.75
    0.06
    Figure 2E, reacquisition
    Mixed-ANOVA
    With sex as a factor
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    AM251 Dose (0, 0.3, 1 µg), between-subjects
    Session Hour (1–6) within-subjects
    AM251 Dose × Session Hour interaction
    Sex × AM251 Dose interaction
    Sex × Session Hour interaction
    Sex × AM251 Dose × Session Hour interaction

    F(1,40) = 1.9
    F(2,40) = 1.2
    F(5,200) = 8.7
    F(10,200) = 1.3
    F(2,40) = 2.9
    F(5,200) = 1.9
    F(10,200) = 1.2

    0.18
    0.30
    <0.001*
    0.26
    0.07
    0.10
    0.32

    0.04
    0.06
    0.18
    0.06
    0.13
    0.04
    0.06
    Figure 3B, self-administration
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor
    Food
    Session (1–6), within-subjects
    Fentanyl
    Session (1–12), within-subjects


    F(5,50) = 1.5

    F(11,110) = 5.3


    0.22

    <0.001*


    0.13

    0.35
    Figure 3C, discrete choice
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor
    Preference score
    Session (1–12), within-subjects


    F(11,110) = 2.7


    0.004*


    0.22
    Figure 3D, relapse test
    Total responding
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor (without statistical outlier)
    WIN55,212-2 Injection (vehicle, WIN55,212-2), within-subjects
    WIN55,212-2 Dose (0.3, 1 µg), between-subjects
    Lever (active, inactive) within-subjects
    WIN55,212-2 Injection × Dose interaction
    WIN55,212-2 Injection × Lever interaction
    WIN55,212-2 Dose × Lever interaction
    WIN55,212-2 Injection × Dose × Lever interaction

    F(1,8) = 0.4
    F(1,8) = 0.0
    F(1,8) = 38.4
    F(1,8) = 0.0
    F(1,8) = 0.6
    F(1,8) = 0.0
    F(1,8) = 0.0

    0.57
    0.87
    <0.001*
    0.86
    0.46
    0.94
    0.85

    0.04
    0.00
    0.83
    0.00
    0.07
    0.00
    0.00
    Figure 3D, relapse test
    Total responding
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor (with statistical outlier)
    WIN55,212-2 Injection (vehicle, WIN55,212-2), within-subjects
    WIN55,212-2 Dose (0.3, 1 µg), between-subjects
    Lever (active, inactive) within-subjects
    WIN55,212-2 Injection × Dose interaction
    WIN55,212-2 Injection × Lever interaction
    WIN55,212-2 Dose × Lever interaction
    WIN55,212-2 Injection × Dose × Lever interaction

    F(1,9) = 0.1
    F(1,9) = 0.6
    F(1,9) = 26.5
    F(1,9) = 0.7
    F(1,9) = 0.1
    F(1,9) = 0.5
    F(1,9) = 0.8

    0.75
    0.45
    <0.001*
    0.42
    0.73
    0.48
    0.40

    0.01
    0.07
    0.75
    0.07
    0.01
    0.06
    0.08
    Figure 3E, reacquisition
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor
    WIN55,212-2 Injection (vehicle, WIN55,212-2), within-subjects
    WIN55,212-2 Dose (0.3, 1 µg), between-subjects
    WIN55,212-2 Injection × Dose interaction

    F(1,9) = 0.6
    F(1,9) = 4.5
    F(1,9) = 0.3

    0.44
    0.06
    0.61

    0.07
    0.33
    0.03
    Figure 3G, re-training
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor
    Fentanyl
    Session (1–4), within-subjects


    F(3,30) = 0.2


    0.92


    0.02
    Figure 3H, discrete choice
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor
    Preference score
    Session (1–4), within-subjects


    F(3,30) = 1.5


    0.25


    0.13
    Figure 4B, self-administration
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    With sex as a factor
    Food
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–6), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction
    Fentanyl
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–12), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction


    F(1,18) = 1.3
    F(5,90) = 3.9
    F(5,90) = 5.8

    F(1,18) = 0.0
    F(11,198) = 2.9
    F(11,198) = 0.5


    0.27
    0.003*
    <0.001*

    0.97
    0.001*
    0.89


    0.07
    0.18
    0.24

    0.00
    0.14
    0.03
    Figure 4C, discrete choice
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    With sex as a factor
    Preference score
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–12), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction


    F(1,18) = 0.2
    F(11,198) = 5.9
    F(11,198) = 1.5


    0.66
    <0.001*
    0.12


    0.01
    0.25
    0.08
    Figure 4D, relapse test
    Total responding
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor (without statistical outlier)
    SCH39166 Injection (vehicle, SCH39166), within-subjects
    SCH39166 Dose (1, 3 µg), between-subjects
    Lever (active, inactive) within-subjects
    SCH39166 Injection × Dose interaction
    SCH39166 Injection × Lever interaction
    SCH39166 Dose × Lever interaction
    SCH39166 Injection × Dose × Lever interaction

    F(1,17) = 0.0
    F(1,17) = 0.9
    F(1,17) = 130.4
    F(1,17) = 0.2
    F(1,17) = 0.1
    F(1,17) = 4.6
    F(1,17) = 0.0

    0.86
    0.35
    <0.001*
    0.65
    0.82
    0.05*
    0.93

    0.00
    0.05
    0.89
    0.01
    0.00
    0.21
    0.00
    Figure 4D, relapse test
    Total responding
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor (with statistical outlier)
    SCH39166 Injection (vehicle, SCH39166), within-subjects
    SCH39166 Dose (1, 3 µg), between-subjects
    Lever (active, inactive) within-subjects
    SCH39166 Injection × Dose interaction
    SCH39166 Injection × Lever interaction
    SCH39166 Dose × Lever interaction
    SCH39166 Injection × Dose × Lever interaction

    F(1,18) = 0.6
    F(1,18) = 0.0
    F(1,18) = 44.2
    F(1,18) = 0.9
    F(1,18) = 0.3
    F(1,18) = 0.2
    F(1,18) = 0.5

    0.46
    0.99
    <0.001*
    0.36
    0.61
    0.68
    0.48

    0.03
    0.00
    0.71
    0.05
    0.02
    0.01
    0.03
    Figure 4E, reacquisition
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Without sex as a factor
    SCH39166 Injection (vehicle, SCH39166), within-subjects
    SCH39166 Dose (1, 3 µg), between-subjects
    SCH39166 Injection × Dose interaction

    F(1,18) = 0.2
    F(1,18) = 1.8
    F(1,18) = 0.1

    0.63
    0.20
    0.77

    0.01
    0.09
    0.01
    Figure 4G, re-training
    repeated-measures ANOVA
    With sex as a factor
    Fentanyl
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–2), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction


    F(1,18) = 2.2
    F(1,18) = 1.9
    F(1,18) = 0.4


    0.15
    0.19
    0.55


    0.11
    0.09
    0.02
    Figure 4H, discrete choice
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    With sex as a factor
    Preference score
    Sex (male, female), between-subjects
    Session (1–4), within-subjects
    Sex × Session interaction


    F(1,18) = 3.2
    F(3,54) = 0.1
    F(3,54) = 0.1


    0.09
    0.93
    0.94


    0.15
    0.01
    0.01
    • Partial Eta2 = proportion of explained variance.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 9 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 9, Issue 4
July/August 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lack of Causal Roles of Cannabinoid and Dopamine Neurotransmitter Systems in Orbitofrontal and Piriform Cortex in Fentanyl Relapse in Rats
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Lack of Causal Roles of Cannabinoid and Dopamine Neurotransmitter Systems in Orbitofrontal and Piriform Cortex in Fentanyl Relapse in Rats
Sarah M. Claypool, Sana Behdin, Sarah V. Applebey, Javier Orihuel, Zilu Ma, David J. Reiner
eNeuro 29 June 2022, 9 (4) ENEURO.0496-21.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0496-21.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Lack of Causal Roles of Cannabinoid and Dopamine Neurotransmitter Systems in Orbitofrontal and Piriform Cortex in Fentanyl Relapse in Rats
Sarah M. Claypool, Sana Behdin, Sarah V. Applebey, Javier Orihuel, Zilu Ma, David J. Reiner
eNeuro 29 June 2022, 9 (4) ENEURO.0496-21.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0496-21.2022
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • addiction
  • cannabinoids
  • dopamine
  • opioid
  • relapse
  • self-administration

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: Negative Results

  • In Vivo Injection of Anti-LGI1 Antibodies into the Rodent M1 Cortex and Hippocampus Is Ineffective in Inducing Seizures
  • Investigating the Role of Rhodopsin F45L Mutation in Mouse Rod Photoreceptor Signaling and Survival
  • Effect of the Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor Doxycycline on Human Trace Fear Memory
Show more Research Article: Negative Results

Cognition and Behavior

  • Deciding while acting - Mid-movement decisions are more strongly affected by action probability than reward amount
  • Environment Enrichment Facilitates Long-Term Memory Consolidation Through Behavioral Tagging
  • Effects of cortical FoxP1 knockdowns on learned song preference in female zebra finches
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.