Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: Confirmation, Disorders of the Nervous System

Confirmation of Decreased Rates of Cerebral Protein Synthesis In Vivo in a Mouse Model of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Rachel Michelle Saré, Anita Torossian, Inna Loutaev and Carolyn Beebe Smith
eNeuro 18 July 2022, 9 (4) ENEURO.0480-21.2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0480-21.2022
Rachel Michelle Saré
Section on Neuroadaptation and Protein Metabolism, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20814
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita Torossian
Section on Neuroadaptation and Protein Metabolism, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20814
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inna Loutaev
Section on Neuroadaptation and Protein Metabolism, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20814
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn Beebe Smith
Section on Neuroadaptation and Protein Metabolism, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20814
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Relative levels of tuberin in WT and Tsc2Mjg+/− mice in lysates of hippocampus and frontal cortex. Relative levels were measured by means of Western blots (A) with two treatments: control and 24 h after a 1-h exposure to isoflurane anesthesia. Data (normalized to WT control mice) were analyzed by means of ANOVA with genotype and treatment as between subject variables. In hippocampus (B) neither the genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,19) = 0.013, p = 0.912) nor the main effect of treatment (F(1,19) = 0.758, p = 0.395) was statistically significant, but the main effect of genotype (F(1,19) = 20.454, p < 0.001) was. In frontal cortex (C) neither the genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,19) = 0.265, p = 0.612) nor the main effect of treatment (F(1,19) = 1.189, p = 0.289) was statistically significant, but the main effect of genotype (F(1,19) = 20.115, p < 0.001) was. Bars represent the means ± SEM for six mice per group except for the isoflurane-exposed WT which had five mice. Regardless of treatment, tuberin levels were 25% and 24% lower in Tsc2Mjg+/− mice in hippocampus and frontal cortex, respectively.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Representative digitized parametric images of rCPS from WT (A, C) and Tsc2Mjg+/− (B, D) mice. Images illustrate the patterns of effects of the mutation on rCPS at the level of the frontal association cortex (A, B) and dorsal hippocampus (C, D). The colorbars on the right define the color scales for the images (upper and lower colorbars pertain to A, B and C, D, respectively). At both levels, images show that rCPS is decreased in the Tsc2Mjg+/− mouse compared with WT. Scale bar under D pertains to all images.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Relative levels of signaling proteins known to affect protein synthesis in lysates of hippocampus from WT and Tsc2Mjg+/− mice. Relative levels were measured by means of Western blots (A) with two treatments: control and 24 h after a 1-h exposure to isoflurane anesthesia. Data were analyzed by means of ANOVA with genotype and treatment as between subject variables (Table 3). Aligned dot plots (B–M) indicate protein expression (normalized to WT control mice). Solid horizontal lines represent means ± SEM for six WT control, five WT isoflurane-treated, six Tsc2Mjg+/− control, and six Tsc2Mjg+/− isoflurane-treated mice. Horizontal dashed line represents a relative expression of 1.0. For Akt Thr 308 (J) the genotype × treatment interaction was statistically significant and results of post hoc Bonferroni corrected t tests are shown on the figure; *0.01 ≤ p ≤ 0.05, **0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Relative levels of signaling proteins known to affect protein synthesis in lysates of frontal cortex from WT and Tsc2Mjg+/− mice. Relative levels were measured by means of Western blots (A) with two treatments: control and 24 h after a 1-h exposure to isoflurane anesthesia. Data were analyzed by means of ANOVA with genotype and treatment as between subject variables (Table 3). Aligned dot plots (B–M) indicate protein expression (normalized to WT control mice). Solid horizontal lines represent means ± SEM for six WT control, five WT isoflurane-treated, six Tsc2Mjg+/− control, and six Tsc2Mjg+/− isoflurane-treated mice. Horizontal dashed line represents a relative expression of 1.0.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Physiologic variables for mice prior to rCPS studies

    VariableWT (8)Tsc2 Mjg+/− (5)
    Age (d)96 ± 295 ± 2
    Body weight (g)41.0 ± 2.041.2 ± 3.2
    Hematocrit (%)49.5 ± 1.750.2 ± 1.8
    Mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg)112 ± 4113 ± 2
    Arterial blood glucose (mm)6.3 ± 0.36.2 ± 0.6
    Arterial plasma leucine (μm)137 ± 5127 ± 6
    • Values are the means ± SEM for the number of mice indicated in parentheses.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    rCPS (nmol/g/min) in WT and Tsc2 Mjg+/− mice

    RegionWTTsc2 Mjg+/−Difference (%)p value
    Cortex
     Frontal6.99 ± 0.48 (n = 8)4.82 ± 0.32 (n = 5)−310.008
     Parietal8.73 ± 0.50 (n = 7)5.50 ± 0.27 (n = 5)−37<0.001
     Auditory8.33 ± 0.53 (n = 5)5.22 ± 0.30 (n = 5)−37<0.001
     Visual8.85 ± 0.75 (n = 6)5.37 ± 0.34 (n = 4)−390.001
    Corpus callosum
     Medial2.94 ± 0.14 (n = 8)2.07 ± 0.12 (n = 5)−300.001
     Lateral3.31 ± 0.18 (n = 8)2.22 ± 0.14 (n = 5)−330.001
    Thalamus
     Anterodorsal nucleus14.67 ± 1.13 (n = 5)8.44 ± 0.86 (n = 4)−42<0.001
     Paraventricular nucleus13.94 ± 1.59 (n = 6)9.15 ± 0.73 (n = 4)−340.011
     Dorsomedial7.65 ± 0.39 (n = 6)4.64 ± 0.40 (n = 3)−39<0.001
     Lateral dorsal nucleus7.39 ± 0.48 (n = 6)4.50 ± 0.32 (n = 4)−39<0.001
     Medial geniculate nucleus7.87 ± 0.60 (n = 4)4.21 ± 0.53 (n = 5)−47<0.001
     Ventral posterior8.37 ± 0.62 (n = 8)5.41 ± 0.36 (n = 5)−350.005
    Hypothalamus
     Suprachiasmatic nucleus10.25 ± 0.82 (n = 5)6.96 ± 1.29 (n = 4)−320.007
     Paraventricular nucleus15.65 ± 0.85 (n = 8)9.97 ± 1.09 (n = 5)−360.002
     Supraoptic nucleus18.09 ± 1.67 (n = 6)9.52 ± 0.90 (n = 4)−47<0.001
     Basolateral amygdala8.87 ± 0.60 (n = 8)5.66 ± 0.36 (n = 5)−360.002
    Hippocampus
     Dorsal7.08 ± 0.39 (n = 8)4.81 ± 0.38 (n = 5)−320.002
     Ventral7.02 ± 0.43 (n = 6)4.18 ± 0.27 (n = 5)−41<0.001
    Cerebellum
     Interpeduncular nucleus9.05 ± 0.62 (n = 3)4.89 ± 0.56 (n = 3)−46<0.001
     Flocculus9.93 ± 0.88 (n = 4)4.01 ± 0.44 (n = 2)−60<0.001
     Arbor vitae3.00 ± 0.21 (n = 5)1.32 ± 0.14 (n = 4)−56<0.001
     Simple lobule10.13 ± 0.86 (n = 5)5.43 ± 0.64 (n = 3)−46<0.001
     Culmen3.63 ± 0.23 (n = 5)2.25 ± 0.09 (n = 3)−38<0.001
    • There were no statistically significant genotype differences.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    ANOVA results of Western blots of hippocampus

    ProteinInteractionMain effectF(df,error) valuep value
    pAKT Ser473Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.1900.668
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.0970.759
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 1.8200.193
    pAKT Thr308Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 6.7660.018*
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 30.807<0.001*
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 5.3340.032*
    pAMPKTreatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 1.8560.189
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.0180.895
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0190.893
    pCREBTreatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.1700.684
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.1950.663
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.5400.471
    peIF2αTreatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.1770.678
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.8370.372
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.6510.430
    pERKTreatment × Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.1550.699
    Treatment × BandF(1,19) = 0.0690.796
    Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.3280.574
    Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.6520.429
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.0010.971
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.2480.624
    BandF(1,19) = 127.210<0.001*
    pGSK3α/βTreatment × Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.6610.426
    Treatment × BandF(1,19) = 0.2270.639
    Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 1.2590.276
    Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.6920.416
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.3880.541
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.2620.614
    BandF(1,19) = 265.256<0.001*
    pmTORTreatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0320.861
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 4.7890.041*
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.1350.717
    p-p70 S6K Thr389Treatment × Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.1910.667
    Treatment × BandF(1,19) = 0.0960.760
    Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 1.1270.302
    Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0200.889
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.0460.832
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0030.955
    BandF(1,19) = 325.069<0.001*
    p-p70 S6K Thr421/Ser424Treatment × Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.2310.636
    Treatment × BandF(1,19) = 0.4630.504
    Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.0750.788
    Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) <0.0010.998
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.7620.394
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.9420.344
    BandF(1,19) = 140.106<0.001*
    pS6Treatment × Genotype × SiteF(1,19) = 1.3430.261
    Treatment × SiteF(1,19) = 0.4060.532
    Genotype × SiteF(1,19) = 0.5060.485
    Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.3370.569
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 6.3960.020*
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0920.765
    SiteF(1,19) = 38.962<0.001*
    • Values are the mean ± SEM for the number of mice indicated in parentheses. Whereas experiments were completed in eight WT and five Tsc2Mjg+/− mice, the number of mice analyzed depended on the quality of the autoradiograms at the level of each ROI. Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests showed that Tsc2Mjg+/− mice had statistically significantly lower rCPS in all brain regions analyzed.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    ANOVA results of Western blots of frontal cortex

    ProteinInteractionMain effectF(df,error) valuep value
    pAKT Ser473Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.1060.749
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.0300.865
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.3780.546
    pAKT Thr308Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.8510.368
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.1090.745
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0120.913
    pAMPKTreatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.7650.393
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 5.1660.035*
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 1.1150.304
    pCREBTreatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0430.838
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 2.6550.120
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0330.859
    peIF2αTreatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.2350.634
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.3700.550
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.2650.613
    pERKTreatment × Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 1.1740.292
    Treatment × BandF(1,19) = 0.5600.464
    Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.3030.588
    Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 2.0990.164
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.3500.561
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.4020.533
    BandF(1,19) = 145.346<0.001*
    pGSK3α/βTreatment × Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.9710.337
    Treatment × BandF(1,19) = 1.7580.201
    Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.0130.911
    Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.2400.630
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.5680.460
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0040.953
    BandF(1,19) = 260.590<0.001*
    pmTORTreatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0520.822
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.0340.856
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.0460.832
    p-p70 S6K Thr389Treatment × Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 2.2920.146
    Treatment × BandF(1,19) = 4.4510.048*
    Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.0010.975
    Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.8820.359
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.0900.767
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 1.2280.282
    BandF(1,19) = 180.660<0.001*
    p-p70 S6K Thr421/Ser424Treatment × Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.0850.773
    Treatment × BandF(1,19) = 0.0030.957
    Genotype × BandF(1,19) = 0.2790.603
    Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.2650.613
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.5350.473
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.1500.702
    BandF(1,19) = 30.355<0.001*
    pS6Treatment × Genotype × SiteF(1,19) < 0.0010.985
    Treatment × SiteF(1,19) < 0.0010.993
    Genotype × SiteF(1,19) = 0.0490.826
    Treatment × GenotypeF(1,19) = 0.9470.343
    TreatmentF(1,19) = 0.8130.378
    GenotypeF(1,19) = 6.2160.022*
    SiteF(1,19) = 6.6340.019*
    • ↵* Denotes statistical significance p ≤ 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    ANOVA results strain differences in physiological variables

    VariableInteractionMain effectF(df,error) valuep value
    Body weightStrain × GenotypeF(1,30) = 0.0130.911
    StrainF(1,30) = 103.935<0.001*
    GenotypeF(1,30) < 0.0010.990
    Arterial blood pressureStrain × GenotypeF(1,30) = 0.0010.981
    StrainF(1,30) = 2.3000.140
    GenotypeF(1,30) = 0.0650.801
    Arterial blood glucose concentrationStrain × GenotypeF(1,30) = 0.0650.801
    StrainF(1,30) < 0.0010.983
    GenotypeF(1,30) = 0.0.4390.513
    Arterial plasma leucine concentrationStrain × GenotypeF(1,30) = 0.4280.518
    StrainF(1,30) = 14.494<0.001*
    GenotypeF(1,30) = 2.1870.150
    • ↵*Denotes statistical significance p ≤ 0.05.

    • Comparison of physiological variables between the Tsc2Mjg+/− mice used in this study (values in Table 1) and Tsc2Djk+/− mice used in our previous study (Saré et al., 2018). Mean values in control and Tsc2Djk+/− mice, respectively, as follows: body weight: 98 ± 1 and 96 ± 2 g; arterial blood pressure: 109 ± 1 and 109 ± 2 mmHg; arterial blood glucose: 6.5 ± 0.4 and 6.1 ± 0.5 mm; arterial plasma leucine: 116 ± 4 and 111 ± 3 μm.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 9 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 9, Issue 4
July/August 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Confirmation of Decreased Rates of Cerebral Protein Synthesis In Vivo in a Mouse Model of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Confirmation of Decreased Rates of Cerebral Protein Synthesis In Vivo in a Mouse Model of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
Rachel Michelle Saré, Anita Torossian, Inna Loutaev, Carolyn Beebe Smith
eNeuro 18 July 2022, 9 (4) ENEURO.0480-21.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0480-21.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Confirmation of Decreased Rates of Cerebral Protein Synthesis In Vivo in a Mouse Model of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
Rachel Michelle Saré, Anita Torossian, Inna Loutaev, Carolyn Beebe Smith
eNeuro 18 July 2022, 9 (4) ENEURO.0480-21.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0480-21.2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • mTOR
  • protein synthesis
  • tuberous sclerosis

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: Confirmation

  • Neural Dynamics during Binocular Rivalry: Indications from Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
  • Viral Tracing Confirms Paranigral Ventral Tegmental Area Dopaminergic Inputs to the Interpeduncular Nucleus Where Dopamine Release Encodes Motivated Exploration
  • An Early Enriched Experience Drives an Activated Microglial Profile at Site of Corrective Neuroplasticity in Ten-m3 Knock-Out Mice
Show more Research Article: Confirmation

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • LINCs are vulnerable to epileptic insult and fail to provide seizure control via on-demand activation
  • Brain FNDC5/irisin expression in patients and mouse models of major depression
  • Increased physiological GDNF levels have no effect on dopamine neuron protection and restoration in a proteasome inhibition mouse model of Parkinson's disease
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.