Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Slow Inactivation of Sodium Channels Contributes to Short-Term Adaptation in Vomeronasal Sensory Neurons

Nicole Sarno, Andres Hernandez-Clavijo, Anna Boccaccio, Anna Menini and Simone Pifferi
eNeuro 29 April 2022, 9 (3) ENEURO.0471-21.2022; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0471-21.2022
Nicole Sarno
1Neurobiology Group, SISSA Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, 34136 Trieste, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andres Hernandez-Clavijo
1Neurobiology Group, SISSA Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, 34136 Trieste, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andres Hernandez-Clavijo
Anna Boccaccio
2Institute of Biophysics, National Research Council, 16149 Genova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anna Boccaccio
Anna Menini
1Neurobiology Group, SISSA Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, 34136 Trieste, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anna Menini
Simone Pifferi
1Neurobiology Group, SISSA Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, 34136 Trieste, Italy
3Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Simone Pifferi
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Diluted urine elicits spike activity in VSNs. A, Whole-cell current-clamp recordings from a VSN stimulated for 5 s with a high-K+ solution (25 mm KCl; black trace), diluted urine (1:50; green trace), or diluted artificial urine (1:50; gray trace). The black bar indicates the arrival of the solutions to the neuron based on the response to the high-K+ solution. B, Raster plot of urine responses of 10 different neurons stimulated for 5 s.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Spike frequency adaptation to repeated urine stimulations. A, Representative whole-cell current-clamp recordings from a VSN repetitively stimulated with diluted urine for 5 s with increasing intervals between pulses of 5, 10, 20, or 60 s, as indicated. Black bars at the top indicate the time of urine application. B, The number of spikes during the first and the second stimulation at the corresponding IPI is shown in the same row in A. The paired-pulse protocol was repeated three times in the same neuron. C, Scatter dot plot with the average ± SD of normalized spike frequency of the second stimulation with respect to the first stimulation for each IPI (n =10, Demsar’s test after Friedman test, p = 0.00029).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The duration of urine stimulation affects the extent of spike frequency adaptation. A, B, Representative whole-cell current-clamp recordings obtained stimulating VSNs with diluted urine for 2 s (A) or 10 s (B), with increasing intervals between pulses of 2, 5, 10, 20, or 60 s, as indicated. Black bars indicate the time of urine application. C, D, Scatter dot plots with the average ± SD of normalized spike frequencies for each IPI for urine pulses of 2 s (C) or 10 s (D; for C: n = 9, Demsar’s test after Friedman test (p = 0.045 for IPI 2 s; for D: n = 6; paired t test with Bonferroni correction after ANOVA for repeated measurements: p = 0.018 for IPI 2 s; p = 0.008 for IPI 5 s; and p = 0.036 for IPI 10 s).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    VSNs show spike frequency adaptation in response to repeated current steps. A, Representative whole-cell current-clamp recordings of a VSN repetitively stimulated with a 5 pA current step for 5 s with increasing intervals between steps of 2, 5, 10, 20, or 60 s, as indicated. Steps at the top indicate the time of current injection. B, Number of spikes during the first and the second stimulation at the corresponding IPI shown in the same row in A. C, Scatter dot plot with the average ± SD of the normalized spike frequency of the second with respect to the first stimulation for each IPI (n = 15; Demsar’s test after Friedman test: p = 7.5 * 10–5 for 2 s; p = 0.006 for 5 s).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    The duration of current step stimulation affects the extent of spike frequency adaptation. A, B, Representative whole-cell current-clamp recordings obtained stimulating VSNs with a 5 pA current step for 2 s (A) or 10 s (B), with increasing intervals between steps of 2, 5, 10, 20, or 60 s, as indicated. Steps at the top indicate the time of current injection. C, D, Scatter dot plots with the average ± SD of normalized spike frequencies for each IPI for current steps of 2 s (C) or 10 s (D; for C: n = 13; Demsar’s test after Friedman test, p = 0.005 for IPI 2 s; for D: n = 10; paired t test with Bonferroni correction after ANOVA for repeated measurements: p = 0.0019 for IPI 2 s; p = 0.01 for IPI 5 s; p = 0.01 for IPI 10 s).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Phase–plane plot analysis of action potentials from repeated stimulations. A, Phase–plane plots of the first action potential in response to a repeated urine stimulation of 10 s duration with increasing IPIs ranging from 2 to 60 s, as indicated. Continuous and dashed lines were calculated from the first action potential of the first and second urine pulses, respectively. B–D, Scatter dot plots with the average ± SD of the ratio between the maximal dV/dt values of the first action potentials at each IPI. Urine pulse durations of 10 s (B), 5 s (C), and 2 s (D; for B: n = 6; Demsar’s test after Friedman test: p = 0.0021 for IPI 2 s; p = 0.0041 for IPI 5 s; for C: n = 6; Friedman test, p = 0.89; for D: n = 9; Friedman test, p = 0.051). E, Phase–plane plots of the first action potential in response to a repeated 5 pA current step of 10 s duration with increasing IPIs ranging from 2 to 60 s, as indicated. Continuous and dashed lines were calculated from the first action potential of the first and second current steps, respectively. F–H, Scatter dot plots with the average ± SD of the ratio between the maximal dV/dt values of the first action potentials at each IPI. Current step durations of 10 s (F), 5 s (G), and 2 s (H; for F: n = 8; Demsar’s test after Friedman test: p = 0.00054 for IPI 2 s; p = 0.018 for IPI 5 s; for H: n = 14; Friedman test, p = 0.126).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Inactivation of Na+ currents in VSNs. A, Families of whole-cell voltage-gated inward currents recorded from a VSN elicited by voltage steps from −80 to +60 mV with 10 mV increments from a holding potential of −100 mV. The patch pipette contained a Cs+-based intracellular solution. The neuron was exposed successively to bath solutions containing 100 μm Cd2+ and 100 μm Cd2+ plus 2 μm TTX, as indicated. B, Current–voltage relations for the peak inward currents from the recordings in A. C, E, Current recordings from the same VSN shown in A in response to stimulation protocols to measure inactivation in the presence of 100 μm Cd2+. A test pulse was preceded by a prepulse at the indicated voltages of 30 ms (C) or 30 s (E) duration to measure fast and slow inactivation, respectively. In C, one every two traces is shown. D, F, Normalized currents versus membrane potential from the experiments shown in C and E were fitted with a Boltzmann equation with Vhalf = −46.7 ± 1.6 mV and k = 4.9 ± 1.3 mV (n = 8) for fast inactivation (D) and Vhalf = −50.6 ± 2.4 mV and k = 8.7 ± 1.3 mV (n = 6) and asymptotic value of A = 0.18 for slow inactivation (F).

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Time course of recovery of Na+ channels from inactivation induced by depolarization steps varying from 1 to 10 s duration. A, B, Representative whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings of Na+ currents in a VSN in the presence of 100 μm Cd2+. Currents were elicited by a paired-pulse protocol consisting of a depolarization prepulse from −80 to −20 mV of 1 s (A) or 10 s (B) duration followed by a short (10 ms) test pulse at increasing recovery intervals ranging from 1 to 15 s. The holding potential was −80 mV. For each IPI, the peak current measured at the test pulse was normalized to the prepulse peak current and superimposed. C, Scatter dot plots with the average ± SD of the normalized peak currents measured at 1 s after the prepulse of the indicated duration (t test with Bonferroni correction after ANOVA for repeated measurements: p =1.7 * 10−6 for 1 s; p = 1.97 * 10−6 for 2 s; p = 0.22 for 5 s; n = 14–17). D, Recovery from inactivation as a function of IPIs at the indicated prepulse duration. E, Scatter dot plot with the average ± SD of the time constants (τ) of recovery from slow inactivation (Dunnett’s test after ANOVA: p = 9.11 * 10−6 for 1 s; p = 3.97 * 10−5 for 2 s; p = 0.0045 for 5 s; n = 12–15).

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 9 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 9, Issue 3
May/June 16
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Slow Inactivation of Sodium Channels Contributes to Short-Term Adaptation in Vomeronasal Sensory Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Slow Inactivation of Sodium Channels Contributes to Short-Term Adaptation in Vomeronasal Sensory Neurons
Nicole Sarno, Andres Hernandez-Clavijo, Anna Boccaccio, Anna Menini, Simone Pifferi
eNeuro 29 April 2022, 9 (3) ENEURO.0471-21.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0471-21.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Slow Inactivation of Sodium Channels Contributes to Short-Term Adaptation in Vomeronasal Sensory Neurons
Nicole Sarno, Andres Hernandez-Clavijo, Anna Boccaccio, Anna Menini, Simone Pifferi
eNeuro 29 April 2022, 9 (3) ENEURO.0471-21.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0471-21.2022
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • adapation
  • sodium channels
  • vomeronasal

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • A progressive ratio task with costly resets reveals adaptive effort-delay tradeoffs
  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Odor Experience Stabilizes Glomerular Output Representations in Two Mouse Models of Autism
  • Neural Response Attenuates with Decreasing Inter-Onset Intervals Between Sounds in a Natural Soundscape
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.