| Effects of DHK, UCPH101 and TBOA on the fraction of correct responses in AIIs at various stimulus frequencies |
| 2-Hz stimulus frequency |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 7 |
| 200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 | Non-normal distribution | | | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 7 |
| 200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA | Normal distribution | | | 0.73 ± 0.08 | 7 |
a | Control vs DHK + UCPH | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | N/A | | 7 |
b | DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0313 | | 7 |
| 5-Hz stimulus frequency |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.93 ± 0.06 | 7 |
| 200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 7 |
| 200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA | Normal distribution | | | 0.49 ± 0.12 | 7 |
c | Control vs DHK + UCPH | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p > 0.9999 | | 7 |
d | DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0313 | | 7 |
| 10-Hz stimulus frequency |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.96 ± 0.04 | 7 |
| 200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 7 |
| 200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.27 ± 0.11 | 7 |
e | Control vs DHK + UCPH | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p > 0.9999 | | 7 |
f | DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0156 | | 7 |
| 20-Hz stimulus frequency |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 7 |
| 200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 7 |
| 200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA | Normal distribution | | | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 7 |
g | Control vs DHK + UCPH | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p > 0.9999 | | 7 |
h | DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0156 | | 7 |
| 50-Hz stimulus frequency |
| Control | Normal distribution | | | 0.81 ± 0.06 | 7 |
| 200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 | Normal distribution | | | 0.64 ± 0.08 | 7 |
| 200 μm DHK + 50 μm UCPH101 + 50 μm TBOA | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 7 |
i | Control vs DHK + UCPH | | Paired t test | p = 0.0533 | | 7 |
j | DHK + UCPH vs DHK + UCPH + TBOA | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.0156 | | 7 |
| |
| Effects of DHK alone on the fraction of correct responses in AIIs at various stimulus frequencies |
| 2-Hz stimulus frequency |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 5 |
| 200 μm DHK | Non-normal distribution | | | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 5 |
k | Control vs DHK | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | N/A | | 5 |
| 5-Hz stimulus frequency |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 5 |
| 200 μm DHK | Non-normal distribution | | | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 5 |
l | Control vs DHK | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | N/A | | 5 |
| 10-Hz stimulus frequency |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 5 |
| 200 μm DHK | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 5 |
m | Control vs DHK | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | N/A | | 5 |
| 20-Hz stimulus frequency |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 5 |
| 200 μm DHK | Non-normal distribution | | | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 5 |
n | Control vs DHK | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | N/A | | 5 |
| 50-Hz stimulus frequency |
| Control | Non-normal distribution | | | 0.88 ± 0.05 | 5 |
| 200 μm DHK | Normal distribution | | | 0.80 ± 0.10 | 5 |
o | Control vs DHK | | Wilcoxon signed-rank test | p = 0.5000 | | 5 |