Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Neuronal Excitability

Prenatal Opioid Exposure Impairs Endocannabinoid and Glutamate Transmission in the Dorsal Striatum

Gregory G. Grecco, Braulio Muñoz, Gonzalo Viana Di Prisco, Emma H. Doud, Brandon M. Fritz, Danielle Maulucci, Yong Gao, Amber L. Mosley, Anthony J. Baucum and Brady K. Atwood
eNeuro 8 April 2022, 9 (2) ENEURO.0119-22.2022; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0119-22.2022
Gregory G. Grecco
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
2Medical Scientist Training Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gregory G. Grecco
Braulio Muñoz
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gonzalo Viana Di Prisco
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma H. Doud
3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
4Center for Proteome Analysis, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandon M. Fritz
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danielle Maulucci
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yong Gao
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amber L. Mosley
3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
4Center for Proteome Analysis, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
5Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony J. Baucum
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
6Department of Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
7Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brady K. Atwood
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
7Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    PME changes the dorsal striatal proteome and leads to numerous network changes A–D, Volcano plots (left; blue circles, proteins decreased in PME vs PSE; red circles, proteins increased in PME vs PSE, which reach the level of significance) and heatmaps (right) identifying the top 30 differentially expressed proteins in the DLS of males (A) and females (B), and in the DMS of males (C) and females (D; Extended Data Figs. 1-1, 1-2, full dataset in the DLS and DMS, respectively). The top five hub proteins identified from the network of differentially expressed proteins are plotted as triangles on volcano plots. For more information, see Table 1 and Extended Data Figure 1-3. E, F, Pathway analysis of enriched KEGG and Reactome terms (represented as pink and blue dots, respectively) among the significant differentially expressed proteins for the DLS in males (E) and DMS in males (F). Highlighted and numbered terms include retrograde endocannabinoid signaling (1), alcoholism (2), cGMP–PKG signaling pathway (3), vesicle-mediated transport (4), opioid signaling (5), transmission across chemical synapses (6), L1CAM interactions (7), NGF-stimulated transcription (8), axon guidance (9), and nervous system development (10) in the DLS (E); and cGMP–PKG signaling pathway (1), axon guidance (2), sphingolipid signaling pathway (3), neuronal system (4), cell–cell communication (5), vesicle-mediated transport (6), axon guidance (7), nervous system development (8), and neurexins and neuroligins (9) the DMS (F; for full enrichment analysis results, see Extended Data Fig. 1-4; n = 8 PME (4 males, 4 females) and 8 PSE (4 males, 4 females).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    PME alters the dorsal striatal phosphoproteome and kinase pathways. A–D, Volcano plots (left; blue circles, phosphopeptides decreased in PME vs PSE; red circles, phosphopeptides increased in PME vs PSE, which reach the level of significance) and heatmaps (right) identifying the top 30 differentially expressed phosphopeptides the DLS in males (A) and females (B) and DMS males (C) and females (D; Extended Data Figs. 2-1, 2-2, full dataset in the DLS and DMS, respectively) Phosphorylated protein hubs of the network of differentially expressed phosphorylated proteins are identified as various triangle symbols on each respective volcano plot (Table 1, Extended Data Fig. 1-3 for more information). E–H, The results of a kinase substrate enrichment analysis demonstrating the top 30 kinases dysregulated. E–H, Right, Blue bars represent kinases decreased in PME versus PSE and red bars represents proteins increased in PME versus PSE, which reach the level of significance for DLS in males (E) and females (F) and DMS males (G) and females (H). Extended Data Figure 2-3, KSEA scores; Extended Data Figures 2-4, 2-5, 2-6, 2-7, coral treeplots. n = 8 PME mice (4 males, 4 females) and 8 PSE mice (4 males, 4 females).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Overlap in differentially abundant proteins and phosphopeptides. A–D, Venn diagrams demonstrating the overlap in significantly increased global proteins (blue), decreased global proteins (yellow), increased phosphopeptides (green), and decreased phosphopeptides (red) in PME relative to PSE mice for the DLS of males (A) and females (B) and DMS of males (C) and females (D).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    PME impairs medium spiny neuron basal glutamate transmission. A, Representative voltage-clamp traces of sEPSCs from MSNs of the DLS in PME (red) and PSE (blue) male (left) and female (right) adolescent offspring. Calibration: 500 ms, 15 pA. B, In the DLS, PME significantly reduced the frequency of sEPSC events (ANOVA: exposure, p = 0.0002). C–E, There was no effect present on amplitude (C), rise time (D), or decay time (E) in the DLS. n = 6 PME mice (3 males; 3 females), 37 neurons (18 males; 19 females), and 6 PSE mice (3 males; 3 females), 37 neurons (18 males; 19 females). F, Representative sEPSC traces from MSNs of the DMS in PME (red) and PSE (blue) male (left) and female (right) adolescent offspring. Calibration: 500 ms, 30 pA. G, H, In the DMS, there was not an effect of exposure on either the frequency of events (G) or the amplitude of responses (H). I, However, PME significantly reduced the rise time of sEPSCs (ANOVA: exposure, p = 0.047). J, The decay was not impacted by PME. n = 6 PME mice (3 males; 3 females), 27 neurons (12 males; 15 females); and 6 PSE mice (3 males; 3 females), 27 neurons (15 males; 12 females). *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    PME effects on AMPA/NMDA currents. A, Representative voltage-clamp traces of AMPA and NMDA current traces from MSNs of the DLS PME (red) and PSE (blue) male (left) and females (right) adolescent offspring. The cell was first held at −80 mV, and AMPAR-mediated EPSCs were electrically evoked. For the NMDAR current, the cell was then held at +40 mV, and an EPSC was again evoked. As the AMPAR component of EPSCs at −80 mV was not apparent 100 ms following the electrical stimulus (i.e., the measured current returned to baseline), the NMDAR-mediated portion of the EPSC at +40 mV was calculated as the average of the measured current over the following 25 ms (i.e., 100–125 ms poststimulus; see dotted lines in A for the PME-male trace). Calibration: 100 ms, 100 pA. B, In the DLS, a significant sex effect, but no exposure-related effects, was present on AMPA/NMDA current. n = 6 PME mice (3 males; 3 females), 25 neurons (13 males; 12 females); and 6 PSE mice (3 males; 3 females), 22 neurons (11 males; 11 females). C, Representative AMPA and NMDA current traces from MSNs of the DMS in PME (red) and PSE (blue) male (left) and female (right) adolescent offspring. Calibration: 100 ms, 100 pA. D, A significant sex effect was also present in the DMS, but no exposure-related effects were present. n = 6 PME mice (3 males; 3 females), 23 neurons (10 males; 13 females); and 6 PSE mice (3 males; 3 females), 24 neurons (13 males; 11 females). *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Excitability of dorsal striatal medium spiny neurons is minimally impacted by PME. A, Representative current-clamp traces of action potential firing from MSNs of the DLS in PME (red) and PSE (blue) male (left) and female (right) adolescent offspring. Calibration: 100 ms, 25 mV. B, In the DLS, action potential frequency at various current steps were not significantly different between exposures. C, Female PME MSNs did reveal a slight but significant increase in resting membrane potential compared with PSE-females (ANOVA: interaction, p = 0.0062; female PME vs female PSE, p = 0.032). D–G, No other exposure related effects were discovered for input resistance (D), threshold potential (E), peak action potential amplitude (F), or action potential half-width (G); n = 6 PME mice (3 males; 3 females), 36 neurons (18 males; 18 females); and 6 PSE mice (3 males; 3 females), 36 neurons (18 males; 18 females). H, Representative current-clamp traces of action potential firing from MSNs of the DMS in PME (red) and PSE (blue) male (left) and female (right) adolescent offspring. Calibration: 100 ms, 25 mV. I, J, In the DMS, the frequency of action potentials was not affected by sex or exposure (I), nor was the resting membrane potential (J). K, However, the input resistance was significantly decreased in PME-males compared with PSE-males (ANOVA: exposure × sex, p = 0.012; Sidak’s post hoc test, p = 0.014). L, PME did not alter the threshold potential. M, PME significantly increased the peak action potential amplitude, although this was primarily because of PME-males (ANOVA: exposure, p = 0.022; Sidak’s post hoc test, p = 0.017). N, The action potential half-width was not significantly impacted by PME. n = 7 PME mice (4 males; 3 females), 34 neurons (18 males; 16 females); and 6 PSE mice (3 males; 3 females), 36 neurons (20 males; 16 females). *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    PME ablates endocannabinoid-mediated long-term depression in the DLS of males. A, Representative electrically eEPSC traces from the DLS before and after HFS (three trains of 1 s, 100 Hz stimulation separated by 10 s) plus postsynaptic depolarization (0 mV) in PME (red) and PSE (blue) male mice. Calibration: 50 ms, 100 pA. B, Time series of eEPSC amplitude averages in the DLS over the 35 min recording session. Blue circles, PSE-males; red circles, PME-males. C, D, HFS plus depolarization was capable of significantly reducing the eEPSC amplitude compared with baseline in PSE-males (paired t test: p < 0.0001; C), but not in PME-males (paired t test: p = 0.42; D). E, The percentage reduction in eEPSC amplitude during the final 10 min of recording was significantly blunted in PME-males compared with PSE-males (Student’s t test, p = 0.0007); n = 5 PME mice (7 neurons) and 5 PSE mice (7 neurons). F, Representative eEPSC traces from the DMS before and after HFS plus depolarization in PME (red) and PSE (blue) male mice. G, Time series of eEPSC amplitude averages in the DMS over the 35 min recording session. Blue circles, PSE-males; red circles, PME-males. H, I, In the DMS, the protocol reduced eEPSC amplitudes in both PSE-males (paired t test: p = 0.037; H) and PME-males, although the p value did not quite reach the level of significance in PME-males (paired t test, p = 0.079; I). J, The percentage reduction in eEPSC amplitude during the final 10 min of recording was not significantly different between exposure groups (Student’s t test, p = 0.53); n = 5 PME mice (7 neurons) and 5 PSE mice (8 neurons). K, Representative eEPSC traces from the DLS before and after HFS plus depolarization in PME (red) and PSE (blue) female mice. L, Time series of eEPSC amplitude averages in the DLS over the 35 min recording session. Blue circles, PSE-females; red circles, PME-females. M, N, HFS plus depolarization did not impact eEPSC amplitudes in either PSE-females (paired t test, p = 0.31; M) or PME-females (paired t test, p = 0.69; N). O, The percentage reduction in eEPSC amplitude did not differ between exposure groups (Student’s t test, p = 0.49); n = 6 PME mice (6 neurons) and 6 PSE mice (6 neurons). P, Representative eEPSC traces from the DMS before and after HFS plus depolarization in PME (red) and PSE (blue) female mice. Q, Time series of eEPSC amplitude averages in the DMS over the 35 min recording session. Blue circles, PSE-females; red circles, PME-females. R, HFS plus depolarization produced a mild potentiation in PSE-females as eEPSC amplitudes increased (paired t test, p = 0.046). S, However, PME-females exhibited a significant reduction in eEPSC from baseline (paired t test, p = 0.032). T, The percentage change in eEPSC amplitude was significantly different in the DMS between exposure groups (Student’s t test, p = 0.0037); n = 6 PME mice (7 neurons) and 6 PSE mice (7 neurons). *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Direct activation CB1 receptors does not rescue endocannabinoid-mediated long-term depression in the DLS of PME-males. A, Representative eEPSC traces from the DLS before and after WIN55,212-2 (1 μm, 10 min) application in PME (red) and PSE (blue) male mice. Calibration: 50 ms, 100 pA. B, Time series of electrically eEPSC amplitude averages in the DLS over the 35 min recording session. Blue circles, PSE-males; red circles, PME-males. C, D, Application of the CB1 agonist WIN55,212-2 (1 μm) significantly reduced the eEPSC amplitude compared with baseline in PSE-males (paired t test, p = 0.0001; C), but not in PME-males (paired t test, p = 0.18; D). E, The percentage reduction in eEPSC amplitude during the final 10 min of recording was significantly different between exposure groups (Student’s t test, p = 0.018); n = 3 PME mice (8 neurons) and 3 PSE mice (8 neurons). F, Representative eEPSC traces from the DMS before and after WIN55,212-2-2 (1 μm, 10 min) application in PME (red) and PSE (blue) mice. G, Time series of eEPSC averages in the DMS over the 35 min recording session. Blue circles, PSE-males; red circles, PME-males. H, I, Application of the CB1 agonist WIN55,212-2 significantly reduced the eEPSC amplitude compared with baseline in both PSE-males (paired t test, p = 0.032; H) and in PME-males (paired t test, p = 0.015; I). J, The percentage reduction in eEPSC amplitude did not differ between PME-males and PSE-males (Student’s t test, p = 0.31); n = 2 PME mice (4 neurons) and 2 PSE mice (4 neurons). *p < 0.05.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Hub proteins from differential protein and phosphopeptide expression networks in the DMS and DLS of males and females

    GeneProteinMCC
    DLS hub proteins for global proteome network in males
     Copb1Coatomer subunit β-1242
     Dynll2Dynein light chain 2, cytoplasmic241
     Capza2F-actin-capping protein subunit α-2240
     Copb2Coatomer subunit β-2240
     Copg1Coatomer subunit γ-1240
    DMS hub proteins for global proteome network in males
     Btbd1BTB/POZ domain-containing protein 15760
     Asb6Ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 65760
     Kbtbd7Kelch repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 75760
     Fbxw10F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 105760
     Fbxo7F-box only protein 75760
    DLS hub proteins for phosphoproteome network in males
     Sptbn1Spectrin beta chain, nonerythrocytic 17
     Ank2Ankyrin-26
     Ank3Ankyrin-36
     Ank1Ankyrin-16
     Rpl3760S ribosomal protein L376
    DLS hub proteins for phosphoproteome network in females
     Gapvd1GTPase-activating protein and VPS9 domain-containing protein 16
     Reps1RalBP1-associated Eps domain-containing protein 16
     Arrb1β-Arrestin-16
     Dnm3Dynamin-36
     Dlg2Disks large homolog 21
    DMS hub proteins for phosphoproteome network in males
     Hspa8Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein4
     CaskPeripheral plasma membrane protein CASK3
     Epb4.1l1Band 4.1-like protein 13
     Epn2Epsin-22
     Camk2bCalcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II subunit β2
    DMS hub proteins for phosphoproteome network in females
     VclVinculin4
     Cyfip1Cytoplasmic FMR1-interacting protein 12
     Lrrc7Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 72
     Arhgef2Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 21
     CaskPeripheral plasma membrane protein CASK1
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Estimated changes in kinase activity from differential phosphopeptide expression networks in the DMS and DLS of males and females (FDR, <0.05)

    Gene nameKinase nameEnrichment z scoreFDR
    DLS of males
     Cdk9Cyclin-dependent kinase 96.68<0.0001
     Ttbk2Tau tubulin kinase 23.870.0039
     PrkcaProtein kinase C α3.410.0154
    DLS of females
     Pak1P21 activated kinase 1−4.110.0003
     Pak2P21 activated kinase 2−4.110.0003
     PrkacaProtein kinase cAMP-activated catalytic subunit α−4.110.0003
     Clk4CDC like kinase 4−2.710.0222
     PrkcdProtein kinase C δ−2.710.0222
     PrkciProtein kinase C ι−2.710.0222
     Rock2Rho associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2−2.710.0222
     PrkczProtein kinase C ζ−2.440.0424
    DMS of males
     Cdk9Cyclin dependent kinase 95.83<0.0001
     PrkciProtein kinase C ι−4.150.0011
     Pak3P21 activated kinase 3−3.580.0078
     Pak1P21 activated kinase 1−3.220.0217
    DMS of females
     Csnk1ECasein kinase 1 ϵ3.380.0083
     Clk2CDC like kinase 23.470.0083
     Mapk11Mitogen-activated protein kinase 11−3.400.0083
     Mapk12Mitogen-activated protein kinase 12−3.400.0083
     Cdc42BpaCDC42 binding protein kinase α−3.540.0083
     Cdc42BpbCDC42 binding protein kinase β−3.540.0083
     Sgk3Serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase family member 33.160.0151
     Prkaa2Protein kinase AMP-activated catalytic subunit α 23.010.0221
     PrkciProtein kinase C ι2.900.0279
     Cdk9Cyclin-dependent kinase 92.650.0427
     Prkaa1Protein kinase AMP-activated catalytic subunit α 12.670.0427
     Clk1CDC like kinase 12.720.0427
     Mapk13Mitogen-activated protein kinase 13−2.650.0427

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Figure 1-1

    Global proteome DLS. This file contains the full proteomics results for males and females in the DLS. Download Figure 1-1, XLS file.

  • Figure 1-2

    Global proteome DMS. This file contains the full proteomics results for males and females in the DMS. Download Figure 1-2, XLS file.

  • Figure 1-3

    Hub protein analysis. This file contains the full hub protein analysis results for males and females in both the DLS and DMS. Download Figure 1-3, XLS file.

  • Figure 1-4

    Pathway analysis. This file contains the full KEGG and Reactome pathway analysis results for males and females in both the DLS and DMS. Download Figure 1-4, XLS file.

  • Figure 2-1

    Phosphoproteome DLS. This file contains the full phosphoproteomics results for males and females in the DLS. Download Figure 2-1, XLS file.

  • Figure 2-2

    Phosphoproteome DMS. This file contains the full phosphoproteomics results for males and females in the DMS. Download Figure 2-2, XLS file.

  • Figure 2-3

    KSEA kinase scores. This file contains the full KSEA analysis results and kinase scores for males and females in both the DLS and DMS. Download Figure 2-3, XLS file.

  • Figure 2-4

    Kinome treeplots representing the full KSEA results for males in the DLS. The results from kinase-substrate enrichment analysis were mapped onto kinome treeplots via Coral in which branch color corresponds to significance level, node color corresponds to the z score of enrichment, and node size corresponds to the magnitude of enrichment for kinase pathways in the DLS of males. Download Figure 2-4, TIF file.

  • Figure 2-5

    Kinome treeplots representing the full KSEA results for females in the DLS. The results from kinase-substrate enrichment analysis were mapped onto kinome treeplots via Coral in which branch color corresponds to significance level, node color corresponds to the z score of enrichment, and node size corresponds to the magnitude of enrichment for kinase pathways in the DLS of females. Download Figure 2-5, TIF file.

  • Figure 2-6

    Kinome treeplots representing the full KSEA results for males in the DMS. The results from kinase-substrate enrichment analysis were mapped onto kinome treeplots via Coral in which branch color corresponds to significance level, node color corresponds to the z score of enrichment, and node size corresponds to the magnitude of enrichment for kinase pathways in the DMS of males. Download Figure 2-6, TIF file.

  • Figure 2-7

    Kinome treeplots representing the full KSEA results for females in the DMS. The results from kinase-substrate enrichment analysis were mapped onto kinome treeplots via Coral in which branch color corresponds to significance level, node color corresponds to the z score of enrichment, and node size corresponds to the magnitude of enrichment for kinase pathways in the DMS of females. Download Figure 2-7, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 9 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 9, Issue 2
March/April 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prenatal Opioid Exposure Impairs Endocannabinoid and Glutamate Transmission in the Dorsal Striatum
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Prenatal Opioid Exposure Impairs Endocannabinoid and Glutamate Transmission in the Dorsal Striatum
Gregory G. Grecco, Braulio Muñoz, Gonzalo Viana Di Prisco, Emma H. Doud, Brandon M. Fritz, Danielle Maulucci, Yong Gao, Amber L. Mosley, Anthony J. Baucum, Brady K. Atwood
eNeuro 8 April 2022, 9 (2) ENEURO.0119-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0119-22.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Prenatal Opioid Exposure Impairs Endocannabinoid and Glutamate Transmission in the Dorsal Striatum
Gregory G. Grecco, Braulio Muñoz, Gonzalo Viana Di Prisco, Emma H. Doud, Brandon M. Fritz, Danielle Maulucci, Yong Gao, Amber L. Mosley, Anthony J. Baucum, Brady K. Atwood
eNeuro 8 April 2022, 9 (2) ENEURO.0119-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0119-22.2022
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • endocannabinoid
  • methadone
  • plasticity
  • prenatal opioid exposure
  • proteomics

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Deletion of endocannabinoid synthesizing enzyme DAGLα in Pcp2-positive cerebellar Purkinje cells decreases depolarization-induced short-term synaptic plasticity, reduces social preference, and heightens anxiety
  • Release of extracellular matrix components after human traumatic brain injury
  • Action intentions reactivate representations of task-relevant cognitive cues
Show more Research Article: New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • Tolerance in Thalamic Paraventricular Nucleus Neurons Following Chronic Treatment of Animals with Morphine
  • Investigating Mechanically Activated Currents from Trigeminal Neurons of Nonhuman Primates
  • Postnatal Development of Dendritic Morphology and Action Potential Shape in Rat Substantia Nigra Dopaminergic Neurons
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.