Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Impaired Subcortical Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Tones in Mice Deficient for Cacna2d3, a Risk Gene for Autism Spectrum Disorders in Humans

Gerhard Bracic, Katrin Hegmann, Jutta Engel and Simone Kurt
eNeuro 11 April 2022, 9 (2) ENEURO.0118-22.2022; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0118-22.2022

Abstract

Temporal processing of complex sounds is a fundamental and complex task in hearing and a prerequisite for processing and understanding vocalization, speech, and prosody. Here, we studied response properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) in mice lacking Cacna2d3, a risk gene for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). The α2δ3 auxiliary Ca2+ channel subunit encoded by Cacna2d3 is essential for proper function of glutamatergic synapses in the auditory brainstem. Recent evidence has shown that much of auditory feature extraction is performed in the auditory brainstem and IC, including processing of amplitude modulation (AM). We determined both spectral and temporal properties of single- and multi-unit responses in the IC of anesthetized mice. IC units of α2δ3−/− mice showed normal tuning properties yet increased spontaneous rates compared with α2δ3+/+. When stimulated with AM tones, α2δ3−/− units exhibited less precise temporal coding and reduced evoked rates to higher modulation frequencies (fm). Whereas first spike latencies (FSLs) were increased for only few modulation frequencies, population peak latencies were increased for fm ranging from 20 to 100 Hz in α2δ3−/− IC units. The loss of precision of temporal coding with increasing fm from 70 to 160 Hz was characterized using a normalized offset-corrected (Pearson-like) correlation coefficient, which appeared more appropriate than the metrics of vector strength. The processing deficits of AM sounds analyzed at the level of the IC indicate that α2δ3−/− mice exhibit a subcortical auditory processing disorder (APD). Similar deficits may be present in other mouse models for ASDs.

Significance Statement

Human speech and animal vocalization contain amplitude-modulated (AM) sounds. Perception of AM sounds requires correct processing of auditory signals in cochlea, auditory brainstem and the inferior colliculus (IC). We have analyzed the ability of IC neurons (units) to extract AM sounds in mice lacking the Cacna2d3 gene encoding the α2δ3 subunit of voltage-activated calcium channels, which are important for proper function of excitatory synapses. With increasing modulation frequencies, units of α2δ3−/− mice showed reduced evoked activity, less precise temporal coding, and longer response latencies compared with units of α2δ3+/+ mice. Humans lacking Cacna2d3 exhibit genetic autism, a neurodevelopmental disorder often accompanied by impaired auditory processing. We propose Cacna2d3 as a candidate gene linking an auditory processing disorder (APD) with genetic autism.

Introduction

Mammals have evolved an extremely powerful auditory system as their communication largely relies on producing and decoding signals from conspecifics, i.e., vocalizations in animals or speech in humans (Woolley and Portfors, 2013; Knörnschild, 2014). Sensory information transduced by hair cells and transmitted from cochlear spiral ganglion neurons in the cochlea is processed by multiple auditory nuclei of the brainstem (cochlear nuclear complex, superior olivary complex, nuclei of the lateral lemniscus), the midbrain (inferior colliculus; IC), and the auditory thalamus before the information enters the cortex for perception (Malmierca and Merchán, 2004). Specialized networks of the auditory brainstem extract features of acoustic information, e.g., onset, offset, space, pitch, and periodicities such as amplitude modulations (AMs) and carrier fine structure (Eggermont, 2015). Notably, vocalization/speech sounds are comprised of AM signals. The aim of the study was to analyze synchronized neuronal responses (phase-locking) evoked by AM tones. These are typically restricted to about fm = 200 Hz as shown by others for the rat (100–200 Hz), the guinea pig (below 150 Hz; for review, see Joris et al., 2004), and for mice (below 200 Hz; Walton et al., 2002).

The central part of the IC contains units that are specialized for processing temporally modulated sound (Langner, 1992; Krishna and Semple, 2000). Recently it became clear that processing of complex sounds is largely performed by the auditory brainstem and the IC, i.e., in subcortical regions (Pressnitzer et al., 2008; Pannese et al., 2015; Felix et al., 2018; Kopp-Scheinpflug and Linden, 2020).

(Central) auditory processing disorders ([C]APD) are characterized by an impaired capacity to discriminate complex or rapidly changing sounds such as speech despite normal hearing thresholds (American Academy of Audiology Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2010; Bellis and Bellis, 2015; Wilson, 2019; Dillon and Cameron, 2021). Genetic forms of APD studied in mice have revealed that even small changes in first spike latency (FSL) or their variability (jitter) in auditory processing can lead to APD. Candidate genes code for cytoskeletal components (beta4spectrin), synaptic proteins (complexin), or ion channels such as Kv1.1, Kv3.3, α7-nAChR, and α2δ3 (Kopp-Scheinpflug and Tempel, 2015; Felix et al., 2019).

The gene Cacna2d3 encodes the α2δ3 auxiliary subunit of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Catterall et al., 2005; Dolphin, 2012). α2δ3 mRNA is strongly expressed in spiral ganglion neurons, in the dorsal and ventral cochlear nucleus, the superior olivary complex, and in some neurons of the IC (Cole et al., 2005; Neely et al., 2010; Pirone et al., 2014). Mice lacking Cacna2d3 show nearly normal hearing thresholds and normal hair cells yet distorted waveforms of auditory brainstem responses (Neely et al., 2010; Pirone et al., 2014). Notably, malformed and functionally impaired auditory nerve (endbulb of Held) synapses resulted in decreased growth functions and increased FSL of 1.0 ms of postsynaptic action potentials (APs) of bushy cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus in these mice (Pirone et al., 2014). In an auditory discrimination learning experiment, α2δ3−/− mice were able to discriminate pure tones (PTs; 7 vs 12 kHz) but failed to discriminate AM tones with a carrier of 12 kHz and modulation frequencies (fm) of 20 versus 40 Hz (Pirone et al., 2014).

Loss of function mutations of Cacna2d3 have been recently identified as risk mutations for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in humans (Iossifov et al., 2012; Girirajan et al., 2013; De Rubeis et al., 2014). Notably, children with ASD frequently show impaired sensory processing, especially impaired auditory processing at the level of the auditory brainstem and midbrain (Alcántara et al., 2012; O’Connor, 2012; Robertson and Baron-Cohen, 2017; Scott et al., 2018; Jones et al., 2020).

In this study we examined neuronal responses as single- and multi-units recorded in the IC, which are highly responsive to AM tones, in ketamine-xylaxine anesthetized mice. Whereas spectral processing was not affected in Cacna2d3-deficient mice, temporal processing was impaired resulting in a reduced ability to follow AM tones with fm > 70 Hz. Overall, mice lacking the gene Cacna2d3, a risk gene for ASD, represent a model for a subcortical APD.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Mice with a targeted deletion of the Cacna2d3 gene coding for α2δ3 with insertion of a bacterial β-galactosidase under its promoter (B6.129P2-Cacna2d3tm1Dgen) were generated by Deltagen (Neely et al., 2010) and purchased through The Jackson Laboratory. They were crossed on a C57Bl/6N background (Charles River) for at least 10 generations. For electrophysiological recordings, seven α2δ3−/− mice (knock-out, five males, two females) and five α2δ3+/+ (wild type, two males, three females) of both sexes from heterozygous breedings (littermates) at the age of 12 ± 2 weeks were used. Animals were housed in a temperature-controlled animal facility with free access to food and water and a 12/12 h light/dark cycle.

The animal care, use and experimental protocols followed the national and institutional guidelines, and were reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare Commissioner and the Regional Board of Animal Experimentation. All experiments were performed in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive (86/609/EEC).

Surgical procedure

A ketamine-xylazine anesthesia was injected intraperitoneally before performing the surgery and recording. The initial mixture was 6 mg/kg xylazine (Rompun 2%; Bayer Vital), 120 mg/kg ketamine (Ketamin 10%; Bela-Pharm GmbH & Co KG), and 0.16 mg/kg atropine sulfate (B. Braun Melsungen AG). During surgery and recordings, the adequate anesthetic level was maintained by injecting 30% of the initial anesthesia mixture about every 20 min. Body temperature was maintained at 38°C with a custom-made feedback-controlled heating pad. Fur, skin and periosteum were removed from the dorsal surface of the skull. A bonding agent (Gluma Comfort Bond; Heraeus Kulzer) was spread over the fixed skull and a 3-cm-long aluminum bar weighing 0.4 g (for head fixation during the experiment) was fixed on the frontal bones with UV-hardening dental cement (Ivoclar vivadent). An insect needle (diameter, 0.25 mm; Fine Science Tools) serving as reference electrode was inserted into the skull touching the brain.

Acoustic stimulation and stimulus program

Recordings of the animals were performed in an anechoic, sound-attenuated chamber. The experimental sessions lasted between 8 and 22 h. The animals were killed at the end of the experiment by an overdose of the narcotic mixture.

Acoustic stimuli were presented free-field via a loudspeaker (Schallwandler W06; Manger). The distance from the animal’s head to the loudspeaker was 30 cm with an angle of 45°. To measure the speaker’s output a condensor microphone (Brüel & Kjær 4135; Brüel & Kjær) was placed between the ears. The signal of the microphone was monitored with a measuring amplifier (Brüel & Kjær 2633; Brüel & Kjær) and read in dB sound pressure level (SPL). The frequency spectrum was controlled with a spectrum analyzer (Ono Sokki Multi-purpose FFT Analyzer CF-5220; Ono Sokki Technology). In the intensity range from the microphone’s noise floor (23.5 dB SPL) to the highest amplitude of the presented tones (70 dB SPL), no additional distortions were detected. Acoustic stimuli (PTs and AM tones) were generated with an NI-PCI 6711 card (National Instruments) and controlled with MATLAB software (MATLAB version 7.3.0 R2006b; The MathWorks). After the signal was transmitted via a BNC unit (BNC-2120; National Instruments) to a computer-controlled attenuator (gPAH; g-tec) it was sent via an audio amplifier (Denon, PMA-1060) to the loudspeaker. The frequency characteristics of the loudspeaker was adjusted by ±5 dB by the software in the whole frequency range used in the experiments (1–64 kHz).

For the acoustic stimulation, PTs were presented for 200 ms (including 5-ms rise and fall times) randomly with 15 repetitions for each frequency at constant intensity of 70 dB SPL and an intertone interval of 1000 ms. The frequency range was split into 16 logarithmically spaced frequencies to determine the best frequency (BF) of the unit. The individual BF of every unit is the frequency with the highest evoked rate, and was taken as carrier frequency (fc) for the stimulation with AM tones. For AM tones, the same adjustments for SPL (70 dB, which was well above the hearing thresholds respectively the thresholds of the CF) and intertone interval were applied but the stimulus duration was 500 ms. The modulation frequency (fm) intervals of AM tones were adapted by dividing them into 20 parts in steps of 5 or 10 Hz depending on the phase-locking of the unit (see below). All AM tones were sinusoidally modulated signals with a modulation depth of 100%.

Tuning curves, which describe the sensitivity of a unit as a function of frequency, were recorded using a tone duration of 100 ms. Each tone was presented randomly at 16 logarithmically spaced frequencies in the frequency range of 1–64 kHz with 10 repetitions each with an interstimulus interval of 600 ms. SPL ranged from 0 to 70 dB SPL in steps of 10 dB to determine the unit’s receptive field.

Electrophysiological recordings

Recordings were performed from both sides of the IC in a stereotactic frame. Recording depth ranged from 200 to 1600 μm from the surface. In total, we recorded from 162 single- and multi-units of α2δ3−/− and from 179 single- and multi-units of α2δ3+/+ mice. Tungsten electrodes (impedance 1 MΩ; Microelectrode Tungsten Kapton, TM 33A10KT; World Precision Instruments) were inserted orthogonally into the IC with a micromanipulator (MM 33; Märzhäuser). For each further recording site, the electrodes were advanced in depth in 200-μm intervals. Extracellular neuronal signals were collected and amplified via a headstage (HST/8o50-G1-GR Omnetics, Headstage; Plexon), transmitted to a preamplifier and bandpass filter (PBX2/16SP-G50; Plexon; 50 000-fold amplification; filter bandwidth, 100 Hz to 8 kHz), and sent to a recording system (MAP; Plexon) and oscilloscope (Yokogawa DL 708E) for audiovisual control of the recordings.

To characterize the units by their response patterns to the acoustic stimulation, a spike analysis software (sort client version 2.3.4; Plexon) was used. Offline-sorting with principal component analysis accepted single- and multi-units up to three units. After stimulation with PTs, the BF of each unit was estimated through the highest evoked rate, which was determined after subtracting the spontaneous activity. Thereafter, the units were stimulated with AM tones up to an fm of 100 or 200 Hz, respectively. To identify the highest modulation frequency at which the neuronal responses were still synchronous (phase-locked) with the AM stimulation, the vector strength (Goldberg and Brown, 1969; Greenwood, 1986) was calculated for a first quick evaluation. The distribution of the neuronal responses was checked for randomness using a Rayleigh test for every modulation frequency at a significance level of 0.01 (Batschelet, 1965; Mardia, 1972). Those units that phase-locked up to fm = 100 Hz were further stimulated up to 200 Hz in 10-Hz steps.

Data analysis

Reponses to stimulation with PTs and AM tones were recorded and analyzed with MATLAB (for PTs) and custom software implemented in C++ (for AM tones). For PT stimulation, the BF was determined, which is the tone frequency that generates the highest evoked discharge rate.

For AM tones, we calculated several parameters describing temporal characteristics of all units and of the population, respectively. For every fm from 10 to 160 Hz in steps of 10 Hz, we searched for those units in which the fc was equal to the BF in both genotypes. First, we calculated the spontaneous discharge rate of the population, i.e., the discharge rate of the population without a stimulus, as mean value across 15 repetitions of all units in a period of 500 ms before the AM stimulus. The spike times of every unit and for the population were binned into a peristimulus time histogram (PSTH) with 200-μs resolution. All further calculations were done with this PSTH. Then we calculated the FSL of a unit, which is defined by the time when the first spike of a unit elicited by the stimulus exceeded its spontaneous rate by 2 SDs. The median of all unit’s FSL is the FSL of the population (Anderson and Linden, 2016). To calculate various results of the neuronal responses to a stimulus both per period of the AM (evoked rate, peak latency) and during the entire stimulus (peak latencies, vector strength, correlation coefficients), spike trains of individual units and population were convolved by a Gaussian kernel σ (Eq. 1): σ=80 Hzfmms, (1)superposed and then compiled to a convolved population PSTH (CPSTH) with time bins of 200 μs. This Gaussian kernel is similar as the one used by Bendor and Wang (2007), however, our SD is a function of the fm to avoid too strong smoothing with increasing fm on the one hand and keep a reasonable resolution on the other hand. Minimum points of this CPSTH define start and end of the periods in response to the stimulus. After that, the evoked rate of the population per period was calculated across all periods of AM stimuli by subtracting spontaneous discharge rate plus 2 SDs. Further, we calculated the vector strength of the population without those periods of the response corresponding to the first 100 ms to avoid distortions by the onset response. After peak latencies had been calculated per period (omitting the first 100 ms) for every unit, the peak latency and jitter of the population and the mean peak latency were calculated. Peak latency was defined as the time lag from the period’s start of the stimulus to the dedicated maximum of a normalized cross-correlation histogram (NCCH). NCCHs were calculated with one period of the stimulus as a reference signal (r[n]) and the PSTH of (1) every unit and (2) of the population, respectively (see Eq. 2): NCCH[k]=∑n=1Nr[n]⋅PSTH[n + k]∑n=1N(r[n])2⋅∑n=1N(PSTH[n])2. (2)

Normalization of the cross-correlation function was performed without those periods corresponding to the first 100 ms of the neuronal response as was done in calculating the vector strength. The peak latency of the population is the mean value of the individual period’s peak latencies of the population, and the jitter is defined by the SD. Mean peak latency was calculated as the mean of the peak latencies of each individual unit. In addition, we calculated peak latencies by the time lag from the period’s start of the stimulus to the dedicated maximum in the CPSTH. Finally, we used the highest correlation coefficient per period of the NCCH as an additional information to assess the neuronal response. For each modulation frequency, we calculated a mean cross-correlation coefficient CCNC as mean value of the coefficients per period. The reference signal as well as the neuronal response have only positive values, so the calculated mean cross-correlation coefficients are in a possible range of 0 (no correlation) and 1 (identical signal). As the modulation frequency increases, the periodic time of the modulation signal respectively the reference signal decreases. The ratio of the duration of the reference signal to the duration of the examined periods (400 ms) of the neuronal response therefore becomes smaller and smaller and so do the correlation coefficients. To compensate for this effect, mean correlation coefficients at different modulation frequencies were scaled by multiplying them with the square root of the number of the considered periods (see Eq. 3): CC=(1M⋅∑i=1MCC[i])⋅M. (3)

A cross-correlation would result in positive values even if the waveform per period was completely flat with evoked rates >0. Therefore, we performed the same calculations with offset-corrected signals to avoid this effect. As a result, the reference signal became symmetrical to the zero baseline (s[n]). Further, the mean of the considered periods of the PSTH (400 ms) for every modulation frequency was subtracted from those PSTHs. The principle of calculation is basically identical to the calculation of Pearson’s correlation coefficient, resulting in a Pearson-like correlation histogram (PCH) with values ranging from −1 to 1 (Eq. 4): PCH[k]=∑n=1Ns[n]⋅(PSTH[n + k]−PSTH¯)∑n=1N(s[n])2⋅∑n=1N(PSTH[n]−PSTH¯)2. (4)

The Pearson-like (mean) correlation coefficients (CCPC) was calculated according to Equation 3.

To analyze tuning curves the following parameters were determined: (1) characteristic frequency (CF), frequency at which the sound level that evoked a response significantly larger (3 SDs) than spontaneous firing rate was minimal; (2) threshold in dB SPL at CF; and (3) calculation of Q40 value, frequency bandwidth of the tuning curve 40 dB SPL above the CF. The Q40 value was calculated as the ratio between the CF of the tuning curve and the bandwidth of the tuning curve 40 dB above the CF.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with Statistica 13.3 (StatSoft). All data were tested for normal distribution. As most of the data were not normally distributed, they were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. All tests were two-tailed with α = 0.05.

Results

This study is based on analyses of single- and multi-unit recordings in the IC from both sides of five α2δ3+/+ and seven α2δ3−/− mice. The percentage of single-units of all recorded units was very similar in both genotypes (25% in α2δ3+/+ vs 21% in α2δ3−/−). In total, we evaluated 179 α2δ3+/+ and 162 α2δ3−/− single- and multi-units each including PT stimulation with SPLs from 0 to 70 dB SPL in steps of 10 dB and experiments using AM tone stimulation with different carrier and modulation frequencies at 70 dB SPL. For AM tone stimulation, 97 α2δ3+/+ units and 99 α2δ3−/− units were analyzed up to modulation frequencies (fm) of 100 Hz, and 77 α2δ3+/+ units respectively 73 α2δ3−/− units for modulation frequencies above. Only those units of both α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− animals were selected in which the fc was identical to the BF of either 2828, 4757, 5657, 6727, 8000, 9514, 11,310, 13,450, 16,000, or 19,030 Hz. All units responded to PT stimulation and had BFs between 2 and 45 kHz. The mean BF was 11.6 kHz for α2δ3+/+ and 11.8 kHz for α2δ3−/−. There was no statistically significant bias in BF for any distribution of response parameters (tone response types, evoked response, Mann–Whitney U test).

In our experimental design, we did not measure hearing thresholds of the mice, e.g., by auditory brainstem responses before IC recordings. However, we determined thresholds from tuning curves at the CF of all units, which revealed thresholds elevated by 5 dB ± 5 dB in α2δ3−/− compared with α2δ3+/+ units. Further, at the frequency of best hearing in mice, 11,310 Hz, the median threshold of α2δ3+/+ units amounted to 20 dB SPL whereas those of α2δ3−/− units were 30 dB SPL (p = 0.048, Mann–Whitney U test). Although α2δ3−/− units showed slightly higher thresholds, their frequency range (CFs registered from 4757 Hz to 26,910 Hz, n = 91) was not corrupted compared with α2δ3+/+ (from 4757 Hz to 19,030 Hz, n = 81). The median of all CFs was 11,310 Hz for both α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/−, with 25th percentiles of 9514 Hz for both α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/−, and with 75th percentiles of 13,450 Hz (α2δ3+/+) and 16,000 Hz (α2δ3−/−).

Spontaneous rate and spectral properties of the neuronal responses

The spontaneous discharge rate of the units (SR), which is shown by individual data and box and whisker plots, varied from 0 to 19.4 spikes/s with a median of 0.49 spikes/s for α2δ3+/+ and 1.02 spikes/s for α2δ3−/− mice (Fig. 1A). Thus, the SR was 2.08-fold higher in α2δ3−/− compared with α2δ3+/+ mice (p = 0.0007, Mann–Whitney U test). Similar results were determined from prestimulus periods in the AM-tone experiments (data not shown).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Increased spontaneous discharge rate yet unaltered sharpness of tuning in α2δ3−/− mice. A, Spontaneous discharge rates of units from α2δ3+/+ (+/+, black) and α2δ3−/− mice (−/−, red) obtained from extracellular recordings in the IC. Individual data and box plots with medians (horizontal lines), interquartile ranges (25% and 75%, boxes), and whiskers (10%, 90%) of 223 α2δ3+/+ and 261 α2δ3−/− units revealed an increased spontaneous rate (p = 0.0007, Mann–Whitney U test, *** p < 0.001). B, There was no difference in the sharpness of frequency tuning expressed as Q40dB values between 154 α2δ3+/+ and 119 α2δ3−/− units (p = 0.79, Mann–Whitney U test).

The Q40 value is a dimensionless measure of tuning sharpness, with higher values indicating that a filter is more sharply tuned (Capranica, 1992). In general, Q40 values were rather small (broad tuning) but they did not significantly differ between α2δ3−/− compared with α2δ3+/+ mice as shown in a box and whisker plot (Fig. 1B). Median Q40 values for both α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− were 0.92 (p = 0.79, Mann–Whitney U test).

Temporal properties of the neuronal responses

Units in the IC typically show discharges in response to AM tones that are phase-locked to the fm of the stimulus. Therefore, the temporal structure of the sound is encoded in the temporal structure of the neuronal discharge rate. Figure 2 shows examples of an α2δ3+/+ (Fig. 2A) and an α2δ3−/− unit (Fig. 2B) each with typical phase-locked responses (raster plot) to the envelope of the AM tone stimulus for fm between 0 Hz (unmodulated carrier) and 100 Hz. In both examples, the fc was set to the BF of the unit, here 11,310 Hz. Each horizontal row of dots represents the responses to one fm with 15 trials each; the green area indicates the duration of the stimulus. The α2δ3+/+ unit (Fig. 2A) displays significant phase locking throughout the range of modulation frequencies tested (vector strength, Rayleigh test, p = 0.01) over the entire range of AM. An α2δ3−/− unit (Fig. 2B) responded in a similar way with phase locking up to a fm of 70 Hz (vector strength, Rayleigh test, p = 0.01). All neuronal responses to AM tone stimuli were binned into a PSTH. Figure 3 shows examples for PSTHs for fm of 10 Hz (Fig. 3A), 30 Hz (Fig. 3B), and 100 Hz (Fig. 3C) as a function of time. The gray plot above each panel indicates the envelope of the AM tone. Using these PSTHs and the start and end of periods of the responses determined with the corresponding convolved PSTHs (CPSTHs), evoked rates per period were calculated for the population.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Examples of neuronal responses to AM tone stimulation of α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− mice. A, Raster plot from an α2δ3+/+ unit responding with action potentials (dots) to AM tone stimulation of modulation frequencies between 0 and 100 Hz showing an onset response and subsequent phase locking over the entire range of AMs (significant vector strength, Rayleigh test, p = 0.01). B, Raster plot from an α2δ3−/− unit showing a similar response with phase-locking up to 70-Hz modulation frequency (significant vector strength, Rayleigh test, p = 0.01). In both examples, the carrier frequency was set to the BF of the unit, here 11,310 Hz. Responses to each modulation frequency are represented by 15 horizontal rows of dots corresponding to 15 trials. The green area indicates the duration of the stimulus.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

IC units of α2δ3−/− mice lose precision of temporal coding and show a reduced evoked rate to higher modulation frequencies. A–C, Evoked rate (activity averaged over all AM tone stimulations at a particular modulation frequency) for all units with carrier frequency of the AM tone equal to their BF of α2δ3+/+ (+/+, black, n = 97) and α2δ3−/− (−/−, red, n = 99) mice as a function of time. Averaged evoked rate (PSTH) is shown for fm = 10 Hz (A), fm = 30 Hz (B), and fm = 100 Hz (C). The AM stimulus with 500-ms duration is shown above each panel. This figure was created using a binning time of 1 ms.

To determine whether the evoked rate of the population was sensitive to higher fm and rising period numbers of the stimulus in either genotype, we compared the evoked rate of the population for fm varying from 10 to 160 Hz shown for selected fm in Figure 4A–F. There was increasing variation over periods in evoked rates for higher fm. The change in the evoked rate of the population for either low (10 Hz) or high (120 Hz) frequency modulations as a function of the period had a similar shape in both genotypes but always revealed lower rates in α2δ3−/− units. Note that for each fm, an onset response is visible in the first periods reflecting the well-known adaptation phenomenon for longer duration of the stimulus.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

AM tone-evoked rates of the population were lower in α2δ3−/− mice compared with α2δ3+/+; the difference of evoked rates between genotypes increased on high modulation frequencies. A–F, AM tone-evoked rates of IC units from α2δ3+/+ (+/+, black, n = 97 for fm ≤ 100 Hz; n = 77 for fm > 100 Hz) and α2δ3−/− (−/−, red, n = 99 for fm ≤ 100 Hz; n = 73 for fm > 100 Hz) mice as a function of the period of the respective fm and for selected modulation frequencies. The onset response is visible in the first periods of each modulation frequency.

Next, we calculated FSLs for fm from 10 to 160 Hz and for PT (fm = 0 Hz) as shown by a box-and-whisker plot in ms (Fig. 5A) and, for a better representation of the differences in latency, especially at higher fm, in multiples of the periodic time (Fig. 5B). Median FSLs in response to different fm were always longer in α2δ3−/− compared with α2δ3+/+ mice. However, there were only few significant differences such as for the fm of 10 Hz (p = 0.016), 40 Hz (p = 0.031), 60 Hz (p = 0.002), 160 Hz (p = 0.012) as well as 0 Hz (Mann–Whitney U test; Fig. 5A), which is likely caused by the large variations in FSL. FSL values of the unmodulated tone (PT, fm = 0 Hz; filled gray and red box) were shorter in both genotypes compared with the respective FSL values in all cases of fm because of the very short stimulus ramp of the PT lasting 5 ms. For the PT stimulation, median FSL was significantly larger in α2δ3−/− mice (p = 0.036; Fig. 5A).

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Median FSLs were longer in IC units of α2δ3−/− compared with α2δ3+/+ mice at some modulation frequencies. FSLs (A) and FSLs in relation to the periodic time (B) of neuronal responses to AM tone stimulation of α2δ3+/+ units (+/+, black) and α2δ3−/− units (−/−, red) as a function of modulation frequency. Box plots with medians (horizontal lines), interquartile ranges (25% and 75%, boxes) and whiskers (10%, 90%) of FSL. FSL of the neuronal response to the unmodulated carrier frequency (0 Hz, PT, left, filled box plot) and to different modulation frequencies (10–160 Hz) for α2δ3+/+ (n = 97 for fm ≤ 100 Hz; n = 77 for fm > 100 Hz) and α2δ3−/− units (n = 99 for fm ≤ 100 Hz; n = 73 for fm > 100 Hz; Mann–Whitney U test, *p < 0.05).

Peak latencies and jitter were calculated as the time lag from the start of the stimulus within a period to the dedicated maximum in the normalized cross-correlation function and in the CPSTH (see Materials and Methods, Data analysis), respectively. Here, we show the results of the cross-correlation functions only because results from the maxima of the CPSTH were very similar.

Figure 6A,B and Table 1 show the peak latency of the population as a function of fm for both genotypes each with SD (jitter). Whereas Figure 6A shows the absolute values of the peak latency in milliseconds, it was divided by the periodic time of neuronal responses to AM tone stimulation in Figure 6B. The advantage of this representation is the elimination of the shorter absolute latency with increasing fm. Peak latencies were significantly larger in α2δ3−/− units for fm from 20 Hz to 100 Hz (p < 0.001; Fig. 6A). Notably, there was an increasing jitter (SD) with increasing fm visible in Figure 6B and Table 1. At fm ≥ 100 Hz, we note an approximation of the curves from α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/−, which is likely caused by the increasingly temporally uncoordinated response to the stimulus in α2δ3−/− mice (compare Fig. 3C). Mean peak latencies ± SD are shown in Figure 6C,D, where the SD is a measure for the variations in peak latency within the units. Peak latencies of the population and mean peak latencies have a similar trend. In summary, peak latencies of α2δ3−/− were consistently longer compared with α2δ3+/+ in a large range of fm.

View this table:
Table 1

Population peak latencies of IC units from α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− mice as a function of modulation frequency in absolute values and in multiples of the periodic time (Fig. 6A,B)

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Peak latencies of IC units from α2δ3−/− mice are longer compared with those from α2δ3+/+ mice. Population peak latency ± SD (jitter; A) and population peak latency ± SD (jitter; B) in relation to the periodic time of neuronal responses to AM tone stimulation for units of α2δ3+/+ (+/+, black) and α2δ3−/− mice (−/−, red). C, Mean peak latency ± SD calculated from each of neuronal responses to AM tone stimulation and each period. D, Mean peak latency ± SD in relation to periodic time of AM tone stimulation. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

To define how a population of units can follow the stimulus signal over time, we plotted the peak latency of the population as a function of the period for the respective fm for both α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− mice (Fig. 7A–F). Apart from small variations, i.e., jitter, which was mainly visible at higher fm – peak latencies of the population were largely constant over the periods for any given fm in both genotypes. Notably, the differences in peak latency between α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− vanish with increasing fm. This indicates that there is no loss of temporal coding for peak latencies over periods for α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/−.

Figure 7.
Figure 7.

Peak latencies of the population of IC units remain largely constant as a function of period in both α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− mice. A–F, Peak latencies of the population of α2δ3+/+ (+/+, black) and α2δ3−/− units (−/−, red) for selected modulation frequencies are constant over the period of AM tone stimulation for both genotypes except some jitter in panels D–F.

Vector strength of the population was calculated using the measured absolute spike times of the units within the determined time window of responses to the 500-ms AM tone stimulation (without the first 100 ms to avoid distortions by onset response). Figure 8 shows the vector strength of population responses to AM tone stimulation as a function of fm from 10 to 160 Hz for α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− mice. At modulation frequencies of ∼80 Hz and above, the vector strength of α2δ3−/− was smaller than that of α2δ3+/+ units, and responses of α2δ3−/− units became more and more temporally uncoordinated (see also Fig. 3C). Surprisingly, below fm of ∼60 Hz the vector strength of α2δ3−/− was larger compared with α2δ3+/+ (Fig. 8), which apparently indicates a response with better temporal precision (see also Fig. 3B). However, this effect does not reflect a more precise response of α2δ3−/− units. Rather, in view of the heterogeneity of IC units in general and the prolonged peak latencies of α2δ3−/− units (Fig. 6), we suppose that there are phasic units in α2δ3−/− mice that cannot respond as quickly as those of α2δ3+/+ mice at fm of ≳30 Hz (Fig. 3A,B).

Figure 8.
Figure 8.

Unexpected dependence of the vector strength of the population on the modulation frequency for IC units from α2δ3−/− mice. For modulation frequencies below ∼60 Hz, population vector strength was higher for α2δ3−/− units (−/−, red) compared with α2δ3+/+ units (+/+, black). For fm ∼80 Hz and above, population vector strength of α2δ3−/− units declined below that of α2δ3+/+ units.

In addition to the vector strength, we calculated correlation coefficients (CCNC, CCPC; see Materials and Methods, Data analysis) for every fm as a measure for the similarity (linear dependence) of stimulus and neuronal response (Fig. 9). The graphs in Figure 9 are shown without SD. Because with increasing period the correlation coefficients have a decreasing tendency because of decreasing evoked rates, this non-random superposition of the deviations of the correlation coefficients causes too high SDs. Their calculation is therefore not meaningful. The coefficients CCNC are similar for α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− mice with a slightly decreasing tendency toward higher fm and smaller coefficients in α2δ3−/− mice at ∼80 Hz onwards (closed symbols). Notably, α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− curves show only small differences because of the effect of the offset described in Materials and Methods, Data analysis, “correlation.” In contrast, the correlation coefficients CCPC of the α2δ3−/− units (open red symbols) show a strong decrease for modulation frequencies of ∼70 Hz and above indicating a markedly reduced ability to follow the stimuli in a coordinated way as compared with α2δ3+/+ units (open black symbols). Notably, the CCPC also shows an increase in α2δ3−/− compared with α2δ3+/+ units at fm ∼30 Hz (Fig. 9); this effect is, however, smaller than for the vector strength (Fig. 8). Taken together, the Pearson-like (offset-corrected) cross-correlation method used yielded a more reliable metric (CCPC) for the population than the vector strength.

Figure 9.
Figure 9.

The Pearson-like correlation coefficient is superior to describe the quality of temporal coding. Mean correlation coefficients calculated from NCCH (CCNC, closed symbols) were rather similar for α2δ3+/+ and α2δ3−/− IC units because of their dependence on the offset (evoked rate) described under Materials and Methods. For fm ≥ 80 Hz, however, mean CCNC were smaller in α2δ3−/− mice as indicated by the stars at the top. In contrast to CCNC, mean Pearson-like correlation coefficients (CCPC, open symbols) showed a strong decrease for modulation frequencies of ∼70 Hz and above for α2δ3−/− compared with α2δ3+/+ units indicating their markedly reduced ability to follow the stimuli in a coordinated manner (downward stars; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).

So far, all calculations for AM tone stimuli shown were done with fc equal to the BF (fc – BF = 0). In addition, all calculations were done with a difference of the fc values of a quarter octave and of a half octave to the BF. We found small variations in the results but all conclusions drawn remain valid.

Discussion

Our results demonstrate temporal processing deficits in the auditory midbrain of α2δ3-deficient mice, specifically in neurons of the IC. This adds to our previous findings on malfunctioning synapses in the cochlear nucleus and the inability of auditory discrimination learning of AM tones despite normal hearing thresholds and normal hair cell function in these mice (Pirone et al., 2014).

Despite increased spontaneous rates in α2δ3−/− IC units, their evoked rates were reduced compared with α2δ3+/+ for most modulation frequencies (Fig. 4). Because the IC is the auditory center that extracts and integrates temporal features of auditory signals from the periphery and auditory brainstem nuclei (Eggermont, 2015), we analyzed the responses of IC units to stimulation with AM tones. We found increased FSLs (Fig. 5) and increased peak latencies (Fig. 6) in α2δ3−/− IC units for a large range of fm. PSTHs revealed that IC units of α2δ3−/− mice were able to follow the envelope of the AM tone for lower modulation frequencies similar as IC units of α2δ3+/+ but failed to phase-lock for higher modulation frequencies (Fig. 3). This was also reflected by the vector strength (Fig. 8) yet even better shown by the Pearson-like (offset-corrected) cross-correlation coefficient CCPC (Fig. 9). Taken together, the responses of α2δ3−/− units were not phase-locked to the stimulus envelope at modulation frequencies ≥70 Hz.

Neuronal α2δ proteins

The α2δ proteins α2δ1 – α2δ4 are expressed in the nervous system, muscle and endocrine organs, with α2δ1, α2δ2, and α2δ3 expressed in the brain (Cole et al., 2005; Ablinger et al., 2020; Geisler et al., 2021). They function as largely extracellular components of voltage-activated Ca2+ channels and modulate the abundance and biophysical properties of these channels (Catterall et al., 2005; Dolphin, 2013). Moreover, α2δ proteins may also act independently of channel function such as (1) in organizing synapses in development; (2) trafficking Ca2+ channels along axons; or (3) in transsynaptic coupling (Eroglu et al., 2009; Kurshan et al., 2009; Pirone et al., 2014; Fell et al., 2016; Kadurin et al., 2016; Dolphin, 2018; Ferron et al., 2018; Geisler et al., 2019, 2021; Ablinger et al., 2020; Bikbaev et al., 2020).

Lack of α2δ3 resulted in altered pain processing, increased acoustic startle response, altered auditory processing, cortical sensory cross-activation, anxiety-like behavior, and a volume decrease in corpus callosum (Neely et al., 2010; Pirone et al., 2014; Landmann et al., 2018; Geisler et al., 2021). Of note, the lack of α2δ3 in α2δ3−/− mice is partially rescued by α2δ1 and α2δ2, as shown in a recent study on single and double knock-out mice for the brain-specific subunits α2δ1, α2δ2, and α2δ3 (Geisler et al., 2021).

α2δ3 protein as a component of presynaptic Ca2+ channels in the central auditory system

The neuronal information flow along the ascending auditory pathway employs fast and reliable glutamatergic synapses with presynaptic Cav2.1 Ca2+ channels (Lin et al., 2011) and postsynaptic AMPA receptors containing predominantly GluA3 and GluA4 subunits (Yang et al., 2011; García-Hernández et al., 2017). All three neuronal isoforms of auxiliary α2δ subunits of voltage-gated Ca2+ channel are key organizers of glutamatergic synapses and can co-assemble with any high voltage-activated Ca2+ channel, either presynaptic or postsynaptic or somatic (Ablinger et al., 2020; Geisler et al., 2021; Schöpf et al., 2021). Because α2δ3 is strongly expressed in principal neurons in the auditory pathway such as spiral ganglion neurons, neurons of the dorsal and ventral cochlear nucleus, the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB), the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (VNLL), and in some neurons of the IC itself (Cole et al., 2005; Pirone et al., 2014; Stephani et al., 2019), it appears to play a specific role at the ultrafast Cav2.1-containing synapses along the auditory pathway.

Mice deficient for α2δ3 showed normal function of inner and outer hair cells and nearly normal hearing thresholds (Pirone et al., 2014). However, the prominent synapse of auditory nerve terminals onto bushy cells in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus, the endbulb of Held synapse, displayed reduced evoked rates and increased latencies of postsynaptic action potentials by 0.78 ms (Pirone et al., 2014), most likely caused by smaller and malformed presynaptic terminals and reduced numbers of Cav2.1 channels (Pirone et al., 2014; Stephani et al., 2019). If other synapses of auditory nerve fiber terminals had similar defects, less excitatory input would be fed into the auditory brainstem. So far, the endbulb synapse is the only central synapse studied in vivo in the α2δ3−/− mouse model. If α2δ3 played a similar role in glutamatergic synaptogenesis and synaptic function in more centrally located auditory nuclei, the temporal processing deficits of α2δ3−/− mice would add up. However, auditory processing in brainstem and midbrain not only involves bottom-up but also top-down signaling. Much of the exquisite extraction of timing information and phase locking was impossible without inhibitory input by interneurons at each level of brainstem and midbrain processing (Eggermont, 2015). Of note, both α2δ1 and α2δ3 subunits have been recently shown to drive the balance between excitatory and inhibitory network formation in development (Bikbaev et al., 2020). The pathomechanisms in α2δ3−/− mice may therefore also include imbalances between excitatory and inhibitory networks, which impair precise temporal coding (Kurt et al., 2006; Bendor, 2015; Cai and Caspary, 2015) and also appear to underlie forms of ASDs (Sohal and Rubenstein, 2019).

In an auditory discrimination learning experiment, we previously found that despite the ability of α2δ3−/− to discriminate PTs they failed to discriminate AM tones with fm of either 20 or 40 Hz (Pirone et al., 2014). The results of the present study indicating more slowly responding phasic IC units in α2δ3−/− mice at fm of ≳30 Hz (see Results) are in accordance with the deficits of α2δ3−/− mice in the auditory discrimination learning experiment (Pirone et al., 2014).

Auditory processing and ASDs

A [C]APD in humans, either developmental or acquired, “results from impaired neural function and is characterized by poor recognition, discrimination, separation, grouping, localization, or ordering of speech sounds without peripheral hearing loss, and does not solely result from a deficit in general attention, language or other cognitive processes” (American Academy of Audiology Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2010; Bellis and Bellis, 2015; Wilson, 2019; Dillon and Cameron, 2021). Impaired information processing starting in the auditory nerve, which leads to degraded processing of AM in the IC, will ultimately deteriorate the perception of speech and other complex sounds in more central parts of the brain. Likewise, any impairment of subcortical auditory processing in mice as shown here for α2δ3−/− mice may lead to poor discrimination of AM sounds mimicking low frequency communication calls or similar meaningful sounds (Pirone et al., 2014; Kopp-Scheinpflug and Tempel, 2015; Felix et al., 2019).

The temporal processing deficits observed in α2δ3−/− mice, especially the reduced ability of IC units to follow stimuli with fm ≥ 70 Hz in a coordinated manner, suggest that humans with loss of Cacna2d3 gene function may experience similar temporal processing difficulties at the level of the IC. Although the hearing range differs between mice and men (2–80 vs 16–20 kHz, respectively) the range of modulation frequencies that can be processed is similar between many vertebrate species (Singh and Theunissen, 2003; Eggermont, 2015). Loss-of-function mutations in Cacna2d3 have been identified in individuals with severe symptoms of ASDs (Iossifov et al., 2012; Girirajan et al., 2013; De Rubeis et al., 2014). ASDs are neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by various degrees of mental disability including speech problems, impaired social interaction and repetitive, stereotyped behavior (for review, see Lai et al., 2014). Children with ASD frequently show impaired auditory processing at the level of the auditory brainstem and midbrain (Marco et al., 2011; Alcántara et al., 2012; Robertson and Baron-Cohen, 2017; Scott et al., 2018; Jones et al., 2020). If subcortical processing of AM tones in some autistic children was similarly affected as described here for α2δ3−/− mice the understanding of phonemes and speech might be degraded, leading to difficulties in speech perception, speech understanding, and language acquisition. In addition, other types of synapses outside the auditory brainstem may be affected by lack of α2δ3, too, which may contribute to other autism symptoms such as impaired social interaction, anxiety, and stereotyped behavior (Lai et al., 2014). Notably, autistic individuals show deficits in decoding the non-verbal emotional content of auditory information, the affective prosody (McCann and Peppé, 2003; O’Connor, 2012; Wang and Tsao, 2015; Robertson and Baron-Cohen, 2017), an activity that requires auditory feature extraction at the subcortical level (Pannese et al., 2015).

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments: We thank Jennifer Ihl and Sabine Schmidt for excellent technical assistance.*G.B. and K.H contributed equally to this work.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Grant PP1608 (En 294/5-1, En 294/5-2, and KU 1972/5-2) and CRC 894 (to J.E.).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Ablinger C, Geisler SM, Stanika RI, Klein CT, Obermair GJ (2020) Neuronal α2δ proteins and brain disorders. Pflugers Arch 472:845–863. pmid:32607809
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Alcántara JI, Cope TE, Cope W, Weisblatt EJ (2012) Auditory temporal-envelope processing in high-functioning children with autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia 50:1235–1251. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.034 pmid:22349444
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    American Academy of Audiology Clinical Practice Guidelines (2010) Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder.Available at https://www.audiology.org/practice-resources/practice-guidelines-and-standards/.
  4. ↵
    Anderson LA, Linden JF (2016) Mind the gap: two dissociable mechanisms of temporal processing in the auditory system. J Neurosci 36:1977–1995. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1652-15.2016 pmid:26865621
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Batschelet E (1965) Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms. Washington, DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences.
  6. ↵
    Bellis TJ, Bellis JD (2015) Central auditory processing disorders in children and adults. Handb Clin Neurol 129:537–556. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00030-5 pmid:25726289
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Bendor D (2015) The role of inhibition in a computational model of an auditory cortical neuron during the encoding of temporal information. PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004197. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004197 pmid:25879843
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Bendor D, Wang X (2007) Differential neural coding of acoustic flutter within primate auditory cortex. Nat Neurosci 10:763–771. doi:10.1038/nn1888 pmid:17468752
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Bikbaev A, Ciuraszkiewicz-Wojciech A, Heck J, Klatt O, Freund R, Mitlöhner J, Enrile Lacalle S, Sun M, Repetto D, Frischknecht R, Ablinger C, Rohlmann A, Missler M, Obermair GJ, Di Biase V, Heine M (2020) Auxiliary α2δ1 and α2δ3 subunits of calcium channels drive excitatory and inhibitory neuronal network development. J Neurosci 40:4824–4841. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1707-19.2020 pmid:32414783
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Cai R, Caspary DM (2015) GABAergic inhibition shapes SAM responses in rat auditory thalamus. Neuroscience 299:146–155. pmid:25943479
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Capranica RR (1992) The untuning of the tuning curve: is it time? Semin Neurosci 4:401–408. doi:10.1016/1044-5765(92)90048-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    Catterall WA, Perez-Reyes E, Snutch TP, Striessnig J (2005) International Union of Pharmacology. XLVIII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated calcium channels. Pharmacol Rev 57:411–425. doi:10.1124/pr.57.4.5 pmid:16382099
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Cole RL, Lechner SM, Williams ME, Prodanovich P, Bleicher L, Varney MA, Gu G (2005) Differential distribution of voltage-gated calcium channel alpha-2 delta (alpha2delta) subunit mRNA-containing cells in the rat central nervous system and the dorsal root ganglia. J Comp Neurol 491:246–269. doi:10.1002/cne.20693 pmid:16134135
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    De Rubeis S, et al. (2014) Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature 515:209–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Dillon H, Cameron S (2021) Separating the causes of listening difficulties in children. Ear Hear 42:1097–1108.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Dolphin AC (2012) Calcium channel auxiliary α2δ and β subunits: trafficking and one step beyond. Nat Rev Neurosci 13:542–555. doi:10.1038/nrn3311 pmid:22805911
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Dolphin AC (2013) The alpha2delta subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels. Biochim Biophys Acta 1828:1541–1549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Dolphin AC (2018) Voltage-gated calcium channel α2δ subunits: an assessment of proposed novel roles. F1000Res 7:1830. doi:10.12688/f1000research.16104.1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    Eggermont JJ (2015) Auditory temporal processing and its disorders, Ed 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. ↵
    Eroglu C, Allen NJ, Susman MW, O’Rourke NA, Park CY, Ozkan E, Chakraborty C, Mulinyawe SB, Annis DS, Huberman AD, Green EM, Lawler J, Dolmetsch R, Garcia KC, Smith SJ, Luo ZD, Rosenthal A, Mosher DF, Barres BA (2009) Gabapentin receptor alpha2delta-1 is a neuronal thrombospondin receptor responsible for excitatory CNS synaptogenesis. Cell 139:380–392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Felix RA, Gourévitch B, Portfors CV (2018) Subcortical pathways: towards a better understanding of auditory disorders. Hear Res 362:48–60. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2018.01.008 pmid:29395615
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Felix RA, Chavez VA, Novicio DM, Morley BJ, Portfors CV (2019) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit α7-knockout mice exhibit degraded auditory temporal processing. J Neurophysiol 122:451–465. doi:10.1152/jn.00170.2019 pmid:31116647
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Fell B, Eckrich S, Blum K, Eckrich T, Hecker D, Obermair GJ, Münkner S, Flockerzi V, Schick B, Engel J (2016) α2δ2 controls the function and trans-synaptic coupling of Cav1.3 channels in mouse inner hair cells and is essential for normal hearing. J Neurosci 36:11024–11036. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3468-14.2016 pmid:27798183
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Ferron L, Kadurin I, Dolphin AC (2018) Proteolytic maturation of α2δ controls the probability of synaptic vesicular release. Elife 7:e37507. doi:10.7554/eLife.37507
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    García-Hernández S, Abe M, Sakimura K, Rubio ME (2017) Impaired auditory processing and altered structure of the endbulb of Held synapse in mice lacking the GluA3 subunit of AMPA receptors. Hear Res 344:284–294. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.12.006 pmid:28011083
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Geisler S, Schöpf CL, Stanika R, Kalb M, Campiglio M, Repetto D, Traxler L, Missler M, Obermair GJ (2019) Presynaptic α2δ-2 calcium channel subunits regulate postsynaptic GABAA receptor abundance and axonal wiring. J Neurosci 39:2581–2605. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2234-18.2019 pmid:30683685
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Geisler SM, Benedetti A, Schöpf CL, Schwarzer C, Stefanova N, Schwartz A, Obermair GJ (2021) Phenotypic characterization and brain structure analysis of calcium channel subunit α2δ-2 mutant (Ducky) and α2δ double knockout mice. Front Synaptic Neurosci 13:634412. doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2021.634412 pmid:33679366
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Girirajan S, Dennis MY, Baker C, Malig M, Coe BP, Campbell CD, Mark K, Vu TH, Alkan C, Cheng Z, Biesecker LG, Bernier R, Eichler EE (2013) Refinement and discovery of new hotspots of copy-number variation associated with autism spectrum disorder. Am J Hum Genet 92:221–237. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.12.016 pmid:23375656
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Goldberg JM, Brown PB (1969) Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J Neurophysiol 32:613–636. doi:10.1152/jn.1969.32.4.613 pmid:5810617
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Greenwood DD (1986) What is “synchrony suppression”? J Acoust Soc Am 79:1857–1872. doi:10.1121/1.393194 pmid:3722597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Iossifov I, et al. (2012) De novo gene disruptions in children on the autistic spectrum. Neuron 74:285–299. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.009 pmid:22542183
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Jones MK, Kraus N, Bonacina S, Nicol T, Otto-Meyer S, Roberts MY (2020) Auditory processing differences in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder. J Speech Lang Hear Res JSLHR 63:1608–1617. doi:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00061 pmid:32407656
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Joris PX, Schreiner CE, Rees A (2004) Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. Physiol Rev 84:541–577. doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2003 pmid:15044682
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Kadurin I, Ferron L, Rothwell SW, Meyer JO, Douglas LR, Bauer CS, Lana B, Margas W, Alexopoulos O, Nieto-Rostro M, Pratt WS, Dolphin AC (2016) Proteolytic maturation of α2δ represents a checkpoint for activation and neuronal trafficking of latent calcium channels. Elife 5:e21143. doi:10.7554/eLife.21143
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    Knörnschild M (2014) Vocal production learning in bats. Curr Opin Neurobiol 28:80–85. pmid:25050812
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Kopp-Scheinpflug C, Tempel BL (2015) Decreased temporal precision of neuronal signaling as a candidate mechanism of auditory processing disorder. Hear Res 330:213–220. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.06.014 pmid:26119177
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Kopp-Scheinpflug C, Linden J (2020) Coding of temporal information. In: The senses: a comprehensive reference, Ed 2, pp 691–712. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.
  38. ↵
    Krishna BS, Semple MN (2000) Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 84:255–273. doi:10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.255 pmid:10899201
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Kurshan PT, Oztan A, Schwarz TL (2009) Presynaptic alpha2delta-3 is required for synaptic morphogenesis independent of its Ca2+-channel functions. Nat Neurosci 12:1415–1423. doi:10.1038/nn.2417 pmid:19820706
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Kurt S, Crook JM, Ohl FW, Scheich H, Schulze H (2006) Differential effects of iontophoretic in vivo application of the GABA(A)-antagonists bicuculline and gabazine in sensory cortex. Hear Res 212:224–235. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2005.12.002 pmid:16442250
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Lai MC, Lombardo MV, Baron-Cohen S (2014) Autism. Lancet 383:896–910. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61539-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Landmann J, Richter F, Classen J, Richter A, Penninger JM, Bechmann I (2018) Behavioral phenotyping of calcium channel (CACN) subunit α2δ3 knockout mice: consequences of sensory cross-modal activation. Behav Brain Res 364:393–402.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    Langner G (1992) Periodicity coding in the auditory system. Hear Res 60:115–142. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(92)90015-F pmid:1639723
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Lin KH, Oleskevich S, Taschenberger H (2011) Presynaptic Ca2+ influx and vesicle exocytosis at the mouse endbulb of Held: a comparison of two auditory nerve terminals. J Physiol 589:4301–4320. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.209189
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Malmierca M, Merchán M (2004) Auditory system. In: The rat nervous system, Ed 3, pp 997–1082. Burlington: Academic Press.
  46. ↵
    Marco EJ, Hinkley LBN, Hill SS, Nagarajan SS (2011) Sensory processing in autism: a review of neurophysiologic findings. Pediatr Res 69:48–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    Mardia KV (1972) Statistics of directional data. San Diego: Academic Press.
  48. ↵
    McCann J, Peppé S (2003) Prosody in autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. Int J Lang Commun Disord 38:325–350. doi:10.1080/1368282031000154204 pmid:14578051
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Neely GG, et al. (2010) A genome-wide Drosophila screen for heat nociception identifies α2δ3 as an evolutionarily conserved pain gene. Cell 143:628–638. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.047 pmid:21074052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    O’Connor K (2012) Auditory processing in autism spectrum disorder: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:836–854. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Pannese A, Grandjean D, Frühholz S (2015) Subcortical processing in auditory communication. Hear Res 328:67–77. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.07.003 pmid:26163900
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Pirone A, Kurt S, Zuccotti A, Rüttiger L, Pilz P, Brown DH, Franz C, Schweizer M, Rust MB, Rübsamen R, Friauf E, Knipper M, Engel J (2014) α2δ3 is essential for normal structure and function of auditory nerve synapses and is a novel candidate for auditory processing disorders. J Neurosci 34:434–445. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3085-13.2014 pmid:24403143
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Pressnitzer D, Sayles M, Micheyl C, Winter IM (2008) Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Curr Biol 18:1124–1128. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.053 pmid:18656355
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Robertson CE, Baron-Cohen S (2017) Sensory perception in autism. Nat Rev Neurosci 18:671–684. pmid:28951611
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Schöpf CL, Ablinger C, Geisler SM, Stanika RI, Campiglio M, Kaufmann WA, Nimmervoll B, Schlick B, Brockhaus J, Missler M, Shigemoto R, Obermair GJ (2021) Presynaptic α2δ subunits are key organizers of glutamatergic synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118:e1920827118.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    Scott KE, Schormans AL, Pacoli KY, De Oliveira C, Allman BL, Schmid S (2018) Altered auditory processing, filtering, and reactivity in the Cntnap2 knock-out rat model for neurodevelopmental disorders. J Neurosci 38:8588–8604. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0759-18.2018 pmid:30126973
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Singh NC, Theunissen FE (2003) Modulation spectra of natural sounds and ethological theories of auditory processing. J Acoust Soc Am 114:3394–3411. doi:10.1121/1.1624067 pmid:14714819
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Sohal VS, Rubenstein JLR (2019) Excitation-inhibition balance as a framework for investigating mechanisms in neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry 24:1248–1257. doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0426-0 pmid:31089192
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Stephani F, Scheuer V, Eckrich T, Blum K, Wang W, Obermair GJ, Engel J (2019) Deletion of the Ca2+ channel subunit α2δ3 differentially affects Cav2.1 and Cav2.2 currents in cultured spiral ganglion neurons before and after the onset of hearing. Front Cell Neurosci 13:278. doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00278 pmid:31293392
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Walton JP, Simon H, Frisina RD (2002) Age-related alterations in the neural coding of envelope periodicities. J Neurophysiol 88:565–578. doi:10.1152/jn.2002.88.2.565 pmid:12163510
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Wang JE, Tsao FM (2015) Emotional prosody perception and its association with pragmatic language in school-aged children with high-function autism. Res Dev Disabil 37:162–170. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.11.013 pmid:25463248
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Wilson WJ (2019) On the definition of APD and the need for a conceptual model of terminology. Int J Audiol 58:516–523. doi:10.1080/14992027.2019.1600057 pmid:30987485
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    Woolley SMN, Portfors CV (2013) Conserved mechanisms of vocalization coding in mammalian and songbird auditory midbrain. Hear Res 305:45–56. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.05.005 pmid:23726970
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    Yang YM, Aitoubah J, Lauer AM, Nuriya M, Takamiya K, Jia Z, May BJ, Huganir RL, Wang LY (2011) GluA4 is indispensable for driving fast neurotransmission across a high-fidelity central synapse. J Physiol 589:4209–4227. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.208066 pmid:21690196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Christine Portfors, Washington State University

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: NONE. Note: If this manuscript was transferred from JNeurosci and a decision was made to accept the manuscript without peer review, a brief statement to this effect will instead be what is listed below.

Thank you for addressing the previous reviewers’ concerns.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 9 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 9, Issue 2
March/April 2022
Email
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Respond to this article
Impaired Subcortical Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Tones in Mice Deficient for Cacna2d3, a Risk Gene for Autism Spectrum Disorders in Humans
Gerhard Bracic, Katrin Hegmann, Jutta Engel, Simone Kurt
eNeuro 11 April 2022, 9 (2) ENEURO.0118-22.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0118-22.2022
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Subjects