Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Cognition and Behavior

Oxytocin Facilitates Allomaternal Behavior under Stress in Laboratory Mice

Yousuke Tsuneoka, Chihiro Yoshihara, Ryuko Ohnishi, Sachine Yoshida, Eri Miyazawa, Masanobu Yamada, Kazuhiko Horiguchi, W. Scott Young, Katsuhiko Nishimori, Tadafumi Kato and Kumi O. Kuroda
eNeuro 11 January 2022, 9 (1) ENEURO.0405-21.2022; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0405-21.2022
Yousuke Tsuneoka
1Laboratory for Affiliative Social Behavior, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chihiro Yoshihara
1Laboratory for Affiliative Social Behavior, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryuko Ohnishi
1Laboratory for Affiliative Social Behavior, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sachine Yoshida
1Laboratory for Affiliative Social Behavior, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eri Miyazawa
1Laboratory for Affiliative Social Behavior, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masanobu Yamada
2Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi 371-8511, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuhiko Horiguchi
2Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi 371-8511, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Scott Young
3Section on Neural Gene Expression, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-9663
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katsuhiko Nishimori
4Department of Obesity and Internal Inflammation, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tadafumi Kato
5Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kumi O. Kuroda
1Laboratory for Affiliative Social Behavior, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Sagittal view of anatomic distribution of Oxt neurons, fibers, and parenting-induced c-Fos expression. Distribution of NPI (brown)-ir and c-Fos (black)-ir cell in and around of MPOA of virgin females after pup exposure (parasagittal section). A, left and right panels, Representative photographs and their diagrammatic drawings, respectively. These sections were stained by IHC. Black squares and plus (+) symbols, respectively, represent strongly and weakly expressed c-Fos-ir neurons without NPI-ir. Filled and open red circles, respectively, represent strongly and weakly NPI-ir cell bodies without c-Fos signals. Green squares, respectively, represent NPI-ir cell bodies with c-Fos-ir. Red lines represent NPI-ir fibers. Numbers 1–4 show the areas relatively devoid of c-Fos-ir, NPI-ir neurons, and fibers. Arrows indicate Oxt-ir thick dendrites with a corkscrew-like morphology and irregular varicosities. ac, anterior commissure. Panels are arranged in the medial–lateral order, from the left top to left bottom, and the right top to right bottom. B, High-magnification image of the blue squared region in A, containing the AC. The circle-headed arrow indicates double-labeled cells of NPI and c-Fos. White arrowheads indicate single-labeled cells of c-Fos, black arrowheads indicate single-labeled cells of NPI, and small arrows indicate NPI-ir fibers.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Horizontal view of anatomic distribution of Oxt neurons, fibers, and parenting-induced c-Fos expression. Distribution of NPI (brown)-ir and c-Fos (black)-ir cell in and around of MPOA of virgin females after pup exposure (horizontal section). Left and right panels show representative photographs and their diagrammatic drawings, respectively. These sections were stained by IHC. Black squares and plus symbols, respectively, represent strongly and weakly expressed c-Fos-ir neurons. Filled and open red circles, respectively, represent NPI-ir cell bodies with or without c-Fos signals. Red lines represent NPI-ir fibers. Numbers 1–4 show the areas relatively devoid of c-Fos-ir, NPI-ir neurons, and fibers. 3V, 3rd ventricle; ac, anterior commissure. All panels are arranged in ventral–dorsal order from the left, top to bottom, and then the right, top to bottom.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Parental behavior, fertility, and abnormal delivery of the Trh-Oxt double knock-out (DKO) mice. A, Responses to pup exposure in virgin females. B, Fertility ratio of the females after mating. C, Proportion of abnormal deliveries (prolonged for >24 h, and/or maternal distress with remaining pups in uterus, which sometimes caused maternal death in labor). “Abnormal (died)” means maternal death by PPD3, and “abnormal (euthanized)” means maternal health deterioration necessitating euthanasia by PPD3. D, The scores for nest quality, indicated by the use of nest material and nest shape (see Materials and Methods) at PPD 0. E, The placentophagia score (1, all the live pups were cleaned for amniotic membrane, umbilical cord, and placenta; 0.5, partially; 0, none of the pups were cleaned) at PPD 0. F, The spontaneous pup grouping score (1, all the live pups were grouped in the nest; 0.5, the live pups were in the nest except one; 0, all the live pups were outside of the nest.) at PPD 0. G, The pup survival rate (number of live pups at PPD 1 divided by the number of live pups at PPD 0 morning) of each mother. H, Schematic of the experimental timeline and responses to pup exposure in mothers. Only four of them (Oxt+/+-Trh+/−: 1, Oxt−/−-Trh+/−: 2, Oxt−/−Trh−/−: 1) had experienced the pup-exposure assay as a virgin, whose results are included in A. I, Responses to pup exposure in virgin males. J, Responses to pup exposure in males, which were separated from their female mates immediately after copulation. Copulation was assessed by vaginal plugs in females. Only males whose mates were later confirmed as pregnant are shown. K, Fertility ratios of the males after mating (7 d of cohabitation with females). L, Responses to pup exposure in males, which were separated from their female mates after 7 d of cohabitation. For D–H, data from only mothers who had normal delivery are shown. For J–L, data from only males who exhibited infanticide as a virgin are shown. (+/*) means wild-type (+/+) or heterozygous KO (+/−), and (−/−) means homozygous KO for the designated genetic locus. A black vertical bar in schematic of the experimental timelines indicates the day a pup-exposure assay was performed. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Different letters denote significant differences (multiple comparisons by Fisher’s exact test for categorical data, and Welch’s t test for continuous data), p < 0.05. Numbers of animals used are described in the figure.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Pup-directed behaviors of the virgin and postpartum Oxt-Trh-Avpr1a-Avpr1b quadruple knock-out (QKO) female mice in the standard pup-exposure assay. A, Schematic of the experimental timeline. “Posti-solation (PI)”: the mothers tested 13 d after the isolation from pups at PPD1. A black vertical bar indicates the day a pup-exposure assay was performed. B, Gross pup-directed behaviors in each genotype, with the number of mice for each behavioral category in each genotype. C–G, Details of pup-directed behaviors compared between quadruple (−/−) versus all other genotypes (others; C); heterozygous (+/−) versus homozygous KO (−/−) for Avpr1b (D), Avpr1a (E), Trh (F), and Oxt (G), regardless of other genetic loci. The left three variables on the abscissae are latencies, the right three variables are proportions of the time bins in which the indicated behaviors were performed. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Fisher’s exact test for categorical data; Welch’s t test for continuous data; **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Numbers of animals used are described in the figure.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Pup-directed behaviors of the virgin and postpartum Oxtr-Avpr1a-Avpr1b triple knock-out (TKO) female mice. A, Schematic of the experimental timeline. “Post-isolation (PI)”: the mothers tested 13 d after the isolation from pups at PPD1. A black vertical bar indicates the day a pup-exposure assay was performed. B, Gross pup-directed behaviors in each genotype, with the number of mice for each behavioral category in each genotype. C–G, Details of pup-directed behaviors compared between triple (−/−) versus all other genotypes (others; C); triple (−/−) versus Oxtr+/−; Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/− [triple (+/−); D], Avpr1b (E), Avpr1a (F), and Oxtr (G), regardless of other genetic loci. The left three variables on the abscissae are latencies, the right three variables are proportions of the time bins in which the indicated behaviors were performed. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Fisher’s exact test for categorical data; Welch’s t test for continuous data; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Numbers of animals used are described in the figure.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Oxt (NPI) and AVP expressions in the MPOA were not affected by Oxtr or Avpr genetic targeting. Distribution of NPI and AVP (black)-ir cells in the MPOA of Avpr1a-Oxtr-Avpr1b triple mutant (TKO) female mice; triple (+/−) mean Avpr1a+/−; Oxtr+/−; Avpr1b+/−, triple (−/−) mean Avpr1a−/−; Oxtr−/−; Avpr1b−/− TKO virgin female mice. A, The sections were stained by IHC. AC (B, E), SO (C, F), and PVH (D, G was identified by counterstain using NeuN). All panels are arranged in anterior–posterior order. B–G, High-magnification images of same-colored squares. H–K, The numbers of NPI-ir neurons in the AC (H), SO (I), and PVH (J) and of Avp-ir neurons in the PVH (K) of triple (+/−; N = 4) and (−/−; N = 4) virgin females. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Responses to pups in the standard pup-exposure assay with the virgin and copulated Oxtr-Avpr1a-Avpr1b triple knock-out (TKO) male mice. A, Schematics of the experimental timeline. A black vertical bar indicates the day a pup-exposure assay was performed. B–F, Gross pup-directed behaviors in each genotype, with the number of mice for each behavioral category in each genotype. Oxtr−/−; Avpr1a−/−; Avpr1b−/− [triple (−/−)] versus all other genotypes (others; B); triple (−/−) versus Oxtr+/−; Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/− [triple (+/−); C]; heterozygous (+/−) versus homozygous (−/−) KO for each four genetic loci for Avpr1b (D), Avpr1a (E), and Oxtr (F), regardless of other genetic loci. Blue asterisk: Fisher’s exact test between parental (pups retrieved) versus nonparental (infanticide or no pup retrieved); red asterisk: Fisher’s exact test between infanticidal versus noninfanticidal; *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Confirmation of the results with HIR strain of Oxtr-Avpr1a-Avpr1b triple knock-out (TKO) mice. A, B, Responses to pups, schematics of the experimental timeline, latencies, and proportion of time of pup-directed behaviors in the standard pup-exposure assay in virgin (A) and postpartum (B) females. The variables in the second rows are latencies, the variables in the third rows are proportion of time bins performed the indicated behavior. C, D, Responses to pups and schematic of the experimental timeline of pup-directed behaviors in the standard pup-exposure assay in virgin males (C) and father mice (D). A black vertical bar in schematic of the experimental timelines indicates the day a pup-exposure assay was performed. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Fisher’s exact test for categorical data; Welch’s t test for continuous data; **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Numbers of animals used are described in the figure.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Effect of restraint stress on the pup-directed behaviors of the virgin and postpartum Oxtr-Avpr1a-Avpr1b triple knock-out (TKO) female mice. A, Gross pup-directed behaviors in each genotype, with the number of mice for each behavioral category in each genotype. Blue asterisk: Fisher’s exact test between parental (pups retrieved) versus non-parental (infanticide or no pup retrieved), *p < 0.05. B–D, Details of pup-directed behaviors compared between heterozygous (+/−) versus homozygous KO (−/−) for Avpr1b (B), Avpr1a (C), and for Oxtr (D), disregarding other genetic loci. The left two variables are latencies, the right two variables are proportion of time bins performed the indicated behavior. Welch’s t test for continuous data; *p < 0.05. E, Total amount of pup retrieval behavior, measured by the total time the three pups spent in the nest. Different letters denote significant differences (multiple comparisons by Welch’s t test, p < 0.05). See also the Extended Data Figure 9-1 for the results of Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum tests with post hoc multiple comparisons by Nemenyi test. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    Stress sensitivity of the virgin Oxtr-Avpr1a-Avpr1b triple knock-out (TKO) female and male mice. Behavioral characteristics in the open field (OF) test (A, D) and elevated plus maze (EPM) (B, E), and effect of restraint stress on plasma CORT level (C, F). (+/−) means heterozygous, (−/−) means homozygous, and * means (+/−) or (−/−) KO for the designated genetic locus. Error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Welch’s t test, *p < 0.05. Numbers of animals used are described in the figure.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Primers used for genotyping

    StrainGene lociPrimer sequence (5′ to 3′)Tm
    B6;129S-Oxttm1Wsy /J;Oxtgtgctggacctggatatgcgcaag68
    agcgtcctttgccgcccgggccgcaggggagacactgtggctgtgg
    ctgctaaagcgcatgctccagactgc
    Trh KOTrhtctcgtcgtgacccatggcgatg64
    tctcgtcgtgacccatggcgatg
    ttactcctccagaggttccctgac
    B6.129P2-Avpr1a tm1Dgen /JAvpr 1acgcaacgaggagctggcgaagctgg64
    gcggtaggtgatgtcccagcacagc
    gggccagctcattcctcccactcat
    Oxtr KOOxtrgttgggaacagcggtgatta64
    ccttggaagcaggaggtgaag
    gctgcgcagtggtggtgacttc
    B6;129×1-Avpr1b tm1Wsy /JAvpr 1baccccttcccagcctctgagcccagaaagcgaagg64
    gaaacggctactctctccgattccaaaagaaag
    acctgtagatatttgacagcccgg
    B6;129Sv-V1atm1GztV1btm1GztAvpr 1aacaagtgttttgtaactagtgactcta60
    aggggcttctggtcacgccttgt
    acatagcgttggctacccgtgat
    Avpr 1bgaaacggctactctctcgattccaaaagaag60
    gcgaattcgatatcaagcttatcga
    acctgtagatatttgacagcccgg
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Mouse genetic mutant lines and control genotypes used in each figure

    FigureAbbreviationKO miceSourceGenotype of control groupsComment
    Fig. 3DKOTrh KO miceYamada et al. (1997)Trh+/− or −/−; Oxt+/− or −/−+/* means +/+ or +/−
    Oxt KO miceJAX (#2713)
    Fig. 4QKOAvpr 1a KO miceJAX (#5776)All other genotypes besides Avpr1a−/−; Avpr1b−/−; Trh−/−; Oxt−/− (Fig. 4C)
    Avpr 1b KO miceJAX (#6160)Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/−; Trh+/− or −/−; Oxt+/− or −/− (Fig. 4D)
    Trh KO miceYamada et al. (1997)Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Trh+/− or −/−; Oxt+/− or −/− (Fig. 4E)
    Oxt KO miceJAX (#2713)Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Trh+/−; Oxt+/− or −/− (Fig. 4F)
    Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Trh+/− or −/−; Oxt+/− (Fig. 4G)
    Fig. 5TKOAvpr 1a KO miceJAX (#5776)All other genotypes besides Avpr1a−/−; Avpr1b−/−; Oxtr−/− (Fig. 5C)
    Avpr 1b KO miceJAX (#6160)Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/−; Oxtr+/− (Fig. 5D)
    Oxtr KO miceTakayanagi et al. (2005)Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/−; Oxtr+/− or −/− (Fig. 5E)
    Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Oxtr+/− or −/− (Fig. 5F)
    Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Oxtr+/− (Fig. 5G)
    Fig. 6TKOAvpr 1a KO miceJAX (#5776)Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/−; Oxtr+/−
    Avpr 1b KO miceJAX (#6160)
    Oxtr KO miceTakayanagi et al. (2005)
    Fig. 7TKOAvpr 1a KO miceJAX (#5776)All other genotypes besides Avpr1a−/−; Avpr1b−/−; Oxtr−/− (Fig. 7B)
    Avpr 1b KO miceJAX (#6160)Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/−; Oxtr+/− (Fig. 7C)
    Oxtr KO miceTakayanagi et al. (2005)Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/−; Oxtr+/− or −/− (Fig. 7D)
    Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Oxtr+/− or −/− (Fig. 7E)
    Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Oxtr+/− (Fig. 7F)
    Fig. 8HIRAvpr1a and 1b
    DKO mice
    Kumamoto University
    (#559)
    Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/−; Oxtr+/−JAX (#5776) Avpr1a KO line was
    not a null mutation, Kumamoto
    (#599) Avpr1a KO line has been
    confirmed for the phenotype in
    cardiovascular system
    Oxtr KO miceTakayanagi et al. (2005)
    Fig. 9TKOAvpr 1a KO miceJAX (#5776)Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/−; Oxtr+/− or −/− (Fig. 9B)
    Avpr 1b KO miceJAX (#6160)Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Oxtr+/− or −/− (Fig. 9C)
    Oxtr KO miceTakayanagi et al. (2005)Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Oxtr+/− (Fig. 9D)
    Fig. 10TKOAvpr 1a KO miceJAX (#5776)Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/−; Oxtr+/− (large panels)
    Avpr 1b KO miceJAX (#6160)Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Oxtr+/− (small left panels)
    Oxtr KO miceTakayanagi et al. (2005)Avpr1a+/−; Avpr1b+/− or −/−; Oxtr+/− or −/− (small middle panels)
    Avpr1a+/− or −/−; Avpr1b+/−; Oxtr+/− or −/− (small right panels)

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Extended Data Figure 9-1

    Effects of restraint stress on the pup-directed behaviors of the virgin Oxtr-Avpr1a-Avpr1b (TKO) triple mutant female mice with nonparametric statistical analysis. Parental behavior, measured by the total time the 3 pups spent in nest, of Oxtr-Avpr1a-Avpr1b triple mutant virgin female mice in standard condition (a) and after restraint stress (b). (+/−) means heterozygous, (−/−) means homozygous, and * means (+/−) or (−/−) for the designated genetic locus. *HH means (Avpr1a*, Oxtr+/−, Avpr1b +/−; gray with white stripe), *KH means (Avpr1a*, Oxtr−/−, Avpr1b +/−-; black with white stripe), *HK means (Avpr1a*, Oxtr+/−, Avpr1b −/−; gray), and *KK means (Avpr1a*, Oxtr−/−, Avpr1b −/−; black). Results of nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum tests are shown above the graphs. # and ## denote significant differences between two groups in post hoc multiple comparisons (Nemenyi test; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01). Nemenyi tests were performed by the R package PMCMR ver. 4.3 (Pohlert, 2014). The box plots were generated by geom_boxplot function with default settings in R package ggplot2 ver. 3.1.0 (Wickham, 2016). The medians are represented by the horizontal bar in the middle of each box. The lower and upper hinges correspond to the first and third quartiles (the 25th and 75th percentiles). The upper whisker extends from the hinge to the largest value no further than 1.5 * IQR from the hinge. The lower whisker extends from the hinge to the smallest value at most 1.5 * IQR of the hinge. Data beyond the end of the whiskers are called “outlying” points and are plotted individually (Wickham, 2016). Download Figure 9-1, EPS file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 9 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 9, Issue 1
January/February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Oxytocin Facilitates Allomaternal Behavior under Stress in Laboratory Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Oxytocin Facilitates Allomaternal Behavior under Stress in Laboratory Mice
Yousuke Tsuneoka, Chihiro Yoshihara, Ryuko Ohnishi, Sachine Yoshida, Eri Miyazawa, Masanobu Yamada, Kazuhiko Horiguchi, W. Scott Young, Katsuhiko Nishimori, Tadafumi Kato, Kumi O. Kuroda
eNeuro 11 January 2022, 9 (1) ENEURO.0405-21.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0405-21.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Oxytocin Facilitates Allomaternal Behavior under Stress in Laboratory Mice
Yousuke Tsuneoka, Chihiro Yoshihara, Ryuko Ohnishi, Sachine Yoshida, Eri Miyazawa, Masanobu Yamada, Kazuhiko Horiguchi, W. Scott Young, Katsuhiko Nishimori, Tadafumi Kato, Kumi O. Kuroda
eNeuro 11 January 2022, 9 (1) ENEURO.0405-21.2022; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0405-21.2022
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • maternal behavior
  • medial preoptic area
  • Mus musculus
  • oxytocin
  • vasopressin

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Deletion of endocannabinoid synthesizing enzyme DAGLα in Pcp2-positive cerebellar Purkinje cells decreases depolarization-induced short-term synaptic plasticity, reduces social preference, and heightens anxiety
  • Release of extracellular matrix components after human traumatic brain injury
  • Action intentions reactivate representations of task-relevant cognitive cues
Show more Research Article: New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency
  • Transformed visual working memory representations in human occipitotemporal and posterior parietal cortices
  • Neural Speech-Tracking During Selective Attention: A Spatially Realistic Audiovisual Study
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.