Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Functional Characterization of Ovine Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons Reveal Peripheral Sensitization after Osteochondral Defect

Sampurna Chakrabarti, Minji Ai, Katherine Wong, Karin Newell, Frances M. D. Henson and Ewan St. John Smith
eNeuro 20 September 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0237-21.2021; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0237-21.2021
Sampurna Chakrabarti
1Department of Neuroscience, Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin (MDC), Berlin, Germany, 13125
2Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1PD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Minji Ai
3Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB3 0ES
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Wong
2Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1PD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karin Newell
3Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB3 0ES
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frances M. D. Henson
3Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB3 0ES
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ewan St. John Smith
2Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1PD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ewan St. John Smith
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Characterizations of defect and sheep DRG neurons. A, Photograph of OD created in sheep joint. B, Photograph showing intact (top) lumbar region of a sheep spine and after transverse section (white dotted dissection line, bottom) to expose DRG (black circles). C, Acutely dissociated sheep DRG neurons in culture. D, Histogram showing area of each sheep DRG neuron imaged from whole DRG section, and the criteria used in this article for assigning neurons into small, medium, and large category. E, Histogram of neuronal diameters on which whole-cell patch clamp was performed.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    OD neurons are more excitable than ctrl neurons. A, Percentage of neurons showing spontaneous activity in ctrl and OD condition (top) and a representative OD neuron with spontaneous activity (bottom). B, Percentage of neurons firing multiple APs on current injection (top) and a representative trace of multiple firing in response to 400 pA injected current (bottom). C, Schematic representation of AP properties (left) and distribution of HPD (right) and (D) RMP in ctrl and defect conditions. E, Representative traces of currents evoked from a neuron at different voltages and (F) plots of the inward and outwards currents in ctrl (black) and defect (red) conditions; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, unpaired t test. See Extended Data Figure 2-1 for breakdown of data according to weeks post-OD.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    OD neurons have increased TRPV1 function than ctrl neurons. A, Patch-clamp traces showing a representative DRG neuron from the ctrl side firing AP spikes above baseline and same as baseline in response to capsaicin and αβ me-ATP, respectively. B, Bar graph showing percentage of neurons with above baseline firing activity in response to capsaicin C, Bar graph showing percentage of neurons with above baseline firing activity in response to αβ me-ATP. Numbers on the bars represent number of neurons in each condition firing above baseline. D, top, Representative Ca2+ trace from a neuron responding to capsaicin and KCl (positive control). Bottom, Magnitude of Ca2+ influx in response to capsaicin (Ctrl, n = 35, defect, n = 48). E, Percentage of neurons responding to capsaicin in each condition. F, top, Representative Ca2+ trace from a neuron responding to αβ me-ATP and KCl (positive control). Bottom, Magnitude of Ca2+ influx in response to αβ me-ATP (ctrl, n = 24, defect, n = 23). G, Percentage of neurons responding to αβ me-ATP in each condition. *p < 0.05, unpaired t-test.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    OD and ctrl DRGs showed similar proportion of P2X3 and CGRP positive neurons. Ai, Representative brightfield (top) and anti-P2X3-antibody stained (bottom) image of a whole-sheep DRG in cross-section along with the percentage of neurons positive for P2X3 (Aii). Bi, Representative brightfield (top) and anti-CGRP-antibody stained (bottom) image of a whole-sheep DRG in cross-section along with the percentage of neurons positive for CGRP (Bii). Histograms of cross-sectional areas of neurons stained positive by anti-CGRP (C) and anti-P2X3 (D) antibodies. Numbers on the bars represent neurons positive for the respective antibody staining; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, χ2 test.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Scores of ODs in sheep by International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) macroscopic scoring system

    Sheep #ICRS macroscopic score
    (appearance of joint postmortem)
    13
    22
    32
    42
    53
    62
    • View popup
    Table 2

    AP properties of sheep DRG neurons in Ctrl and OD groups

    Ctrl (n = 15)OD (n = 16)
    MeanSDMeanSD
    Diameter (μm)39.58.30939.57.611
    Capacitance (pF)71.041.2480.547.24
    RMP (mV)−48.313.39−46.59.633
    Threshold (pA)116.7155.5100.0225.8
    HPD (ms)3.1*0.88864.52.151
    AHP amplitude (mV)14.07.54814.09.126
    Amplitude (mV)101.618.17103.511.17
    • *p < 0.05, unpaired t test.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    List of TRPV1 antibodies tested on sheep DRGs

    AntibodyDescriptionSupplierCatalog
    Anti-TRPV1, mouse monoclonalPrimaryProteintech66983-1-Ig
    Anti-TRPV1, rabbit polyclonalPrimaryAbcamAb3487
    Anti-Trpv1, rabbit polyclonalPrimaryAbcamAb31895
    Anti-TRPV1, guinea pig polyclonalPrimaryAlomoneAGP-118

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Extended Data Figure 2-1

    Extended data supporting Figure 2. Data points from main figures separated according to weeks post-OD. A, AP properties of sheep DRG neurons. Percentage of sheep DRG neurons which evoked AP upon application of capsaicin (B) and αβ m-ATP (C). D, Percentage and magnitude of Ca2+ influx of sheep DRG neurons in response to capsaicin and αβ m-ATP. E, percentage of P2X3 and CGRP positive sheep DRG neurons as assessed using immunohistochemistry. In all the panels, black = control, red = OD, circle = data from sheep two weeks post-OD, square = data from sheep four weeks post-OD and, triangle = data from sheep six weeks post-OD; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, unpaired t test. Download Figure 2-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 5
September/October 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Functional Characterization of Ovine Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons Reveal Peripheral Sensitization after Osteochondral Defect
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Functional Characterization of Ovine Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons Reveal Peripheral Sensitization after Osteochondral Defect
Sampurna Chakrabarti, Minji Ai, Katherine Wong, Karin Newell, Frances M. D. Henson, Ewan St. John Smith
eNeuro 20 September 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0237-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0237-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Functional Characterization of Ovine Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons Reveal Peripheral Sensitization after Osteochondral Defect
Sampurna Chakrabarti, Minji Ai, Katherine Wong, Karin Newell, Frances M. D. Henson, Ewan St. John Smith
eNeuro 20 September 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0237-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0237-21.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • knee
  • neuron
  • osteochondral defect
  • pain
  • sheep model

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • sAPPα inhibits neurite outgrowth in primary mouse neurons via GABA B Receptor subunit 1a
  • When Familiar Faces Feel Better: A Framework for Social Neurocognitive Aging in a Rat Model
  • The neurexin1β histidine-rich domain is involved in excitatory presynaptic organization and short-term plasticity
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Independent encoding of orientation and mean luminance by mouse visual cortex
  • Different But Complementary Motor Functions Reveal an Asymmetric Recalibration of Upper Limb Bimanual Coordination
  • Serotonergic Suppression of Sustained Synaptic Responses in Rat Oculomotor Neural Integrator Networks
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.