Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Cognition and Behavior

A Direct Comparison of Afferents to the Rat Anterior Thalamic Nuclei and Nucleus Reuniens: Overlapping But Different

Mathias L. Mathiasen, Andrew J. D. Nelson, Eman Amin, Shane M. O’Mara and John P. Aggleton
eNeuro 22 July 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0103-20.2021; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0103-20.2021
Mathias L. Mathiasen
1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. D. Nelson
1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eman Amin
1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shane M. O’Mara
2Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John P. Aggleton
1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John P. Aggleton
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Photomicrographs showing the CTB and FB tracer deposits in the seven highlighted cases. Case numbers are indicated in the top left corner. In all cases, the red tracer is CTB. Images show the center of each injection. L5/A4/N21 refers to the filter cubes used for imaging in the epifluorescence microscope. The dotted lines signal nuclei boundaries. AM, anteromedial thalamic nucleus; AV, anteroventral thalamic nucleus; mt, mammillothalamic tract; PHD, posterior hypothalamic area, dorsal part; PT, parataenial nucleus; RE, nucleus reuniens; Rh, rhomboid thalamic nucleus; Rt, reticular nucleus; sm, striamedullaris; SMT, submedial thalamic nucleus; ZIR, zona incerta rostral part. Scale bars, 200 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Photomicrographs depicting the delineation of sublayers VIa and VIb in cresyl violet- and parvalbumin-stained sections. a–h, j–m, The images also show how retrogradely labeled cells from Fast Blue in nucleus reuniens are preferentially localized in layer VIb in cases #9 (a–h) and #3 (j–m). Notice that the parvalbumin stain is stained with a red fluorophore in case #9 and green in case #3. a, b, A parvalbumin-stained frontal section (red) with Fast Blue-labeled cells plotted (green/yellow color) in b. c, d, A 20× zoom scan of the frontal cortical portion indicated by the white stippled box in b. c shows the parvalbumin label, while d shows both parvalbumin and Fast Blue labels. e, f, Frontal brain sections as in a and b, but with the sublaminar differentiation of layer VI indicated in f. Inserted asterisks indicate the borders between layers VIb/VIa and layers VIa/V, as well as the cingulum bundle/layer VIb border. g, The laminar delineations are based on cytoarchitectonic criteria. Nissl-stained section from the same case (#9) is shown, with the sublaminar borders indicated by asterisks as in f. This brain section is adjacent to the section in e and f, and the indicated laminar borders in this case were made by overlaying the image with the cresyl violet-stained image. h, Enlargement of the portion indicated in g with a black stippled box. i, Center of the injection site in case #9. j–m, Images from case #3, showing parvalbumin (green) with Fast Blue (k, m) or without Fast Blue (j, l) in rostral anterior cingulate/prelimbic cortices (j, k) and a more caudal portion of the anterior cingulate cortex (l, m). Inserted asterisks indicate the border between layers VIa/VIb and VIb/cingulum bundle. Note that retrogradely labeled cells in b are manually plotted whereas in all other images the original scans are shown. Images are adjusted for contrast, brightness, and intensity. 3V, Third ventricle; mt, mammillothalamic tract; SMT, submedial thalamic nucleus; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; RE, nucleus reuniens; CM, central medial thalamic nucleus; pRE, perireuniens. Scale bars, 200 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Photomicrographs showing the distribution of labeled cells resulting from a CTB injection in the anteromedial thalamic nucleus (red cells) and a Fast Blue injection in the nucleus reuniens (blue cells; case #7). a–e, Scans (5×) illustrating cell labeling along the anteroposterior axis showing all portions of neocortex substantially labeled by both tracers. Stippled white lines indicate laminar borders, and arrows indicate regional borders. Cells labeled from the Fast Blue tracer in nucleus reuniens are densely concentrated in layer VIb in the ACC, PL, IL, and secondary motor cortices (M2), as well as the deep cell layer of the DP. At anterior portions of the anterior cingulate cortex only, appreciable Fast Blue labeling is also present in layer VIa. Cells labeled by CTB (anteromedial nucleus injection) were more concentrated in the anterior cingulate cortex and distributed in both layer VIa and layer VIb, but in some sections had a clear preference for layer VIa, avoiding the deepest portion of layer VIb. Some Fast Blue- and CTB-labeled cells are also present in layer V. In this case, cell labeling by both CTB and Fast Blue extends into the rostral retrosplenial cortex. c1–c3, Zoom images (10×) of the box in c. c4–c6, Zoom images (20×) of the box in c3. d1–d3, Zoom images (10×) of the box in d. d4–d6, Zoom images (20×) of the box in d3. In all zoom panels, the first image to the left shows Fast Blue-labeled cells, the second shows CTB-labeled cells, and the third image is an overlay of the two previous images. Double-labeled cells are present and can clearly be seen in the 20× zoom images. f, Line drawing of the injection site. For photomicrographs of injections, see Figure 1. Images are adjusted for contrast, brightness, and intensity. A13, A13 dopamine cells; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; AD, anterodorsal thalamic nucleus; AM, anteromedial thalamic nucleus; AV, anteroventral thalamic nucleus; CM, central medial thalamic nucleus; DA, dorsal hypothalamic areas aRSC, anterior retrosplenial cortex; DP, dorsal peduncular cortex; IL, infralimbic cortex; IAM, interanteromedial thalamic nucleus; LO, lateral orbitofrontal cortex; M2, secondary motor cortex; PaXi, paraxiphoid thalamic nucleus; PL, prelimbic cortex; pRE, perireuniens; RE, nucleus reuniens; Rh, rhomboid nucleus; SMT, submedial thalamic nucleus; VM, ventromedial thalamic nucleus; ZI, zona incerta. Scale bars, 200 μm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Density of cortical labeled neurons (per square millimeter): the plots show the mean and SEM from the seven highlighted cases. a, Density of retrogradely labeled cells. Densities are given for the IL/DP, PL, as well as the aACC and pACC. b, Cortical cell counts showing the number of cells in layer VIa as a proportion of the total cell counts in layer VIa and VIb combined. Cell counts are given for the same areas as in a, except for IL/DP. c, Density of retrogradely labeled cells in retrosplenial cortex (RSC). ATN, Anterior thalamic injections; RE, nucleus reuniens injections. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Photomicrographs showing retrograde cell labeling in case #1 with a Fast Blue injection involving all anterior thalamic nuclei combined with a CTB injection in nucleus reuniens. a, Plentiful Fast Blue labeling in layer VI of retrosplenial cortex following the ATN injection, while no CTB-labeled cells are visible. The schematic drawing in the top right corner indicates a–p levels of the image. b, Retrograde cell labeling in the mammillary bodies where only Fast Blue (ATN injection) is visible, with no cells labeled following the nucleus reuniens injection. lMB, Lateral mammillary nucleus; mMB medial mammillary nuclei; dRSC, dysgranular retrosplenial cortex; gRSC, granular retrosplenial cortex; SUM, supramammillary nucleus. Scale bars, 200 μm.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Photomicrographs depicting the distribution of label resulting from a CTB injection in the AM (red cells) and a Fast Blue injection centered in RE (case #7). a–c, A 5× scan of cell labeling in subiculum. Labeled cells resulting from the Fast Blue tracer in nucleus reuniens are distributed across all septotemporal and proximodistal portions (with a slight preference for distal portions at septal levels), whereas the CTB label (from the anteromedial thalamic nucleus) shows a clear preference for the proximal subiculum and often avoids the most ventral subiculum, aside from the ventral portion of the intermediate subiculum (c). b1–b3, Zoom images (20×) of the dorsal white box in b. b4–b6, Zoom images (20×) of the black/white ventral box in b. c1–c3, Zoom images (20×) of the most dorsal white box in c. c4–c6, Zoom images (20×) of the slightly more ventral white box in c. Comparing c1–c3 and c4–c6, the proximodistal differences between the two cell populations are evident. c7–c9, Zoom images (20×) of the most ventral white box in c. Double-labeled cells are visible in the 20× zoom images, highlighted by arrows pointing to representative double-labeled cells. In all zoom panels, the first image shows Fast Blue-labeled cells, the second image shows CTB-labeled cells, and the third image is an overlay of the two. Images are adjusted for contrast, brightness, and intensity. d, Line drawings depicting the center of the two injections in case #7. A13, A13 dopamine cells; AD, anterodorsal thalamic nucleus; AM, anteromedial thalamic nucleus; AV, anteroventral thalamic nucleus; CM, central medial thalamic nucleus; dSUB, dorsal subiculum; IAM, interanteromedial thalamic nucleus; iSUB, intermediate subiculum; PaS, parasubiculum; PaXi, paraxiphoid thalamic nucleus; pRE, perireuniens; PrS, presubiculum; RE, nucleus reuniens; Rh, rhomboid nucleus; SMT, submedial thalamic nucleus; VL, ventrolateral thalamic nucleus; VM, ventromedial thalamic nucleus; vSUB, ventral subiculum; ZI, zona incerta. Scale bars, 200 μm.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Photomicrographs of retrogradely labeled cells in dorsal and intermediate subiculum in five different cases. Case numbers are indicated in each frame. a, b, Injection sites are restricted to nucleus reuniens and the anterior thalamic nuclei. c–e, Other areas were involved in the injection sites (Table 1). In case #3, the Fast Blue injection (blue cells) is in nucleus reuniens and the CTB injection (red cells) is in the anterior thalamic nuclei. In all other cases, this is reversed. a, Labeled cells resulting from both tracer injections are intermixed in the deep cellular layers. Nevertheless, a tendency for laminar separation is visible with cells projecting to nucleus reuniens (blue) being positioned in the deepest portion. b, At very caudal levels of the intermediate subiculum (where in coronal sections, all cells belong to the deep cell layer), the cells targeting nucleus reuniens (blue) are located in the deepest portion, whereas cells targeting the anterior thalamic nuclei are more equally distributed, but avoid the deepest portion, creating a differentiation across these deepest layers. c–e, Independent of the density of the additional cell label in the superficial cell layer, a sublaminar differentiation is present in the deepest layer. c and e also show the more superficial subiculum label observed in a subset of reuniens injection cases. The insert in d is a 20× zoom image of the same section, showing the morphologic details. Images are adjusted for contrast, brightness, and intensity. Cx, Neocortex; POS, postsubiculum; dSUB, dorsal subiculum. Scale bars, 200 μm.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Density of labeled neurons in subiculum (per square millimeter). Plots showing mean density and SEM of retrograde labeled cells in five highlighted cases. Densities are given for the dorsal (dSUB), intermediate (iSUB), and ventral (vSUB) subiculum. ATN, anterior thalamic injections; RE, nucleus reuniens injections. ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Plots showing the density of double-labeled cells in cortex and subiculum (per square millimeter). a, Plots showing the mean density and SEM of double-labeled cells in infralimbic/dorsal peduncular cortices (IL/DP), prelimbic cortex (PL), rostral anterior cingulate cortex (aACC) and caudal anterior cingulate cortex (pAAC). b, Plots showing the mean density and SEM of double-labeled cells in the dSUB, iSUB, and vSUB. **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    Plots showing the proportions of double-labeled cells in cortex and subiculum. Numbers are given as proportions of cells labeled by the tracer in either the anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN) or nucleus reuniens (RE). a, Plots showing the mean proportions and SEM of double-labeled cells in infralimbic/dorsal peduncular cortices (IL/DP), prelimbic cortex (PL), rostral anterior cingulate cortex (aACC) and caudal anterior cingulate cortex (pAAC). b, Plots showing the mean proportions and SEM of double-labeled cells in the dorsal (dSUB), intermediate (iSUB) and ventral subiculum (vSUB). As these data are not independent, no statistical analyses are shown.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Tracer injection details for the study cases

    Case #CTB injection siteFB injection sitemPFC layer VI: main distribution
    of retrogradely labeled cells
    mPFC layer V: (typically, many
    fewer cells than in VI)
    Distribution of retrogradely labeled
    cells in the subiculum
    #1
    (216#10)
    REAM/AV/ADRE: layer VIb (+ scant label VIa)
    ATN: layer VIa + VIb
    RE: only a few single
    scattered cells in layer V
    ATN: Layer V
    RE: deep
    ATN: deep(↑)
    #2
    (5000#1)
    AMRERE: layer VIb (+ moderate VIa,
    predominantly in aACC)
    AM: layer VIa and VIb
    RE: layer V
    AM: Layer V
    RE: deep layer (+ scant in superficial layer)
    AM: deep layer(↑) (+ a few scattered
    cells in superficial layer)
    #3
    (223#10)
    AMRERE: layer VIb (moderate VIa in aACC)
    AM: layer VIa + VIb
    RE: only a few single
    cells in layer V
    AM: Layer V
    RE: deep (+ scant superficial cells only
    septal distal portion)
    AM: deep(↑) (a few single cells more superficial)
    #4
    (5000#2)
    AM (VA)RE (Rh)RE+: layer VIb (+ scant in VIa)
    AM+: layer VIa and VIb
    RE+: layer V
    AM: layer V
    RE+: deep layer (+ scant in superficial layer)
    AM: deep layer(↑)
    #5
    (198#4)
    AVRERE: layer VIb (however, moderate-
    to-dense in VIa, mainly ACC)
    AM: layer VIa and VIb
    RE: layer V moderate
    AM: layer V
    RE: deep layer (+ scant in superficial layer)
    AM: deep layer(↑) (+ scant in superficial
    layer). In deep layer noticeably separate
    from deeper RE label
    #6
    (5000#7)
    AMRE (Rh/CM/SMT)RE+: layer VIa and VIb (although
    densest in VIb)
    AM: layer VIa and VIb
    RE+: layer V
    AM: layer V
    RE+: deep layer (+ scant in superficial layer
    AM: deep layer(↑)
    #7
    (4000#3)
    AMRE (SMT, pRE)RE+: layer VIb (moderate rostral
    ACC label in layer VIa)
    AM: layer VIa + VIb
    RE+: layer V
    AM: layer V
    RE+: deep (+ scant superficial label)
    AM: deep(↑) (a few single cells scattered
    superficially)
    #8
    (4000#7)
    AMRE/RhRE+: layer VIb (moderate rostral
    ACC label in layer VIa)
    AM: layer VIa + VIb
    RE+: layer V
    AM: layer V
    RE+: deep (+ scant superficial label)
    AM: deep(↑)
    #9
    (208#9)
    RERE: layer VIbRE: deep
    #10
    (215#4)
    RE/RhRE+: layer VIb (rostral ACC
    moderate label in layer VIa)
    N/ARE+: deep (+ scant superficial label)
    #11
    (88#5)
    AVAV: layer VIa + VIbAM: layer VAM: deep (+ single scattered cells in
    superficial layer)
    #12
    (207#2)
    RE/Rh/SMT (IAM)RE+: layer VIa + VIbRE+: layer VRE+: deep (+ scant superficial layer)
    #13
    (4000#4)
    AMRE/Rh/CM, (pRE, SMT)RE+: layer VIb + Via
    AM: layer VIa + VIb
    RE+: layer V
    AM: layer V
    RE+: deep (+ scant in superficial layer)
    AM: deep(↑)
    #14
    (5000#10)
    AM/VMRERE: layer VIb
    AM+: layer VIa and VIb
    RE: a few single cells
    AM+: layer V
    RE: deep layer
    AM+: deep layer(↑)
    #15
    (216#8)
    Ventral RE/PaXiAM/PT/MD/
    VL/SMT
    RE+: layer VIb (+ scant in
    layer VIa)
    ATN+: layer VIa + VIb
    RE+: layer V
    ATN+: layer V
    RE+: deep (moderate in superficial layer)
    ATN+: deep(↑)
    #16
    (198#8)
    Ventral RE and PaXi (hyp,
    very weak involvement)
    AM/MD (AV, AD)RE+: layer VIb (+scant in
    layer VIa)
    ATN+: layer VIa + Vib
    RE+: layer V
    ATN+: Layer V
    RE+: deep + moderate superficial
    ATN+: deep(↑) (only single cells superficial)
    #17
    (216#12)
    Ventral RE (PaXi, very minor
    involvement)
    AM/MD (AV, AD, DG)RE+: layer VIb (+ scant in
    layer Via)
    ATN+: layer VIa + VIb
    RE+: layer V (dense in
    ventral mPFC)
    ATN+: layer V
    RE+: deep + moderate superficial
    ATN+:(↑) deep (moderate superficial
    involvement in some sections)
    #18
    (216#3)
    RE (very restricted)AM/PC/MD/CM
    (AD, PT)
    RE: layer VIb (+ scant in
    layer VIa)
    ATN+: layer VIa + VIb
    RE: few scattered cells
    in layer V
    ATN+: layer V
    RE: deep (only in iSUB where very scant)
    ATN+: deep(↑)
    • The top rows are those cases with the most selective pairs of injections. In column 1, the case numbers given in the text are in first line (#1 to #18), small case numbers in parenthesis (second line) give the original case numbers. In columns 2 and 3, areas in parentheses show only limited tracer. Column 4 indicates the overall distribution of retrograde cell labeling across the two sublayers of layer VI. Column 5 indicates whether the layer V label is present, while column 6 indicates the laminar position of label in the subiculum. In column 6, “deep” and “superficial” refer to the two principal cell layers. In cases with dual injections, (↑) indicates that the labeling is overall more superficial than the labeling from the other tracer, although still in the deep cell layer. DG, Dentate gyrus; FX, fornix; hyp, hypothalamus; MD, mediodorsal thalamic nucleus; PT, paratenial nucleus; SMT, submedial thalamic nucleus; VA, ventral anterior thalamic nucleus; VL, ventrolateral nucleus; PC, paracentral thalamic nucleus.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 5
September/October 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Direct Comparison of Afferents to the Rat Anterior Thalamic Nuclei and Nucleus Reuniens: Overlapping But Different
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Direct Comparison of Afferents to the Rat Anterior Thalamic Nuclei and Nucleus Reuniens: Overlapping But Different
Mathias L. Mathiasen, Andrew J. D. Nelson, Eman Amin, Shane M. O’Mara, John P. Aggleton
eNeuro 22 July 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0103-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0103-20.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
A Direct Comparison of Afferents to the Rat Anterior Thalamic Nuclei and Nucleus Reuniens: Overlapping But Different
Mathias L. Mathiasen, Andrew J. D. Nelson, Eman Amin, Shane M. O’Mara, John P. Aggleton
eNeuro 22 July 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0103-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0103-20.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • frontal
  • hippocampus
  • layer 6
  • layer VI
  • subiculum
  • thalamus

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Neural mechanisms of self-generated action sequences
  • Assessment of cell-type-specific excitatory synaptic strength in the dorsolateral striatum of goal-directed and habitual cocaine-seeking behavior
  • Heading and then saccades predict visual discrimination decisions in freely moving ferrets
Show more Research Article: New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Neural mechanisms of self-generated action sequences
  • Disrupting motor cortical regional activity during motor sequence skill training impairs human motor visuomotor skill acquisition and learning that is not sequence-specific
  • Whole-Brain Mapping of Neuronal Activity Associated with Vocal Socialization Behaviors in Adult Mice
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.