Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Modeling Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Epilepsy Caused by Loss of Function of kif2a in Zebrafish

Michèle Partoens, Ann-Sofie De Meulemeester, Hoi-Khoanh Giong, Duc-Hung Pham, Jeong-Soo Lee, Peter A. de Witte and Aleksandra Siekierska
eNeuro 17 August 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0055-21.2021; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0055-21.2021
Michèle Partoens
1Laboratory for Molecular Biodiscovery, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann-Sofie De Meulemeester
1Laboratory for Molecular Biodiscovery, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ann-Sofie De Meulemeester
Hoi-Khoanh Giong
2Disease Target Structure Research Centre, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
3KRIBB School, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
4Dementia DTC R&D Convergence Program, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Duc-Hung Pham
1Laboratory for Molecular Biodiscovery, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeong-Soo Lee
2Disease Target Structure Research Centre, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
3KRIBB School, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
4Dementia DTC R&D Convergence Program, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter A. de Witte
1Laboratory for Molecular Biodiscovery, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aleksandra Siekierska
1Laboratory for Molecular Biodiscovery, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aleksandra Siekierska
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A novel kif2a knock-out zebrafish model shows that kif2a is not indispensable for survival and mutations do not result in gross morphologic abnormalities. a, Linear representation of the human kinesin 2A polypeptide with highlighted four de novo MCD-associated mutations (indicated in red-pink) located in or near the ATP-binding region (indicated in green). Kinesin motor domain, coiled coil, and globular domains (UniProtKB-O00139) are highlighted. Multiple sequence alignment shows the level of conservation of the ATP binding region (indicated in dark turquoise) of human, mouse, and zebrafish. b, Localization of 4-nucleotide deletion (CCAG) in the globular region of Kif2a and electropherogram of kif2a+/+ larvae, confirming the presence of the mutation in homozygotes. c, Kaplan–Meier survival rate curves of kif2a+/+ (n = 5), kif2a+/− (n = 21), and kif2a−/− (n = 10) larvae. Larvae were obtained by the mating of heterozygous adults. Surviving larvae were counted every 24 h until 30 dpf. d, Lateral bright-field images representing normal macroscopic morphology of 3 and 5 dpf kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. Scale bar, 1 mm. The design of the CRISPR/Cas9 kif2a zebrafish knock-out line is illustrated in Extended Data Figure 1-1. qPCR analysis of kif2c expression levels showed no upregulation of kif2c during development in kif2a−/− larvae (Extended Data Fig. 1-1).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Expression and localization pattern of kif2a in the developing zebrafish. a, qPCR analysis of kif2a levels in kif2a+/+ larvae normalized to actin and represented as the fold change expression to 0 hpf. Values are reported as the mean ± SEM of three separate experiments. Significant values are noted as ****p ≤ 0.0001 and *p ≤ 0.05. b, Relative quantification of Kif2a protein expression in kif2a+/+ larvae of 1–7 dpf normalized to Gapdh and represented as the fold change expression to 1 dpf. Values are reported as the mean ± SEM of three separate experiments. Significant values are noted as ***p ≤ 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, and *p ≤ 0.05. Below the graph is a representative Western blot image of Kif2a protein expression levels in kif2a+/+ larvae of 1–7 dpf. c, Spatiotemporal expression patterns of kif2a by whole-mount RNA in situ hybridization at 8 hpf, 23 hpf, 2 dpf, and 5 dpf. B, Brain; H, hindbrain; M, midbrain; MBH, midbrain–hindbrain boundary; Som, somite; R, retina. Scale bar, 200 μm. d, Representative Western blot image of Kif2a protein expression levels comparing kif2a+/+ with kif2a−/− larvae at 5 and 7 dpf.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    kif2a−/− larvae exhibit locomotor abnormalities, increased locomotor behavior to PTZ and habituation learning disabilities. a, Average total movement of kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae from 5 to 8 dpf expressed in actinteg units. Values are reported as the mean ± SD of four separate experiments. Significant values are noted as ****p ≤ 0.0001, ***p ≤ 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, and *p ≤ 0.05. b, Average total movement of 5 dpf kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae after 6 mm PTZ immersion for 30 min. Values are reported as the mean ± SD of four separate experiments. Significant values are noted as ***p ≤ 0.001. c, The habituation learning assay performed on 6 dpf kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae was composed of different protocols: starting with a 3 h incubation period in the light (indicated in yellow), followed by a habituation training consisting of four periods with 120 DFs with a 15 s ISI (regions with gray and yellow stripes), alternated by 10 min of light, a period of 30 min pause in the light preceding the actual test, and a test consisting of 10 DFs with a 60 s ISI (region with gray and yellow stripes). d, Percentage habituation of kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae to DFs during the spaced training. Values are reported as the mean ± SD of three separate experiments. e, Habituation ratio of average movement of kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae to DFs during the test. Values are reported as the mean ± SD of three separate experiments. Significant values are noted as **p ≤ 0.01. No locomotor abnormalities and habituation learning disabilities were observed in kif2a−/− zebrafish larvae from +/– incrosses (Extended Data Fig. 3-1).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    kif2a−/− larvae show increased susceptibility to epilepsy. a, Visual representation of the setup of local field potential recording from optic tectum (indicated in red) of 5 dpf larvae. b, Number of seizures and average seizure duration in kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. c, Number of seizures and average seizure duration in kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae after 6 mm PTZ immersion for 15 min. d, Representative fragments of a 10 min recording (calibration: 0.1 mV, 20 s) of kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae after 6 mm PTZ immersion for 15 min, with enlargement of a polyspiking event (calibration: 0.02 mV, 2 s) in kif2a−/− larvae. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. Significant values are noted as **p ≤ 0.01. No increased seizure susceptibility was observed in the brains of kif2a−/− zebrafish larvae from +/– incrosses (Extended Data Fig. 4-1).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    kif2a larvae present microcephaly that is associated with defects in neurologic development. a–d, Comparison of the individual measurements for body area (a, b) and head size (c, d) for kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae at 3 and 5 dpf. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. Significant values are noted as *p ≤ 0.05. e, Histologic assessment of 5 dpf kif2a−/− and kif2a+/+ larval brains. Six brain regions (from forebrain to hindbrain) were selected per genotype as indicated in the diagram. f, Comparison of the number of brain sections from forebrain to hindbrain (e) between kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. Significant values are noted as ****p ≤ 0.0001. g, h, Coronal sections stained with H&E imaged at 20× and 40× (indicated by orange square) magnification. DT, Dorsal thalamus; Hi, intermediate hypothalamus; lfb, lateral forebrain bundle; PG, preglomerular complex; PrT, pretectum; Teg, midbrain tegmentum; TeO, tectum opticum. Bar graphs compare hematoxylin-positive stained nuclei between kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. Significant values are noted as ****p ≤ 0.0001 and **p ≤ 0.01. A significant neuronal loss was observed in specific brain regions of kif2a−/− zebrafish larvae (Extended Data Fig. 5-1).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Neuronal cell proliferation defects and increased apoptosis in kif2a−/− larvae. a, Cell proliferation was measured in the optic tectum of 5 dpf kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae as indicated in the diagram. b, Comparison of the number of proliferating cells in the optic tectum of kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae showing BrdU-positive cells in dorsal z-stacks. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. Significant values are noted as *p ≤ 0.1. c, Representative z-stacks of optic tecta with BrdU and nuclei staining of kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae at 5 dpf. d, Histologic assessment of 5 dpf kif2a−/− and kif2a+/+ larval brains. Six brain regions (from forebrain to hindbrain) were selected per genotype as indicated in the diagram. e, Total amount of apoptotic cells in the brain of kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. Significant values are noted as **p ≤ 0.01. f, g, Coronal sections stained against active caspase-3, imaged at 20× magnification. h, Percentage of apoptotic cells in the hindbrain region of kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. Significant values are noted as *p ≤ 0.05.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Statistical table

    FigureData structureType of testPower
    1cNALog-rank Mantel–Cox0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    1–1cGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    1–1dGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    2aGaussian distributionOne-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    2bGaussian distributionOne-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    3aGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test per day0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    3bGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    3cGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    3dGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    3–1aGaussian distributionOne-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test per day0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    3–1bGaussian distributionOne-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    3–1cGaussian distributionOne-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    4bGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    4cGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    4–1aGaussian distributionOne-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    4–1bGaussian distributionOne-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    5a–dGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    5fGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    5g,hGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    5–1bGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    5–1c–hGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    6bGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    6eGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)
    6hGaussian distributionUnpaired Student’s t test0.05 (95% confidence interval)

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Figure 1-1

    Design of a CRISPR/Cas9 kif2a zebrafish knock-out line. a, Scheme illustrating the generation process of kif2a CRISPR line. Single cell-stage wild type (WT) AB embryos were injected with kif2a sgRNA and Cas9 mRNA. Injected embryos were raised until adulthood, and among them an F0 founder was selected that was outcrossed with WT zebrafish. F1 generation embryos were raised till adulthood, fin clipped, and genotyped via Sanger sequencing. Zebrafish carrying the identical mutation (4 bp deletion) were identified and pooled together. b, Ensembl image of the kif2a zebrafish gene structure (ENSDARG00000043571) showing its 20 exons and mutated exon 5 affecting the globular N-terminal domain. c, qPCR analysis of expression levels of kif2c in 2 dpf kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. Data are represented as fold change expression (10 heads per sample used). d, qPCR analysis of expression levels of kif2c in 5 dpf kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. Data are represented as fold change expression (seven heads per sample used). Download Figure 1-1, EPS file.

  • Figure 3-1

    kif2a−/− zebrafish larvae from +/– incrosses do not exhibit locomotor abnormalities and habituation learning disabilities as seen in larvae from –/– incrosses. a, Average total movement of kif2a+/+, kif2a+/–, and kif2a–/– larvae from 5 to 8 dpf expressed in actinteg units. Values are reported as the mean ± SD of three separate experiments. b, Cognition assay performed on 6 dpf kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. The assay was composed of different protocols: starting with a 3 h incubation period in the light (indicated in yellow), followed by a habituation training consisting of four periods with 120 DFs with a 15 s ISI (regions with gray and yellow stripes), alternated by 10 min of light, a 30 min pause in the light preceding the actual test, and a test consisting of 10 DFs with a 60 s ISI (region with gray and yellow stripes). c, Percentage of habituation of kif2a+/+, kif2a+/–, and kif2a–/– larvae to DFs during the spaced training. Values are reported as the mean ± SD of three separate experiments. e, Habituation ratio of average movement of kif2a+/+, kif2a+/–, and kif2a–/– larvae to DFs during the test. Values are reported as the mean ± SD of three separate experiments. Download Figure 3-1, EPS file.

  • Figure 4-1

    Brains of kif2a−/− zebrafish larvae from +/– incrosses do not show increased susceptibility to epilepsy as seen in brains of larvae from −/− incrosses. a, Number of seizures and average seizure duration in kif2a+/+, kif2a+/–, and kif2a−/− larvae. b, Number of seizures and average seizure duration in kif2a+/+, kif2a+/–, and kif2a−/− larvae after 6 mM PTZ immersion for 15 min. Download Figure 4-1, EPS file.

  • Figure 5-1

    H&E histological staining of kif2a−/− larvae reveals neuronal loss. a, Histological assessment of 5 dpf kif2a−/− and kif2a+/+ larval brains. Six brain regions (from forebrain to hindbrain) were selected per genotype, as indicated in the diagram. b, Comparison of the number of brain sections from forebrain to hindbrain (a, c–h) between kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. Significant values are noted as ****p ≤ 0.0001. c–h, Coronal sections stained with H&E imaged at 20× magnification. CC, Cerebellar crest; CeP, cerebellar plate; Ch, chorda dorsalis; DIL, diffuse nucleus of inferior lobe; DT, dorsal thalamus; E, epiphysis; EmT, eminentia thalami; Ha, habenula; Hc, caudal hypothalamus; Hi, intermediate hypothalamus; Hyp, hypothalamus; lfb, lateral forebrain bundle; mlf, medial longitudinal fascicle; MO, medulla oblongata; OB, olfactory bulb; OC, otic capsule; OE, olfactory epithelium; P, pallium; PG, preglomerular complex; Pi, pigment; Po, preoptic region; PrT, pretectum; PTd, dorsal part of posterior tuberculum; PTv, ventral part of posterior tuberculum; S, subpallium; Teg, midbrain tegmentum; TeO, tectum opticum; Va, valvula cerebelli; VT, ventral thalamus. Bar graphs compare hematoxylin-positive stained nuclei between kif2a+/+ and kif2a−/− larvae. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. Significant values are noted as ****p ≤ 0.0001 and **p ≤ 0.01. Download Figure 5-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 5
September/October 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Modeling Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Epilepsy Caused by Loss of Function of kif2a in Zebrafish
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Modeling Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Epilepsy Caused by Loss of Function of kif2a in Zebrafish
Michèle Partoens, Ann-Sofie De Meulemeester, Hoi-Khoanh Giong, Duc-Hung Pham, Jeong-Soo Lee, Peter A. de Witte, Aleksandra Siekierska
eNeuro 17 August 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0055-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0055-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Modeling Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Epilepsy Caused by Loss of Function of kif2a in Zebrafish
Michèle Partoens, Ann-Sofie De Meulemeester, Hoi-Khoanh Giong, Duc-Hung Pham, Jeong-Soo Lee, Peter A. de Witte, Aleksandra Siekierska
eNeuro 17 August 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0055-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0055-21.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • drug-resistant epilepsy
  • KIF2A
  • malformations of cortical development
  • seizures
  • zebrafish

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Aperiodicity in mouse CA1 and DG power spectra
  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
  • Breaching the blood-brain interface: Vasoactive neurons contact capillary vessels of the brain clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
  • Investigating the Role of Cortical Microglia in a Mouse Model of Viral Infection-Induced Seizures
  • Functional-Structural Coupling: Brain Reorganization in Presbycusis Is Related to Cognitive Impairment
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.