Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Seizure Phenotype and Underlying Cellular Defects in Drosophila Knock-In Models of DS (R1648C) and GEFS+ (R1648H) SCN1A Epilepsy

Alexa Joanna Roemmich, Thy Vu, Tamas Lukacsovich, Charlesice Hawkins, Soleil S. Schutte and Diane K. O’Dowd
eNeuro 2 September 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0002-21.2021; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0002-21.2021
Alexa Joanna Roemmich
1Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thy Vu
1Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tamas Lukacsovich
2Faculties of Medicine and Natural Sciences, Brain Research Institute, University of Zürich, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlesice Hawkins
3Office of Intramural Training and Education, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soleil S. Schutte
4Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diane K. O’Dowd
1Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    CRISPR strategy and validation. A, Scheme of the two-step CRIPSR-Cas9-mediated genome editing for targeting the mutations to the Drosophila para gene. B, Mutant Drosophila lines were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The wild-type codon is CGA. Step 2 repair plasmids carried the silent mutation CGT for R-R controls, TGT for R-C mutants, and CAT for R-H mutants.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    R-C and R-H mutants display seizure-like behavior and reduced life span. A, Average seizure probability at any point in a 2 min trial for each independent line (3 R-R/FM7, 3 R-C/FM7, 4 R-H/FM7). B, Average seizure probability for each genotype shown at 40°C over time. At both 22°C and 40°C, R-C and R-H mutants have a significantly greater average seizure probability compared with R-R controls. Comparisons between R-C and R-H flies or between lines of one genotype are not significant: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; two-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test. n > 12 trials/group. Bi, Average temperature inside vial over time of vial in 40°C bath. C, Kaplan–Meier survival curve estimates of R-R, R-C, and R-H flies over time. Median survival (50%) line is shown. Median percentage of survival analyzed using the Mantel–Cox log-rank test. Life span is significantly longer in R-R flies compared with R-C and R-H flies. *p < 0.05. n = 30 flies/genotype.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    R-C and R-H mutants display sustained depolarizations during evoked firing, even after stimulus has ended. A–Ci, Representative trains of action potentials evoked by illustrated stimulus protocol at 22°C (A,B,C) and 30°C (Ai,Bi,Ci). Arrow indicates the appearance of poststimulus depolarization. D, E, Percentage of cells in each genotype with sustained depolarizations during stimulus (D) and poststimulus depolarizations (E) at 22°C, at 30°C, and after cooling back to 22°C. R-C and R-H mutants have increased the incidence of SDs and poststimulus SDs at 30°C. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, χ2 test. Any differences before or after heating are not significant. F, G, Average spike frequency shown as a function of current input at ambient temperature (F) and elevated temperature (G). At 22°C, R-Cs have generally increased firing frequency. At 30°C, R-Hs have generally decreased firing frequency compared with R-Cs. n = 7 groups/genotype. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, two-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s post hoc test.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    R-C and R-H mutants display spontaneous sustained depolarizations and reduced inhibitory firing frequency at elevated temperatures. A, B, C, Representative continuous recording of neuron subjected to heating protocol. Chamber temperature over heating protocol shown on A. Ai–Aiii, Bi–Biii, Ci–Ciii, The 1.1 s interval within the labeled part of the temperature curve at 22°C preheating (Ai, Bi, Ci), 27°C mid-heating (Aii, Bii, Cii), and 22°C postcooling (Aiii, Biii, Ciii). D–F, Average frequency and duration of sustained depolarizations (D, E) and firing frequency of action potentials (F) during baseline (22°C), heating (26–29°C), and cooling (22°C). n = 8–9 cells/genotype. *p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s post hoc test.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    R-H neurons exhibit hyperpolarized sodium current activation threshold. A–C, Voltage step-elicited currents at 22°C and 30°C. The first voltage step to elicit current shown. Cells exhibit both an initial transient and then a persistent current. D, Average peak INaT amplitude. E, Average activation threshold at 22°C, 30°C, and following cooling (second threshold at 22°C). R-H mutants have an average activation threshold hyperpolarized to R-C and R-R, but no effect by temperature. *p < 0.05, two-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s post hoc test.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    R-C and R-H neurons exhibit hyperpolarized sodium current deactivation threshold. A–Ci, Voltage-step sodium channel currents for deactivation at room temperature (22°C; A, B, C) and high temperature (30°C; Ai, Bi, Ci), with the current steps in bold. Cells subjected to a multistep protocol, as shown. Selected sweeps shown to illustrate differences in deactivation properties. D, Average deactivation threshold at 22°C, 30°C, and after cooling back to 22°C. R-C and R-H mutants had hyperpolarized deactivation threshold compared with R-Rs. *p < 0.05, two-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s post hoc test.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Properties of evoked firing in R-R, R-C, and R-H LNs

    R-R/FM7R-C/FM7R-H/FM7
    Input resistance, GΩ0.64 ± 0.020.59 ± 0.100.56 ± 0.05
    Cell capacitance, pF20.32 ± 2.1317.72 ± 2.0121.13 ± 4.31
    Action potential threshold, mV22˚C: −52.45 ± 1.9922˚C: −50.05 ± 3.8122˚C: −50.68 ± 3.68
    30˚C: −42.71 ± 3.6330˚C: −44.50 ± 5.2630˚C: −46.40 ± 2.30
    22˚C: −50.25 ± 1.9422˚C: −51.45 ± 4.8822˚C: −50.13 ± 2.01
    Action potential amplitude, mV22˚C: 38.59 ± 2.7022˚C: 33.65 ± 3.0222˚C: 42.99 ± 2.91
    30˚C: 27.41 ± 3.5830˚C: 23.32 ± 3.3230˚C: 27.08 ± 3.87
    22˚C: 33.78 ± 3.4022˚C: 35.67 ± 3.6922˚C: 38.76 ± 4.19
    Half-width, ms22˚C: 3.0 ± 0.122˚C: 3.2 ± 0.222˚C: 2.8 ± 0.1
    30˚C: 2.2 ± 0.130˚C: 2.7 ± 0.330˚C: 2.6 ± 0.2
    22˚C: 2.6 ± 0.122˚C: 3.3 ± 0.322˚C: 3.1 ± 0.2
    Max slope22˚C: 24.78 ± 2.8222˚C: 22.45 ± 4.1722˚C: 29.32 ± 4.07
    30˚C: 27.97 ± 4.6730˚C: 23.96 ± 4.8830˚C: 26.27 ± 3.75
    22˚C: 22.18 ± 3.3922˚C: 23.72 ± 5.9122˚C: 25.31 ± 3.66
    Adaptation ratio (ISIfirst/ISIfinal at half-maximal firing)22˚C: 0.49 ± 0.0722˚C: 0.44 ± 0.0922˚C: 0.56 ± 0.09
    30˚C: 0.27 ± 0.0530˚C: 0.33 ± 0.0830˚C: 0.33 ± 0.08
    22˚C: 0.45 ± 0.0622˚C: 0.52 ± 0.0922˚C: 0.64 ± 0.06
    Peak instantaneous frequency, Hz22˚C: 104.7 ± 12.422˚C: 111.5 ± 8.322˚C: 97.6 ± 9.2
    30˚C: 205.3 ± 22.830˚C: 237.8 ± 42.430˚C: 206.8 ± 35.6
    22˚C: 81.7 ± 10.522˚C: 90.7 ± 10.222˚C: 83.6 ± 10.2
    • Values are the mean ± SE at 22°C (during the 5 min preheating), at elevated temperature 30°C, and again at 22°C (during the 5 min postcooling). ISI, Interstimulus interval.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Properties of spontaneous burst firing in R-R, R-C, and R-H LNs

    R-R/FM7R-C/FM7R-H/FM7
    Burst frequency, Hz22˚C: 0.70 ± 0.2422˚C: 0.90 ± 0.2622˚C: 0.70 ± 0.24
    27˚C: 0.63 ± 0.2627˚C: 0.57 ± 0.1727˚C: 0.63 ± 0.26
    22˚C: 0.57 ± 0.2022˚C: 0.37 ± 0.1622˚C: 0.57 ± 0.20
    Action potential threshold, mV22˚C: −37.77 ± 1.4822˚C: −37.48 ± 1.8322˚C: −38.00 ± 2.45
    27˚C: −36.74 ± 1.3627˚C: −37.06 ± 1.7727˚C: −33.81 ± 3.10
    22˚C: −36.79 ± 1.6622˚C: −35.95 ± 2.0822˚C: −36.17 ± 2.40
    Action potential amplitude, mV22˚C: 35.34 ± 2.3522˚C: 32.27 ± 3.8322˚C: 28.18 ± 5.16
    27˚C: 28.29 ± 2.3427˚C: 23.16 ± 3.1927˚C: 23.33 ± 3.87
    22˚C: 34.27 ± 3.8122˚C: 28.52 ± 2.5722˚C: 31.33 ± 4.16
    Action potentials per burst22˚C: 5.27 ± 0.3922˚C: 5.24 ± 0.5622˚C: 4.79 ± 0.35
    27˚C: 5.46 ± 0.3827˚C: 5.05 ± 0.5627˚C: 4.34 ± 0.87
    22˚C: 6.17 ± 0.5022˚C: 5.31 ± 0.3922˚C: 5.23 ± 0.49
    Resting membrane potential, mV22˚C: −57.1 ± 2.222˚C: −54.2 ± 2.022˚C: −54.0 ± 2.6
    27˚C: −55.9 ± 1.827˚C: −52.1 ± 1.327˚C: −47.8 ± 3.2*
    30˚C: −57.4 ± 2.430˚C: −58.3 ± 4.030˚C: −47.9 ± 1.9*
    22˚C: −54.9 ± 3.222˚C: −49.5 ± 2.122˚C: −49.8 ± 1.8
    • Values are the mean ± SE at 22°C (during the 5 min preheating), “27°C” (during the minute of heating from 26°C to 29°C), and again at 22°C (during the 5 min postcooling).

    • ↵* R-H mutants have depolarized RMP at elevated temperatures compared with R-R controls; p < 0.05, two-way ANOVA.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 5
September/October 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Seizure Phenotype and Underlying Cellular Defects in Drosophila Knock-In Models of DS (R1648C) and GEFS+ (R1648H) SCN1A Epilepsy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Seizure Phenotype and Underlying Cellular Defects in Drosophila Knock-In Models of DS (R1648C) and GEFS+ (R1648H) SCN1A Epilepsy
Alexa Joanna Roemmich, Thy Vu, Tamas Lukacsovich, Charlesice Hawkins, Soleil S. Schutte, Diane K. O’Dowd
eNeuro 2 September 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0002-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0002-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Seizure Phenotype and Underlying Cellular Defects in Drosophila Knock-In Models of DS (R1648C) and GEFS+ (R1648H) SCN1A Epilepsy
Alexa Joanna Roemmich, Thy Vu, Tamas Lukacsovich, Charlesice Hawkins, Soleil S. Schutte, Diane K. O’Dowd
eNeuro 2 September 2021, 8 (5) ENEURO.0002-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0002-21.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Drosophila
  • electrophysiology
  • epilepsy
  • Scn1a
  • sodium channel

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Aperiodicity in mouse CA1 and DG power spectra
  • Transcriptional Changes Fade Prior to Long-Term Memory for Sensitization of the Aplysia Siphon-Withdrawal Reflex.
  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
  • Investigating the Role of Cortical Microglia in a Mouse Model of Viral Infection-Induced Seizures
  • Functional-Structural Coupling: Brain Reorganization in Presbycusis Is Related to Cognitive Impairment
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.