Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleFeature: Research Highlights, Neuronal Excitability

AMPA Receptors Exist in Tunable Mobile and Immobile Synaptic Fractions In Vivo

Daniel T. Gray and Lindsay M. De Biase
eNeuro 22 July 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0267-21.2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0267-21.2021
Daniel T. Gray
1Division of Neural System, Memory and Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724
2Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724
3Department of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lindsay M. De Biase
3Department of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Highlighted Research Paper: AMPA Receptors Exist in Tunable Mobile and Immobile Synaptic Fractions In Vivo, by Haiwen Chen, Richard H. Roth, Elena Lopez-Ortega, Han L. Tan, and Richard L. Huganir.

Information processing in the nervous system emerges from complex temporal and spatial interactions between fast excitatory synaptic neurotransmission and modulatory signals from other neurochemicals. A critical property of excitatory synapses is that they undergo bidirectional changes in synapse strength in response to experience to encode relevant information for future recall. This process is referred to as Hebbian plasticity (Magee and Grienberger, 2020) and is a critical mechanism by which brain circuits optimize their function for an organism’s unique needs. While it is difficult to overstate the importance of Hebbian plasticity for learning, memory, and behavior, problems arise if this process proceeds unchecked. Excessive synapse strengthening can lead to aberrant excitability with detrimental consequences for cellular health. One of the most intuitive examples of a pathologic condition associated with increased excitability in the nervous system is epileptic activity, and numerous other developmental and neurodegenerative disorders are also associated with excess neuronal activity. Consequently, neuronal networks must be scaled to a healthy physiological state while differences in synapse weightings that arise through Hebbian plasticity are retained. Remarkably, a second form of plasticity that globally scales synapse strength to levels of healthy excitability has evolved in response to these demands (Turrigiano, 2012). This form of plasticity is known as homeostatic plasticity.

Homeostatic plasticity is primarily accomplished through altering the number and composition of excitatory neurotransmitter receptors found at postsynaptic sites (Diering and Huganir, 2018). Glutamate-activated AMPA receptors are the central mediators of fast excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system. It has been known for some time that AMPA receptors can diffuse along a neuron’s plasma membrane, a process that is regulated by interactions with intracellular trafficking and scaffolding proteins (Heine et al., 2008). Because synaptic transmission occurs within the tightly confined cleft between pre and postsynaptic sites, lateral AMPA receptor diffusion along the plasma membrane can potently alter the number of receptors capable of responding to glutamate release. This modulates postsynaptic sensitivity to transmitter independently of changes in presynaptic function and provides a key mechanism through which neural networks dynamically regulate excitability.

Until recently, AMPA receptor motility in the plasma membrane had only been studied in vitro, generally using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching or FRAP. In these experiments, AMPA receptors are labeled with a fluorescent tag that allows receptors to be tracked during live imaging. A segment of plasma membrane containing AMPA receptors is then photobleached through excessive illumination, and researchers measure the time and extent to which the fluorescent signal recovers in the bleached region. A rebound in fluorescence within the bleached membrane segment indicates that AMPA receptors diffused into the region following photobleaching. Estimates of AMPA receptor diffusion using in vitro FRAP experiments have been highly variable, ranging from estimates that anywhere between 20% and 100% of AMPA receptors are mobile within the plasma membrane (Chen et al., 2021). Such discrepancies make interpretation of these data challenging and suggest that in vitro preparations may alter the biology that exists in vivo. Resolving these inconsistencies is of profound importance as it can point to which mechanisms of homeostatic plasticity predominate within the brain.

New results by Chen et al. (2021) in eNeuro provide the first in vivo estimate of AMPA receptor mobility in the plasma membrane. In experiments with a high degree of technical difficulty, Chen and colleagues used in utero electroporation to tag AMPA receptors with fluorescent probes and implanted mice with cranial windows for two-photon in vivo imaging once they reached adulthood. They then performed FRAP experiments by photobleaching synaptic spines and measuring the fluorescence recovery in the visual and motor cortices. In both regions, roughly 50% of the fluorescent signal recovered following quenching, suggesting that a significant proportion of AMPA receptors are immobile at basal states in live animals.

Many CNS disorders are characterized by changes in synapse strength and network excitability that could involve alterations in AMPA receptor mobility. Exposure to significant stress, particularly in early life, is one of the strongest risk factors for developing pathologic brain conditions and stress hormones can alter synaptic transmission and plasticity (McEwen et al., 2015). To test the hypothesis that aberrant AMPA receptor diffusion may contribute to stress-induced network dysfunction, Chen et al. (2021) administered corticosterone to one group of mice following baseline FRAP measurements and compared AMPA receptor diffusion to that observed in mice injected with saline. These experiments revealed that AMPA receptor mobility is greatly enhanced following corticosterone injections, suggesting that synapse composition becomes more volatile following periods of stress.

In summary, Chen et al. (2021) demonstrate that synapses in vivo exist in a state of intermediate AMPA receptor motility that maximizes the dynamic range over which synapse strength can be bi-directionally modulated. Furthermore, the finding that corticosterone treatment significantly altered these dynamics indicates that systemic factors associated with different physiological states can have immediate and profound impacts on synapse function and network scaling. These rigorous in vivo data provide a critical foundation for future in vivo and in vitro studies of AMPA receptor dynamics aimed at revealing the mechanisms underlying physiological and pathologic synaptic and network function in numerous contexts.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by the Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation (D.T.G.), Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium (D.T.G.), the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Grant 5R24AG061421-03 (to D.T.G.), David Geffen School of Medicine (L.M.D.B.), Glenn Foundation for Medical Research (L.M.D.B.), and American Federation for Aging Research (L.M.D.B.).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Chen H, Roth RH, Lopez-Ortega E, Tan HL, Huganir RL (2021) AMPA receptors exist in tunable mobile and immobile synaptic fractions in vivo. eNeuro 8:ENEURO.0015-21.2021. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0015-21.2021
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Diering GH, Huganir RL (2018) The AMPA receptor code of synaptic plasticity. Neuron 100:314–329. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.018 pmid:30359599
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Heine M, Groc L, Frischknecht R, Béïque JC, Lounis B, Rumbaugh G, Huganir RL, Cognet L, Choquet D (2008) Surface mobility of postsynaptic AMPARs tunes synaptic transmission. Science 320:201–205. doi:10.1126/science.1152089 pmid:18403705
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Magee JC, Grienberger C (2020) Synaptic plasticity forms and functions. Annu Rev Neurosci 43:95–117. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-090919-022842 pmid:32075520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    McEwen BS, Bowles NP, Gray JD, Hill MN, Hunter RG, Karatsoreos IN, Nasca C (2015) Mechanisms of stress in the brain. Nat Neurosci 18:1353–1363. doi:10.1038/nn.4086 pmid:26404710
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Turrigiano G (2012) Homeostatic synaptic plasticity: local and global mechanisms for stabilizing neuronal function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4:a005736. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005736 pmid:22086977
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Christophe Bernard, INSERM & Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 4
July/August 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
AMPA Receptors Exist in Tunable Mobile and Immobile Synaptic Fractions In Vivo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
AMPA Receptors Exist in Tunable Mobile and Immobile Synaptic Fractions In Vivo
Daniel T. Gray, Lindsay M. De Biase
eNeuro 22 July 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0267-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0267-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
AMPA Receptors Exist in Tunable Mobile and Immobile Synaptic Fractions In Vivo
Daniel T. Gray, Lindsay M. De Biase
eNeuro 22 July 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0267-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0267-21.2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Feature: Research Highlights

  • Under Pressure: A Microfluidic Chip for Prolonged, Anesthetic-Free Imaging of Neuronal Mitostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans
  • Behavioral Responses to Neural Circuit Control: Pitfalls and Possible Solutions
Show more Feature: Research Highlights

Neuronal Excitability

  • Dendritic compartmentalization of learning-related plasticity
  • Structural Analysis of Human and Mouse Dendritic Spines Reveals a Morphological Continuum and Differences across Ages and Species
  • Glutamate Transporters EAAT2 and EAAT5 Differentially Shape Synaptic Transmission from Rod Bipolar Cell Terminals
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Research Highlights

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.