Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Cognition and Behavior

Vocal Music Listening Enhances Poststroke Language Network Reorganization

Aleksi J. Sihvonen, Pablo Ripollés, Vera Leo, Jani Saunavaara, Riitta Parkkola, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells, Seppo Soinila and Teppo Särkämö
eNeuro 17 June 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0158-21.2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0158-21.2021
Aleksi J. Sihvonen
1Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
2Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Herston 4029, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aleksi J. Sihvonen
Pablo Ripollés
3Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003
4Music and Audio Research Laboratory, New York University, Brooklyn, New York 11201
5Center for Language, Music and Emotion, New York University, New York, New York 10014
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vera Leo
1Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jani Saunavaara
6Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, 20521 Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Riitta Parkkola
7Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, FI-20520 Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
8Cognition and Brain Plasticity Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
9Department of Cognition, Development and Education Psychology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
10Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, 08037 Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seppo Soinila
11Neurocenter, Turku University Hospital and Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, 20521 Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Teppo Särkämö
1Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Teppo Särkämö
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Listening to vocal music has been recently shown to improve language recovery in stroke survivors. The neuroplasticity mechanisms supporting this effect are, however, still unknown. Using data from a three-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled trial including acute stroke patients (N = 38) and a 3 month follow-up, we set out to compare the neuroplasticity effects of daily listening to self-selected vocal music, instrumental music, and audiobooks on both brain activity and structural connectivity of the language network. Using deterministic tractography, we show that the 3 month intervention induced an enhancement of the microstructural properties of the left frontal aslant tract (FAT) for the vocal music group compared with the audiobook group. Importantly, this increase in the strength of the structural connectivity of the left FAT correlated with improved language skills. Analyses of stimulus-specific activation changes showed that the vocal music group exhibited increased activations in the frontal termination points of the left FAT during vocal music listening compared with the audiobook group from acute to 3 month poststroke stage. The increased activity correlated with the structural neuroplasticity changes in the left FAT. These results suggest that the beneficial effects of vocal music listening on poststroke language recovery are underpinned by structural neuroplasticity changes within the language network and extend our understanding of music-based interventions in stroke rehabilitation.

  • aphasia
  • DTI
  • fMRI
  • language
  • music
  • recovery

Significance Statement

Poststroke language deficits have a devastating effect on patients and their families. Current treatments yield highly variable outcomes, and the evidence for their long-term effects is limited. Patients often receive insufficient treatment that is predominantly given outside the optimal time window for brain plasticity. Poststroke vocal music listening improves language outcome, which is underpinned by neuroplasticity changes within the language network. Vocal music listening provides a complementary rehabilitation strategy that could be safely implemented in the early stages of stroke rehabilitation and seems to specifically target language symptoms and recovering language network.

Introduction

Rapid aging of the population leads to a massive growth in the prevalence of stroke (Feigin et al., 2014), which incurs enormous socioeconomical challenges (Olesen et al., 2012). Poststroke aphasia—an impairment of speech production and/or comprehension—occurs in up to 40% of stroke patients (Pedersen et al., 2004) and has a devastating impact on the individual, decreasing quality of life more than any other stroke-induced impairment (Lam and Wodchis, 2010).

Language functions are underpinned by a left-lateralized network comprising frontal, temporal, and parietal brain regions and the white matter pathways interconnecting them (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Saur et al., 2008; Rauschecker and Scott, 2009; Alyahya et al., 2020; Hula et al., 2020). In poststroke language impairments, the language network is disrupted because of hypoperfusion and consequent brain tissue damage (Fox, 2018), and recovery relies on the ability of the spared neurons to remodel the injured network (Kiran et al., 2019). Aphasia treatments aim to achieve functional gains by promoting neuroplasticity processes within the language network (Cramer, 2008, 2018). Better aphasia outcomes have been associated with functional neuroplasticity changes within the language network, mainly in the left hemisphere, during both spontaneous recovery (Saur et al., 2006) and after treatments (Fridriksson, 2010; Fridriksson et al., 2012; Van Hees et al., 2014a; Hartwigsen and Saur, 2019). Studies evaluating treatment-related structural connectivity changes in aphasia are sparse, but have linked better outcomes with plasticity changes in the left-hemispheric white matter tracts (Van Hees et al., 2014b).

Current treatments have, however, shown highly variable outcomes and the evidence for their long-term effects is scarce (Brady et al., 2016). It is vital to pursue new rehabilitation methods that are inexpensive and both independent of and complementary to the traditional rehabilitation strategies. In this vein, music-based interventions have emerged as promising rehabilitation strategies in many neurologic diseases, including stroke (Winstein et al., 2016; Sihvonen et al., 2017c). In neurologic rehabilitation, music provides a multidomain stimulus that increases activity-dependent neuroplasticity in the brain and provides a fertile environment for recovery (Murphy and Corbett, 2009; Särkämö and Soto, 2012). In stroke patients, daily music listening during the subacute poststroke stage has been found beneficial for improving cognitive and emotional recovery (Särkämö et al., 2008; Baylan et al., 2020) and increasing gray matter volume in frontolimbic regions (Särkämö et al., 2014) compared with standard care. Recently, using data pooled together from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we showed that the vocal (sung) component of music is crucial for its rehabilitative efficacy: compared with instrumental music and audiobooks, vocal music listening improved language recovery and verbal memory, especially in patients with aphasia, and was coupled with increased gray matter volume in temporal regions and enhanced functional connectivity of the default mode network (Sihvonen et al., 2020).

While vocal music listening promotes poststroke language recovery, little is known about the specific language-related neural mechanisms supporting this effect. An interesting hypothesis is that vocal music listening induces neuroplasticity effects on the language network, especially in the regions linked to connected speech after stroke (e.g., the left frontal regions and their underlying white matter tracts; Alyahya et al., 2020). Evaluating the possible neurobiological mediators of recovery and treatment effects is of great importance for improving our understanding of aphasia rehabilitation, and for optimizing current and future approaches (Copland, 2020).

The present study sought to unveil the neuroplasticity effects of vocal music in both the brain function and the structural connectivity of the language network. To do so, we assessed longitudinally a subsample of 38 stroke patients from our previous music intervention study (Sihvonen et al., 2020) using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and task-related functional MRI (fMRI). We hypothesized that poststroke vocal music listening induces neuroplasticity changes in the language network that, in turn, underpin the enhanced recovery of language skills (Sihvonen et al., 2020).

Materials and Methods

Subjects and study design

Fifty stroke patients were recruited from 2013 to 2016 from the Turku University Hospital for a three-arm RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov: trial NCT01749709). Inclusion criteria were acute unilateral stroke; right handedness; age <80 years; capability to communicate in Finnish; residence in Southwest Finland; ability to cooperate; and normal hearing. Patients with prior neurologic or psychiatric disease or substance abuse were not included. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Southwest Finland and performed in conformance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave informed consent, and received standard stroke treatment and rehabilitation. Baseline MRI scans and behavioral assessments were performed <3 weeks poststroke (mean, 12 d; SD, 5.5). Patients were then randomly allocated to vocal music group (VMG; N = 17), instrumental music group (IMG; N = 17), and audiobook group (ABG; N = 16). The randomization was stratified for lesion laterality (left/right) and performed as block randomization (10 blocks of three consecutive patients for left and right lesions), with the order within the blocks being drawn by a random number generator. The randomization list was generated by a laboratory engineer not involved in the data collection and the persons performing the patient recruitment had no access to it (allocation concealment). During follow-up, six patients were excluded because of refusal to participate at follow-up, and six patients because of incomplete MRI data. Thirty-eight of the remaining patients (15 female and 23 male; mean age, 56.1 years; SD, 13.4) completed the intervention and 3 month postintervention MRI and behavioral assessments, and were included in statistical analyses (VMG, N = 12; IMG, N = 15; ABG, N = 11; Table 1). The groups did not differ between clinical variables (Table 1) such as stroke type (p = 0.398), lesion laterality (p = 0.676), or lesion volume (p = 0.712), nor did the study groups differ between the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at the acute stage (F(22,38) = 0.872, p = 0.627; Wilks’ lambda = 0.442; individual categories. p = 0.153–0.994). Patients with both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes were included to reflect the real-world clinical population undergoing rehabilitation as well as to increase the generalization of the effects of this intervention. In clinical populations, the prevalence of poststroke cognitive impairments has not been shown to differ between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes (Lo et al., 2019).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients

Intervention

After baseline assessments, each patient was contacted by a professional music therapist who informed them of their group allocation and interviewed them about prestroke leisure activities, including music listening and reading. Other researchers were blinded to the group allocation of the patients. The therapist provided the patients with a portable MP3 player, headphones, and a collection of listening material individually selected to match the music or literature preferences of the patient as closely as possible. The listening material was vocal music with sung lyrics in VMG, instrumental music (with no sung lyrics) in IMG, and narrated audiobooks (with no music) in ABG. All material was in a language that the patients understood best (mostly Finnish or English). The patients were trained in using the players, instructed to listen to the allocated material by themselves daily (minimum 1 h/d) for the following 2 months in the hospital or at home, and asked to keep a listening diary. During the 2 month intervention period, the music therapist kept regular contact with the patients to encourage listening, provide more material, and help with the equipment if needed.

MRI data acquisition

Patients were scanned on a 3 T Siemens Magnetom Verio scanner with a standard 12-channel head matrix coil at the Department of Radiology of Turku University Hospital. The MRI protocol comprised high-resolution T1-weighted anatomic images, DWI data (TR = 11,700 ms; TE = 88 ms; acquisition matrix = 112 × 112; 66 axial slices; voxel size = 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 mm3) with one non-diffusion-weighted volume and 64 diffusion-weighted volumes (b = 1000 s/mm2), and task-fMRI using a single-shot T2*-weighted gradient-echo EPI sequence (280 functional volumes; 32 slices; slice thickness = 3.5 mm; TR = 2010 ms; TE = 30 ms; flip angle = 80°; voxel size = 2.8 × 2.8 × 3.5 mm3).

During a block design task-fMRI, the patients were presented with 15 s excerpts of well known Finnish songs with (1) sung lyrics (vocal, 6 blocks) and (2) without sung lyrics (instrumental, 6 blocks), (3) well known Finnish poems (speech, 6 blocks), and (4) no auditory stimuli (rest, 18 blocks) through MR-compatible headphones using Presentation software (version 16.3, Neurobehavioral Systems). The order of the auditory blocks was randomized across subjects and time, and the rest blocks were presented in between the auditory blocks. Intervention listening material was not used in the task-fMRI excerpts.

MRI data preprocessing

MRI data were preprocessed using Statistical Parametric Mapping software [SPM8, Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, UCL (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/)] under MATLAB version 8.4.0. The fMRI images were initially realigned, and a mean image of the whole task-fMRI run was created. Individual images were reoriented according to the anterior commissure. Cost function masking was applied to achieve optimal normalization of the lesioned brain tissue, with no postregistration lesion shrinkage or out-of-brain distortion (Brett et al., 2001; Andersen et al., 2010; Ripollés et al., 2012). Cost function masking was performed by manually depicting the stroke lesions slice by slice to the individual T1 images using MRIcron software package (http://people.cas.sc.edu/rorden/mricron/index.html; Rorden and Brett, 2000). All lesion tracing was conducted by one person (author A.J.S.) experienced in this matter (Sihvonen et al., 2016, 2017a). Task-fMRI data were normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute space using Unified Segmentation (Ashburner and Friston, 2005) and resampled into isotropic 2 × 2× 2 mm3 voxel size. Finally, the preprocessed task-fMRI data were smoothed using an isotropic spatial filter (FWHM = 8 mm).

The statistical evaluation of the task-fMRI data was based on a least-squares estimation using the general linear model at both time points (acute/3 month). At the individual level, the different task conditions (vocal/instrumental/speech) were modeled with a box-car regressor waveform convolved with a canonical hemodynamic response function. Data were high-pass filtered to a maximum of 1/128 Hz, and serial autocorrelations were estimated using an autoregressive model (AR[1] model). In addition, confounding factors from head movement were included in the model. A block-related design matrix was created including the conditions of interest (Vocal/Instrumental/Speech). After model estimation, main effects for each condition against rest were calculated (e.g., Vocal > Rest).

DTI data preprocessing

The processing of DWI data started by correcting eddy current distortions and head motion using the FMRIB Software Library [FSL version 5.0.8, University of Oxford (www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl); Smith et al., 2004; Jenkinson et al., 2012]. Next, the gradient matrix was rotated using FSL fdt rotate bvecs to provide a more accurate estimate of diffusion tensor orientations (Leemans and Jones, 2009). Following this, brain extraction was performed using the Brain Extraction Tool (Smith, 2002). Then, the diffusion tensors were reconstructed using the linear least-squares algorithm included in Diffusion Toolkit version 0.6.2.2 (Ruopeng Wang, Van J. Wedeen (trackvis.org/dtk), Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA).

Dissections of individual white matter tracts were performed using TrackVis (version 0.6.0.1, Build 2015.04.07) following commonly used published guidelines for the number and positioning of the regions of interest (Catani et al., 2002; Sihvonen et al., 2017b). All analyses were performed by one person (author A.J.S.) experienced in virtual dissections (Sihvonen et al., 2017b). Deterministic tractography analysis focused on three white matter tracts integral to the language network and language skills (Catani et al., 2005, 2012; Dick and Tremblay, 2012; Dick et al., 2019; Alyahya et al., 2020): the left arcuate fasciculus (AF; long segment), the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), and the left frontal aslant tract (FAT). After dissections, fractional anisotropy (FA) values of each tract, representing white matter integrity, were collected using MATLAB toolbox, “along-tract statistics” (Colby et al., 2012) and imported into IBM SPSS Statistics 27. Lower FA values in left-hemispheric tracts have been associated with greater aphasia severity (Rosso et al., 2015). Deterministic tractography dissections and placement of regions of interest have been described in detail previously (Sihvonen et al., 2017b).

Language assessment

Language assessment was performed in both time points (acute, 3 months) using the standard Verbal Fluency Test (Lezak et al., 2012); the shortened Token Test (De Renzi and Faglioni, 1978); and the shortened Boston Naming test (a 20-item version including every third of the original 60 line drawings with a maximum score of 20; Morris et al., 1989; Laine et al., 1993), blinded to the group allocation of the patient. In our previous study (Sihvonen et al., 2020), the individual tests correlated significantly with each other (acute stage in all: r = 0.46–0.84, p < 0.001) and a summary score was calculated by adding up the raw test scores used in the analyses. To follow our previous study, and to maintain continuity and uniformity, as well as to conform the smaller sample size, the summary score was used in the current analyses.

Statistical analyses

In deterministic tractography analysis, multivariate ANOVA with change (3 month minus acute) in FA values of the left AF, IFOF, and FAT as dependent variables and Group as a factor was performed. Total brain volume (TBV) and cross-listening (i.e., listening to material not part of the protocol) were included as covariates in the analysis (Sihvonen et al., 2020). In addition, the groups showed significant differences in the prevalence of rhythm amusia (p = 0.028; Table 1), and therefore the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia (MBEA) Rhythm Subtest score (Peretz et al., 2003) was also included as a covariate in the analysis. Results were corrected for post hoc multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni adjustment.

Statistical analyses of the preprocessed task-fMRI data were conducted using SPM8. To evaluate longitudinal changes, three flexible factorial ANOVAs with Time (Acute/3 month) and Group (VMG/IMG/ABG) as factors were performed using the Vocal > Rest, Instrumental > Rest, and Speech > Rest conditions. To focus analyses on the language network, analyses were constricted to the left hemisphere using an explicit mask. All task-fMRI result (spmT) maps were thresholded at an uncorrected p < 0.001 at the voxel level, and standard SPM familywise error cluster-level correction based on random field theory with a p value <0.05 was used (Eklund et al., 2016). Because of three conditions, α-level was set to p < 0.017, and only clusters surviving this threshold are reported. Similar to tractography, TBV, cross-listening, and MBEA Rhythm Subtest score were included as covariates in the task-fMRI analysis (Table 1).

Correlation analyses (Spearman, two‐tailed) were performed between the significant tractography and fMRI changes (3 month > Acute) and the changes in language skills.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, A.J.S., on reasonable request.

Results

Structural neuroplasticity

In the multivariate ANOVA, there was a statistically significant difference in the longitudinal change (3 month > Acute) in the microstructural properties of the left-hemispheric tracts between the groups (F(6,60) = 2.859; p = 0.016; Wilks’ lambda = 0.605, partial η2 = 0.222). Therefore, three separate univariate ANOVAs (i.e., one for each tract) were performed, and α-level was set to p < 0.017.

Separate univariate ANOVAs for each tract revealed a significant effect on the FA values of the left FAT, indicating that the longitudinal change (3 month > Acute) in the microstructural properties of this tract differed between the groups (F(2,32) = 4.819, p = 0.015; partial η2 = 0.231). Post hoc t tests corrected for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni) revealed that the VMG showed a significantly greater increase in FA values over time than the ABG (p = 0.017; Fig. 1A), whereas there were no significant differences between the IMG and ABG or VMG and IMG. Importantly, the FA change in the left FAT correlated with improved language skills (rs = 0.71, p = 0.021) within the VMG. There were no significant interactions for the other tracts (AF, IFOF).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Structural and functional neuroplasticity changes (3 month > Acute). A, Significant tractography results showing increased FA in the left FAT for VMG > ABG (3 month > Acute). Correlations to change in language skills score within the Vocal music group are shown in the scatter plot. B, Significant fMRI-task results showing increased activity between VMG and ABG (3 month > Acute) during vocal music condition. Correlations to increased FA of the left FAT are shown in the scatter plot. Data reported in the histograms are the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.017. L, left; R, right.

Functional neuroplasticity

Similarly, there was a significant Group × Time interaction for the Vocal > Rest condition revealing that the VMG showed greater longitudinal (3 month > Acute) activation increase than the ABG in a specific left frontal cluster (p = 0.016; T = 4.63; size = 216 voxels) located in the superior/middle frontal gyrus and the precentral gyrus (Fig. 1B). The increased activity in the significant cluster correlated with the increased FA in the left FAT rs = 0.49, p = 0.002) across the whole sample. Correlation between the increased activity and improved language skills was nonsignificant. No other significant interactions were detected for the other task conditions (Instrumental > Rest, Speech > Rest).

Discussion

This study set out to determine the poststroke vocal music listening induced functional and structural neuroplasticity changes in the language network possibly supporting the improved language skills. Our two main findings were that, compared with listening to audiobooks (1) daily poststroke vocal music listening enhanced left FAT structural connectivity, which was linked to better recovery of language skills; and (2) vocal music listening led to increased stimulus-specific functional changes in the superior frontal termination areas of the left FAT that were linked to improved structural connectivity in the left FAT. The present study not only extends previous results on the rehabilitative effects of music listening after stroke (Särkämö et al., 2008, 2014; Baylan et al., 2020; Sihvonen et al., 2020), but also reveals novel information about the neural mechanisms (i.e., functional and structural reorganization of key regions within the language network) that support language recovery in stroke via vocal music listening. This evidence is important in evaluating treatment mediators of music-based rehabilitation strategies (Sihvonen et al., 2017c), and in improving our understanding of aphasia rehabilitation.

Connecting the inferior frontal gyrus with dorsomedial frontal areas and anterior cingulate cortex, the left FAT has recently been recognized as an important tract for speech production (Catani et al., 2012; Thiebaut de Schotten et al., 2012; Dick et al., 2014, 2019; Sierpowska et al., 2015). Damage to the FAT underlies disease-related speech impairments in patients with poststroke aphasia (Basilakos et al., 2014; Halai et al., 2017; Alyahya et al., 2020) and primary progressive aphasia (Catani et al., 2013; Mandelli et al., 2014), as well as in patients with resected frontal gliomas (Kinoshita et al., 2015). Moreover, neuroplasticity changes in the inferior frontal and dorsomedial termination points of the left FAT have been shown to underpin better aphasia outcomes both after targeted rehabilitation and also in patients showing spontaneous recovery (Saur et al., 2006; Schevenels et al., 2020). En masse, while studies evaluating direct aphasia treatment-related structural changes in the left FAT are lacking, its role in regaining language functions after poststroke aphasia as well as a potential target for aphasia treatments stands to reason. The present study suggests that this avenue for poststroke language recovery could be targeted by listening to vocal music.

The sensory and motor environment during the acute stroke stage has a crucial role in the recovery. However, in clinical practice, patients often receive rehabilitation in suboptimal intensity, frequency, and timing (Murphy and Corbett, 2009; Foley et al., 2012), and remain largely inactive and unstimulated during the critical acute stage (Bernhardt et al., 2004; De Wit et al., 2005). In other words, the prerequisites for poststroke rehabilitation exploiting activity-dependent neural plasticity are often not met (Cramer et al., 2011). Music listening could respond to these unmet needs of recovering stroke patients. First, music listening serves as a multimodal stimulus, akin to “enriched environment” where neural stimulation is achieved by increasing stimuli from the physical and social surroundings during the rehabilitation (Nithianantharajah and Hannan, 2006). Studies on healthy subjects have revealed that mere music listening induces a widespread activation pattern in the brain (Schmithorst, 2005; Samson et al., 2011; Alluri et al., 2012; Zatorre and Salimpoor, 2013; Koelsch, 2014). In acute stroke patients, music listening activates a similar network of brain regions (Sihvonen et al., 2017d). This increased neural stimulation supports neural plasticity in the recovering brain by increasing, for example, dendritic spine density and neurotrophic factor levels (Nithianantharajah and Hannan, 2006).

Second, language and music processing have been shown to be supported by common neural networks (Maess et al., 2001; Koelsch et al., 2002; Callan et al., 2006; Schön et al., 2010; Kunert et al., 2015); that is, language network engagement can be modulated by music. This modulatory effect can be enhanced by listening to music with sung lyrics (i.e., vocals), which binds linguistic and musical information into a unified representation: vocal music engages bilateral frontotemporal areas more extensively than speech (Callan et al., 2006; Schön et al., 2010) or music without vocals (i.e., instrumental music; Brattico et al., 2011; Alluri et al., 2013), even in patients with acute stroke (Sihvonen et al., 2017d). Importantly, vocal music engages the left inferior and dorsomedial frontal termination areas of the left FAT, which have been implicated in the auditory–motor processing of music (Zatorre et al., 2007) and singing (Callan et al., 2006). Crucially, the left dorsomedial frontal areas (superior frontal gyrus and anterior cingulate) showed increased gray matter volume after the music listening intervention in our previous stroke study (Särkämö et al., 2014), and the anterior cingulate is also the frontal hub of the default mode network where we previously reported enhanced functional connectivity induced by the vocal music listening (Sihvonen et al., 2020). The present results elaborate the activity-dependent neuroplasticity effects of poststroke vocal music listening by elucidating its effects on modulating communal neural structures for speech and music, underpinning language recovery after stroke.

Regarding the real-world shortcomings in rehabilitation intensity, frequency, and timing, poststroke vocal music listening could be implemented with minimal professional input early in the rehabilitation process (i.e., acute stage). One hour daily patient-led music listening has been shown to be enough in terms of intensity to produce behavioral (Särkämö et al., 2008; Sihvonen et al., 2020) and neuroplasticity (Särkämö et al., 2014; Sihvonen et al., 2020) gains, and, if implemented, could increase the received daily rehabilitation (De Wit et al., 2005) and possibly provide better aphasia outcomes (Bhogal et al., 2003). In turn, this could provide better long-term outcomes by increasing mood and ameliorating social isolation (Doogan et al., 2018).

The present study has some potential limitations. While the randomization to groups was stratified for lesion laterality, the groups showed significant differences for the prevalence of rhythm amusia, the inability to perceive musical rhythm. However, the number of patients with rhythm amusia in each group was largely similar (ranging from 8 to 11). Moreover, the prevalence of amusia and aphasia in the current sample was similar to those in previous studies (Sihvonen et al., 2019), making it representative of the real-world population. Most importantly, despite these group differences, vocal music listening was still effective. To fill the inclusion criteria, patients were required that have some degree of verbal communication and speech comprehension. This means that patients with global or severe aphasia were not able to participate, and aphasic patients in the current study have mild to moderate aphasia. This impedes us from making any conclusion on the effects of vocal music listening in severe forms of poststroke language impairments, and in the future, these effects should be studied. This very limitation can also contribute to the observed pattern of results: in different forms and severities of aphasia, improved outcomes can be underpinned by structural neuroplasticity changes in white matter pathways other than the left FAT (Alyahya et al., 2020; Hula et al., 2020; Gajardo-Vidal et al., 2021). How vocal music listening can target those and possibly mediate recovery is as yet unknown. Moreover, the current sample size prevented us from performing separate analyses for aphasic and nonaphasic patients.

Future research on the effects and the most active ingredients of music listening in poststroke rehabilitation is still needed. One crucial aspect of music is its capacity to evoke and regulate emotions, provide joy and comfort, and relieve stress (Saarikallio, 2011). Emotionally engaging music activates multiple brain circuits related to dopaminergic signaling reward and emotion, the engagement of which has been shown to be directly proportional to the intensity of the experience (Blood and Zatorre, 2001; Salimpoor et al., 2011; Ferreri et al., 2019). The engagement of crucial brain regions related to dopamine, motivation, and pleasure could partly explain the cognitive–emotional gains induced by music listening in neurologic rehabilitation (Sihvonen et al., 2017c). Importantly, the music in the study was self-selected by the patients to maximize personal relevance and emotional arousal, and this could have further enhanced the benefits of poststroke music listening. Future studies should include online (i.e., while the patients listen to music as part of their daily therapy) subjective (e.g., self-reports of pleasure) and objective (e.g., physiological responses via wearable technology that does not hinder the musical experience; Pelofi et al., 2021) measures evaluating the emotional arousal and pleasure of the music material. Furthermore, vocal music listening could be used as an adjuvant therapy in connection with traditional speech therapy to provide neural stimulation and fertile ground for recovery (Nithianantharajah and Hannan, 2006). As a receptive form of music-based rehabilitation, music listening could also support the effects of melodic intonation therapy (Albert et al., 1973), an active, singing-based treatment, the goal of which is to restore propositional speech, that has been related to neuroplasticity effects in the right AF (Schlaug et al., 2009). Furthermore, it would be extremely interesting to investigate whether the beneficial effects of vocal music listening are accessible in patients with different lesion locations affecting the language system (i.e., temporoparietal and frontal strokes; Stockert et al., 2020) and in patients with different aphasia severities and subtypes. Future studies using larger samples should assess the effect that music listening has on more specific language- and auditory-related functions and how this interacts with hemispheric damage. This is of particular importance for language-related functions thought to be supported by bilateral regions in the temporal cortex (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007).

In conclusion, the present results suggest that the positive effects of music listening on stroke recovery are underpinned by structural and functional reorganization of the left hemisphere language network for vocal music. Clinically, the results provide further evidence that vocal music listening is a feasible tool to stimulate the language network and promote language recovery after stroke.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and their families for their participation, and the staff of the Tyks Neurocenter and rehabilitation hospitals in the Hospital District of Southwest Finland for collaboration.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This study was supported by the European Research Council (Grant 803466), the Academy of Finland (Grants 257077, 277693, 299044), Tyks Research Funding (Grant 13944), the Finnish Brain Research and Rehabilitation Foundation, the Finnish Brain Foundation, the Finnish Cultural Foundation (Grant 191230), the Orion Research Foundation, and the Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Albert ML, Sparks RW, Helm NA (1973) Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Arch Neurol 29:130–131. doi:10.1001/archneur.1973.00490260074018 pmid:4717723
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Alluri V, Toiviainen P, Jääskeläinen IP, Glerean E, Sams M, Brattico E (2012) Large-scale brain networks emerge from dynamic processing of musical timbre, key and rhythm. Neuroimage 59:3677–3689. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.019 pmid:22116038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Alluri V, Toiviainen P, Lund TE, Wallentin M, Vuust P, Nandi AK, Ristaniemi T, Brattico E (2013) From vivaldi to beatles and back: predicting lateralized brain responses to music. Neuroimage 83:627–636. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.064 pmid:23810975
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Alyahya RSW, Halai AD, Conroy P, Lambon MA (2020) A unified model of post-stroke language deficits including discourse production and their neural correlates. Brain 143:1541–1554. doi:10.1093/brain/awaa074 pmid:32330940
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Andersen SM, Rapcsak SZ, Beeson PM (2010) Cost function masking during normalization of brains with focal lesions: still a necessity? Neuroimage 53:78–84. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.003 pmid:20542122
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2005) Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26:839–851. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018 pmid:15955494
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Basilakos A, Fillmore PT, Rorden C, Guo D, Bonilha L, Fridriksson J (2014) Regional white matter damage predicts speech fluency in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Front Hum Neurosci 8:845. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00845 pmid:25368572
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Baylan S, Haig C, MacDonald M, Stiles C, Easto J, Thomson M, Cullen B, Quinn TJ, Stott D, Mercer SW, Broomfield NM, Murray H, Evans JJ (2020) Measuring the effects of listening for leisure on outcome after stroke (MELLO): a pilot randomized controlled trial of mindful music listening. Int J Stroke 15:149–158. doi:10.1177/1747493019841250 pmid:30940047
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, Donnan G (2004) Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke 35:1005–1009. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000120727.40792.40 pmid:14988574
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M (2003) Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke 34:987–992. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000062343.64383.D0
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Blood AJ, Zatorre RJ (2001) Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:11818–11823. doi:10.1073/pnas.191355898 pmid:11573015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P (2016) Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016:CD000425.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Brattico E, Alluri V, Bogert B, Jacobsen T, Vartiainen N, Nieminen S, Tervaniemi M (2011) A functional MRI study of happy and sad emotions in music with and without lyrics. Front Psychol 2:308. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00308 pmid:22144968
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Brett M, Leff AP, Rorden C, Ashburner J (2001) Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Neuroimage 14:486–500. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0845 pmid:11467921
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Callan DE, Tsytsarev V, Hanakawa T, Callan AM, Katsuhara M, Fukuyama H, Turner R (2006) Song and speech: brain regions involved with perception and covert production. Neuroimage 31:1327–1342. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.036 pmid:16546406
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Catani M, Howard RJ, Pajevic S, Jones DK (2002) Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain. Neuroimage 17:77–94. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1136 pmid:12482069
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Catani M, Jones DK, Ffytche DH (2005) Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Ann Neurol 57:8–16. doi:10.1002/ana.20319 pmid:15597383
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Catani M, Dell'acqua F, Vergani F, Malik F, Hodge H, Roy P, Valabregue R, Thiebaut de Schotten M (2012) Short frontal lobe connections of the human brain. Cortex 48:273–291. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.12.001 pmid:22209688
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Catani M, Mesulam MM, Jakobsen E, Malik F, Martersteck A, Wieneke C, Thompson CK, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell'Acqua F, Weintraub S, Rogalski E (2013) A novel frontal pathway underlies verbal fluency in primary progressive aphasia. Brain 136:2619–2628. doi:10.1093/brain/awt163 pmid:23820597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Colby JB, Soderberg L, Lebel C, Dinov ID, Thompson PM, Sowell ER (2012) Along-tract statistics allow for enhanced tractography analysis. Neuroimage 59:3227–3242. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.004 pmid:22094644
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Copland DA (2020) Elizabeth Usher Memorial Lecture: lost in translation? Challenges and future prospects for a neurobiological approach to aphasia rehabilitation. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 22:270–280. doi:10.1080/17549507.2020.1768287 pmid:32686593
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Cramer SC (2008) Repairing the human brain after stroke. II. Restorative therapies. Ann Neurol 63:549–560. doi:10.1002/ana.21412 pmid:18481291
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Cramer SC (2018) Treatments to promote neural repair after stroke. J Stroke 20:57–70. doi:10.5853/jos.2017.02796 pmid:29402069
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH, O'Brien C, Sanger TD, Trojanowski JQ, Rumsey JM, Hicks R, Cameron J, Chen D, Chen WG, Cohen LG, deCharms C, Duffy CJ, Eden GF, Fetz EE, Filart R, Freund M, Grant SJ, Haber S, et al. (2011) Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain 134:1591–1609. doi:10.1093/brain/awr039 pmid:21482550
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    De Renzi E, Faglioni P (1978) Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the token test. Cortex 14:41–49. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(78)80006-9 pmid:16295108
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    De Wit L, Putman K, Dejaeger E, Baert I, Berman P, Bogaerts K, Brinkmann N, Connell L, Feys H, Jenni W, Kaske C, Lesaffre E, Leys M, Lincoln N, Louckx F, Schuback B, Schupp W, Smith B, De Weerdt W (2005) Use of time by stroke patients: a comparison of four European rehabilitation centers. Stroke 36:1977–1983. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000177871.59003.e3 pmid:16081860
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Dick AS, Tremblay P (2012) Beyond the arcuate fasciculus: consensus and controversy in the connectional anatomy of language. Brain 135:3529–3550. doi:10.1093/brain/aws222 pmid:23107648
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Dick AS, Bernal B, Tremblay P (2014) The language connectome: new pathways, new concepts. Neuroscientist 20:453–467. doi:10.1177/1073858413513502 pmid:24342910
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Dick AS, Garic D, Graziano P, Tremblay P (2019) The frontal aslant tract (FAT) and its role in speech, language and executive function. Cortex 111:148–163. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.015 pmid:30481666
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Doogan C, Dignam J, Copland D, Leff A (2018) Aphasia recovery: when, how and who to treat? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 18:90. doi:10.1007/s11910-018-0891-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutsson H (2016) Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:7900–7905. doi:10.1073/pnas.1602413113 pmid:27357684
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, Moran AE, Sacco RL, Anderson L, Truelsen T, O'Donnell M, Venketasubramanian N, Barker-Collo S, Lawes CMM, Wang W, Shinohara Y, Witt E, Ezzati M, Naghavi M, Murray C (2014) Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 383:245–255. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61953-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Ferreri L, Mas-Herrero E, Zatorre RJ, Ripollés P, Gomez-Andres A, Alicart H, Olivé G, Marco-Pallarés J, Antonijoan RM, Valle M, Riba J, Rodriguez-Fornells A (2019) Dopamine modulates the reward experiences elicited by music. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:3793–3798. doi:10.1073/pnas.1811878116 pmid:30670642
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Foley N, McClure JA, Meyer M, Salter K, Bureau Y, Teasell R (2012) Inpatient rehabilitation following stroke: amount of therapy received and associations with functional recovery. Disabil Rehabil 34:2132–2138. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.676145 pmid:22524794
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Fox MD (2018) Mapping symptoms to brain networks with the human connectome. N Engl J Med 379:2237–2245. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1706158 pmid:30575457
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Fridriksson J (2010) Preservation and modulation of specific left hemisphere regions is vital for treated recovery from anomia in stroke. J Neurosci 30:11558–11564. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2227-10.2010 pmid:20810877
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Fridriksson J, Richardson JD, Fillmore P, Cai B (2012) Left hemisphere plasticity and aphasia recovery. Neuroimage 60:854–863. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.057 pmid:22227052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Gajardo-Vidal A, Lorca-Puls DL, Team P, Warner H, Pshdary B, Crinion JT, Leff AP, Hope TMH, Geva S, Seghier ML, Green DW, Bowman H, Price CJ (2021) Damage to Broca’s area does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after stroke. Brain 144:817–832. doi:10.1093/brain/awaa460 pmid:33517378
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Halai AD, Woollams AM, Lambon Ralph MA (2017) Using principal component analysis to capture individual differences within a unified neuropsychological model of chronic post-stroke aphasia: revealing the unique neural correlates of speech fluency, phonology and semantics. Cortex 86:275–289. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.016 pmid:27216359
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Hartwigsen G, Saur D (2019) Neuroimaging of stroke recovery from aphasia—insights into plasticity of the human language network. Neuroimage 190:14–31. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.056 pmid:29175498
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Hickok G, Poeppel D (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:393–402. doi:10.1038/nrn2113 pmid:17431404
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Hula WD, Panesar S, Gravier ML, Yeh FC, Dresang HC, Dickey MW, Fernandez-Miranda JC (2020) Structural white matter connectometry of word production in aphasia: an observational study. Brain 143:2532–2544. doi:10.1093/brain/awaa193
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM (2012) FSL. Neuroimage 62:782–790. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 pmid:21979382
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Kinoshita M, de Champfleur NM, Deverdun J, Moritz-Gasser S, Herbet G, Duffau H (2015) Role of fronto-striatal tract and frontal aslant tract in movement and speech: an axonal mapping study. Brain Struct Funct 220:3399–3412. doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0863-0 pmid:25086832
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Kiran S, Meier EL, Johnson JP (2019) Neuroplasticity in aphasia: a proposed framework of language recovery. J Speech Lang Hear Res 62:3973–3985. doi:10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-RSNP-19-0054 pmid:31756154
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Koelsch S (2014) Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions. Nat Rev Neurosci 15:170–180. doi:10.1038/nrn3666 pmid:24552785
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Koelsch S, Gunter TC, Cramon DY, Zysset S, Lohmann G, Friederici AD (2002) Bach speaks: a cortical “language-network” serves the processing of music. Neuroimage 17:956–966. pmid:12377169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Kunert R, Willems RM, Casasanto D, Patel AD, Hagoort P (2015) Music and language syntax interact in Broca’s area: an fMRI study. PLoS One 10:e0141069. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141069 pmid:26536026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Laine M, Goodglass H, Niemi J, Koivuselka-Sallinen P, Tuomainen J, Marttila R (1993) Adaptation of the Boston diagnostic aphasia examination and the boston naming test into finnish. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 18:83–92. doi:10.3109/14015439309101353
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    Lam JMC, Wodchis WP (2010) The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Med Care 48:380–387. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca2647 pmid:20220536
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Leemans A, Jones DK (2009) The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magn Reson Med 61:1336–1349. doi:10.1002/mrm.21890 pmid:19319973
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D (2012) Neuropsychological assessment, Ed 5. New York: Oxford UP.
  53. ↵
    Lo JW, Crawford JD, Desmond DW, Godefroy O, Jokinen H, Mahinrad S, Bae H-J, Lim J-S, Köhler S, Douven E, Staals J, Chen C, Xu X, Chong EJ, Akinyemi RO, Kalaria RN, Ogunniyi A, Barbay M, Roussel M, Lee B-C, et al. (2019) Profile of and risk factors for poststroke cognitive impairment in diverse ethnoregional groups. Neurology 93:E2257–E2271. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000008612 pmid:31712368
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Maess B, Koelsch S, Gunter TC, Friederici AD (2001) Musical syntax is processed in Broca’s area: an MEG study. Nat Neurosci 4:540–545. doi:10.1038/87502 pmid:11319564
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Mandelli ML, Caverzasi E, Binney RJ, Henry ML, Lobach I, Block N, Amirbekian B, Dronkers N, Miller BL, Henry RG, Gorno-Tempini ML (2014) Frontal white matter tracts sustaining speech production in primary progressive aphasia. J Neurosci 34:9754–9767. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3464-13.2014 pmid:25031413
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    Morris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC, Hughes JP, van Belle G, Fillenbaum G, Mellits ED, Clark C (1989) The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 39:1159–1165. doi:10.1212/wnl.39.9.1159 pmid:2771064
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Murphy TH, Corbett D (2009) Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:861–872. doi:10.1038/nrn2735 pmid:19888284
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Nithianantharajah J, Hannan AJ (2006) Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:697–709. doi:10.1038/nrn1970 pmid:16924259
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen HU, Jönsson B (2012) The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol 19:155–162. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03590.x pmid:22175760
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS (2004) Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis: the Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis 17:35–43. doi:10.1159/000073896 pmid:14530636
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Pelofi C, Goldstein M, Bevilacqua D, McPhee M, Abrams E, Ripollés P (2021) CHILLER: a computer human interface for the live labelling of emotional responses. Paper presented at 2021 New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, June.
  62. ↵
    Peretz I, Champod AS, Hyde K (2003) Varieties of musical disorders: the montreal battery of evaluation of amusia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 999:58–75. doi:10.1196/annals.1284.006 pmid:14681118
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    Rauschecker JP, Scott SK (2009) Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat Neurosci 12:718–724. doi:10.1038/nn.2331 pmid:19471271
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    Ripollés P, Marco-Pallarés J, de Diego-Balaguer R, Miró J, Falip M, Juncadella M, Rubio F, Rodriguez-Fornells A (2012) Analysis of automated methods for spatial normalization of lesioned brains. Neuroimage 60:1296–1306. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.094 pmid:22305954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Rorden C, Brett M (2000) Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 12:191–200. doi:10.1155/2000/421719 pmid:11568431
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    Rosso C, Vargas P, Valabregue R, Arbizu C, Henry-Amar F, Leger A, Lehéricy S, Samson Y (2015) Aphasia severity in chronic stroke patients: a combined disconnection in the dorsal and ventral language pathways. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29:287–295. doi:10.1177/1545968314543926
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    Saarikallio S (2011) Music as emotional self-regulation throughout adulthood. Psychol Music 39:307–327. doi:10.1177/0305735610374894
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. ↵
    Salimpoor VN, Benovoy M, Larcher K, Dagher A, Zatorre RJ (2011) Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nat Neurosci 14:257–264. doi:10.1038/nn.2726 pmid:21217764
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Samson F, Zeffiro TA, Toussaint A, Belin P (2011) Stimulus complexity and categorical effects in human auditory cortex: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Front Psychol 1:241. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00241 pmid:21833294
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Särkämö T, Soto D (2012) Music listening after stroke: beneficial effects and potential neural mechanisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1252:266–281. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06405.x pmid:22524369
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    Särkämö T, Tervaniemi M, Laitinen S, Forsblom A, Soinila S, Mikkonen M, Autti T, Silvennoinen HM, Erkkilä J, Laine M, Peretz I, Hietanen M (2008) Music listening enhances cognitive recovery and mood after middle cerebral artery stroke. Brain 131:866–876. doi:10.1093/brain/awn013 pmid:18287122
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    Särkämö T, Ripollés P, Vepsäläinen H, Autti T, Silvennoinen HM, Salli E, Laitinen S, Forsblom A, Soinila S, Rodríguez-Fornells A (2014) Structural changes induced by daily music listening in the recovering brain after middle cerebral artery stroke: a voxel-based morphometry study. Front Hum Neurosci 8:245. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00245 pmid:24860466
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, Schraknepper V, Willmes K, Rijntjes M, Weiller C (2006) Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 129:1371–1384. doi:10.1093/brain/awl090 pmid:16638796
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    Saur D, Kreher BW, Schnell S, Kümmerer D, Kellmeyer P, Vry M-S, Umarova R, Musso M, Glauche V, Abel S, Huber W, Rijntjes M, Hennig J, Weiller C (2008) Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:18035–18040. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805234105 pmid:19004769
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    Schevenels K, Price CJ, Zink I, De Smedt B, Vandermosten M (2020) A review on treatment-related brain changes in aphasia. Neurobiol Lang 1:402–433. doi:10.1162/nol_a_00019
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. ↵
    Schlaug G, Marchina S, Norton A (2009) Evidence for plasticity in white-matter tracts of patients with chronic Broca’s aphasia undergoing intense intonation-based speech therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1169:385–394. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04587.x pmid:19673813
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    Schmithorst VJ (2005) Separate cortical networks involved in music perception: preliminary functional MRI evidence for modularity of music processing. Neuroimage 25:444–451. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.006 pmid:15784423
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    Schön D, Gordon R, Campagne A, Magne C, Astésano C, Anton JL, Besson M (2010) Similar cerebral networks in language, music and song perception. Neuroimage 51:450–461. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.023 pmid:20156575
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    Sierpowska J, Gabarrós A, Fernandez-Coello A, Camins A, Castañer S, Juncadella M, de Diego-Balaguer R, Rodríguez-Fornells A (2015) Morphological derivation overflow as a result of disruption of the left frontal aslant white matter tract. Brain Lang 142:54–64. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.005 pmid:25658634
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    Sihvonen AJ, Leo V, Ripollés P, Lehtovaara T, Ylönen A, Rajanaro P, Laitinen S, Forsblom A, Saunavaara J, Autti T, Laine M, Rodríguez-Fornells A, Tervaniemi M, Soinila S, Särkämö T (2020) Vocal music enhances memory and language recovery after stroke: pooled results from two RCTs. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 7:2272–2287. doi:10.1002/acn3.51217 pmid:33022148
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    Sihvonen AJ, Ripollés P, Leo V, Rodríguez-Fornells A, Soinila S, Särkämö T (2016) Neural basis of acquired amusia and its recovery after stroke. J Neurosci 36:8872–8881. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0709-16.2016 pmid:27559169
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    Sihvonen AJ, Ripollés P, Rodríguez-Fornells A, Soinila S, Särkämö T (2017a) Revisiting the neural basis of acquired amusia: lesion patterns and structural changes underlying amusia recovery. Front Neurosci 11:426. doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00426 pmid:28790885
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    Sihvonen AJ, Ripollés P, Särkämö T, Leo V, Rodríguez-Fornells A, Saunavaara J, Parkkola R, Soinila S (2017b) Tracting the neural basis of music: deficient structural connectivity underlying acquired amusia. Cortex 97:255–273. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.028 pmid:29100660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    Sihvonen AJ, Särkämö T, Leo V, Tervaniemi M, Altenmüller E, Soinila S (2017c) Music-based interventions in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 16:648–660. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30168-0 pmid:28663005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    Sihvonen AJ, Särkämö T, Ripollés P, Leo V, Saunavaara J, Parkkola R, Rodríguez-Fornells A, Soinila S (2017d) Functional neural changes associated with acquired amusia across different stages of recovery after stroke. Sci Rep 7:11390. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11841-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  86. ↵
    Sihvonen AJ, Särkämö T, Rodríguez-Fornells A, Ripollés P, Münte TF, Soinila S (2019) Neural architectures of music—insights from acquired amusia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 107:104–114. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.023 pmid:31479663
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    Smith SM (2002) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17:143–155. doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 pmid:12391568
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23:S208–S219. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    Stockert A, Wawrzyniak M, Klingbeil J, Wrede K, Kümmerer D, Hartwigsen G, Kaller CP, Weiller C, Saur D (2020) Dynamics of language reorganization after left temporo-parietal and frontal stroke. Brain 143:844–861. doi:10.1093/brain/awaa023 pmid:32068789
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell'Acqua F, Valabregue R, Catani M (2012) Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts. Cortex 48:82–96. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.001 pmid:22088488
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    Van Hees S, McMahon K, Angwin A, de Zubicaray G, Copland DA (2014a) Neural activity associated with semantic versus phonological anomia treatments in aphasia. Brain Lang 129:47–57. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.12.004 pmid:24556337
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    Van Hees S, McMahon K, Angwin A, De Zubicaray G, Read S, Copland DA (2014b) Changes in white matter connectivity following therapy for anomia post stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 28:325–334. doi:10.1177/1545968313508654 pmid:24297762
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD (2016) Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 47:e98–e169. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000098 pmid:27145936
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. ↵
    Zatorre RJ, Salimpoor VN (2013) From perception to pleasure: music and its neural substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:10430–10437. doi:10.1073/pnas.1301228110
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. ↵
    Zatorre RJ, Chen JL, Penhune VB (2007) When the brain plays music: auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:547–558. doi:10.1038/nrn2152 pmid:17585307
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Sunghee Cho, Burke Neurological Institute/Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Susan Wortman-Jutt. Note: If this manuscript was transferred from JNeurosci and a decision was made to accept the manuscript without peer review, a brief statement to this effect will instead be what is listed below.

The presented clinical study, describing potential benefit of vocal music listening on post-stroke language therapy, were evaluated by two reviewers with expertise in the field. While both reviewers considered that the manuscript that addresses a potential adjunctive rehabilitation strategy of vocal music listening on the early stage of stroke patients is a timely topic and bears important consequences, they also raised serious concerns. These include the lack of clarity in controlling important variables, the impact of hemispheric differences, and the rationale for the combining three test scores as opposed to present breakdown for each test. It was also noted that missing analyses of an important structure for vocal behavior and insufficient information on the nature of injury. More detailed and specific comments from the reviewers are appended.

Reviewer 1

The authors of the present study propose that listening to vocal music as an adjunct to standard of care post-stroke therapy may provide benefits to stroke patients in the first 3 months of recovery, particularly those with aphasia. This is an important and timely topic.

Imaging data from the authors previous (combined) 2020 study is compared with behavioral data in this manuscript. Findings include microstructural enhancement of the left frontal aslant track when listening to vocal music which the authors correlate with improvement in raw scores of 3 brief, combined language-based subtests. The specifics of what language domains improved most are not yet provided and there are some issues with the study design that may benefit from further explanation. A full language evaluation using a complete standardized assessment is not provided and an explanation of this omission would be helpful. For example, were the authors expecting improvement in "following directions" (as measured by the shortened Token Test), pictured-object naming (as measured by a shortened version of the Boston Naming Test) and word finding (as measured by a fluency task) specifically? And if so, why were those specific areas expected to improve? If not, why was a more thorough and complete language evaluation not conducted?

The authors begin by stating in the Abstract that, "listening to vocal music has been recently shown to improve language recovery in stroke." In their previous (2020) paper from which this manuscript derives, the authors looked at the results of 2 combined studies and found improvements in verbal memory (the primary outcome measure) following 1-hour of passive daily vocal music listening versus listening to audiobooks or instrumental music. In the former paper the authors also found improvement in language scores on 2 abbreviated language subtests (a shortened version of the Token Test and the short version of the Boston Naming Test), and improvements on a verbal fluency task. In the original paper, the authors combine the raw scores from these 3 separate and unrelated subtests into one language score, which, when presented in combination, is neither validated nor standardized. The combination of raw scores from the 3 unrelated subtests into one so-called language score has the potential to be misleading. Table 1 provides mean baseline data on each of the individual language subtests, but it is unclear how each language subtest improved individually over time. In a future version of the current manuscript, it might add merit to provide a breakdown of language scores pre- and post-treatment on all 3 language subtests.

Of note, the authors report that subjects received standard of care therapy in all disciplines throughout the study. They do not report, however, on the timing of the listening relative to participation in therapy. Was it random? Was there a prescribed time set aside for listening relative to when they would receive physical, occupational or speech therapy? If this was not determined or left up to the participant, why was this so? Did the authors not feel there would be a relationship between the timing of their intervention relative to the other interventions the participants were receiving? It would be interesting to understand the rationale behind leaving the timing of listening up to the participants, versus having a prescribed listening period in direct relationship to their other therapies. Having a specified, or even supervised listening period may have helped to ameliorate concerns regarding "cross-listening," which the authors acknowledge (in the original paper) took place, in which the vocal music, instrumental and audiobook groups listened to other types of entertainment on separate devices during the treatment period. Itߣs unclear why a more supervised, structured form of listening given before, say, speech therapy, or before beginning all therapy for the day, wasnߣt prescribed for each group. With respect to the standard of care therapies received during the listening treatment period, it would also be interesting to note whether improvements in language were found by the speech-language therapists during the course of participantsߣ care. Are the findings of the study team consistent with improvements noted by the treating therapists?

Hickok and Poeppel (2007) and later Fridriksson et al. (2016; 2018) have suggested that the right hemisphere is more involved in the auditory comprehension of novel information, such as unfamiliar words. It has been hypothesized by Hickock and Poeppel (2007) that this explains why many patients with fluent aphasia perform well on tests of sound discrimination in spite of their auditory comprehension deficits; that is, there is bilateral representation of this phonological processing skill. This may be relevant to the findings in the present study since the audiobooks contained the rapid presentation of unfamiliar information, whereas the vocal music contained lyrics that may have been overlearned or familiar. Could the automaticity, repetitiveness or over-learned nature (e.g., reduced demand) of the vocal music lyrics have played a role in the outcome? It would be interesting to hear the authorsߣ views; but again, a more complete understanding of what specific language domains were positively impacted by vocal music listening, and whether some domains were impacted more than others, might be helpful.

Finally, one issue confused me with respect to Table 1: Baseline mean Naming scores (BNT) are listed as 18.3, 17.5 and 17.4 respectively; however, the short version of the BNT is standardized as a 15-item test. Was there an alternate number of items used in this "shortened" version of the BNT?

Reviewer 2

This is an innovative intervention and measure in a group of 38 stroke patients with important consequences for post stroke care. Generally, the results are very interesting, however, I would like to have some more information and clarification

1.) sample lacks an empty control/emotional arousal which could account for the differences in outcome

2.) the subgroup are heterogeneous with respect to stroke nature (hemorrhagic vs. ischemic?)

3.) the analysis did not include the most important tract for vocal behavior, the arcuate fasciculus

4.) too little information about the size and nature of the left hemisphere lesion

5.) no discussions of earlier work on melodic intonation therapy by Gottfried Schlaug

6.) What were the DTI results for the FA? This is the fibre bundle which was most commonly investigated - maybe there was no effect, this is interesting (see work on melodic intonation therapy by Schlaug)

7.) Did the subjects rate their pleasure with listening and was this the same (emotional arousal in the three groups?)

8.) is the fact, that in the VMG only 2 patients suffered from hemorrhagic stroke, in the two others however 6 and 4, and therefore a much higher percentage has any impact on the results. I would like to know more about the size of the lesion, the Barthel index etc.etc.

9.) Discussion: Any idea, why MIT is the painful and with so little effect in most patients?

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 4
July/August 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vocal Music Listening Enhances Poststroke Language Network Reorganization
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Vocal Music Listening Enhances Poststroke Language Network Reorganization
Aleksi J. Sihvonen, Pablo Ripollés, Vera Leo, Jani Saunavaara, Riitta Parkkola, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells, Seppo Soinila, Teppo Särkämö
eNeuro 17 June 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0158-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0158-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Vocal Music Listening Enhances Poststroke Language Network Reorganization
Aleksi J. Sihvonen, Pablo Ripollés, Vera Leo, Jani Saunavaara, Riitta Parkkola, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells, Seppo Soinila, Teppo Särkämö
eNeuro 17 June 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0158-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0158-21.2021
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • aphasia
  • DTI
  • fMRI
  • language
  • music
  • recovery

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Capacity Limits Lead to Information Bottlenecks in Ongoing Rapid Motor Behaviors
  • Nonlinear Theta-Gamma Coupling between the Anterior Thalamus and Hippocampus Increases as a Function of Running Speed
  • Contrast and Luminance Gain Control in the Macaque’s Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
Show more Research Article: New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Environment Enrichment Facilitates Long-Term Memory Consolidation Through Behavioral Tagging
  • Effects of cortical FoxP1 knockdowns on learned song preference in female zebra finches
  • The genetic architectures of functional and structural connectivity properties within cerebral resting-state networks
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.