Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Characterization of Seizure Induction Methods in Drosophila

Jurga Mituzaite, Rasmus Petersen, Adam Claridge-Chang and Richard A. Baines
eNeuro 30 July 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0079-21.2021; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0079-21.2021
Jurga Mituzaite
1Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
2Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Singapore 138673
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rasmus Petersen
1Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Claridge-Chang
2Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Singapore 138673
3Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593
4Program in Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Baines
1Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Richard A. Baines
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Methods of seizure induction in Drosophila adults and larvae. A, Schematic showing vortex assay. Adult flies in vials are vortexed for 10 s, and their seizure duration is measured as time taken to regain their posture. B, Schematic showing heat assay. Adult flies in vials are exposed to 40°C water for 120 s, and seizure duration is measured as time taken to regain their posture after being taken out from the water bath. C, Schematic showing electroshock assay. Electroshock is applied to the dorsal side of third instar larvae. Seizure duration is measured as the time required to restart normal crawling after the shock.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Comparison of seizure induction methods in Drosophila adults and larvae. We tested BS pk-sple, eas, jus, and bss lines and heat-sensitive DS and GEFS+ lines. A, Vortex-induced seizures in pk-sple 15.22 s [95% CI: 11.37, 20.69], eas 107.54 s [95% CI: 88.71, 123.84], jus 73.35 s [95% CI: 64.60, 79.88], and bss 168.35 s [95CI: 157.31, 179.39]. No SLA was observed in CS, DS-C, DS, GEFS-C, and GEFS+ flies. B, Seizure duration induced by the heat assay. DS showed seizures of average 71.82 s and GEFS+ of 431.03 s, with no seizures recorded for the respective matched controls (DS-C and GEFS-C). pk-sple showed seizures of 136.67 s [95% CI: 87.42, 191.84]. By comparison, CS, OR, jus, bss, or eas did not show heat-induced seizures. C, Cumulative fraction of flies seizing throughout the 120 s of heat assay. Only 100% of DS flies seized during the 2-min period. Other genotypes reached a maximum of: 90% for GEFS+, 83% for pk-sple, and 20% for eas. D, Electroshock induced seizures in all genotypes tested. Results of OR, jus, eas, bss, and pk-sple are reported as a ratio to CS seizure duration which was measured at 97.0 s [95% CI: 95.4, 101.6]. There were no differences between OR and CS. Pk-sple exhibited the weakest phenotype with seizure duration increased by 57.47%, whereas bss showed an increase of 244.11%. eas and jus had 112.62% and 104.95% longer seizures. DS and GEFS+ seizure durations are reported as a ratio to their respective controls (DS-C and GEFS-C). DS showed 119.78% and GEFS+ 70.67% increase in seizures as compared with controls. E, Seizure induction in larva and adult flies have similar effectiveness (R2 = 0.85 [95% CI: 0.03, 1.0], shaded area indicates 95% CI for the linear regression model fit). Effect sizes for adults were derived from vortex assay for BS and heat assay for temperature-sensitive lines.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Adult seizure mutants do not exhibit obvious changes in locomotor activity. A, Schematic showing the locomotor assay. B, During the 12-h period of lights on, jus (1298.14 mm/h), eas (724.40 mm/h), pk-sple (1148.98 mm/h), and GEFS+ (1007.61 mm/h) show reduced locomotor activity (compared with appropriate controls), with eas and GEFS+ having the most prominent phenotypes; slower by 1012.09 mm/h [95% CI: −1211.17, −818.82] and 654.49 mm/h [95% CI: −1017.36, −267.84], respectively. DS showed increased activity by 361 mm/h [95% CI: 154.58, 592.13] over its control (DS-C) with an average speed of 727.60 mm/h. C, During lights off, several mutants showed a small increase in activity levels. Of these, eas had the most prominent phenotype at 667.02 mm/h [95% CI: 493.03, 870.27]. jus and bss showed similar activity levels with an increase of 261.51 mm/h [95% CI: 128.67, 404.60] and 285.95 mm/h [95% CI: 138.50, 458.49], respectively. GEFS+ is the only genotype remaining slower than its respective control (GEFS-C) by 313.14 mm/h [95% CI: −489.98, −154.34]. Other genotypes showed no meaningful differences. Fly activity was tracked for 3 d at 25°C at 12/12 h light/dark cycle. All genotypes were recorded at least twice. D, Schematic showing the set up for larval tracking. E, Total distances crawled by BS mutants pk-sple (49.27 mm), eas (60.51 mm), jus (52.29 mm), and bss (32.43 mm) were greatly lower in comparison to CS (161.47 mm). Heat-sensitive mutants did not show any meaningful reduction in the total distance crawled from their matched controls.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Seizure mutants show elongated motor neuron bursting. A, B, Examples of cell-attached recordings from larval RP2 and aCC motor neuron bursting patterns in CS wild-type (A) and the bss seizure mutant (B). C, The fraction of elongated bursts (i.e., activity shown in B) observed in wild-type and the BS genotypes: CS, OR (0%), pk-sple (31.8%), eas (14.29%), jus (41.67%), and bss (15.38%). D, Fraction of elongated bursts recorded in heat-sensitive mutants and their respective controls: GEFS-C (16.67%), GEFS+ (41.67%), DS-C (50.00%), and DS (58.33%). E, Fraction of elongated bursts detected in CS larvae fed with either vehicle (–PTX) or PTX. Vehicle showed only normal bursting, but recordings from PTX-fed larvae showed 83.33% elongated bursts. F, PTX induces larval seizures with recovery time 86% longer in the experimental group than control.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Larval motor neuron firing does not predict seizure susceptibility. Analysis of 3-min loose-patch recordings from larval RP2/aCC motor neurons revealed that there is no correlation between mean burst duration (A), SD of burst duration (B), burst frequency (C), AP count per burst (D), AP frequency per burst (E), AP firing rate (F), and fraction of elongated bursting (G) and larval seizure. (H) Fraction of elongated bursting from larval motor neurons showed no correlation with the effect size of adult seizure. Shaded areas indicate 95% CI for the linear regression model fit.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Analysis of activity recordings from larval motor neurons

    GenotypeNBurst
    duration
    (ms)
    Burst
    duration
    SD (ms)
    Burst
    frequency
    (Hz)
    Firing
    rate
    (AP/s)
    AP count
    per burst
    (AP/burst)
    AP frequency
    per burst (Hz)
    CS13174.5791.540.476.6814.2587.53
    OR10155.4084.800.406.3816.24104.30
    pksple22394.01348.540.466.9216.8151.48
    jus12703.941211.460.318.2323.2658.88
    eas14210.22165.490.496.7312.7869.78
    bss13195.42215.280.434.9712.7277.89
    GEFS-C12208.94183.280.374.3213.6776.16
    GEFS+121160.341827.300.469.4849.54362.66
    DS-C1211,859.2511,869.450.396.21166.21322.43
    DS123139.834338.580.234.3942.2634.13
    CS –PTX12170.1689.590.304.0712.5990.34
    CS +PTX121964.825369.330.3713.9965.3040.28
    • Three-minute loose-patch recordings of spiking activity were analyzed using a custom-built MATLAB script. Bursts were defined as three or more spikes occurring within 100 ms from each other. The numbers are averages for all traces per genotype.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 4
July/August 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of Seizure Induction Methods in Drosophila
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Characterization of Seizure Induction Methods in Drosophila
Jurga Mituzaite, Rasmus Petersen, Adam Claridge-Chang, Richard A. Baines
eNeuro 30 July 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0079-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0079-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Characterization of Seizure Induction Methods in Drosophila
Jurga Mituzaite, Rasmus Petersen, Adam Claridge-Chang, Richard A. Baines
eNeuro 30 July 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0079-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0079-21.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • antiepileptic
  • Drosophila
  • epilepsy
  • insect
  • model
  • seizure induction

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Multiplexed smFISH reveals the spatial organization of neuropil localized mRNAs is linked to abundance
  • Novelty influences dopamine responses to conditioned and unconditioned aversive stimuli over extended temporal windows
  • Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor Function in Interpeduncular Nucleus Is Modulated by Nicotine Exposure
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Lack of ADAP1/Centaurin-α1 Ameliorates Cognitive Impairment and Neuropathological Hallmarks in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease
  • The PDGFBB-PDGFRβ Pathway and Laminins in Pericytes Are Involved in the Temporal Change of AQP4 Polarity during Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Pathogenesis
  • The Ventral Pallidum Innervates a Distinct Subset of Midbrain Dopamine Neurons
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.