1 | B' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | M NGM vs M Astro | K-W = 65.23 |
| | | | p < 0.0001 |
1 | B' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | F NGM vs F Astro | K-W = 65.23 |
| | | | p < 0.0001 |
1 | B' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | M Astro vs F Astro | K-W = 65.23 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
1 | D' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | M NGM vs M M-ACM | K-W = 77.03 |
| | | | p < 0.0001 |
1 | D' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | M NGM vs M F-ACM | K-W = 77.03 |
| | | | p < 0.0001 |
1 | D' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | M M-ACM vs M F-ACM | K-W = 77.03 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
1 | D' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | M M-ACM vs F M-ACM | K-W = 77.03 |
| | | | p = 0.0142 |
1 | D' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | M F-ACM vs F F-ACM | K-W = 77.03 |
| | | | p = 0.1693 |
1 | D' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | F NGM vs F M-ACM | K-W = 77.03 |
| | | | p = 0.2781 |
1 | D' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | F NGM vs F F-ACM | K-W = 77.03 |
| | | | p = 0.0036 |
2 | C' | One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison | M NGM vs M ACM | F(3,75) = 10.29 |
| | | | p = 0.0002 |
2 | C' | One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison | F NGM vs F ACM | F(3,75) = 10.29 |
| | | | p = 0.0195 |
2 | C' | One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparison | M ACM vs F ACM | F(3,75) = 10.29 |
| | | | p = 0.2119 |
2 | D' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | M NGM vs M ACM | K-W = 22.61 |
| | | | p = 0.0165 |
2 | D' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | F NGM vs F ACM | K-W = 22.61 |
| | | | p = 0.0018 |
2 | D' | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | M ACM vs F ACM | K-W = 22.61 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
4 | A | Unpaired Student's t test | TSP2 relative band intensity, male vs female | p = 0.568 |
4 | B | Two-way ANOVA (interaction) | α2δ−1 relative band intensity | F(2,12) = 0.220 |
| | | | p = 0.805 |
4 | B | Two-way ANOVA (sex) | α2δ−1 relative band intensity | F(1,12) = 0.647 |
| | | | p = 0.437 |
4 | B | Two-way ANOVA (treatment) | α2δ−1 relative band intensity | F(2,12) = 0.093 |
| | | | p = 0.912 |
4 | C | Linear mixed-effects model (REML) with Holm–Sidak’s post hoc comparison (sex) | E2 (pg/ml) | F(1,55) = 6.999 |
| | | | p = 0.011 |
4 | D | Linear mixed-effects model (REML) with Holm–Sidak’s post hoc comparison (sex) | E2 (pg/ml) | F(1,29) = 3.799 |
| | | | p = ns |
5 | E, left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs Astro | K-W = 52.57 |
| | | | p = 0.0002 |
5 | E, left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs Astro + Let | K-W = 52.57 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
5 | E, left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs ACM | K-W = 52.57 |
| | | | p = 0.0002 |
5 | E, left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs ACM + Let | K-W = 52.57 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
5 | E, left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | Astro vs Astro + Let | K-W = 52.57 |
| | | | p = 0.0198 |
5 | E, left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | ACM vs ACM + Let | K-W = 52.57 |
| | | | p < 0.0001 |
5 | E, right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs Astro | K-W = 66.18 |
| | | | p < 0.0001 |
5 | E, right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs Astro + Let | K-W = 66.18 |
| | | | p = 0.0123 |
5 | E, right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs ACM | K-W = 66.18 |
| | | | p < 0.0001 |
5 | E, right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs ACM + Let | K-W = 66.18 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
5 | E, right | Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | Astro vs Astro + Let | K-W = 66.18 |
| | | | p = 0.2655 |
5 | E, right | Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | ACM vs ACM + Let | K-W = 66.18 |
| | | | p < 0.0001 |
6 | left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs TSP2 | K-W = 64.21 |
| | | | p = 0.0039 |
6 | left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs E2 | K-W = 64.21 |
| | | | p = 0.2220 |
6 | left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs E2 TSP2 | K-W = 64.21 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
6 | left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs ICI | K-W = 64.21 |
| | | | p = 0.0452 |
6 | left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs ICI TSP2 | K-W = 64.21 |
| | | | p = 0.2420 |
6 | left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs PGE2 | K-W = 64.21 |
| | | | p = 0.0377 |
6 | left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs PGE2 TSP2 | K-W = 64.21 |
| | | | p = 0.0467 |
6 | left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | E2 vs E2 TSP2 | K-W = 64.21 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
6 | left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | ICI vs ICI TSP2 | K-W = 64.21 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
6 | left | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | PGE2 vs PGE2 TSP2 | K-W = 64.21 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
6 | right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs TSP2 | K-W = 44.75 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
6 | right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs E2 | K-W = 44.75 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
6 | right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs E2 TSP2 | K-W = 44.75 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
6 | right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs ICI | K-W = 44.75 |
| | | | p = 0.8729 |
6 | right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs ICI TSP2 | K-W = 44.75 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
6 | right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs PGE2 | K-W = 44.75 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
6 | right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | NGM vs PGE2 TSP2 | K-W = 44.75 |
| | | | p = 0.0002 |
6 | right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | E2 vs E2 TSP2 | K-W = 44.75 |
| | | | p > 0.9999 |
6 | right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | ICI vs ICI TSP2 | K-W = 44.75 |
| | | | p = 0.6315 |
6 | right | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparison | PGE2 vs PGE2 TSP2 | K-W = 44.75 |
| | | | p < 0.0001 |