Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Development

Astrocyte-Derived Thrombospondin Induces Cortical Synaptogenesis in a Sex-Specific Manner

Anna Mazur, Ean H. Bills, Kayla M. DeSchepper, James C. Williamson, Brandon J. Henderson and W. Christopher Risher
eNeuro 15 July 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0014-21.2021; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0014-21.2021
Anna Mazur
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25701
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ean H. Bills
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25701
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kayla M. DeSchepper
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25701
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James C. Williamson
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25701
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandon J. Henderson
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25701
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brandon J. Henderson
W. Christopher Risher
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25701
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W. Christopher Risher
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Sex differences in astrocyte-mediated synaptogenesis. A, Representative ICC images of cortical neurons isolated from either male (top row) or female (bottom row) pups and treated with either NGM only or cultured with sex-matched astrocyte inserts (Astro) that allow for the continuous exchange of media/factors between cell types. Co-localized presynaptic (Bassoon; magenta) and postsynaptic (Homer1; green) puncta reveal sites of excitatory synapses (white arrowheads). B, Exposure to astrocyte-secreted factors via culture inserts significantly increased excitatory synapse number per ROI in both sexes. B’, Fold-change of synapse number induced by male or female-derived astrocyte inserts (shown as percent of sex-matched NGM control); ****p < 0.0001; n.s., not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis; K-W statistic = 65.23). C, Representative ICC images of male (top row) and female (bottom row)-derived cortical neurons treated with ACM previously purified from either males or females (M-ACM and F-ACM, respectively), stained as in A. D, ACM derived from either sex promoted excitatory synapses in male neurons. In females, this increase was limited to F-ACM. D’, Fold-change of synapse number induced by male or female-derived ACM (shown as percent of sex-matched NGM control); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 (Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis; K-W statistic = 77.03). In B, D, the mean difference for each comparison is shown in the Cumming estimation plot. The raw data are plotted on the upper axes; each mean difference (within sex) is plotted on the lower axes as a bootstrap sampling distribution. Mean differences are depicted as dots; 95% CIs are indicated by the ends of the vertical error bars.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    A, Brightfield image of a cortical neuron in whole cell patch clamp configuration for the recording of mEPSCs. B, Sample mEPSC traces from male and female-derived cortical neurons treated with either standard NGM or NGM with the addition of sex-matched ACM. C and D, Sex-matched ACM increased both frequency (C) and amplitude (D) of mEPSCs recorded from either male or female-derived cortical neurons. C’, Fold-change of mEPSC frequency values (in Hz) induced by male or female-derived ACM (shown as percent of sex-matched NGM control); *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis; F = 10.29). D’, Fold-change of mEPSC amplitude values (in pA) induced by male or female-derived ACM (shown as percent of sex-matched NGM control); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis; K-W statistic = 22.61).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Increased synaptic response to astrocytic factor TSP2 by male but not female-derived cortical neurons. A, Representative ICC images of male and female-derived cortical neurons. Co-localized presynaptic (Bassoon; magenta) and postsynaptic (Homer1; green) puncta reveal sites of excitatory synapses (white arrowheads). B, No baseline difference in the number of co-localized excitatory synaptic puncta between male and female-derived neurons with standard NGM treatment. The mean difference between M and F is shown in the Gardner–Altman estimation plot. Both groups are plotted on the left axes; the mean difference is plotted on a floating axis on the right as a bootstrap sampling distribution. The mean difference is depicted as a dot; the 95% CI is indicated by the ends of the vertical error bar. C, Sample mEPSC traces from male and female-derived cortical neurons treated with either standard NGM or NGM with the addition of purified TSP2. D, E, TSP2 treatment increased frequency (D) but not amplitude (E) of mEPSCs recorded from male-derived cortical neurons. Female-derived cortical neurons showed no change in mEPSC frequency but had a small decrease in amplitude after TSP2.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Transient increase in neuronally-derived estradiol in cultured female cortical neurons. A, left, Western blotting for TSP2 [top, ∼160-kDa observed band (∼130 kDa expected); bottom, total protein blot for normalization] from astrocyte media collected on DIV10. Right, No difference was found in secreted TSP2 levels between male and female astrocytes; p = 0.568 [unpaired Student’s t test; n = 4 independent experimental replicates (M1-4, F1-4)]. B, left, Western blotting for α2δ−1 (top, 143-kDa observed band; bottom, total protein blot for normalization) from purified male and female cortical neuron lysates. Lysates were collected on DIV13 following treatment with NGM only, 100 nm E2, or 100 nm letrozole (Let) on DIV7 and DIV10. Right, No difference in total α2δ−1 protein expression was observed between male or female-derived neurons at baseline or following treatment with either E2 or Let; p = 0.805 (two-way ANOVA, interaction: F(2,12) = 0.220; n = 3 independent experimental replicates). C, Immunoassay results for levels of E2 detected in male versus female neuron-conditioned media. An increase in secreted E2 was detected in female cultures at the start of the second week, reaching significance at DIV9; *p < 0.05 [linear mixed-effects model (REML) with Holm–Sidak’s post hoc analysis, sex: F(1,55) = 7.00; n = 4 independent experimental replicates]. D, Estradiol measurements from male versus female cortical ACM. No significant differences were observed (linear mixed-effects model, sex: F(1,29) = 3.80; n = 3 independent experimental replicates).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Inhibition of neuronal estrogen production modulates TSP/astrocyte-induced synaptogenesis. A, ICC image of a male-derived cortical neuron fixed and stained on DIV13 with presynaptic (Bassoon; magenta) and postsynaptic (Homer1; green) markers. Dotted box indicates example dendritic ROI sampled for images in B, which shows co-localized excitatory synaptic puncta (white, arrowheads) along male and female-derived cortical neurites treated with NGM only or NGM plus TSP2, 100 nm letrozole (Let), or TSP2/letrozole on DIV7 and DIV10. C, left, Letrozole had a mild synaptogenic effect on male-derived cortical neurons but attenuated the synapse-promoting ability of TSP2. Right, Female-derived cortical neurons showed no synaptogenic response to TSP2 unless treatment was combined with Let. D, Delayed treatment (DIV13 and DIV16, fixed and stained DIV19) revealed no differences in synapse number from NGM-only condition following TSP2 and/or Let treatment in neurons from either sex. E, Quantification of Bassoon/Homer1 co-localized synaptic puncta following DIV7/DIV10 treatment schedule showed that Let abolished the synaptogenic effects of sex-matched astrocyte inserts (Astro) and ACM in male-derived neurons as well as ACM in female-derived neurons. No attenuation was observed with Let and Astro in females; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 [Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis; K-W statistic = 52.57 (male), 66.18 (female); n = 30 cells per condition per experimental replicate, 3 independent experimental replicates].

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Endogenous estrogen signaling permits TSP2-induced synapse formation in male but not female neurons. Quantification of Bassoon/Homer1 co-localized synaptic puncta following DIV7/DIV10 treatment schedule showed that modulating endogenous estrogen signaling, either with exogenous 100 nm E2, 100 nm ICI 182780 (ER antagonist), or 100 nm PGE2 (aromatase agonist), precluded the ability of TSP2 to promote synapse formation in either male (left)-derived or female (right)-derived cortical neurons. PGE2, in particular, was notable in that it lowered synapse number compared with NGM alone in males and when combined with TSP2 in both sexes; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 [Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post hoc analysis; K-W statistic = 64.21 (male), 44.75 (female); n = 30 cells per condition per experimental replicate, 3 independent experimental replicates].

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Statistical results for Western blottings, estradiol immunoassay, and ICC (fold-change and multiple group comparisons)

    FigureFigure panelStatistical testConditionsResults
    1B'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonM NGM vs M AstroK-W = 65.23
        p < 0.0001
    1B'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonF NGM vs F AstroK-W = 65.23
        p < 0.0001
    1B'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonM Astro vs F AstroK-W = 65.23
        p > 0.9999
    1D'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonM NGM vs M M-ACMK-W = 77.03
        p < 0.0001
    1D'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonM NGM vs M F-ACMK-W = 77.03
        p < 0.0001
    1D'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonM M-ACM vs M F-ACMK-W = 77.03
        p > 0.9999
    1D'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonM M-ACM vs F M-ACMK-W = 77.03
        p = 0.0142
    1D'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonM F-ACM vs F F-ACMK-W = 77.03
        p = 0.1693
    1D'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonF NGM vs F M-ACMK-W = 77.03
        p = 0.2781
    1D'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonF NGM vs F F-ACMK-W = 77.03
        p = 0.0036
    2C'One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisonM NGM vs M ACMF(3,75) = 10.29
        p = 0.0002
    2C'One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisonF NGM vs F ACMF(3,75) = 10.29
        p = 0.0195
    2C'One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisonM ACM vs F ACMF(3,75) = 10.29
        p = 0.2119
    2D'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonM NGM vs M ACMK-W = 22.61
        p = 0.0165
    2D'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonF NGM vs F ACMK-W = 22.61
        p = 0.0018
    2D'Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonM ACM vs F ACMK-W = 22.61
        p > 0.9999
    4AUnpaired Student's t testTSP2 relative band intensity,
    male vs female
    p = 0.568
    4BTwo-way ANOVA (interaction)α2δ−1 relative band intensityF(2,12) = 0.220
        p = 0.805
    4BTwo-way ANOVA (sex)α2δ−1 relative band intensityF(1,12) = 0.647
        p = 0.437
    4BTwo-way ANOVA (treatment)α2δ−1 relative band intensityF(2,12) = 0.093
        p = 0.912
    4CLinear mixed-effects model (REML) with Holm–Sidak’s
    post hoc comparison (sex)
    E2 (pg/ml)F(1,55) = 6.999
        p = 0.011
    4DLinear mixed-effects model (REML) with Holm–Sidak’s
    post hoc comparison (sex)
    E2 (pg/ml)F(1,29) = 3.799
        p = ns
    5E, leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs AstroK-W = 52.57
        p = 0.0002
    5E, leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs Astro + LetK-W = 52.57
        p > 0.9999
    5E, leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs ACMK-W = 52.57
        p = 0.0002
    5E, leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs ACM + LetK-W = 52.57
        p > 0.9999
    5E, leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonAstro vs Astro + LetK-W = 52.57
        p = 0.0198
    5E, leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonACM vs ACM + LetK-W = 52.57
        p < 0.0001
    5E, rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs AstroK-W = 66.18
        p < 0.0001
    5E, rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs Astro + LetK-W = 66.18
        p = 0.0123
    5E, rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs ACMK-W = 66.18
        p < 0.0001
    5E, rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs ACM + LetK-W = 66.18
        p > 0.9999
    5E, rightKruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonAstro vs Astro + LetK-W = 66.18
        p = 0.2655
    5E, rightKruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonACM vs ACM + LetK-W = 66.18
        p < 0.0001
    6leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs TSP2K-W = 64.21
        p = 0.0039
    6leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs E2K-W = 64.21
        p = 0.2220
    6leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs E2 TSP2K-W = 64.21
        p > 0.9999
    6leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs ICIK-W = 64.21
        p = 0.0452
    6leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs ICI TSP2K-W = 64.21
        p = 0.2420
    6leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs PGE2K-W = 64.21
        p = 0.0377
    6leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs PGE2 TSP2K-W = 64.21
        p = 0.0467
    6leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonE2 vs E2 TSP2K-W = 64.21
        p > 0.9999
    6leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonICI vs ICI TSP2K-W = 64.21
        p > 0.9999
    6leftKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonPGE2 vs PGE2 TSP2K-W = 64.21
        p > 0.9999
    6rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs TSP2K-W = 44.75
        p > 0.9999
    6rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs E2K-W = 44.75
        p > 0.9999
    6rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs E2 TSP2K-W = 44.75
        p > 0.9999
    6rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs ICIK-W = 44.75
        p = 0.8729
    6rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs ICI TSP2K-W = 44.75
        p > 0.9999
    6rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs PGE2K-W = 44.75
        p > 0.9999
    6rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonNGM vs PGE2 TSP2K-W = 44.75
        p = 0.0002
    6rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonE2 vs E2 TSP2K-W = 44.75
        p > 0.9999
    6rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonICI vs ICI TSP2K-W = 44.75
        p = 0.6315
    6rightKruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc comparisonPGE2 vs PGE2 TSP2K-W = 44.75
        p < 0.0001
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 4
July/August 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Astrocyte-Derived Thrombospondin Induces Cortical Synaptogenesis in a Sex-Specific Manner
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Astrocyte-Derived Thrombospondin Induces Cortical Synaptogenesis in a Sex-Specific Manner
Anna Mazur, Ean H. Bills, Kayla M. DeSchepper, James C. Williamson, Brandon J. Henderson, W. Christopher Risher
eNeuro 15 July 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0014-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0014-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Astrocyte-Derived Thrombospondin Induces Cortical Synaptogenesis in a Sex-Specific Manner
Anna Mazur, Ean H. Bills, Kayla M. DeSchepper, James C. Williamson, Brandon J. Henderson, W. Christopher Risher
eNeuro 15 July 2021, 8 (4) ENEURO.0014-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0014-21.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • astrocytes
  • cortex
  • estrogen
  • sex differences
  • synaptogenesis
  • thrombospondin

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • mPFC Synaptosome Proteomics Reveals Novel Pathways and Muscarinic Receptor Changes in a Learned Helplessness Mouse Model
  • Environmental Enrichment Attenuates Fentanyl-Seeking Behavior and Protects Against Stress-Induced Reinstatement in Both Male and Female Rats
  • Microglial morphological complexity in the piriform cortex is associated with olfactory aversion following chronic stress
Show more Research Article: New Research

Development

  • Astrocyte-derived PTPRZ1 regulates excitatory synapse density in the mouse cortex
  • sAPPα Inhibits Neurite Outgrowth in Primary Mouse Neurons via GABA B Receptor Subunit 1a
  • Partial Deletion of Cxcl12 from Hippocampal Cajal–Retzius Cells Does Not Disrupt Dentate Gyrus Development or Neurobehaviors
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.