Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Neuronal Excitability

Essential Role of Somatic Kv2 Channels in High-Frequency Firing in Cartwheel Cells of the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus

Tomohiko Irie
eNeuro 9 April 2021, 8 (3) ENEURO.0515-20.2021; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0515-20.2021
Tomohiko Irie
Division of Pharmacology, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa 210-9501, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tomohiko Irie
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Immunoreactivity of Kv2.1 and Kv2.2 on somatic membrane of cartwheel cells. A, Single optical section of a layer 5 cortical neuron immunolabeled for ankyrin-G (AnkG; blue), Kv2.1 (green), and Kv2.2 (yellow). Ankyrin-G-positive AIS is indicated by arrowheads. Bi–Biv, Single optical section of cartwheel cells immunolabeled for Kv2.1 (green), Kv2.2 (yellow), and ryanodine receptors (RyR; magenta). The cell bodies of cartwheel cells are pointed by arrowheads or arrows. Note that one cartwheel cell is Kv2.1-negative (arrows). Ci–Civ, Zoom-in image from the rectangle area in Bi. Cv, Cvi, The profiles of signal intensity along the membrane measured by drawing linear regions of interest along the cell membrane (a − b in Ci–Civ), guided by the ryanodine receptor signal. Overlapped peaks are indicated by hash marks (#).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Immunoreactivity of Kv2.1 and Kv2.2 on ankyrin-G-positive AISs and dendrites of cartwheel cells. Ai, Bi, Projected z-stack of optical sections taken from cartwheel cells immunolabeled for ryanodine receptors (RyR; magenta) and ankyrin-G (AnkG; blue). Aii–Av, Bii–Bv, Single optical sections of AISs immunolabeled for ankyrin-G (AnkG; blue), Kv2.1 (green), and Kv2.2 (yellow). The positions of AISs are indicated by arrowheads. The location of Kv2.2 on the edge of AIS is pointed by arrows in Aii–Av. The cell in A is distinct from the one in B. Ci, Projected z-stack of optical sections of AF 647-labeled cartwheel cells. Two cartwheel cells are labeled. Cii–Cv, Single optical sections of a proximal dendrite, which is immunonegative to Kv2.1 (Cii) and Kv2.2 (Civ). Location of the dendrite was marked by arrowheads. Note that a cell is Kv2.2-positive in the panels (arrow), indicating that the antibodies used reached the tissue.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Biophysical properties of GxTX-sensitive Kv2 current in cartwheel cells. A, Outward current evoked by voltage steps. Pulse protocol is indicated at the bottom of A. The recordings were made at room temperature (23–24°C) using ACSF supplemented with NBQX, MK-801, strychnine, picrotoxin, TTX, apamin (a SK channel blocker), and penitrem A (a BK channel blocker). To remove inward current by voltage-gated calcium channels, CaCl2 in the ACSF was excluded and replaced with equimolar MgCl2, and 0.25 mm EGTA-Na was added. GxTX-sensitive current was obtained by subtraction. B, The current–voltage relationship of the outward current in the absence (control) or presence of 100 nm GxTX (GxTX). The amplitude of steady-state was used for the plotting. Here and the following figures, error bars indicate SEM, numbers in parentheses indicate the number of replications (cells). Statistical significance was tested using two-way repeated measure ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests (significance at p < 0.05). n.s.: not significant; ***p < 0.001. C, GxTX-sensitive tail current evoked by voltage steps. The voltage pulse protocol is shown in the left of C. D, GxTX-sensitive, normalized conductance (G) plotted as a function of voltage (n = 13 in each point). The activation curves were fit with the Boltzmann function with a V1/2 of –11.84 ± 0.86 mV (n = 13) and a slope factor (k) of 7.90 ± 0.76 mV (n = 13). Ei, Activation kinetics of Kv2 current isolated by GxTX subtraction as in A. Activation was fit with a single exponential function, and τ is the time constant. Fits are shown as red lines. Eii, τ as a function of voltage. Fi, Deactivation kinetics of Kv2 current obtained by GxTX subtraction. Deactivation was fit with a single exponential function, and fits are shown as red lines. Fii, τ as a function of voltage.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    The effects of GxTX on simple or complex spikes elicited by brief current injection. Ai, Simple spike evoked by current injection (1-ms duration). Recordings were made in the ACSF at 33–34°C supplemented with NBQX, MK-801, strychnine, and picrotoxin. GxTX broadened the action potential width (inset) and depolarized the potential of ADP. Aii, Summary of the change ADP measured at 10 ms after the beginning of depolarizing current injection (dashed line in Ai, overlay). ***p < 0.001. Aii, Summary of the half-width of action potentials; ***p < 0.001. Bi, The simple spike converted into complex spikes by GxTX. Bii, Summary of the change of spiking pattern by GxTX. Out of 24 simple-spiking cells, seven cells started showing complex spiking in GxTX. Ci, Complex spikes evoked by current injection. In GxTX, fAHP became less negative (inset) and ADP became more prominent. Cii–Civ, Summary of fAHP, ADP, and half-width of first action potential in complex spikes. ADP was measured at 10 ms after the beginning of depolarizing current injection (dashed line in Ci, overlay). Statistical significance was tested using paired t tests; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    The effects of GxTX on sustained firing induced by depolarizing current injection. A, The effects of GxTX on a simple-spiking cell. Tonic firing induced by square-wave current injection in the absence (control) or presence (GxTX) of GxTX. In GxTX, the cell showed phasic response when the cells were excited by 400- or 700-pA current injection. B, The effects of GxTX on a complex spiking cell. The generation of trains of complex spikes disappear in the middle of current injection (GxTX, 350 and 700 pA). C–E, Summary of the input-output relationship of simple-spiking cells (C), complex-spiking cells (D), and both simple-spiking and complex-spiking cells (E, combined). Statistical significance was tested using two-way repeated measure ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests. n.s.: not significant; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    A train of parallel fiber-EPSCs evoked by various stimulus frequencies. A, A train of EPSCs induced by repetitive stimulation of parallel fibers. The membrane potential was held at –80 mV in the presence of strychnine and picrotoxin. Averages of five traces were used. Note that the amplitude of the last EPSCs is still large compared with the first EPSC in every stimulus frequency. B–D, Summary of relative amplitude of EPSCs plotted against stimulus numbers. Ei, A train of EPSCs in the absence (control) or presence (GxTX) of GxTX. Eii, Summary of the effects of GxTX on a train of EPSCs evoked at 100 Hz. Statistical significance was tested using two-way repeated measure ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests. n.s.: not significant.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    The effects of GxTX on sustained firing evoked by repetitive parallel fiber stimulation. A–C, Tonic firing evoked by repetitive parallel fiber stimulation. Traces in A, B were recorded from the same cells. Traces in C were from another cell. Top traces in each panel were used for the overlays. A part of overlayed traces is expanded as insets. Note that in the presence of GxTX (red traces), some of action potentials were not evoked by the stimulation. Failures of action potentials are indicated by hash marks (#). Stimulus artifacts were truncated for clarity. D, The relationship between maximum rate of rise of spikes and peak amplitude of action potentials plotted on a semi-logarithmic scale. The plot was made by differentiating six traces showing 20 synaptic responses at 100 Hz in the presence or absence of GxTX. Action potentials which have the rate of rises lower than 30 V/s or have peak amplitude lower than –15 mV are colored in blue (failures). E, Summary of spike probabilities plotted against stimulus numbers. For the analysis, five traces in control and five in GxTX were used from each recording for the calculation of the probabilities. Statistical significance was tested using two-way repeated measure ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests. n.s.: not significant; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Antibody information

    Antigen and antibody nameImmunogenSpecies/isotypeManufacture informationConcentration
    used
    Ankyrin-G (N160/36)Fusion protein ∼1000 aa of Ankyrin-GMouse IgG2a monoclonal antibody (mAb)NeuroMab catalogue 75–146-020, RRID: AB_106730301 μg/ml
    Kv2.1 (L80/21)Synthetic peptide 837–853 aa of rat Kv2.1Mouse IgG3 mAbNeuroMab catalogue 75-315, RRID: AB_23158631 μg/ml
    Kv2.2 (N372B/60)Fusion protein 717–907 aa of rat Kv2.2 long isoformMouse IgG2b mAbNeuroMab catalogue 75-360, RRID: AB_23158681 μg/ml
    Ryanodine receptor (34C)Partially purified chicken pectoral muscle ryanodine receptorMouse IgG1 mAbThermo Fisher Scientific catalogue MA3-925, RRID: AB_22541381 μg/ml
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Quantitative analysis of Kv2.1 and Kv2.2 immunoreactivities in cartwheel cells

    Cell bodies in
    p27 male
    Cell bodies
    in p30 male
    Cell bodies in
    p34 female
    Cell bodies
    in the three mice
    AISs in the
    three mice
    Proximal dendrites
    in biocytin-filled cells
    Kv2.1(+) and Kv2.2
    (+)/total
    25/37 (67.6%)31/43 (72.1%)36/50 (72.0%)92/130 (70.8%)0/12 (0.0%)0/10 (0.0%)
    Kv2.1(−) and Kv2.2
    (+)/total
    11/37 (29.7%)10/43 (23.3%)13/50 (26.0%)34/130 (26.2%)0/12 (0.0%)0/10 (0.0%)
    Kv2.1(+) and Kv2.2
    (-)/total
    0/37 (0%)0/43 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/130 (0%)0/12 (0.0%)0/10 (0.0%)
    Kv2.1(−) and Kv2.2 (−)/total1/37 (2.7%)2/43 (4.7%)1/50 (2.0%)4/130 (3.1%)12/12 (100.0%)10/10 (100.0%)
    • For the examination of immunoreactivity to cell bodies and AISs, ryanodine-positive, medium-sized cells were considered as cartwheel cells. When cartwheel cells were labeled intracellularly, the cell type was confirmed by recording the characteristic complex spiking behavior.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    The effects of GxTX on intrinsic membrane properties of cartwheel cells

    Resting membrane
    potential (mV)
    Input
    resistance
    (MΩ)
    Threshold
    potential
    (mV)
    Threshold
    current
    (pA)
    Action
    potential
    amplitude
    (mV)
    Maximum rate
    of spike
    rise (V/s)
    Maximum rate
    of spike
    decay (V/s)
    ControlGxTXControlGxTXControlGxTXControlGxTXControlGxTXControlGxTXControlGxTX
    Simple-spiking (24)–83.39 ±
    0.62
    −83.04 ±
    0.53 n.s
    77.03 ±
    4.18
    78.70 ±
    3.71n.s
    –62.49 ±
    1.45
    –61.27 ±
    1.41 n.s
    1808 ±
    71
    1704 ±
    79**
    75.90 ±
    2.22
    74.89 ±
    2.61 n.s
    567.9 ±
    23.1
    556.1 ±
    23.9 n.s
    –170.0 ±
    8.25
    –132.9 ±
    5.34***
    Complex-spiking (15)−81.05 ±
    0.69
    –80.84 ±
    0.65 n.s
    89.56 ±
    8.73
    94.10 ±
    8.20n.s.
    –62.21 ±
    1.39
    –60.22 ±
    1.69 n.s
    1953 ±
    72
    1760 ±
    83***
    77.11 ±
    2.02
    74.72 ±
    3.02 n.s
    569.5 ±
    26.4
    560.9 ±
    25.1 n.s
    –141.5 ±
    6.30
    –129.9 ±
    6.55*
    Combined (39)–82.49 ±
    0.50
    –82.20 ±
    0.44 n.s
    81.85 ±
    4.28
    84.62 ±
    4.02 n.s
    –62.38 ±
    1.03
    –60.87 ±
    10.8 n.s
    1864 ±
    52
    1726 ±
    57***
    76.37 ±
    1.55
    74.82 ±
    1.96 n.s
    568.5 ±
    17.2
    557.9 ±
    17.4 n.s
    –159.0 ±
    6.00
    –131.8 ±
    4.09***
    • As cartwheel cells exhibit spontaneous firing in vitro, at the beginning of the experiment, the resting membrane potential was adjusted to around −80 mV to suppress spontaneous firing by injecting a negative bias current (−50 to −150 pA). The amplitude of the bias current was kept constant throughout the experiment. Input resistance was measured by applying a small hyperpolarizing current pulse (−50 pA, 300-ms duration). For the measurement of action potential properties, simple or complex spikes were induced by brief, strong current injection (1-ms duration, 100-pA increment, up to 2500 pA). Threshold current was defined as the current amplitude that evoked action potential for the first time. The half-width of action potential was measured at the potential between the threshold and action potential peak. In complex-spiking neurons, the threshold potential, action potential amplitude, and the maximum rate of spike rise and decay of action potentials were calculated from the waveform of the first action potential. Statistical significance was tested using paired t tests; n.s.: not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 3
May/June 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Essential Role of Somatic Kv2 Channels in High-Frequency Firing in Cartwheel Cells of the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Essential Role of Somatic Kv2 Channels in High-Frequency Firing in Cartwheel Cells of the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus
Tomohiko Irie
eNeuro 9 April 2021, 8 (3) ENEURO.0515-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0515-20.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Essential Role of Somatic Kv2 Channels in High-Frequency Firing in Cartwheel Cells of the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus
Tomohiko Irie
eNeuro 9 April 2021, 8 (3) ENEURO.0515-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0515-20.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cartwheel cells
  • dorsal cochlear nucleus
  • guangxitoxin-1E
  • Kv2 channels
  • sustained firing

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • A progressive ratio task with costly resets reveals adaptive effort-delay tradeoffs
  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
Show more Research Article: New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
  • Variation in the involvement of hippocampal pyramidal cell subtypes in spatial learning tasks
  • Dentate Granule Cell Capacitance Is Stable across the Light/Dark Cycle
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.