Figure 8. Behavioral performance of Zbtb20+/– mice and WT controls. A–L, Zbtb20+/– mice and WT (Zbtb20+/+) controls were tested in the Morris water maze (MWM), active place avoidance (APA), elevated plus maze (EPM), and open field (OF) paradigms at five to seven months of age. A–F, Learning of the spatial component (platform hidden) of the MWM task as indicated by reductions in the escape latency (A) and path length (B) to reach a hidden platform. C–F, A probe trial (platform removed) was performed 24 h after the last training trial to measure the percent time mice spent in the target (solid) versus non-target (stippled) quadrants (C), calculate the target preference index (ratio of target/non-target percentages; D), and determine the average distance of mice from the original target position during the trial (E). F, Swim speed during the second trial in the visually cued component of the MWM. G–J, Learning of the APA task as indicated by increases in maximal avoidance time (G) and reduced numbers of entries into the aversive zone (H). I,J, A probe trial (aversive stimulus inactivated) was performed 24 h after the last training trial to measure the maximal avoidance time of (I) and number of entries into (J) what was the aversive zone during training. K, Percent time spent in the open arms of the EPM. L, Ambulatory movements (beam breaks) during 15 min in the OF; n = 15 male mice per group. Linear mixed model analysis of learning curves revealed significant effects of training (day) in (A, p < 0.0001; B, p < 0.0001; G, p < 0.001; H, p < 0.0001) and of genotype in (B, p < 0.01) but not (A, p = 0.1; G, p = 0.6; H, p = 0.4). No interactions were detected between training and genotype (A, p = 0.4; B, p = 0.3; G, p = 0.6; H, p = 0.6). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by paired (C) or unpaired (D–F,I–L) two-tailed Student’s t test. ns, not significant. Dots represent individual mice and bars are means ± SEM.