Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Development

Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Neural Retinal Progenitors Interact via Semaphorin 6D to Facilitate Optic Cup Morphogenesis

Paula Bernice Cechmanek, Carrie Lynn Hehr and Sarah McFarlane
eNeuro 2 April 2021, 8 (3) ENEURO.0053-21.2021; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0053-21.2021
Paula Bernice Cechmanek
1Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
2Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carrie Lynn Hehr
2Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah McFarlane
2Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah McFarlane
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    sema6d and plxna1a are expressed in complementary domains in the early eye vesicle. A, Lateral view of a 16-ss zebrafish embryo shows sema6d transcript in the eye vesicle, and regions of the head and trunk. B, C, Embryos processed for RNA ISH reveal transcript present in the optic vesicle at the 14-ss (plxna1a) and 18-ss (plxna1b) stage. D–F, Transverse sections (line in A) through the brain and eye. sema6d transcript is expressed in the ventral (future temporal) domain of the inner eye vesicle leaflet (arrows) and neural retina (outer leaflet), but is absent from the dorsal (future nasal), presumptive RPE progenitor (pRPE) domain (bar; D). plxna1a mRNA is present in the pRPE domain (bar) and faintly in the dorsal neural retina (asterisk), but absent from the ventral inner and outer eye vesicle leaflet (E). plxna1b is expressed in scattered cells of the outer leaflet of the developing optic cup (F). G, H, Eye vesicle (viewed dorsally) at the 16 ss processed for whole-mount ISH with antisense riboprobes for plxna1a (arrows in G) or the RPE marker, pmel1a (H). I, Plxna1-like immunoreactivity is present at the 16 ss in the pRPE domain (arrows). J–L, Schematics of the eye vesicle (J), the early embryo axes with respect to the eye (K), and optic cup morphogenesis (L); note that as the eye rotates alongside brain development, early ventral retina tissue (pink) becomes mature temporal tissue. M, Schematic of plxna1a and sema6d mRNA expression in the 16-ss eye vesicle. Scale bars: 300 μm (A) and 50 μm (D). br: brain, D: dorsal, e: eye, il: inner leaflet, N: nasal, nk: neural keel, nr: neural retina, ol: outer leaflet, os: optic stalk, pRPE: presumptive RPE, RPE: retinal pigment epithelium, T: temporal, V: ventral, ve: ventricle.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    sema6d mutants do not display gross morphologic defects. A, Schematic of the two sema6d mutant alleles; sema6dca302 mutants contain a five-base pair deletion and two-base pair mismatch in exon6, and sema6dca303 mutants contain a 16-base pair insertion in exon10, both predicted to generate proteins that truncate prematurely within the SEMA domain and result in the loss of the transmembrane domain (TMD) and the intracellular domain (ICD). B–E, Lateral views of whole-mount embryos processed for bhlhe40 ISH, revealing normal gross embryonic morphology and somite labeling in both mutant alleles with respect to their wild-type siblings at 24 hpf. F, G, Eye area measured from lateral images of sema6d mutants and their respective wild-type siblings at 24 hpf [unpaired t test, df = 26 (F), df = 21 (G); error bars are SD]. Scale bar: 200 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    sema6d mutants display normal eye vesicle development and patterning before optic cup morphogenesis. Whole-mount RNA ISH for patterning genes indicates early development occurs normally in sema6d mutants (B, D, F, H, J) relative to wild-type siblings (A, C, E, G, I). In the bottom right of panels are the number of embryos of the total analyzed that exhibited the normal wild-type expression pattern. A, B, fgf8a expression in 10-ss embryos viewed laterally. C–H, Dorsal whole-mount images of the eye vesicles (dashed outlines) and neural keel of 12 ss processed by whole-mount ISH for the expression of early patterning genes. C, D, Early dorsal (future nasal) tissue with foxg1a. E, F, Early ventral (future temporal) tissue with foxd1. G, H, Early anterior (future ventral) tissue with vax2. I, J, RPE progenitors and neural crest cells express tfec at the appropriate time in wild-type siblings and sema6d mutants. K, The average anteroposterior length of the eye vesicles. L, Ratio (%) of RPE to eye vesicle anteroposterior lengths [bars a:b in J; p values are unpaired t test, df = 22 (K), df = 21 (L), error bars are SD]. Scale bars: 100 μm. A: anterior, C: caudal, ev: eye vesicle, h: hypothalamus, mhb: mid-hindbrain boundary, N: nasal, nc: neural crest, nk: neural keel, P: posterior, R: rostral, som: somites, T: temporal, tb: tailbud.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    sema6d mutants display temporal neural retina defects post optic cup morphogenesis. A, B, D, E, Lateral images of 24-hpf optic cups processed for RNA ISH in wild-type (A, D) and sema6d mutant (B, E) embryos show similar expression of nasal (foxg1a) and dorsal (tbx5) markers. Of note, these domains derive from the dorsal and posterior eye vesicle, respectively. In the bottom right of panels are the number of embryos of the total analyzed that exhibited either a WT (A, B, D, E, G, J) or a disrupted (I,K,L) expression pattern. C, F, The angle formed by the lateral edges of the foxg1a (C; p values are unpaired t test, df = 22, error bars are SD) and tbx5 (F; p values are unpaired t test, df = 30 ex6+/+ vs ca302, df = 24 ex6+/+ vs ca303, error bars are SD) domains to the center of the lens (θ). G–L, foxd1 and vax2 RNA ISH viewed in whole mount. The shape and size of temporal eye (early ventral) markers, vax2 and foxd1, are disrupted in the sema6d302 (H, K) and sema6d303 (I, L) mutants as compared with wild-type siblings (G, J). Black arrowheads point to aberrant vax2 and foxd1 label in the inner vesicle leaflet, seen through the depth of the eye in the transparent zebrafish embryo. M, N, P, Q, Transverse plastic sections (axis shown by red line in G) through the central retina of 24-hpf wild-type sibling and sema6d mutant eyes processed for foxd1 and vax2 RNA ISH. Note in mutants a smaller (compare t in J–L and length of bars in M, P vs N, Q) foxd1/vax2 domain in the temporal neural retina, and an open ventricle as compared to wild-type (white arrow in N). O, Blinded quantitation of the ratio of the width of vax2+ domain in temporal versus nasal optic cup (t and n in J–L), which captures the redistribution of vax2 expression in sema6d mutants (p values are one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, error bars are SD, df = 53). Scale bars: 50 μm (A, M). D: dorsal, il: inner leaflet, L: lens, N: nasal, ol: outer leaflet, T: temporal, V: ventral.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Disrupted RPE morphogenesis in sema6d mutants. A–C, Morphogenesis of the RPE is disrupted in sema6dca302 and sema6dca303 eyes as compared with wild-type, with mutants displaying ectopic bhlhe40 staining apparent through the transparent lens (white arrowhead in B, C). In the bottom right of panels are the number of embryos of the total analyzed that exhibited either a WT (A) or a disrupted (B, C) expression pattern. A’–C’, F, Transverse sections reveal full expansion of the bhlhe40+ RPE to abut the nasal lens (black arrows), while the RPE of the temporal eye fails to reach the lens in mutants (compare red arrows). RPE cells are expanded in the inner leaflet of wild-type embryos, but cuboidal in mutants (compare red asterisks). In most mutants the bhlhe40+ RPE not only failed to abut the lens, but bhlhe40 was ectopically expressed in the lateral portion of the temporal neural retina (white arrowheads in B’, C’), while in some sema6d mutants, bhlhe40 expression was restricted entirely to the inner eye vesicle leaflet (red arrow in F). D, E, Wild-type (D) and sema6dca302 mutant (E) embryos bred on a Tg(tfec:EGFP) background to label RPE progenitors. Mutants display ectopic EGFP expression in the temporal neural retina (arrowheads in E) and EGFP+ RPE cells in the temporal (early ventral) inner leaflet are cuboidal and not extended as in wild-type (compare arrows in D, E). G, H, Transverse sections of 22-hpf eyes of wild-type (G–G’’) and sema6dca302 (H–H’’) mutant embryos on a Tg(tfec:EGFP) background that were processed for GFP immunohistochemistry (G, H) and RNA ISH for the temporal neural retina marker foxd1 (G’, H’). Blended images (G’’, H’’). EGFP+ cells that co-express foxd1 are present in the distal temporal neural retina of both wild-type and mutant eyes (arrowheads in G, G’’, H, H’’). A few foxd1+ cells in the wild-type inner leaflet (asterisk in G’) have not yet moved around the distal rim, with many more present in the mutant inner leaflet (asterisk in H’). Scale bars: 50 μm (A, A’). D: dorsal, il: inner leaflet, L: lens, N: nasal, ol: outer leaflet, T: temporal, V: ventral.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Temporal neural retina is disorganized in sema6d mutants. A–F, Immunohistochemistry for the apical marker aPKC (A, B) of wild-type and sema6d mutant (C, D) Tg(rx3:GFP) embryos. Magnified view of merge of labels in temporal eye (boxed area in C; E, F). E’–F’, Schematic of E, F showing ventricle as marked by aPKC immunoreactivity (red), labeled GFP (blue) cells, and their orientation (black lines). In sema6d mutants, there is a failure of the temporal ventricle to seal (arrowheads in B) and disorganization of temporal neural retina cells (D, F, F’). G, H, Distributions of the angles made by the long axis of DAPI-labeled nuclei with the basal temporal retinal neuroepithelium at 24 hpf. Average of the distributions in mutants (I, n = 12 embryos) and wild-type sibling (H, n = 13 embryos) are significantly different (p < 0.0001, χ2 contingency test). Circles indicate the average numbers of nuclei found in each 15° bin. Scale bars: 50 μm (A) and 20 μm (E). N: nasal, T: temporal.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Ventral inner leaflet cells fail to move appropriately around the distal rim during optic cup morphogenesis. A, B, Confocal optical sections, and their corresponding schematics, acquired from the nasal/temporal plane between the 14 ss and 23 hpf of wild-type and sema6d mutant Tg(rx3:GFP) eyes (labels all eye progenitors). Dotted yellow line(s) indicates the separation between the inner and outer leaflets. C, D, Higher magnification of inset boxes (early ventral/future temporal retina) in A, B, respectively. In wild type (A), ventral progenitors move around the distal rim of the optic cup and come to reside in the temporal neural retina at 23 hpf. In contrast, sema6d mutants display temporal defects (follow arrow in B). While a ventral inner leaflet cells in wild type (C) moves around the distal rim (pink asterisk), a corresponding cell in the sema6d mutant (D) begins to move toward the distal rim, but stalls and, together with other progenitors, protrudes from the inner leaflet (blue asterisk). E, F, Mean of the speed of individual cells in each wild-type and sema6d mutant embryo tracked over the period of optic cup morphogenesis. Tracked were ventral neural progenitors located at the distal eye vesicle tip in the Tg(rx3:GFP) background (E) and brightly EGFP labeled presumptive RPE cells in the Tg(tfec:EGFP) background (F). In both reporter lines, sema6d mutant cells move more slowly than their wild-type counterparts, and stall at ∼18–20 hpf. ns are number of embryos assayed (2–7 cells/embryo), and error bars are SEM. Mean speeds at individual time points were compared statistically between wild-type and heterozygous embryos by a Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05; E, F). A: anterior, il: inner leaflet, L: lens, N: nasal, nr: neural retina, ol: outer leaflet, P: posterior, pRPE: presumptive RPE, RPE: retinal pigment epithelium, T: temporal, ve: ventricle.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Plxna1a loss-of-function recapitulates the temporal eye defects observed in sema6d mutants. A, B, RT-PCR confirming morpholino mis-splicing (outlined in schematic) of plxna1a transcript (A), and knock down of plxna1a transcript in CRISPRi-injected embryos (B). β-Actin mRNA as loading control. C, D, Normal expansion of the bhlhe40-expressing RPE progenitor domain at the 14 ss. Mean anteroposterior eye vesicle length (C) and percent RPE expansion (D; RPE bhlhe40+ domain length/anteroposterior eye vesicle length) are not significantly different in plxna1a morphants as compared with controls [N = 2, control n = 17, plxna1 MO n = 17; p values are unpaired t tests, df = 33 (C), df = 18 (D), error bars are SD]. E, F, Tg(vsx1:GFP) expression in the nasal retina. G, H, vax2 mRNA in lateral views of a control (G) and a plxna1a morphant (H) 24-hpf eye. I, J, Transverse sections of whole-mount foxd1+ RNA ISH of 24-hpf eyes. Early ventral (future temporal) foxd1+ tissue undergoes rim movement into the outer leaflet in control (I), but in a plxna1a morphant remains partially in the inner leaflet (J; red asterisk and compare bars). Also evident is an open ventricle (arrow in J) in the morphant. K, The average angle formed by the lateral edges of the vsx1 (J) domain to the center of the lens (θ) is similar between controls and plxna1a morphants (N = 2; control n = 16, plxna1a MO n = 19, p value is unpaired t test, df = 33). L, Ratio of the width of the temporal to nasal (t and n in G) vax2 whole-mount RNA ISH domain measured in images of lateral eyes (unpaired t test, p < 0.0001, control n = 13, plxna1a MO n = 23, error bars are SD, df = 34). M–P, Transverse eye sections of whole-mount RNA ISH for bhlhe40+ performed on 24-hpf control embryos (M, O) or embryos injected at the one-cell stage with either an antisense plxna1a morpholino (N) or a sgRNA against exon5 of plxna1a along with dead-cas9 mRNA (CRISPRi; P). RPE bhlhe40+ progenitors elongate in control embryos (arrows in M, O) to line the back of the eye, and abut the lens, while the bhlhe40 signal is expressed ectopically in the morphant and CRISPRi-injected embryos (arrowheads N, P), and RPE cells retain a cuboidal shape (arrows N, P). Embryos in I, J, M, N were treated with 1-phenyl 2-thiourea to inhibit pigmentation of the RPE. Scale bars: 75 μm (E–H) and 50 μm (I, J, M–P). A: anterior, D: dorsal, L: lens, N: nasal, P: posterior, T: temporal, V: ventral, ve: ventricle.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Possible Sema6d-Plxna1 repellent interactions during optic cup morphogenesis. A, B, EGFP+ eye vesicles from 18-ss wild-type Tg(tfec:EGFP) embryos were explanted and cultured in control media (A–A’’) or in the presence of a soluble Sema6d protein (Sema6d-Fc; B–B’’). A’’, B’’ are magnified views of the boxed areas in A’, B’. C, Quantitation of the average number of EGFP+ RPE cells that left the explant in the presence or absence of Sema6d-Fc (N = 3; n = 8–9 explants/condition each from a separate embryo, error bars are SD; unpaired t test, df = 16). D, Percent of GFP+ RPE coverage over the explanted Tg(tfec:EGFP) optic cup. Eye explants cultured in vitro develop RPE that covers the extent of the explant, whereas those cultured in the presence of soluble Semd6d fragment do not (N = 3; n = 8–9 explants/condition, each from a separate embryo, error bars are SD; one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, df = 24). E, Schematic of eye explant culture experiments. F–I, Lateral views of vax2 whole-mount ISH at 24 hpf. Losing Sema6d or inhibition of c-Abl with dasatinib disrupts temporal eye morphogenesis (asterisks). J, Quantitation of optic cup morphogenesis defects by representing the ratio of the width of the temporal versus nasal eye (N = 3; n = 14–18 embryos/condition, error bars are SD; one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, df = 59). K, L, Immunolabeling of cryostat sections through the eye vesicle of 18-hpf wild-type (K) and sema6d mutant (L) embryos for the phosphorylated form of c-Abl (N = 2 independent experiments). Dotted yellow lines indicate the separation between the neural retina and the RPE. Yellow arrowheads point to labeling of temporal eye vesicle in wild-type, with this label largely absent in mutants. M, Simple repulsion model. Our data support the possibility that Plxna1a from RPE cells activates Sema6d reverse signaling in neural retinal progenitors to promote movement of the cells of the inner eye vesicle around the distal rim of the optic cup. The possibility that Sema6d forward signals to Plxna1a-expressing RPE cells appears less likely. N, Repulsion across the ventricle model. Progenitor RPE cells interact with neural retina cells to allow leaflets to slide over each other during optic cup morphogenesis. Our data support the idea that Sema6d reverse signaling is the main mode involved. O, De-adhesion from ECM model. Progenitor RPE cells interact with neural retina cells to prevent over-adhesion to the ECM. Scale bars: 50 μm (A, F).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Antisense riboprobes used for RNA ISH

    ProbePrimers (5′−3′)Linearize/transcribe
    bhlhe40F-TTGCAAATCGGCGAACAGGG
    R-GGAAACGTGCACGCAGTCG
    EcoRV/SP6
    foxd1F-AGGCAACTACTGGACGCTAGACCCTG
    R-GAAACAGACCGTGTAAAAATATCACACTCCGAG
    EcoRV/SP6
    foxg1aF-GCAGGAAGAAAAACGGGACGC
    R-GATGGGTGAGGGACATGGGG
    EcoRV/SP6
    plxna1aF-ACGGGTCAGTTATCGCCCTG
    R-CGCCGACAGGATCTCGTCTT
    EcoRV/SP6
    plxna1bF-CTCAGCCGGAAAACACATGG
    R-GAACTTCACCTCCGGGTTTCTG
    EcoRV/SP6
    sema6dF-GCAGTAGCAGTCAACGTTCTG
    R-GGGGTCAGTAGTTGTGTGTCGT
    BamH1/T7
    tbx5F-GGAGCTGCATCGCATGTCAC
    R-TGTCCAGTGCTCCTTTACCCC
    EcoRV/SP6
    tfecF-TATAAAGACCGGACGGGGACAAC
    R-GCTCCTGGATTCGTAGCTGGA
    EcoRV/SP6
    vax2F-TGACAGGAACGAACTTCGCTAGAC
    R-TCCGCTTCATCCGATTGGATGTTTGC
    PmeI/T7
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Table of statistics

    p valueData structureType of test95% confidence interval
    aNormal distributionUnpaired t test−3.213 to 1.076
    bNormal distributionUnpaired t test−2.735 to 0.3842
    cNormal distributionUnpaired t test−13.45 to 5.779
    dNormal distributionUnpaired t test−7.157 to 2.843
    eNormal distributionUnpaired t test−10.98 to 4.126
    fNormal distributionUnpaired t test−1.931 to 10.15
    gNormal distributionUnpaired t test−6.045 to 5.374
    hNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparison0.2090 to 0.3762
    iNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparison0.1456 to 0.3019
    jNon-normal distributionχ2 contingency testN/A
    kNon-normal distributionMann–Whitney U testN/A
    lNon-normal distributionMann–Whitney U testN/A
    mNormal distributionUnpaired t test−0.4634 to −0.2
    nNormal distributionUnpaired t test−0.4473 to −0.06999
    oNormal distributionUnpaired t test−9.210 to −2.790
    pNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparison0.07807 to 0.2947
    qNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparison0.1373 to 0.3642
    rNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparison26.09 to 56.69
    sNormal distributionOrdinary one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparison14.00 to 45.54
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 3
May/June 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Neural Retinal Progenitors Interact via Semaphorin 6D to Facilitate Optic Cup Morphogenesis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Neural Retinal Progenitors Interact via Semaphorin 6D to Facilitate Optic Cup Morphogenesis
Paula Bernice Cechmanek, Carrie Lynn Hehr, Sarah McFarlane
eNeuro 2 April 2021, 8 (3) ENEURO.0053-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0053-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Neural Retinal Progenitors Interact via Semaphorin 6D to Facilitate Optic Cup Morphogenesis
Paula Bernice Cechmanek, Carrie Lynn Hehr, Sarah McFarlane
eNeuro 2 April 2021, 8 (3) ENEURO.0053-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0053-21.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Danio rerio
  • eye
  • Plexina1
  • repulsion
  • RPE
  • zebrafish

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Fast spiking interneurons autonomously generate fast gamma oscillations in the medial entorhinal cortex with excitation strength tuning ING–PING transitions
  • The serotonin 1B receptor modulates striatal activity differentially based on behavioral context
  • Population-level age effects on the white matter structure subserving cognitive flexibility in the human brain
Show more Research Article: New Research

Development

  • Partial Deletion of Cxcl12 from Hippocampal Cajal–Retzius Cells Does Not Disrupt Dentate Gyrus Development or Neurobehaviors
  • Absence of Testes at Puberty Impacts Functional Development of Nigrostriatal But Not Mesoaccumbal Dopamine Terminals in a Wild-Derived Mouse
  • Anxiety-Associated Behaviors Following Ablation of Miro1 from Cortical Excitatory Neurons
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.