Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Review, Novel Tools and Methods

Zebrafish as a Translational Model: An Experimental Alternative to Study the Mechanisms Involved in Anosmia and Possible Neurodegenerative Aspects of COVID-19?

Karla C. M. Costa, Tamires A. V. Brigante, Gabriel G. Fernandes, Davi S. Scomparin, Franciele F. Scarante, Danielle P. de Oliveira and Alline C. Campos
eNeuro 5 May 2021, 8 (3) ENEURO.0027-21.2021; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0027-21.2021
Karla C. M. Costa
1Pharmacology of Neuroplasticity Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 14049-900,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karla C. M. Costa
Tamires A. V. Brigante
1Pharmacology of Neuroplasticity Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 14049-900,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriel G. Fernandes
1Pharmacology of Neuroplasticity Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 14049-900,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Davi S. Scomparin
1Pharmacology of Neuroplasticity Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 14049-900,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franciele F. Scarante
1Pharmacology of Neuroplasticity Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 14049-900,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danielle P. de Oliveira
2EcoHumanTox Laboratory, Department of Clinical, Toxicological and Bromatological Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Science of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 14049-900
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alline C. Campos
1Pharmacology of Neuroplasticity Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 14049-900,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) presents a variability of clinical symptoms, ranging from asymptomatic to severe respiratory and systemic conditions. In a cohort of patients, the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), beyond the classical respiratory manifestations, induces anosmia. Evidence has suggested SARS-CoV-2-induced anosmia can be the result of neurodegeneration of the olfactory pathway. Neurologic symptoms associated with COVID-19 have been reported; however, the precise mechanism and possible long-lasting effects remain poorly investigated. Preclinical models are valuable tools for describing and testing new possible treatments for neurologic disorders. In this way, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) organism model represents an attractive tool in the field of neuroscience, showing economic and logistic advantages besides genetic and physiologic similarities with mammalian, including the brain structure and functions. Besides, its external embryonic development, high availability of eggs, and fast development allows easy genetic manipulation and fast replications. In the present review, we suggest that the zebrafish model can be advantageous to investigate the neurologic features of COVID-19.

  • anosmia
  • encephalitis
  • olfactory system
  • pandemic
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • zebrafish

Significance Statement

The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is characterized not only by respiratory, but also neurologic symptoms that may persevere even longer than the respiratory condition. However, some questions remain unanswered. How does the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enter the brain? Which brain regions are infected? How does the virus affect our behavioral and sensorial responses? Can the brain infection induce alterations that last longer? We propose that the zebrafish is a suitable model to study the effects of SARS-CoV-2 in the brain, especially because of the similarities between the fish’ and the human brain. Zebrafish is a cheap animal model and several reproducible and fast animal tests can be used to investigate its behavioral and sensory functions.

COVID-19 and Society: The Urgent Need of a Rapid and Fast Animal Model

The novel strain of coronavirus responsible for the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) emerged in December 2019 in Wuhan, a province in China (Rothan and Byrareddy, 2020). In a short period, COVID-19 cases have rapidly spread worldwide causing frightful rates of morbidity and mortality (Jain et al., 2020) and declared as a global public health threat by the World Health Organization in March 2020 (World Health Organization, 2020).

Because of efforts made by different groups of scientists, the etiologic agent of this new pandemic was characterized as a β coronavirus named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is closely related to its previous relative SARS-CoV, responsible for the SARS outbreak in China during the early 2000s (Ksiazek et al., 2003). Similar to its “older cousin,” spike proteins S1 and S2 of the SARS-CoV-2 use the host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a receptor (Walls et al., 2020) to initiate its entrance into the cell. This interaction with ACE2 seems to be primed by a proteolytic cleavage of the spike (S) protein by the transmembrane protease serine (TMPRSS2), responsible for the virus interaction with its target receptor (Hoffmann et al., 2020; Ou et al., 2020). Moreover, unlike SARS-CoV, the invasive mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 seems to involve preactivation by furin, a proprotein convertase that reduces the dependence of the novel coronavirus on recruiting proteases of the target cells for its successful entry (Shang et al., 2020).

Early epidemiological studies suggested that most patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 developed none or mild symptoms, similar to common flu, caused by influenza viruses, such as fever, cough, fatigue, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and sore throat. However, recent evidences showed that beyond the respiratory system infection, SARS-CoV-2 could also produce a severe syndrome with its collection of symptoms: severe pneumonia, important damage in the cardiovascular system, including thrombosis, persistent anosmia, and in some quite often neurologic symptoms (encephalitis, disturbed consciousness, and cerebrovascular accident; Duong et al., 2020; Ellul et al., 2020; Mao et al., 2020; Rothan and Byrareddy, 2020; Wu and McGoogan, 2020; Xu et al., 2020).

A great number of patients with COVID-19 have described neurologic complications associated with the viral infection (Helms et al., 2020; Mao et al., 2020). These case reports raise questions regarding the SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism, and how it contributes to the postinfection complications in the CNS (Netland et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2020; Zhang, 2020). A recent study (Chen et al., 2021) showed that ACE2, the target for SARS-CoV-2 entrance, could be identified in different components of CNS such as neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. Many brain structures exhibited a high expression of ACE2 including the olfactory bulb, a region that has been associated with anosmia (loss of smell sense), a recurrent symptom also reported by patients with COVID-19 (Chen et al., 2021). Besides, other neurologic manifestations have already been identified in patients diagnosed with COVID-19, such as headache, confusion, and disabling strokes (Iadecola et al., 2020). However, it is not well characterized how the SARS-CoV-2 affects directly the CNS or to what extent the neurologic disorders are consequences to secondary mechanisms.

The ACE2 is an enzyme expressed in many tissues, including the brain cells (Gheblawi et al., 2020), which can infer that once in the brain parenchyma, SARS-CoV-2 could be neuroinvasive. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 is mainly transmitted through expelled virus-laden droplets, which can be inhaled by another person, leaving the virus exposed mainly to epithelium-like tissues throughout the respiratory tract. In this way, recent evidence suggests that the virus may enter the brain via the olfactory system through the nasal cavity, affecting breath control (Li et al., 2020a). Although other species of virus are capable of penetrating the CNS (for detailed review, see Koyuncu et al., 2013) the precise mechanism involved in SARS-CoV-2 neurologic manifestation remains poorly understood.

Other viruses from the coronavirus family have been shown to use the olfactory pathway to enter the brain following intranasal inoculation. Perlman et al. (1990) showed that the Mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), a neurotropic coronavirus, is detected in brain areas neuroanatomically connected to the olfactory nerve after intranasal exposure to the virus. Furthermore, surgical bulbectomy prevented the entry of MHV into the brain via the olfactory pathway (Perlman et al., 1990). Moreover, in transgenic mice that express the human ACE2 receptor under the control of the human cytokeratin 18 (K18) promoter, SARS-CoV, after intranasal inoculation, was rapidly found in the olfactory bulb and in brain regions that have first or second-order connections with the olfactory bulb, indicating that the virus enters the brain through the olfactory tract and reaches connected brain areas through transneuronal spreading (Netland et al., 2008). A similar mechanism of neuro-propagation from the olfactory bulb to neuroanatomically associated areas was described for the human coronavirus strain OC43 (Dubé et al., 2018).

If SARS-CoV-2 uses the olfactory route to enter the brain and migrates through transsynaptic spreading to brain regions directly or indirectly connected to the olfactory bulb, the virus can potentially invade the thalamus, the hypothalamus, cortical regions, the midbrain, and even the brainstem. This could be related not only to the neurologic manifestations described in several COVID-19 patients but could also contribute to the respiratory symptoms since the neuro-invasiveness of SARS-CoV-2 could compromise the respiratory center of the brainstem (Gandhi et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020b; Manganelli et al., 2020; Dey et al., 2021).

The assumption of the olfactory pathway as the route of entry for SARS-CoV-2 into the brain is supported by the expression of ACE2 in the olfactory bulb and in brain regions that are directly connected to the olfactory tract (Chen et al., 2021). The ACE2 receptor is expressed in numerous cell types, including excitatory and inhibitory neurons, as well as microglia, oligodendrocytes, oligodendrocyte-precursor cells, and astrocytes (Chen et al., 2021). Moreover, TMPRSS2, a protease that participates in the cellular transfection of the virion, and neuropilin-1, a signaling molecule shown to increase SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, are also expressed in the olfactory neuroepithelium (Butowt and Bilinska, 2020; Matschke et al., 2020; Karuppan et al., 2021).

Histopathological evidence also supports that SARS-CoV-2 could directly infect cells from the olfactory tract. Meinhardt et al. (2021) reported the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein within neuronal cells in the olfactory mucosa from patients with COVID-19. They also found SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the olfactory bulb and in brain regions that receive projections from the olfactory tract (Meinhardt et al., 2021). In K18-hACE2 mice, after intranasal inoculation of SARS-CoV-2, the virus was detected in the brain tissue on day 3 after infection. By day 6 after the inoculation, SARS-CoV-2 was detectable in the olfactory bulb, cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus of K18-hACE2 mice (Kumari et al., 2021).

The SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with brain damage in the olfactory bulb and its neuroanatomically connected areas. Stoyanov et al. (2020) described severe neurodegeneration and inflammatory cell infiltration in the olfactory bulb of two COVID-19 patients. In a postmortem case series conducted in Germany, neuropathological analysis of glial activation patterns revealed a high degree of astrogliosis and microgliosis in the olfactory bulb, with low levels of cytotoxic-T cell infiltration (Matschke et al., 2020). The study also reported activation of microglial cells and infiltration of CD8-positive lymphocytes in the brainstem and a level of astrogliosis in the frontal cortex of COVID-19 patients (Matschke et al., 2020). In K18-hACE mice, SARS-CoV-2 intranasal inoculation triggered an increase in proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the brain and induced neuronal cell death in the hippocampus, cortex, and cerebellum (Kumari et al., 2021).

Animal models are the founding steps toward a better understanding of biological processes. Rodents-based models, such as mice and rats are widely used in biomedical research, but because of their intrinsic phenotype, their use in COVID-19 is limited. This restriction is associated with crucial amino acid variations in the primary structure of the ACE2 receptor (Chan et al., 2020). To circumvent this limitation, transgenic mice models expressing human ACE2 (hACE2) are available, but there are some limitations regarding their use: (1) there are reports that SARS-CoV-2 induces mortality on 7 d postinfection (dpi) limiting their use on long-term experiments; (2) because of the high demand of research labs, their breeding and distribution are limited. Other animal models are being studied, such as ferrets (Kim et al., 2020), golden hamster (Chan et al., 2020; Sia et al., 2020), and non-human primates (Bao et al., 2020; Rockx et al., 2020), but to perform experiments using these animals, several laboratories must adapt their animal housing facilities, and some of them take several weeks to produce offspring (for detailed review of animal models available, see Johansen et al., 2020).

Since there is an urgency to establish new and effective experimental models to understand the neurologic components associated with COVID-19, our goal with this review is to present evidences supporting the use of Danio rerio, commonly known as zebrafish, as a powerful tool to comprehend to which extent the SARS-CoV-2 may affect and alter the CNS homeostasis.

Zebrafish as a rapid and replicable experimental model

Zebrafish (D. rerio) is a small teleost that originated from the South of Asia and is characterized by the blue-black longitudinal stripes alternating with silver-white stripes that extend across its body (Lawrence, 2007). After fertilization, a large number of eggs (∼100 per day) is generated. The eggs are transparent, making it possible to observe the structures of the zebrafish’s organs during development. They achieve the larval stage from 2 to 3 d after the fertilization period in which the organogenesis of many structures is still not complete (Kimmel et al., 1995; Spence et al., 2007). Its small size, easy maintenance in the laboratory, external fertilization, transparency of the embryos, and well-defined stages of development make the zebrafish an attractive model for research in many fields (Kimmel et al., 1995; Howe et al., 2013; Diniz et al., 2015; Kundap et al., 2017; Saad et al., 2017; Ayala-Nunez et al., 2019). Besides, zebrafish have genetics and physiologic similarities with mammals, increasing their value as a powerful tool on the bench side of the scientific methods (MacRae and Peterson, 2015).

Genetic sequences in zebrafish have been studied since the 1980s. Njølstad et al. (1988) characterized a zebrafish homeobox and found that this sequence shares similarities that lead to the same encoded proteins as the murine domain hox-2.1. In the following years, other zebrafish genes were sequenced and compared with mammalian. Several genes showed similarities in the sequence, expression, and encoded proteins (Njølstad et al., 1988; Krauss et al., 1991). Postlethwait et al. (1998) mapped 144 zebrafish genes and described large conservation of chromosome segments between zebrafish and mammalian, including some human genes. Sahly et al. (1999) described the expression of eya1 that is involved in embryogenesis, and their results predicted a protein with 84.7% similarities with its human orthologue. Blaker-Lee et al. (2012) described zebrafish genes orthologues with human genes involved in brain disorders.

Howe et al. (2013) accomplished the significant step to evaluate the homology between human and zebrafish genomes in 2013. The zebrafish genome comprises around 26 thousand protein-coding genes in 26 pairs of chromosomes, while the human genome is composed of between 20–25 thousand genes in 23 pairs of chromosomes (Howe et al., 2013; International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2001). The researchers observed that >70% of human genes have an orthologue in zebrafish. The authors also found that some human genes have no orthologue in zebrafish, even presenting related receptors. These facts indicate that zebrafish have proteins with similar functions to human proteins; however, they encoded for different genes in humans and zebrafish. They also compared the zebrafish genes with the human genes described in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database, which catalog genes involved in morbidity development. More than 80% of the 3176 genes described have an orthologue in zebrafish, allowing the use of zebrafish to investigate numerous human morbidities (Howe et al., 2013).

Over the years, many authors described genes associated with CNS development (Mack-Bucher et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2011; Blaker-Lee et al., 2012; Umans et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2019), CNS functions (Cocco et al., 2017; Laboissonniere et al., 2018), neurogenesis (Krauss et al., 1991; Byrd and Brunjes, 2001; GermanÀ et al., 2011), suggesting that zebrafish is a suitable model to evaluate neural disturbance mechanisms, efficacy, and toxicology of potential treatments. Besides, it is extremely important to highlight that although both species, human and zebrafish, possess a distinct systemic respiratory mechanism, studies have shown that the zebrafish swimming bladder (a specialized organ responsible for a proper buoyancy of teleosts) possesses anatomic, embryological, and transcriptome resemblances with human (and other mammals) lungs (Zheng et al., 2011). Moreover, Jonz and Nurse (2003) showed that the neuroepithelial cells (NECs) which are involved in respiratory control in mammals, are also present in larval and adult zebrafish. As indicated by immunolabeling, the NECs have vesicles containing the neurotransmitter serotonin, which seems to play a role in the respiratory system (Jonz and Nurse, 2003). These aspects suggest that not only the neuroinvasion could be studied (as discussed below) but also other systemic COVID-19s manifestation and complication.

Moreover, using zebrafish is a tremendous advantage because it has been accepted as an alternative model since it fulfills the 3R’s principles: reduction, refinement, and replacement. The current European Union legislation (European Parliament, 2010) on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes considers that the early stages of the development of zebrafish [until 5 d postfertilization (dpf)] do not need protection since the procedures conducted will not provide suffering. The period before embryos and larvae reach exogenous feeding is used as criteria by EU Directive 2010/63/EU to define the period that fish do not require regulation (Scholz et al., 2008; Beekhuijzen et al., 2015; Bhusnure et al., 2015). Using zebrafish for research purposes also contributes to reduction because it allows the economy of animals of higher orders in many research steps, such as screening of substances in drug discovery. Also, because it undergoes the processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, zebrafish’s use reduces the difference in results obtained between in vitro and in vivo tests (Bhusnure et al., 2015).

Zebrafish’s susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection

In addition to the receptor ACE2, the TMPRSS2, the proteases cathepsin L, trypsin, and furin were referred to mediate the virus’ entry into the cells. Between the countless human-related proteins that zebrafish presents, there is also evidence of these enzymes involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection. This information can be used to design experiments that could help understand the virus infection’s whole process or even study potential drugs, which target these enzymes.

Cathepsin L is present in zebrafish since the early stage of development. Expression of the gene catL can be detected even around 7 h postfertilization (hpf), and the expression is higher at the hatching time. Cathepsin L is involved in the development and hatching processes (Vogel and Gerster, 1997). Dana et al. (2019) used zebrafish as the in vivo model to ensure the efficacy of a selective probe synthesized to study human cathepsin L. Therefore, cathepsin L was proposed as a biomarker for chemical exposure by evaluating its enzymatic activity in zebrafish embryos (Küster, 2005).

Trypsin and its receptor Par2 are present in zebrafish. The receptor Par2 is ubiquitously distributed while the trypsin was found in higher concentrations in the gill, nasal cavity, and mouth of embryo-larvae stages of zebrafish. It seems to play a role in response to injury, protecting the fish from bleeding (Kim et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2011).

Expression of furin genes was also described in zebrafish even in early stages and seemed to be relevant in the development and immunologic system (Walker et al., 2006; Ojanen et al., 2015).

The protease TMPRSS2 has only been studied in zebrafish in its rearranged form TMPRSS2-ERG, a biomarker of prostate cancer. However, there is still evidence that zebrafish have an orthologue to the TMPRSS2 protease (Bansal et al., 2014; Butler et al., 2017). Ohler and Becker-Pauly (2011) observed high evolutionary conservation between the genes encoding TMPRSS4 in zebrafish and humans. They also demonstrated that the early development of zebrafish was affected by the TMPRSS4 gene silencing (Ohler and Becker-Pauly, 2011).

The zebrafish ACE2 receptor region that interacts with the protein S seems to share 50–64% similarities with the same human region (Kraus et al., 2020). This characteristic was explored in a recent preprint paper, in which the authors showed that an exposure of zebrafish larvae to SARS-CoV-2 protein S receptor-binding domain (RBD) induced augmentation on heart rate at 5 and 7 dpf. This parameter was normalized after larvae exposure to captopril, suggesting the participation of the ACE2 receptor on this cardiovascular parameter (Kraus et al., 2020). Intriguingly, the authors also observed that intranasal delivery to RBD resulted in disrupted integrity of the olfactory system, such as edema, hemorrhage, and apical loss of olfactory sensory neurons, accompanied by reduced electro-olfactogram signal (Kraus et al., 2020).

Modeling zebrafish’s viral infection: a powerful tool to understand SARS-CoV-2

The zebrafish organism is gaining considerable visibility as an animal model to study pathogenesis and to screen new potential compounds for the treatment of different bacterial (Takaki et al., 2013) and viral infections (Gabor et al., 2014) that also affects the respiratory system in humans. Zebrafish has several components of human immunity. The innate immunity is present since the larvae hatched from the egg, whereas adaptive immunity takes weeks to fully develop (Lam et al., 2004; Novoa and Figueras, 2012). Despite the evolutionary distance, there are several similarities between the human and zebrafish immune systems; those include cellular components, i.e., macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, dendritic cells, and signal transduction pathways to eliminate the intruders (Goody et al., 2014).

The innate immune system first recognizes viral infections through mechanisms that may rely on toll-like receptors (TLRs), among them 3, 7, 8, and 9, retinoic acid-inducible gene I-like receptors, nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptors, and receptors that detect DNA in the cytoplasm (for more details, see Thompson and Iwasaki, 2008). Although the exact mechanism responsible for an immune response toward SARS-CoV-2 is still under loose, it is conceivable to assume that it interacts with one or more of these receptors. Elucidating this piece of the puzzle may help comprehend one of the significant complications concerning the COVID-19’s evolution and mortality.

It is assumed that the exacerbated immune response toward SARS-CoV-2 elicits a colossal increase in peripheral proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine that ultimately can promote organ failure and death, an effect known as a “cytokine storm” (Mehta et al., 2020; Qin et al., 2020). In this way and assuming the importance of generating new rapid models to study this phenomenon in the laboratory, Kraus et al. (2020) have established zebrafish, in different stages of life, as useful models to investigate the pathophysiological effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on both olfactory and cardiovascular system. The study revealed that the immune response of zebrafish to recombinant protein S parallel those observed in humans that present a mild-form of COVID-19. More specifically, the authors observed an increase in mRNA of antiviral response and proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis-α (TNFα), interleukin-17 (IL-17), and chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20; Kraus et al., 2020).

Highlighting the converge immune response of zebrafish and humans, Progatzky et al. (2019) elegantly showed that mimicking viral infection on the upper respiratory tract through intranasal administration of resiquimod (TLR 7/8 agonist) promoted an increase in proinflammatory cytokines expressions, such as IL-1β, type-I interferons (IFN- a crucial antiviral signaling molecule) and TNF-α. The study provided insights that zebrafish responses to resiquimod stimuli were similar to those observed in humans, both presented an augmentation of TNF-α and IFN-γ in a time-dependent manner, while in mice the levels of TNF-α drastically reduced below basal levels after 1 h. Moreover, the authors also observed that the exposure to polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly (I:C), a viral double-strand RNA mimetic) produced an upregulation of genes responsible for TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN- γ only in mice, while there was no observable changes neither on humans or zebrafish after 1 or 8 h exposure (Progatzky et al., 2019). More intriguing, Gabor et al. (2014) described zebrafish as a valuable animal model to investigate the infection of different strains of human Influenza A virus (IAV), which similarly to SARS-CoV-2, is characterized as a causative agent of respiratory disease. The infected animals presented an increase in viral burden, recapitulating the immune and clinical symptoms of influenza infections in humans, showing an increased and sustained IFN expression, edema, and tissue destruction with multiple organ involvement. Besides, the treatment of infected zebrafish with Zanamivir, an anti-influenza compound, was able to reduced mortality and the expression of viral gene product, demonstrating the validity of zebrafish as a model to screen new antiviral compounds for IAV treatment (Gabor et al., 2014).

Besides its use on cytokine profile to immune challenges, zebrafish can be genetically manipulated to gain or loss-of-function of a myriad of proteins and may help to characterize the SARS-CoV-2 kinetic and dynamic. These have been applied to understand in vivo viral infection kinetic, cell tropism, phagocytic behavior, spatiotemporal activation of antiviral pathways (Ding et al., 2011; Palha et al., 2013; Passoni et al., 2017). In this direction, Ding et al. (2011) investigated whether zebrafish could be a potential model for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication research. The animals microinjected with NS5B-plasmids demonstrated viral particles amplified in the liver. Even without any abnormalities in the development of zebrafish larvae, the viral amplification induced a similar gene expression pattern as those observed in human hepatocytes (increased expression of Argsyn, Hsp70, Leugpcr, ScarF2, Rasgbd, and chemokine-1 genes). Beyond the immune similarities, the administration of anti-HCV drugs, ribavirin and oxymatrine, was able to reduce the amplification rate in infected larvae, demonstrating again the great potential of this model as a tool for HCV drug screening (Ding et al., 2011). Another suitable example of zebrafish versatility to study viral infections was demonstrated by Passoni et al. (2017) using a transgenic zebrafish and genetically modified Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and Sinbdis virus (SINV), both pathogens that sometimes are associated with neuropathies. The study showed that microinjection of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing CHIKV and SINV on zebrafish larvae promoted an increase in GFP intensity in different organs. The authors also observed that SINV possesses a broad organ tropism as showed by GFP expression on central and peripheral organs after 1 d postinjection. Moreover, this study has demonstrated, by using a transgenic zebrafish expressing the red fluorescent protein (RFP) on endothelial cells, that only GFP-CHIKV colocalized with RFP-endothelium after 1 and 2 d postinfection, revealing that CHIKV, but not SINV, infects endothelial cells of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Besides, they also studied the “Trojan-horse” neuroinvasion hypothesis, a secondary mechanism for CNS entry. By using a transgenic zebrafish line in which macrophages (including the microglia) express mCherry, a red cytosolic fluorescent protein, the authors showed that neither CHIKV nor SINV use this alternative route for CNS infection. Altogether, these results aid by unveiling possible tools to understand viruses neuroinvasion mechanism on humans (Passoni et al., 2017).

The Zebrafish CNS, Olfactory Pathway, and Its Possible Relevance in the Context of COVID-19

Among the preclinical models applied o to study the physiological and abnormal brain functions, rodents still are the most employed animals in the neuroscience field. However, other animal models, like zebrafish, are emerging as promisor candidates (Keifer and Summers, 2016).

As exemplified in Figure 1, the zebrafish’s brains share many neuroarchitecture and cellular morphology with mammals, including humans, characteristics that configure it as a valuable tool to model a wide range of human brain disorders (Kalueff et al., 2014; Stewart et al., 2014). Moreover, zebrafish have a very similar neurotransmitter system when compared with humans. Among the already neurotransmitters and neuromodulators characterized in this teleost are the GABA, glutamate, dopamine, noradrenaline, serotonin, acetylcholine, and histamine systems, which can already be observed at the early stages of zebrafish embryo and seems to play similar roles to those observed on mammals (for detailed review, see Horzmann and Freeman, 2016).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Zebrafish versus human olfactory system as one of the possible routes for the entrance of SARS-CoV-2 into the central nervous system. The human olfactory neuroepithelium comprehends ACE2-expressing olfactory sensory neurons that communicate with mitral cells in the olfactory bulb. The structure and cytoarchitecture of zebrafish’s olfactory neuroepithelia and olfactory bulb are similar to that found in humans. Moreover, human brain areas present functional and structural correlates in the zebrafish brain.

Regarding anatomy and physiology, despite its smaller cerebral hemispheres, the zebrafish brain presents a highly conserved organization, keeping important similarities when compared with the human brain. For instance, zebrafish have all typical sensory functions (vision, olfaction, taste, hearing, and tactile), and of note, all the sensory pathways share significant homology with humans (Byrd et al., 1996; Wullimann and Puelles, 1999). Highlighting similarities with humans’ brain organization, the BBB is present on zebrafish, which develops on 3 dpf, and controls small molecules’ permeability (Fleming et al., 2013).

Like mammals, the adult zebrafish brain is divided into the forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain. The forebrain is the anterior part and includes the telencephalon and diencephalon. The midbrain is the portion between the forebrain and hindbrain, divided into optic tectum, torus semicircularis, torus longitudinalis, and midbrain tegmentum. Besides, the posterior portion of the brain is the hindbrain, which is composed of the cerebellum and medulla oblongata (Wullimann et al., 1996; Mueller et al., 2011; Folgueira et al., 2012). Functional similarities are also observed, for instance, the lateral pallium of zebrafish contains homologous structures to the hippocampus (Fig. 1), a structure that is derived from the medial pallium and is closely related to spatial memory (Eichenbaum et al., 1999; Rodríguez et al., 2002). Besides, the medial pallium of zebrafish presents an amygdaloid-like function (Fig. 1), a brain structure involved in the aversive learning in humans (Martín et al., 2011; Mueller et al., 2011; von Trotha et al., 2014). Similar to the olfactory system of mammals, neurons in the olfactory bulb of zebrafish project toward the telencephalon and diencephalon (Wullimann and Puelles, 1999), suggesting that the zebrafish present an anatomic and functional organization that parallel those observed on humans (Fig. 1). In this sense, Miyasaka et al. (2014) used single-neuron labeling analysis in larvae zebrafish to reveal that axons at glomerular clusters in the olfactory bulb target the regions of the forebrain such as the posterior telencephalon, ventral telencephalon, the right habenula, the posterior tuberculum and the olfactory bulb itself in ipsilateral and contralateral regions. Noteworthy in the context of COVID-19, the olfactory system of zebrafish also shares many similarities with those observed in terrestrial mammals, including humans (Hildebrand and Shepherd, 1997; Howe et al., 2013; Saraiva et al., 2015; Fig. 1).

In zebrafish, the olfactory system can be divided into two main structures: the peripheral organ that organizes itself in a pair of rosettes on the nasal cavity, and the superior structure that is represented by the olfactory bulb and attached structures, responsible for diverse behavioral responses (Baier and Korsching, 1994; Korsching et al., 1997; Friedrich et al., 2013). The odorant receptors, responsible for the primary signal transduction in the periphery organ, follow the one neuron – one receptor rule, by which the sensory neurons can express only one receptor of many existing types. These neurons expressing the same receptors converge their axons onto a specific location in the olfactory bulb, and different odors can activate different types of compromised neurons, encoding a specific pattern of activation responsible for singular odors sensations (Barth et al., 1996; Friedrich and Korsching, 1997).

Another advantage is that zebrafish’s olfactory system has a quick development detecting and discriminating odors between 2 and 4 dpf (Lindsay, 2004; Vitebsky et al., 2005). Moreover, this teleost also presents anatomically olfactory components more accessible than other vertebrates, allowing invasive manipulations with an increased rate of survival (Baier and Korsching, 1994; Iqbal and Byrd-Jacobs, 2010; Paskin and Byrd-Jacobs, 2012; White et al., 2015). Altogether, these characteristics allow a quick and effective investigation of SARS-CoV-2 infection both on embryonic and adult olfactory systems.

Zebrafish as a model of neurologic disorders

How SARS-CoV-2 encroaches on the CNS is a question that remains unexplained. As mentioned, the primary hypothesis is that the virus can reach the neuronal cells through the olfactory nerves, promoting complications related to the olfactory perception, such as anosmia (for detailed review, see Lao et al., 2020). Corroborating this premise, functional analysis using magnetic resonance imaging of a patient who suffered from COVID-19 anosmia and dysgeusia suggested an altered cortical activity that normalized after resolving these symptoms (Politi et al., 2020).

Another hypothesis suggests that SARS-CoV-2 can promote an entry by a hematogenous route, either infecting the BBB cells or camouflaging itself in immune cells to enter the central nervous system as Trojan horses, both leading to possible neuroinflammatory boards. This hypothesis is based on the neurovascular symptoms, such as stroke, that affect many contaminated patients (Kumar et al., 2020). These possible pathways to SARS-CoV-2 entry in the CNS agree with the secondary neurologic symptoms presented by the patients, which can range from simple headaches to hemorrhagic strokes (Berger, 2020; Orrù et al., 2020), a serious condition that can increase the risk of death (for more detailed review of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion, see Iadecola et al., 2020).

The zebrafish model shows up great features once it is already used as a neurologic model for the disorders studies because of its similarities with the human CNS and the easy access to the communications routes among the brain areas, mainly in the embryonic phase (MacRae and Peterson, 2003). The neurovascular system can be evaluated in zebrafish and robust protocols and neuroimages assays that can easily show the dimension of the stroke-induced (Crilly et al., 2019) and can lead to a neuroinflammatory correlation process, as happens in parallel in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, transsynaptic tracing using viruses to enable gene transfer has been used in zebrafish to study neuronal connection (Mundell et al., 2015). In this sense, similar techniques in addition to fluorescent labeling could be used to evaluate the spreading of SARS-CoV-2 in the CNS. Beyond that, the virus’ pathways to entry in the CNS can be easily verified in the zebrafish model, as already happened with Chikungunya virus and Sindbis virus through fluorescent techniques (Passoni et al., 2017), a protocol that may be applied in COVID-19 research.

More than evaluating the acute consequences of the infection and its correlation with the CNS, zebrafish can provide long-term results about these consequences. It is unknown whether and how the interaction with SARS-CoV-2 and the brain can lead to the worsening of other preexistent neurologic conditions or precipitate the appearance of symptoms in people susceptible to neurologic diseases in a long-term manner, either by the possible capacity of the virus to cause brain injury directly or through affecting the people by promoting a stressful overload because of pandemic era events, like social distancing.

Anosmia and ageusia, symptoms experience for most patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, are also reported in the initial stages of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease (Tarakad and Jankovic, 2017; Marin et al., 2018). Therefore, the concern that the new coronavirus can promote a certain degree of neurodegeneration, or even modulate the CNS homeostasis to lead to a new pathologic state, as happened with one patient that presents a quick development of Parkinson’s disease starting after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (Cohen et al., 2020). To evaluate whether these factors can induce long-term changes, the zebrafish is a valuable tool since it is an established model to study neurodegeneration even in the context of neurodegenerative disorders (Tierney, 2011; Martín-Jiménez et al., 2015), and can be used to assess infection course and neurodegeneration relationship in a longitudinal way, because of quick and easy mode to obtain young to aged zebrafish (Kao et al., 2014). Teleosts also present an interesting great feature that can serve as an advantage against the rodent models: the possibility to regenerate the brain tissue (Kizil et al., 2012; Gemberling et al., 2013).

People who do not suffer from SARS-CoV-2 infection can experiment with its effect on their brains, even if not directly. Many studies reveal that pandemic issues tend to increase mood disorders (such as depression and anxiety) diagnosis worldwide (Tang et al., 2021), a problem that may have worse consequences in the future. One manner of studying these consequences is through behavioral analysis, an area where zebrafish can get great importance once it demonstrates a wide range of complex behaviors that can be evaluated and recently gained notoriety (Jesuthasan, 2012). Moreover, software that analyzes many behavioral types (such as ANY-maze software for rodents) can be found for zebrafish (Khan et al., 2017), which adds to its short development and great reproducibility and can save even more time and make searching even easier.

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Neurologic Alterations through Zebrafish’s Behavior

Behavioral tests have been used in neuroscience, neuropharmacology, and neurotoxicity fields to access numerous CNS disorders. This tool can help to elucidate the mechanisms involved in pathologies or injuries caused by chemical exposure and may be conducted with adults (Abreu et al., 2017; Kundap et al., 2017; Genario et al., 2020; Müller et al., 2020) or larvae zebrafish (Vitebsky et al., 2005; Krishnan et al., 2014; Ko et al., 2019), and may use the exploratory pattern to stimuli, such as light vibration and odorants exposure (Kalueff et al., 2013). In this context, many protocols have been developed and cataloged over the past decade; for instance, Kalueff et al. (2013) clustered 190 distinct behavioral phenotypes that include anxiety-like, freeze, spasm behaviors, and seizures.

In the light of COVID-19 CNS alterations, anosmia may be evaluated in zebrafish at the behavioral level. In this direction, assessing locomotor activity with adults or larvae can be used to evaluate the olfactory system function (Krishnan et al., 2014; Abreu et al., 2017). It has been described that anosmia induced by lidocaine and ZnSO4 promoted anxiety-like behaviors in zebrafish (Abreu et al., 2016, 2017). Also, protocols aiming at evaluating the olfaction capacity can include predator responses. These stimuli can be produced by using the skin of the predator as stimuli (Volz et al., 2020), skin injury mixture to evoke stress-related behavior (Diaz-Verdugo et al., 2019), or water-soluble chemicals such as food preparation, for the search for food behavior (Braubach et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2019), amino acids (Krishnan et al., 2014; Wakisaka et al., 2017), or bile acids (Koide et al., 2009; Wakisaka et al., 2017). Interestingly, even in the first stages of development, it is possible to evaluate zebrafish’s motor activity. At almost 24 hpf (19–27 hpf), zebrafish have spontaneously tail coiling measured by frequency and duration of occurrence. These assays enable the evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 infection during development and may shed light on possible future alterations (Menelaou et al., 2008; Selderslaghs et al., 2013).

Regarding long-term behavioral alterations promoted by SARS-CoV-2 that may suggest neurodegeneration, several reports are evaluating the zebrafish memory performance in a distinct context such as spatial memory function (Williams et al., 2002), stress-induced memory impairment (Gaikwad et al., 2011), and scopolamine-induced memory impairment (Richetti et al., 2011).

To model zebrafish into a preclinical and efficient model of COVID-19 model: exploring the strategies and tools

The generation of the first transgenic mammal in the 1980s opened a wide venue for this field (Gordon and Ruddle, 1981). Nowadays, genetic manipulation of animals is an invaluable tool for understanding human disease. Although almost 40 years have passed since Palmiter et al. (1992) successfully generated “gigantic” mice, the steps used to generate transgenic mice are almost the same, which involve: (1) constructing a transgene; (2) obtaining fertilized eggs from female mice donors; (3) microinjections of the transgene material into the pronuclei/zygote; (4) implanting the modified zygote into pseudo-pregnant female mice; (5) genotype the transgene offspring. These several steps and the limitation of offspring generated by each pregnancy lead to several months of work until a viable transgenic mouse is established. These limitations and the urgency of viable tools to understand the behavior of SARS-CoV-2 during this pandemic raise the undeniable necessity of a rapid and reliable animal model.

Zebrafish’s genetic manipulation offers an undeniable resource. The first transgenic zebrafish were obtained in the 1980s (Stuart et al., 1988) that showed that DNA transplantation into the zebrafish’s embryo could be integrated and inherited by their germline. Almost a decade later, two distinct groups successfully created a transgenic zebrafish that expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP) under promoter-control that conveyed a tissue-dependent expression pattern (Long et al., 1997; Higashijima, 2008). These rudimentary protocols highlight the advantages of zebrafish over rodents. The former produces hundreds of eggs that can be fertilized and generated offspring’s in a shorter period; their eggs are translucent, allowing in vivo imaging studies during the development of the CNS (Long et al., 1997).

Nowadays, several techniques have been described to generate transgenic zebrafish, such as knock-down with morpholinos, insertion of exogenous DNA with Tol2 transposons, knock-in for fate-mapping studies (Kizil et al., 2013; Kesavan et al., 2017; Rafferty and Quinn, 2018). To provide organized information regarding the strains of zebrafish, plasmids, and antibodies accessible, online database centers were created, such as the Zebrafish Information Network (Varshney et al., 2016; Gut et al., 2017).

Real-time visualization of the zebrafish’s CNS and SARS-CoV-2

Imaging tools can be very useful for understanding the possible alterations triggered in the CNS, facilitating, and improving clinical prognosis. Beyond the conventional immunohistochemistry protocols, new strategies allowed in vivo screening and whole-brain assays in the zebrafish. These tools can be very important in the characterization of the neuroinvasion promoted by SARS-CoV-2 (Solomon et al., 2020).

Some fluorescent markers, like the GFP and the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP), can be used to label neuronal projections during zebrafish neurodevelopment. Indeed, the combined expression of different fluorescent markers refers to the transgenic technology known as Brainbow, in which several neurons can be individually labeled through genetic recombination (Cai et al., 2013). This technology was recently applied to the zebrafish model (Pan et al., 2011), giving rise to the successful transgenic tool named Zebrabow (Pan et al., 2013), enabling the broad study of the zebrafish’s CNS.

Moreover, the functional analyses and activity of neurons can be achieved through genomic tools like the genetically-encoded calcium indicators (Ahrens et al., 2013) and the optogenetic neuromodulation (Knafo and Wyart, 2015). Both strategies can be easily inserted in the zebrafish genome by driving the expression of many protein-based systems for genome engineering (Kawakami et al., 2004; Scott et al., 2007), targeting a specific neuronal population of interest. Unlike other vertebrate models, using light-sheet microscopy, the whole-brain activity of larval zebrafish can be rapidly obtained without attaching any fiber optic cables (Ahrens et al., 2013).

In addition to the techniques for functional analyses in the brain of zebrafish larvae, there are the fluorescent false neurotransmitters that are capable of measuring the in vivo uptake and release of a specific neurotransmitter. These synapse-markers are based on a fluorescent label of the synaptic vesicle or the extracellular neurotransmitters (Gubernator et al., 2009).

Because of the lack of transparency and a larger brain, imaging the CNS of adult zebrafish is a challenge. However, methods like the use of different solvents to remove the excess of lipids and reduce light scattering (Ertürk et al., 2012), allow transforming a fixed and opaque organ into a transparent one, enabling an in situ analysis of the whole adult brain (Susaki et al., 2014). Another recent protocol applied for imaging the brain of adult zebrafish is the contrast-enhanced X-ray micro-computed tomography, which provides a 3D brain visualization (Babaei et al., 2016). Furthermore, the optical coherence tomography enables an in vivo and non-invasive real-time 3D imaging of the adult zebrafish brain anatomy (Rao et al., 2009).

Molecular and biochemical analysis in the zebrafish model

As in whole science, molecular biology techniques are essential in virology research, even more, if we consider that viruses do not have macro features to be analyzed, which gives great importance to genomic and proteomic analysis. Despite being a relatively new model, zebrafish can supply the molecular research with optimized protocols that ensure not only technical quality but also relative simplicity, presenting several examples of its use in viral infection research in zebrafish (Goody et al., 2014).

The Western blotting (WB) technique is one of the most used techniques to evaluate protein content and can be performed to verify proteins involved with viral infection as well as the proteins that lead the immune response to the viral infection. Furthermore, zebrafish provide a broad spectrum of possibilities once the protein content can be measured and compared in different developmental phases with relative speed. Newly published protocols also guarantee sample economy and optimized protein extraction of a single zebrafish larvae or embryo for WB, which added to the high fertility of zebrafish culminates in a large amount of sample in short periods (Schnabel et al., 2019). Besides that, the availability of antibodies specific to zebrafish samples is increasing.

Despite the utility of WB to provide previously known protein quantity information, much more unknown proteins can be related to viral infections and disease progression, further in novel viral infections such as COVID-19. In this case, zebrafish can be a useful tool in the research as well, which can involve specifically protocols for proteomics assays that can lead to a protein screening in diverse scenarios, from electrophoresis to the mass spectrometry techniques, both in adults and embryos (Link et al., 2006; Singh et al., 2013).

If the aim of the work concentrates on the genomic profile, zebrafish can help mainly in the evaluation of viral infection kinetics studies and genome expression measurements, not only for viral particles or whole-genome but also for the genes of target-proteins for viruses (Goody et al., 2014). The evaluation of the RNA content can be a powerful tool against SARS-CoV-2, once this virus has a single-stranded RNA, enabling the investigation of a plausible connection between the viral proteins and the ACE2 target-protein in humans. Furthermore, using the reverse transcription-PCR quantitative real-time (RT-qPCR) technique, ACE2 domains in different neurons and regions in zebrafish were already identified (Chou et al., 2006).

Besides the aforementioned, biochemical assays comprehend the understanding of the chemical reactions that occur inside the organism. This type of essay allows us to elucidate the mechanism of action of many substances. Many procedures to perform the biochemical assays developed for other species (Ellman et al., 1961; Misra and Fridovich, 1972; Bradford, 1976; Aebi, 1984; Draper and Hadley, 1990; LeBel et al., 1992; Frasco and Guilhermino, 2002) has been adapted and used in zebrafish with great results (Jin et al., 2015; Abe et al., 2018; Agostini et al., 2018; Maharajan et al., 2018; Sarasamma et al., 2018, 2019; Bernardo et al., 2019; Mocelin et al., 2019; Schmitt et al., 2019; Ünal et al., 2019; Walpitagama et al., 2019).

Different enzymes or processes can be studied by biochemical assays in zebrafish and may be used to understand the possible alterations promoted by SARS-CoV-2 at the cellular and tissue level. For instance, some tests allow the determination of the reactive oxygen species, the lipid peroxidation, and the activity of the enzymes involved in antioxidant mechanisms, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione-S-transferase (Diniz et al., 2015; Jin et al., 2015; Sarasamma et al., 2018). Besides, some assays enable the measurement of distinct neurotransmitters activity, such as the choline, GABA, glutamate, glycine, dopamine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (Abe et al., 2018; Agostini et al., 2018; Sarasamma et al., 2018, 2019; Schmitt et al., 2019; Walpitagama et al., 2019).

As was previously discussed, some enzymes are involved in SARS-CoV-2 entrance into the cells, such as the proteases cathepsin L, TMRPSS, trypsin, and furin. These enzymes could be used as a target for new drug development. A methodology to evaluate cathepsin L activity was already developed and tested in zebrafish (Dana et al., 2019). It was developed for different purposes, happened before SARS-CoV-2 was brought to light, but it could be helpful to assess the efficacy of drugs that target cathepsin L.

The “omics-era” and zebrafish

Much of our knowledge about single cells evolved drastically within the past decades with advanced molecular biology techniques. Nowadays, it is possible to comprehend the system-behavior in a single-cell resolution (Wagner and Klein, 2020).

The advent of omics analysis, which refers to an integrative discipline with the objective of mapping genes and proteins and comprehends the interactions and relationship among them and the environment surrounding the cell, has enabled the in-depth knowledge of the different systems and how diseases may disturb the homeostasis of these systems (Jehan, 2019; Unterman et al., 2020).

Regarding COVID-19, the omics approach has already been used to clarify some of the molecular alterations promoted by SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans (Song et al., 2020; Unterman et al., 2020). For instance, lipidomes analysis revealed that some plasma metabolites differed from COVID-19 patients compared with healthy controls (Song et al., 2020), and a multiomics single-cells analysis revealed that worse response to SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with predominant interferon type-1 response across different immune cells accompanied with an imbalance between innate and adaptive immunity (Unterman et al., 2020). However, preclinical studies using the omics approach and SARS-CoV-2 dynamics still need to be explored.

In this direction, some shreds of evidence strongly suggest that zebrafish omics may be used to screen the biological activity of distinct chemical compounds, testing its teratogenicity and toxicity (Sukardi et al., 2010; Hung et al., 2012). Also, the proteomics approach has already been used to understand age-related neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s (Abramsson et al., 2010; Mushtaq et al., 2013), alterations on the Rett syndrome model (Cortelazzo et al., 2017), to demonstrate the similarities between humans and zebrafish plasma composition (Li et al., 2016) and neutrophils (Singh et al., 2013), to explore different biomarkers for liver dysfunction (Ayobahan et al., 2020), to explore the dynamics of extracellular matrix composition during heart regeneration (Garcia-Puig et al., 2019), and to investigate the alterations promoted by spring viremia of Carp virus in the zebrafish (Liu et al., 2020). These pieces of evidence highlight that omics tools may be used for different purposes on the zebrafish model and are a powerful tool for a better understanding of human diseases with distinct etiology, including COVID-19.

Conclusion

Among all the animal models, zebrafish has proven to be an essential and powerful tool for human disease analysis. General attributes, like the low-cost maintenance, external fertilization, a large number of eggs, rapid life cycle, transparency of the embryos, and the several available techniques make this vertebrate an attractive model for research. Zebrafish also display genetics and physiologic similarities with mammalian, including the brain structure and functions, which highlights its great potential as an animal model for studying the neurologic components associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Several of the genetic, behavioral, cellular, molecular, and biochemical approaches already standardized in other animal models are also applicable in this teleost. Altogether, those advantages ensure reliable, fast, and reproducible results for COVID-19 analysis when compared with other animal models. The goal of proposing an innovative animal model like zebrafish to study neurologic components related to SARS-CoV-2 infection is ambitious but will be of great value for more robust and effective analysis.

Search strategy

All the relevant articles were identified and collected from the PubMed database from April 1, 2020, up to November 30, 2020. The following search terms were used (alone or in combination): zebrafish, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, CNS, encephalitis, neurologic disorders, anosmia, ciliopathy, olfactory system, olfactory bulb, olfactory neurons, ACE2, TMPRSS2, immunity, behavior, genetic manipulation, imaging tools, molecular analysis, biochemical analysis, omics. The reference list was generated based on papers relevant to the topics discussed in this review.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements: We thank our laboratory colleagues for their support and for building an amazing teamwork environment.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) Grants 2020/05416-4 and 2018/24298-2.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Abe FR, Soares AMVM, de Oliveira DP, Gravato C (2018) Toxicity of dyes to zebrafish at the biochemical level: cellular energy allocation and neurotoxicity. Environ Pollut 235:255–262. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.020
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    Abramsson A, Westman-Brinkmalm A, Pannee J, Gustavsson M, von Otter M, Blennow K, Brinkmalm G, Kettunen P, Zetterberg H (2010) Proteomics profiling of single organs from individual adult zebrafish. Zebrafish 7:161–168. doi:10.1089/zeb.2009.0644
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Abreu MS, Giacomini ACVV, Kalueff AV, Barcellos LJG (2016) The smell of “anxiety”: behavioral modulation by experimental anosmia in zebrafish. Physiol Behav 157:67–71. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.030
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    Abreu MS, Giacomini ACVV, Rodriguez R, Kalueff AV, Barcellos LJG (2017) Effects of ZnSO 4 -induced peripheral anosmia on zebrafish behavior and physiology. Behav Brain Res 320:275–281. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    Aebi H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105:121–126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Agostini JF, Toé HCZD, Vieira KM, Baldin SL, Costa NLF, Cruz CU, Longo L, Machado MM, da Silveira TR, Schuck PF, Rico EP (2018) Cholinergic system and oxidative stress changes in the brain of a zebrafish model chronically exposed to ethanol. Neurotox Res 33:749–758. doi:10.1007/s12640-017-9816-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    Ahrens MB, Orger MB, Robson DN, Li JM, Keller PJ (2013) Whole-brain functional imaging at cellular resolution using light-sheet microscopy. Nat Methods 10:413–420. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2434
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Ayala-Nunez NV, Follain G, Delalande F, Hirschler A, Partiot E, Hale GL, Bollweg BC, Roels J, Chazal M, Bakoa F, Carocci M, Bourdoulous S, Faklaris O, Zaki SR, Eckly A, Uring-Lambert B, Doussau F, Cianferani S, Carapito C, Jacobs FMJ, et al. (2019) Zika virus enhances monocyte adhesion and transmigration favoring viral dissemination to neural cells. Nat Commun 10:4430. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12408-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    Ayobahan SU, Eilebrecht S, Baumann L, Teigeler M, Hollert H, Kalkhof S, Eilebrecht E, Schäfers C (2020) Detection of biomarkers to differentiate endocrine disruption from hepatotoxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) using proteomics. Chemosphere 240:124970. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124970
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    Babaei F, Hong TLC, Yeung K, Cheng SH, Lam YW (2016) Contrast-enhanced x-ray micro-computed tomography as a versatile method for anatomical studies of adult zebrafish. Zebrafish 13:310–316. doi:10.1089/zeb.2016.1245
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Baier H, Korsching S (1994) Olfactory glomeruli in the zebrafish form an invariant pattern and are identifiable across animals. J Neurosci 14:219–230. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-01-00219.1994
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Bansal N, Davis S, Tereshchenko I, Budak-Alpdogan T, Zhong H, Stein MN, Kim IY, DiPaola RS, Bertino JR, Sabaawy HE (2014) Enrichment of human prostate cancer cells with tumor initiating properties in mouse and zebrafish xenografts by differential adhesion. Prostate 74:187–200. doi:10.1002/pros.22740
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Bao L, Deng W, Gao H, Xiao C, Liu J, Xue J, Lv Q, Liu J, Yu P, Xu Y, Qi F, Qu Y, Li F, Xiang Z, Yu H, Gong S, Liu M, Wang G, Wang S, Song Z, et al. (2020) Reinfection could not occur in SARS-CoV-2 infected rhesus macaques. bioRxiv 2020.03.13.990226.
  14. ↵
    Barth AL, Justice NJ, Ngai J (1996) Asynchronous onset of odorant receptor expression in the developing zebrafish olfactory system. Neuron 16:23–34. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80020-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Beekhuijzen M, de Koning C, Flores-Guillén M-E, de Vries-Buitenweg S, Tobor-Kaplon M, van de Waart B, Emmen H (2015) From cutting edge to guideline: a first step in harmonization of the zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) by describing the most optimal test conditions and morphology scoring system. Reprod Toxicol 56:64–76. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.06.050
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    Berger JR (2020) COVID-19 and the nervous system. J Neurovirol 26:143–148. doi:10.1007/s13365-020-00840-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Bernardo HT, Agostini JF, Toé HCZD, Vieira KM, Baldin SL, Schuck PF, Uribe-Cruz C, Longo L, da Silveira TR, Rosemberg DB, Rico EP (2019) Cholinergic system and exploratory behavior are changed after weekly-binge ethanol exposure in zebrafish. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 186:172790. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2019.172790
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    Bhusnure OG, Mane JM, Gholve SB (2015) Drug target screening and its validation by zebrafish as a novel tool. Pharm Anal Acta 6:10. doi:10.4172/2153-2435.1000426
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    Blaker-Lee A, Gupta S, McCammon JM, De Rienzo G, Sive H (2012) Zebrafish homologs of genes within 16p11.2, a genomic region associated with brain disorders, are active during brain development, and include two deletion dosage sensor genes. Dis Model Mech 5:834–851. doi:10.1242/dmm.009944
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Braubach OR, Wood H-D, Gadbois S, Fine A, Croll RP (2009) Olfactory conditioning in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res 198:190–198. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.10.044
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Butler MS, Roshan-Moniri M, Hsing M, Lau D, Kim A, Yen P, Mroczek M, Nouri M, Lien S, Axerio-Cilies P, Dalal K, Yau C, Ghaidi F, Guo Y, Yamazaki T, Lawn S, Gleave ME, Gregory-Evans CY, McIntosh LP, Cox ME, et al. (2017) Discovery and characterization of small molecules targeting the DNA-binding ETS domain of ERG in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 8:42438–42454. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.17124
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    Butowt R, Bilinska K (2020) SARS-CoV-2: olfaction, brain infection, and the urgent need for clinical samples allowing earlier virus detection. ACS Chem Neurosci 11:1200–1203. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00172
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    Byrd C, Brunjes P (2001) Neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb of adult zebrafish. Neuroscience 105:793–801. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00215-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Byrd CA, Jones JT, Quattro JM, Rogers ME, Brunjes PC, Vogt RG (1996) Ontogeny of odorant receptor gene expression in zebrafish, Danio rerio. J Neurobiol 29:445–458. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199604)29:4<445::AID-NEU3>3.0.CO;2-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Cai D, Cohen KB, Luo T, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR (2013) Improved tools for the Brainbow toolbox. Nat Methods 10:540–547. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2450
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Chan JF, Zhang AJ, Yuan S, Poon VK, Chan CC, Lee AC, Chan WM, Fan Z, Tsoi HW, Wen L, Liang R, Cao J, Chen Y, Tang K, Luo C, Cai JP, Kok KH, Chu H, Chan KH, Sridhar S, et al. (2020) Simulation of the clinical and pathological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a golden Syrian hamster model: implications for disease pathogenesis and transmissibility. Clin Infect Dis 71:2428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Chen R, Wang K, Yu J, Howard D, French L, Chen Z, Wen C, Xu Z (2021) The spatial and cell-type distribution of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in the human and mouse brains. Front Neurol 11:573095.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Chen W, Peng X, Deng Q, Chen M, Du J, Zhang B (2019) Role of olfactorily responsive neurons in the right dorsal habenula–ventral interpeduncular nucleus pathway in food-seeking behaviors of larval zebrafish. Neuroscience 404:259–267. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.01.057
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    Chou CF, Loh CB, Foo YK, Shen S, Fielding BC, Tan THP, Khan S, Wang Y, Lim SG, Hong W, Tan YJ, Fu J (2006) ACE2 orthologues in non-mammalian vertebrates (Danio, Gallus, Fugu, Tetraodon and Xenopus). Gene 377:46–55. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.03.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Cocco A, Rönnberg AMC, Jin Z, André GI, Vossen LE, Bhandage AK, Thörnqvist P-O, Birnir B, Winberg S (2017) Characterization of the γ-aminobutyric acid signaling system in the zebrafish (Danio rerio Hamilton) central nervous system by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Neuroscience 343:300–321. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Cohen ME, Eichel R, Steiner-Birmanns B, Janah A, Ioshpa M, Bar-Shalom R, Paul JJ, Gaber H, Skrahina V, Bornstein NM, Yahalom G (2020) A case of probable Parkinson’s disease after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lancet Neurol 19:804–805. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30305-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Cortelazzo A, Pietri T, De Felice C, Leoncini S, Guerranti R, Signorini C, Timperio AM, Zolla L, Ciccoli L, Hayek J (2017) Proteomic analysis of the Rett syndrome experimental model mecp2Q63X mutant zebrafish. J Proteomics 154:128–133. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2016.12.010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    Crilly S, Njegic A, Parry-Jones AR, Allan SM, Kasher PR (2019) Using zebrafish larvae to study the pathological consequences of hemorrhagic stroke. J Vis Exp 59716.
  35. ↵
    Dana D, Garcia J, Bhuiyan AI, Rathod P, Joo L, Novoa DA, Paroly S, Fath KR, Chang EJ, Pathak SK (2019) Cell penetrable, clickable and tagless activity-based probe of human cathepsin L. Bioorg Chem 85:505–514. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.02.032
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    Dey J, Alam MT, Chandra S, Gupta J, Ray U, Srivastava AK, Tripathi PP (2021) Neuroinvasion of SARS‐CoV‐2 may play a role in the breakdown of the respiratory center of the brain. J Med Virol 93:1296–1303. doi:10.1002/jmv.26521
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    Diaz-Verdugo C, Sun GJ, Fawcett CH, Zhu P, Fishman MC (2019) Mating suppresses alarm response in zebrafish. Curr Biol 29:2541–2546.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.047
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    Ding CB, Zhang JP, Zhao Y, Peng ZG, Song DQ, Jiang JD (2011) Zebrafish as a potential model organism for drug test against Hepatitis C virus. PLoS One 6:e22921. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022921
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Diniz MS, Salgado R, Pereira VJ, Carvalho G, Oehmen A, Reis MAM, Noronha JP (2015) Ecotoxicity of ketoprofen, diclofenac, atenolol and their photolysis byproducts in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Sci Total Environ 505:282–289. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.103
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    Draper HH, Hadley M (1990) Malondialdehyde determination as index of lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 186:421–431.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Dubé M, Le Coupanec A, Wong AHM, Rini JM, Desforges M, Talbot PJ (2018) Axonal transport enables neuron-to-neuron propagation of human coronavirus OC43. J Virol 92:e00404-18. doi:10.1128/JVI.00404-18
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Duong L, Xu P, Liu A (2020) Meningoencephalitis without respiratory failure in a young female patient with COVID-19 infection in Downtown Los Angeles, early April 2020. Brain Behav Immun 87:33. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.024
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    Eichenbaum H, Dudchenko P, Wood E, Shapiro M, Tanila H (1999) The hippocampus, memory, and place cells. Neuron 23:209–226. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80773-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V, Featherstone RM (1961) A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7:88–95. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Ellul MA, Benjamin L, Singh B, Lant S, Michael BD, Easton A, Kneen R, Defres S, Sejvar J, Solomon T (2020) Neurological associations of COVID-19. Lancet Neurol 19:767–783. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30221-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Ertürk A, Becker K, Jährling N, Mauch CP, Hojer CD, Egen JG, Hellal F, Bradke F, Sheng M, Dodt H-U (2012) Three-dimensional imaging of solvent-cleared organs using 3DISCO. Nat Protoc 7:1983–1995. doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    European Parliament (2010) Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. EUR-Lex. Available from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/63/oj. Accessed January 6, 2021.
  48. ↵
    Fleming A, Diekmann H, Goldsmith P (2013) Functional characterisation of the maturation of the blood-brain barrier in larval zebrafish. PLoS One 8:e77548. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Folgueira M, Bayley P, Navratilova P, Becker TS, Wilson SW, Clarke JD (2012) Morphogenesis underlying the development of the everted teleost telencephalon. Neural Dev 7:32. doi:10.1186/1749-8104-7-32
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Frasco MF, Guilhermino L (2002) Effects of dimethoate and beta-naphthoflavone on selected biomarkers of Poecilia reticulata. Fish Physiol Biochem 26:149–156. doi:10.1023/A:1025457831923
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    Friedrich RW, Korsching SI (1997) Combinatorial and chemotopic odorant coding in the zebrafish olfactory bulb visualized by optical imaging. Neuron 18:737–752. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80314-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Friedrich RW, Genoud C, Wanner AA (2013) Analyzing the structure and function of neuronal circuits in zebrafish. Front Neural Circuits 7:71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    Gabor KA, Goody MF, Mowel WK, Breitbach ME, Gratacap RL, Witten PE, Kim CH (2014) Influenza A virus infection in zebrafish recapitulates mammalian infection and sensitivity to anti-influenza drug treatment. Dis Model Mech 7:1227–1237. doi:10.1242/dmm.014746
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    Gaikwad S, Stewart A, Hart P, Wong K, Piet V, Cachat J, Kalueff AV (2011) Acute stress disrupts performance of zebrafish in the cued and spatial memory tests: the utility of fish models to study stress–memory interplay. Behav Processes 87:224–230. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2011.04.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Gandhi S, Srivastava AK, Ray U, Tripathi PP (2020) Is the collapse of the respiratory center in the brain responsible for respiratory breakdown in COVID-19 patients? ACS Chem Neurosci 11:1379–1381. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00217
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Garcia-Puig A, Mosquera JL, Jiménez-Delgado S, García-Pastor C, Jorba I, Navajas D, Canals F, Raya A (2019) Proteomics analysis of extracellular matrix remodeling during zebrafish heart regeneration. Mol Cell Proteomics 18:1745–1755. doi:10.1074/mcp.RA118.001193
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Gemberling M, Bailey TJ, Hyde DR, Poss KD (2013) The zebrafish as a model for complex tissue regeneration. Trends Genet 29:611–620. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2013.07.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Genario R, Giacomini ACVV, de Abreu MS, Marcon L, Demin KA, Kalueff AV (2020) Sex differences in adult zebrafish anxiolytic-like responses to diazepam and melatonin. Neurosci Lett 714:134548. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134548
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. ↵
    GermanÀ A, Montalbano G, Guerrera MC, Amato V, LaurÀ R, Magnoli D, Campo S, Suarez‐Fernandez E, Ciriaco E, Vega JA (2011) Developmental changes in the expression of sox2 in the zebrafish brain. Microsc Res Tech 74:347–354. doi:10.1002/jemt.20915
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Gheblawi M, Wang K, Viveiros A, Nguyen Q, Zhong J-C, Turner AJ, Raizada MK, Grant MB, Oudit GY (2020) Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 receptor and regulator of the renin-angiotensin system. Circ Res 126:1456–1474. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Goody MF, Sullivan C, Kim CH (2014) Studying the immune response to human viral infections using zebrafish. Dev Comp Immunol 46:84–95. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2014.03.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Gordon J, Ruddle F (1981) Integration and stable germ line transmission of genes injected into mouse pronuclei. Science 214:1244–1246. doi:10.1126/science.6272397
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Gubernator NG, Zhang H, Staal RGW, Mosharov EV, Pereira DB, Yue M, Balsanek V, Vadola PA, Mukherjee B, Edwards RH, Sulzer D, Sames D (2009) Fluorescent false neurotransmitters visualize dopamine release from individual presynaptic terminals. Science 324:1441–1444. doi:10.1126/science.1172278
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    Gut P, Reischauer S, Stainier DYR, Arnaout R (2017) Little fish, big data: zebrafish as a model for cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Physiol Rev 97:889–938. doi:10.1152/physrev.00038.2016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, Clere-Jehl R, Schenck M, Kummerlen C, Collange O, Boulay C, Fafi-Kremer S, Ohana M, Anheim M, Meziani F (2020) Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med 382:2268–2270. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2008597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    Higashijima S (2008) Transgenic zebrafish expressing fluorescent proteins in central nervous system neurons. Dev Growth Differ 50:407–413. doi:10.1111/j.1440-169X.2008.01023.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    Hildebrand JG, Shepherd GM (1997) Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: converging evidence for common principles across phyla. Annu Rev Neurosci 20:595–631. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.595
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, Schiergens TS, Herrler G, Wu N-H, Nitsche A, Müller MA, Drosten C, Pöhlmann S (2020) SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181:271–280.e8. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Horzmann K, Freeman J (2016) Zebrafish get connected: investigating neurotransmission targets and alterations in chemical toxicity. Toxics 4:19. doi:10.3390/toxics4030019
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. ↵
    Howe K, Clark MD, Torroja CF, Torrance J, Berthelot C, Muffato M, Collins JE, Humphray S, McLaren K, Matthews L, McLaren S, Sealy I, Caccamo M, Churcher C, Scott C, Barrett JC, Koch R, Rauch GJ, White S, Chow W, et al. (2013) The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 496:498–503. doi:10.1038/nature12111
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, et al. (2020) Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395:497–506. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    Hung MW, Zhang ZJ, Li S, Lei B, Yuan S, Cui GZ, Man Hoi P, Chan K, Lee SMY (2012) From omics to drug metabolism and high content screen of natural product in zebrafish: a new model for discovery of neuroactive compound. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012:1–20. doi:10.1155/2012/605303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    Iadecola C, Anrather J, Kamel H (2020) Effects of COVID-19 on the nervous system. Cell 183:16–27.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (2001) Correction: initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 412:565–566.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    Iqbal T, Byrd-Jacobs C (2010) Rapid degeneration and regeneration of the zebrafish olfactory epithelium after Triton X-100 application. Chem Senses 35:351–361. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjq019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    Jain J, Gaur S, Chaudhary Y, Kaul R (2020) The molecular biology of intracellular events during Coronavirus infection cycle. Virusdisease 31:75–79. doi:10.1007/s13337-020-00591-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. ↵
    Jehan Z (2019) Single-cell omics: an overview. In: Single-cell omics, pp 3–19. San Diego: Elsevier.
  78. ↵
    Jesuthasan S (2012) Fear, anxiety, and control in the zebrafish. Dev Neurobiol 72:395–403. doi:10.1002/dneu.20873
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    Jin Y, Liu Z, Liu F, Ye Y, Peng T, Fu Z (2015) Embryonic exposure to cadmium (II) and chromium (VI) induce behavioral alterations, oxidative stress and immunotoxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Neurotoxicol Teratol 48:9–17. doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2015.01.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  80. ↵
    Johansen MD, Irving A, Montagutelli X, Tate MD, Rudloff I, Nold MF, Hansbro NG, Kim RY, Donovan C, Liu G, Faiz A, Short KR, Lyons JG, McCaughan GW, Gorrell MD, Cole A, Moreno C, Couteur D, Hesselson D, Triccas J, et al. (2020) Animal and translational models of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19. Mucosal Immunol 13:877–891. doi:10.1038/s41385-020-00340-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  81. ↵
    Jonz MG, Nurse CA (2003) Neuroepithelial cells and associated innervation of the zebrafish gill: a confocal immunofluorescence study. J Comp Neurol 461:1–17. doi:10.1002/cne.10680
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    Kalueff AV, Gebhardt M, Stewart AM, Cachat JM, Brimmer M, Chawla JS, Craddock C, Kyzar EJ, Roth A, Landsman S, Gaikwad S, Robinson K, Baatrup E, Tierney K, Shamchuk A, Norton W, Miller N, Nicolson T, Braubach O, Gilman CP, et al. (2013) Towards a comprehensive catalog of zebrafish behavior 1.0 and beyond. Zebrafish 10:70–86. doi:10.1089/zeb.2012.0861
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    Kalueff AV, Stewart AM, Gerlai R (2014) Zebrafish as an emerging model for studying complex brain disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci 35:63–75. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2013.12.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  84. ↵
    Kao TT, Chu CY, Lee GH, Hsiao TH, Cheng NW, Chang NS, Chen BH, Fu TF (2014) Folate deficiency-induced oxidative stress contributes to neuropathy in young and aged zebrafish — implication in neural tube defects and Alzheimer’s diseases. Neurobiol Dis 71:234–244. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2014.08.004
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  85. ↵
    Karuppan MKM, Devadoss D, Nair M, Chand HS, Lakshmana MK (2021) SARS-CoV-2 infection in the central and peripheral nervous system-associated morbidities and their potential mechanism. Mol Neurobiol 1–16.
  86. ↵
    Kawakami K, Takeda H, Kawakami N, Kobayashi M, Matsuda N, Mishina M (2004) A transposon-mediated gene trap approach identifies developmentally regulated genes in zebrafish. Dev Cell 7:133–144. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    Keifer J, Summers CH (2016) Putting the “biology” back into “neurobiology”: the strength of diversity in animal model systems for neuroscience research. Front Syst Neurosci 10:69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    Kesavan G, Chekuru A, Machate A, Brand M (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated zebrafish knock-in as a novel strategy to study midbrain-hindbrain boundary development. Front Neuroanat 11:1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    Khan KM, Collier AD, Meshalkina DA, Kysil EV, Khatsko SL, Kolesnikova T, Morzherin YY, Warnick JE, Kalueff AV, Echevarria DJ (2017) Zebrafish models in neuropsychopharmacology and CNS drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol 174:1925–1944. doi:10.1111/bph.13754
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  90. ↵
    Kim S, Carrillo M, Kulkarni V, Jagadeeswaran P (2009) Evolution of primary hemostasis in early vertebrates. PLoS One 4:e8403. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008403
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    Kim YI, Kim SG, Kim SM, Kim EH, Park SJ, Yu KM, Chang JH, Kim EJ, Lee S, Casel MAB, Um J, Song MS, Jeong HW, Lai VD, Kim Y, Chin BS, Park JS, Chung KH, Foo SS, Poo H, et al. (2020) Infection and rapid transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in ferrets. Cell Host Microbe 27:704–709.e2. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2020.03.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF (1995) Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203:253–310. doi:10.1002/aja.1002030302
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    Kizil C, Kaslin J, Kroehne V, Brand M (2012) Adult neurogenesis and brain regeneration in zebrafish. Devel Neurobio 72:429–461. doi:10.1002/dneu.20918
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    Kizil C, Iltzsche A, Kaslin J, Brand M (2013) Micromanipulation of gene expression in the adult zebrafish brain using cerebroventricular microinjection of morpholino oligonucleotides. J Vis Exp 1–6.
  95. ↵
    Knafo S, Wyart C (2015) Optogenetic neuromodulation: new tools for monitoring and breaking neural circuits. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 58:259–264. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    Ko MJ, Ganzen LC, Coskun E, Mukadam AA, Leung YF, van Rijn RM (2019) A critical evaluation of TRPA1-mediated locomotor behavior in zebrafish as a screening tool for novel anti-nociceptive drug discovery. Sci Rep 9:2430. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38852-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  97. ↵
    Koide T, Miyasaka N, Morimoto K, Asakawa K, Urasaki A, Kawakami K, Yoshihara Y (2009) Olfactory neural circuitry for attraction to amino acids revealed by transposon-mediated gene trap approach in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9884–9889. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900470106
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  98. ↵
    Korsching SI, Argo S, Campenhausen H, Friedrich RW, Rummrich A, Weth F (1997) Olfaction in zebrafish: what does a tiny teleost tell us? Semin Cell Dev Biol 8:181–187. doi:10.1006/scdb.1996.0136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    Koyuncu OO, Hogue IB, Enquist LW (2013) Virus infections in the nervous system. Cell Host Microbe 13:379–393. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.03.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    Kraus A, Casadei E, Huertas M, Ye C, Bradfute S, Boudinot P, Levraud J-P, Salinas I (2020) A zebrafish model for COVID-19 recapitulates olfactory and cardiovascular pathophysiologies caused by SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv 2020.11.06.368191.
  101. ↵
    Krauss S, Johansen T, Korzh V, Fjose A (1991) Expression of the zebrafish paired box gene pax[zf-b] during early neurogenesis. Development 113:1193–1206. doi:10.1242/dev.113.4.1193
    OpenUrlAbstract
  102. ↵
    Krishnan S, Mathuru AS, Kibat C, Rahman M, Lupton CE, Stewart J, Claridge-Chang A, Yen S-C, Jesuthasan S (2014) The right dorsal habenula limits attraction to an odor in zebrafish. Curr Biol 24:1167–1175. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.073
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  103. ↵
    Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, Zaki SR, Peret T, Emery S, Tong S, Urbani C, Comer JA, Lim W, Rollin PE, Dowell SF, Ling AE, Humphrey CD, Shieh WJ, Guarner J, Paddock CD, Rota P, Fields B, DeRisi J, et al. (2003) A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:1953–1966. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa030781
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    Kumar A, Pareek V, Prasoon P, Faiq MA, Kumar P, Kumari C, Narayan RK (2020) Possible routes of SARS‐CoV‐2 invasion in brain: in context of neurological symptoms in COVID‐19 patients. J Neurosci Res 98:2376–2383. doi:10.1002/jnr.24717
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  105. ↵
    Kumari P, Rothan HA, Natekar JP, Stone S, Pathak H, Strate PG, Arora K, Brinton MA, Kumar M (2021) Neuroinvasion and encephalitis following intranasal inoculation of SARS-CoV-2 in K18-hACE2 mice. Viruses 13:132. doi:10.3390/v13010132
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  106. ↵
    Kundap UP, Kumari Y, Othman I, Shaikh MF (2017) Zebrafish as a model for epilepsy-induced cognitive dysfunction: a pharmacological, biochemical and behavioral approach. Front Pharmacol 8:515.
    OpenUrl
  107. ↵
    Küster E (2005) Cholin- and carboxylesterase activities in developing zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio) and their potential use for insecticide hazard assessment. Aquat Toxicol 75:76–85. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.07.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    Laboissonniere LA, Smith CL, Mesenbrink J, Chowdhury R, Burney A, Lang M, Sierra M, Stark A, Maldonado-Casalduc G, Muller M, Trimarchi JM (2018) ALS-associated genes display CNS expression in the developing zebrafish. Gene Expr Patterns 30:14–31. doi:10.1016/j.gep.2018.08.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  109. ↵
    Lam S, Chua H, Gong Z, Lam T, Sin Y (2004) Development and maturation of the immune system in zebrafish, Danio rerio: a gene expression profiling, in situ hybridization and immunological study. Dev Comp Immunol 28:9–28. doi:10.1016/S0145-305X(03)00103-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. ↵
    Lao WP, Imam SA, Nguyen SA (2020) Anosmia, hyposmia, and dysgeusia as indicators for positive SARS-CoV-2 infection. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 6:S22–S25.
    OpenUrl
  111. ↵
    Lawrence C (2007) The husbandry of zebrafish (Danio rerio): a review. Aquaculture 269:1–20. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.04.077
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  112. ↵
    LeBel CP, Ischiropoulos H, Bondy SC (1992) Evaluation of the probe 2’,7’-dichlorofluorescin as an indicator of reactive oxygen species formation and oxidative stress. Chem Res Toxicol 5:227–231. doi:10.1021/tx00026a012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. ↵
    Li C, Tan XF, Lim TK, Lin Q, Gong Z (2016) Comprehensive and quantitative proteomic analyses of zebrafish plasma reveals conserved protein profiles between genders and between zebrafish and human. Sci Rep 6:24329. doi:10.1038/srep24329
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  114. ↵
    Li Y, Bai W, Hashikawa T (2020a) Response to Commentary on “The neuroinvasive potential of SARS‐CoV‐2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID‐19 patients.” J Med Virol 92:707–709. doi:10.1002/jmv.25824
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    Li Y, Bai W, Hashikawa T (2020b) The neuroinvasive potential of SARS‐CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID‐19 patients. J Med Virol 92:552–555. doi:10.1002/jmv.25728
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. ↵
    Lindsay SM (2004) Behavioral responses of newly hatched zebrafish (Danio rerio) to amino acid chemostimulants. Chem Senses 29:93–100. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  117. ↵
    Link V, Shevchenko A, Heisenberg C-P (2006) Proteomics of early zebrafish embryos. BMC Dev Biol 6:1. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-6-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. ↵
    Liu R, Hu X, Lü A, Song Y, Lian Z, Sun J, Sung YY (2020) Proteomic profiling of zebrafish challenged by spring viremia of carp virus provides insight into skin antiviral response. Zebrafish 17:91–103. doi:10.1089/zeb.2019.1843
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  119. ↵
    Long Q, Meng A, Wang M, Jessen JR, Farrell MJ, Lin S (1997) GATA-1 expression pattern can be recapitulated in living transgenic zebrafish using GFP reporter gene. Development 124:4105–4111. doi:10.1242/dev.124.20.4105
    OpenUrlAbstract
  120. ↵
    Mack-Bucher JA, Li J, Friedrich RW (2007) Early functional development of interneurons in the zebrafish olfactory bulb. Eur J Neurosci 25:460–470. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05290.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  121. ↵
    MacRae CA, Peterson RT (2003) Zebrafish-based small molecule discovery. Chem Biol 10:901–908. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.10.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. ↵
    MacRae CA, Peterson RT (2015) Zebrafish as tools for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14:721–731. doi:10.1038/nrd4627
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  123. ↵
    Maharajan K, Muthulakshmi S, Nataraj B, Ramesh M, Kadirvelu K (2018) Toxicity assessment of pyriproxyfen in vertebrate model zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio): a multi biomarker study. Aquat Toxicol 196:132–145. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.01.010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  124. ↵
    Manganelli F, Vargas M, Iovino A, Iacovazzo C, Santoro L, Servillo G (2020) Brainstem involvement and respiratory failure in COVID-19. Neurol Sci 41:1663–1665. doi:10.1007/s10072-020-04487-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  125. ↵
    Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, Chang J, Hong C, Zhou Y, Wang D, Miao X, Li Y, Hu B (2020) Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol 77:683. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. ↵
    Marin C, Vilas D, Langdon C, Alobid I, López-Chacón M, Haehner A, Hummel T, Mullol J (2018) Olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 18:42. doi:10.1007/s11882-018-0796-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  127. ↵
    Martín-Jiménez R, Campanella M, Russell C (2015) New zebrafish models of neurodegeneration. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 15:33. doi:10.1007/s11910-015-0555-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  128. ↵
    Martín I, Gómez A, Salas C, Puerto A, Rodríguez F (2011) Dorsomedial pallium lesions impair taste aversion learning in goldfish. Neurobiol Learn Mem 96:297–305. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2011.06.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  129. ↵
    Matschke J, Lütgehetmann M, Hagel C, Sperhake JP, Schröder AS, Edler C, Mushumba H, Fitzek A, Allweiss L, Dandri M, Dottermusch M, Heinemann A, Pfefferle S, Schwabenland M, Sumner Magruder D, Bonn S, Prinz M, Gerloff C, Püschel K, Krasemann S, et al. (2020) Neuropathology of patients with COVID-19 in Germany: a post-mortem case series. Lancet Neurol 19:919–929. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30308-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  130. ↵
    Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ (2020) COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 395:1033–1034. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  131. ↵
    Meinhardt J, Radke J, Dittmayer C, Franz J, Thomas C, Mothes R, Laue M, Schneider J, Brünink S, Greuel S, Lehmann M, Hassan O, Aschman T, Schumann E, Chua RL, Conrad C, Eils R, Stenzel W, Windgassen M, Rößler L, et al. (2021) Olfactory transmucosal SARS-CoV-2 invasion as a port of central nervous system entry in individuals with COVID-19. Nat Neurosci 24:168–175. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00758-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  132. ↵
    Menelaou E, Husbands EE, Pollet RG, Coutts CA, Ali DW, Svoboda KR (2008) Embryonic motor activity and implications for regulating motoneuron axonal pathfinding in zebrafish. Eur J Neurosci 28:1080–1096. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06418.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  133. ↵
    Misra HP, Fridovich I (1972) The role of superoxide anion in the autoxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. J Biol Chem 247:3170–3175. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(19)45228-9
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  134. ↵
    Miyasaka N, Arganda-Carreras I, Wakisaka N, Masuda M, Sümbül U, Seung HS, Yoshihara Y (2014) Olfactory projectome in the zebrafish forebrain revealed by genetic single-neuron labelling. Nat Commun 5:3639. doi:10.1038/ncomms4639
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. ↵
    Mocelin R, Marcon M, da Rosa Araujo AS, Herrmann AP, Piato A (2019) Withdrawal effects following repeated ethanol exposure are prevented by N-acetylcysteine in zebrafish. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 93:161–170. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.03.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  136. ↵
    Mueller T, Dong Z, Berberoglu MA, Guo S (2011) The dorsal pallium in zebrafish, Danio rerio (Cyprinidae, Teleostei). Brain Res 1381:95–105. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.089
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  137. ↵
    Müller TE, Ziani PR, Fontana BD, Duarte T, Stefanello FV, Canzian J, Santos ARS, Rosemberg DB (2020) Role of the serotonergic system in ethanol-induced aggression and anxiety: a pharmacological approach using the zebrafish model. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 32:66–76. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.12.120
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  138. ↵
    Mundell NA, Beier KT, Pan YA, Lapan SW, Göz Aytürk D, Berezovskii VK, Wark AR, Drokhlyansky E, Bielecki J, Born RT, Schier AF, Cepko CL (2015) Vesicular stomatitis virus enables gene transfer and transsynaptic tracing in a wide range of organisms. J Comp Neurol 523:1639–1663. doi:10.1002/cne.23761
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  139. ↵
    Mushtaq MY, Verpoorte R, Kim HK (2013) Zebrafish as a model for systems biology. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 29:187–205. doi:10.1080/02648725.2013.801238
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  140. ↵
    Netland J, Meyerholz DK, Moore S, Cassell M, Perlman S (2008) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection causes neuronal death in the absence of encephalitis in mice transgenic for human ACE2. J Virol 82:7264–7275. doi:10.1128/JVI.00737-08
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  141. ↵
    Njølstad PR, Molven A, Fjose A (1988) A zebrafish homologue of the murine Hox-2.1 gene. FEBS Lett 230:25–30. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(88)80634-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  142. ↵
    Novoa B, Figueras A (2012) Zebrafish: model for the study of inflammation and the innate immune response to infectious diseases. In: Current topics in innate immunity II. New York: Springer New York.
  143. ↵
    Ohler A, Becker-Pauly C (2011) Morpholino knockdown of the ubiquitously expressed transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS4a in zebrafish embryos exhibits severe defects in organogenesis and cell adhesion. Biol Chem 392:653–664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  144. ↵
    Ojanen MJT, Turpeinen H, Cordova ZM, Hammarén MM, Harjula S-KE, Parikka M, Rämet M, Pesu M (2015) The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin furinA regulates zebrafish host response against Mycobacterium marinum. Infect Immun 83:1431–1442. doi:10.1128/IAI.03135-14
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  145. ↵
    Orrù G, Conversano C, Malloggi E, Francesconi F, Ciacchini R, Gemignani A (2020) Neurological complications of COVID-19 and possible neuroinvasion pathways: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:6688. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186688
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  146. ↵
    Ou X, Liu Y, Lei X, Li P, Mi D, Ren L, Guo L, Guo R, Chen T, Hu J, Xiang Z, Mu Z, Chen X, Chen J, Hu K, Jin Q, Wang J, Qian Z (2020) Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat Commun 11:1620. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15562-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  147. ↵
    Palha N, Guivel-Benhassine F, Briolat V, Lutfalla G, Sourisseau M, Ellett F, Wang C-H, Lieschke GJ, Herbomel P, Schwartz O, Levraud J-P (2013) Real-time whole-body visualization of Chikungunya virus infection and host interferon response in zebrafish. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003619. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003619
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  148. ↵
    Palmiter RD, Brinster RL, Hammer RE, Trumbauer ME, Rosenfeld MG, Birnberg NC, Evans RM (1992) Dramatic growth of mice that develop from eggs microinjected with metallothionein-growth hormone fusion genes. 1982. Biotechnology 24:429–433.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  149. ↵
    Pan YA, Livet J, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW, Schier AF (2011) Multicolor brainbow imaging in zebrafish. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2011:pdb.prot5546. doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5546
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  150. ↵
    Pan YA, Freundlich T, Weissman TA, Schoppik D, Wang XC, Zimmerman S, Ciruna B, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW, Schier AF (2013) Zebrabow: multispectral cell labeling for cell tracing and lineage analysis in zebrafish. Development 140:2835–2846. doi:10.1242/dev.094631
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  151. ↵
    Paskin TR, Byrd-Jacobs CA (2012) Reversible deafferentation of the adult zebrafish olfactory bulb affects glomerular distribution and olfactory-mediated behavior. Behav Brain Res 235:293–301. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  152. ↵
    Passoni G, Langevin C, Palha N, Mounce BC, Briolat V, Affaticati P, De Job E, Joly JS, Vignuzzi M, Saleh MC, Herbomel P, Boudinot P, Levraud JP (2017) Imaging of viral neuroinvasion in the zebrafish reveals that sindbis and chikungunya viruses favour different entry routes. Dis Model Mech 10:847–857. doi:10.1242/dmm.029231
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  153. ↵
    Perlman S, Evans G, Afifi A (1990) Effect of olfactory bulb ablation on spread of a neurotropic coronavirus into the mouse brain. J Exp Med 172:1127–1132. doi:10.1084/jem.172.4.1127
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  154. ↵
    Politi LS, Salsano E, Grimaldi M (2020) Magnetic resonance imaging alteration of the brain in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and anosmia. JAMA Neurol 77:1028. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2125
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  155. ↵
    Postlethwait JH, Yan YL, Gates MA, Horne S, Amores A, Brownlie A, Donovan A, Egan ES, Force A, Gong Z, Goutel C, Fritz A, Kelsh R, Knapik E, Liao E, Paw B, Ransom D, Singer A, Thomson M, Abduljabbar TS, et al. (1998) Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map. Nat Genet 18:345–349. doi:10.1038/ng0498-345
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  156. ↵
    Progatzky F, Jha A, Wane M, Thwaites RS, Makris S, Shattock RJ, Johansson C, Openshaw PJ, Bugeon L, Hansel TT, Dallman MJ (2019) Induction of innate cytokine responses by respiratory mucosal challenge with R848 in zebrafish, mice, and humans. J Allergy Clin Immunol 144:342–345.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2019.04.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  157. ↵
    Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, Zhang S, Yang S, Tao Y, Xie C, Ma K, Shang K, Wang W, Tian D-S (2020) Dysregulation of immune response in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis 71:762–768. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa248
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  158. ↵
    Rafferty SA, Quinn TA (2018) A beginner’s guide to understanding and implementing the genetic modification of zebrafish. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 138:3–19. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.07.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  159. ↵
    Rao KD, Alex A, Verma Y, Thampi S, Gupta PK (2009) Real-time in vivo imaging of adult Zebrafish brain using optical coherence tomography. J Biophoton 2:288–291. doi:10.1002/jbio.200910032
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  160. ↵
    Richetti SK, Blank M, Capiotti KM, Piato AL, Bogo MR, Vianna MR, Bonan CD (2011) Quercetin and rutin prevent scopolamine-induced memory impairment in zebrafish. Behav Brain Res 217:10–15. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.09.027
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  161. ↵
    Rockx B, Kuiken T, Herfst S, Bestebroer T, Lamers MM, Oude Munnink BB, de Meulder D, van Amerongen G, van den Brand J, Okba NMA, Schipper D, van Run P, Leijten L, Sikkema R, Verschoor E, Verstrepen B, Bogers W, Langermans J, Drosten C, et al. (2020) Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model. Science 368:1012–1015. doi:10.1126/science.abb7314
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  162. ↵
    Rodríguez F, López JC, Vargas JP, Broglio C, Gómez Y, Salas C (2002) Spatial memory and hippocampal pallium through vertebrate evolution: insights from reptiles and teleost fish. Brain Res Bull 57:499–503. doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(01)00682-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  163. ↵
    Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN (2020) The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun 109:102433. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  164. ↵
    Saad M, Matheeussen A, Bijttebier S, Verbueken E, Pype C, Casteleyn C, Van Ginneken C, Apers S, Maes L, Cos P, Van Cruchten S (2017) In vitro CYP-mediated drug metabolism in the zebrafish (embryo) using human reference compounds. Toxicol Vitr 42:329–336. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2017.05.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  165. ↵
    Sahly I, Andermann P, Petit C (1999) The zebrafish eya1 gene and its expression pattern during embryogenesis. Dev Genes Evol 209:399–410. doi:10.1007/s004270050270
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  166. ↵
    Saraiva LR, Ahuja G, Ivandic I, Syed AS, Marioni JC, Korsching SI, Logan DW (2015) Molecular and neuronal homology between the olfactory systems of zebrafish and mouse. Sci Rep 5:11487. doi:10.1038/srep11487
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  167. ↵
    Sarasamma S, Audira G, Juniardi S, Sampurna B, Liang ST, Hao E, Lai YH, Hsiao CD (2018) Zinc chloride exposure inhibits brain acetylcholine levels, produces neurotoxic signatures, and diminishes memory and motor activities in adult zebrafish. Int J Mol Sci 19:3195. doi:10.3390/ijms19103195
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  168. ↵
    Sarasamma S, Audira G, Samikannu P, Juniardi S, Siregar P, Hao E, Chen JR, Hsiao CD (2019) Behavioral impairments and oxidative stress in the brain, muscle, and gill caused by chronic exposure of C70 nanoparticles on adult zebrafish. Int J Mol Sci 20:5795. doi:10.3390/ijms20225795
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  169. ↵
    Schmitt C, McManus M, Kumar N, Awoyemi O, Crago J (2019) Comparative analyses of the neurobehavioral, molecular, and enzymatic effects of organophosphates on embryo-larval zebrafish (Danio rerio). Neurotoxicol Teratol 73:67–75. doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2019.04.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  170. ↵
    Schnabel D, Castillo-Robles J, Lomeli H (2019) Protein purification and Western blot detection from single zebrafish embryo. Zebrafish 16:505–507. doi:10.1089/zeb.2019.1761
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  171. ↵
    Scholz S, Fischer S, Gündel U, Küster E, Luckenbach T, Voelker D (2008) The zebrafish embryo model in environmental risk assessment—applications beyond acute toxicity testing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15:394–404. doi:10.1007/s11356-008-0018-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  172. ↵
    Scott EK, Mason L, Arrenberg AB, Ziv L, Gosse NJ, Xiao T, Chi NC, Asakawa K, Kawakami K, Baier H (2007) Targeting neural circuitry in zebrafish using GAL4 enhancer trapping. Nat Methods 4:323–326. doi:10.1038/nmeth1033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  173. ↵
    Selderslaghs IWT, Hooyberghs J, Blust R, Witters HE (2013) Assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity of compounds by measuring locomotor activity in zebrafish embryos and larvae. Neurotoxicol Teratol 37:44–56. doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2013.01.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  174. ↵
    Shang J, Wan Y, Luo C, Ye G, Geng Q, Auerbach A, Li F (2020) Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:11727–11734. doi:10.1073/pnas.2003138117
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  175. ↵
    Sia SF, Yan LM, Chin AWH, Fung K, Choy KT, Wong AYL, Kaewpreedee P, Perera RAPM, Poon LLM, Nicholls JM, Peiris M, Yen HL (2020) Pathogenesis and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in golden hamsters. Nature 583:834–838. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2342-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  176. ↵
    Singh SK, Sethi S, Aravamudhan S, Krüger M, Grabher C (2013) Proteome mapping of adult zebrafish marrow neutrophils reveals partial cross species conservation to human peripheral neutrophils. PLoS One 8:e73998. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073998
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  177. ↵
    Solomon IH, Normandin E, Bhattacharyya S, Mukerji SS, Keller K, Ali AS, Adams G, Hornick JL, Padera RF, Sabeti P (2020) Neuropathological features of Covid-19. N Engl J Med 383:989–992. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2019373
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  178. ↵
    Song JW, Lam SM, Fan X, Cao WJ, Wang SY, Tian H, Chua GH, Zhang C, Meng FP, Xu Z, Fu JL, Huang L, Xia P, Yang T, Zhang S, Li B, Jiang TJ, Wang R, Wang Z, Shi M, et al. (2020) Omics-driven systems interrogation of metabolic dysregulation in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Cell Metab 32:188–202.e5. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.016
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  179. ↵
    Spence R, Gerlach G, Lawrence C, Smith C (2007) The behaviour and ecology of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Biol Rev 83:13–34. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00030.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  180. ↵
    Stewart AM, Braubach O, Spitsbergen J, Gerlai R, Kalueff AV (2014) Zebrafish models for translational neuroscience research: from tank to bedside. Trends Neurosci 37:264–278. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2014.02.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  181. ↵
    Stoyanov GS, Petkova L, Dzhenkov DL, Sapundzhiev NR, Todorov I (2020) Gross and histopathology of COVID-19 with first histology report of olfactory bulb changes. Cureus 12:e11912.
    OpenUrl
  182. ↵
    Stuart GW, McMurray JV, Westerfield M (1988) Replication, integration and stable germ-line transmission of foreign sequences injected into early zebrafish embryos. Development 103:403–412. doi:10.1242/dev.103.2.403
    OpenUrlAbstract
  183. ↵
    Sukardi H, Ung CY, Gong Z, Lam SH (2010) Incorporating zebrafish omics into chemical biology and toxicology. Zebrafish 7:41–52. doi:10.1089/zeb.2009.0636
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  184. ↵
    Susaki EA, Tainaka K, Perrin D, Kishino F, Tawara T, Watanabe TM, Yokoyama C, Onoe H, Eguchi M, Yamaguchi S, Abe T, Kiyonari H, Shimizu Y, Miyawaki A, Yokota H, Ueda HR (2014) Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using chemical cocktails and computational analysis. Cell 157:726–739. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.042
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  185. ↵
    Takaki K, Davis JM, Winglee K, Ramakrishnan L (2013) Evaluation of the pathogenesis and treatment of Mycobacterium marinum infection in zebrafish. Nat Protoc 8:1114–1124. doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.068
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  186. ↵
    Tang F, Liang J, Zhang H, Kelifa MM, He Q, Wang P (2021) COVID-19 related depression and anxiety among quarantined respondents. Psychol Health 36:164–178.
    OpenUrl
  187. ↵
    Tarakad A, Jankovic J (2017) Anosmia and ageusia in Parkinson’s disease. Int Rev Neurobiol 133:541–556.
    OpenUrl
  188. ↵
    Thompson J, Iwasaki A (2008) Toll-like receptors regulation of viral infection and disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:786–794. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.11.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  189. ↵
    Tierney KB (2011) Behavioural assessments of neurotoxic effects and neurodegeneration in zebrafish. Biochim Biophys Acta 1812:381–389. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.10.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  190. ↵
    Umans RA, Henson HE, Mu F, Parupalli C, Ju B, Peters JL, Lanham KA, Plavicki JS, Taylor MR (2017) CNS angiogenesis and barriergenesis occur simultaneously. Dev Biol 425:101–108. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.03.017
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  191. ↵
    Ünal İ, Üstündağ ÜV, Ateş PS, Eğilmezer G, Alturfan AA, Yiğitbaşı T, Emekli-Alturfan E (2019) Rotenone impairs oxidant/antioxidant balance both in brain and intestines in zebrafish. Int J Neurosci 129:363–368. doi:10.1080/00207454.2018.1538141
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  192. ↵
    Unterman A, Sumida TS, Nouri N, Yan X, Zhao AY, Gasque V, Schupp JC, Asashima H, Liu Y, Cosme C Jr., Deng W, Chen M, Brickman Raredon MS, Hoehn K, Wang G, Wang Z, DeIuliis G, Ravindra NG, Li N, Castaldi N, et al. (2020) Single-cell omics reveals dyssynchrony of the innate and adaptive immune system in progressive COVID-19. medRxiv 2020.07.16.20153437.
  193. ↵
    Varshney GK, Zhang S, Pei W, Adomako-Ankomah A, Fohtung J, Schaffer K, Carrington B, Maskeri A, Slevin C, Wolfsberg T, Ledin J, Sood R, Burgess SM (2016) CRISPRz: a database of zebrafish validated sgRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D822–D826. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  194. ↵
    Vitebsky A, Reyes R, Sanderson MJ, Michel WC, Whitlock KE (2005) Isolation and characterization of thelaure olfactory behavioral mutant in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Dev Dyn 234:229–242. doi:10.1002/dvdy.20530
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  195. ↵
    Vogel AM, Gerster T (1997) Expression of a zebrafish Cathepsin L gene in anterior mesendoderm and hatching gland. Dev Genes Evol 206:477–479. doi:10.1007/s004270050078
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  196. ↵
    Volz SN, Hausen J, Smith K, Ottermanns R, Schaeffer A, Schiwy S, Hollert H (2020) Do you smell the danger? Effects of three commonly used pesticides on the olfactory-mediated antipredator response of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere 241:124963. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124963
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  197. ↵
    Trotha JW, Vernier P, Bally‐Cuif L (2014) Emotions and motivated behavior converge on an amygdala-like structure in the zebrafish. Eur J Neurosci 40:3302–3315. doi:10.1111/ejn.12692
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  198. ↵
    Wagner DE, Klein AM (2020) Lineage tracing meets single-cell omics: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 21:410–427. doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0223-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  199. ↵
    Wakisaka N, Miyasaka N, Koide T, Masuda M, Hiraki-Kajiyama T, Yoshihara Y (2017) An adenosine receptor for olfaction in fish. Curr Biol 27:1437–1447.e4. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  200. ↵
    Walker MB, Miller CT, Coffin Talbot J, Stock DW, Kimmel CB (2006) Zebrafish furin mutants reveal intricacies in regulating Endothelin1 signaling in craniofacial patterning. Dev Biol 295:194–205. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.03.028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  201. ↵
    Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D (2020) Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181:281–292.e6. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  202. ↵
    Walpitagama M, Carve M, Douek AM, Trestrail C, Bai Y, Kaslin J, Wlodkowic D (2019) Additives migrating from 3D-printed plastic induce developmental toxicity and neuro-behavioural alterations in early life zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquat Toxicol 213:105227. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.105227
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  203. ↵
    White EJ, Kounelis SK, Byrd-Jacobs CA (2015) Plasticity of glomeruli and olfactory-mediated behavior in zebrafish following detergent lesioning of the olfactory epithelium. Neuroscience 284:622–631. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.10.036
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  204. ↵
    Williams FE, White D, Messer WS (2002) A simple spatial alternation task for assessing memory function in zebrafish. Behav Processes 58:125–132. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00025-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  205. ↵
    World Health Organization (2020) WHO timeline - COVID-19. World Heal Organ. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. (Accessed April 4, 2021).
  206. ↵
    Wu M, Zhang S, Chen X, Xu H, Li X (2019) Expression and function of lncRNA MALAT-1 in the embryonic development of zebrafish. Gene 680:65–71. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2018.09.037
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  207. ↵
    Wu Z, McGoogan JM (2020) Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA 323:1239. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  208. ↵
    Wullimann MF, Puelles L (1999) Postembryonic neural proliferation in the zebrafish forebrain and its relationship to prosomeric domains. Anat Embryol (Berl) 199:329–348. doi:10.1007/s004290050232
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  209. ↵
    Wullimann MF, Rupp B, Reichert H (1996) Neuroanatomy of the zebrafish brain. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel.
  210. ↵
    Xu H, Echemendia N, Chen S, Lin F (2011) Identification and expression patterns of members of the protease-activated receptor (par) gene family during zebrafish development. Dev Dyn 240:278–287. doi:10.1002/dvdy.22517
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  211. ↵
    Xu XW, Wu XX, Jiang XG, Xu KJ, Ying LJ, Ma CL, Li SB, Wang HY, Zhang S, Gao HN, Sheng JF, Cai HL, Qiu YQ, Li LJ (2020) Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: retrospective case series. BMJ 368:m606.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  212. ↵
    Zhang H (2020) Early lessons from the frontline of the 2019-nCoV outbreak. Lancet 395:687. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30356-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  213. ↵
    Zheng W, Wang Z, Collins JE, Andrews RM, Stemple D, Gong Z (2011) Comparative transcriptome analyses indicate molecular homology of zebrafish swimbladder and mammalian lung. PLoS One 6:e24019. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Eran Perlson, Tel Aviv University

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Jennifer Freeman.

This review discusses the use of zebrafish to study effects and mechanisms of COVID-associated anosmia and neurodegeneration. It is well written and potentially interesting. There are some aspects that should be better addressed:

- Differences between respiratory modes in human and fishes sould be considered in terms of adaptive mechanisms and how do they impact traslation in the context of COVID. Suggestions: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024019

- Some of the most important supporting references are from repositories (biorxiv) and not peer-reviewed yet. While this makes sense given recency, it would be good to provide some additional support from published papers. For example, zebrafish has been used for studying pulmonary diseases and neurodegeneration (see for instance https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.08.004) and also models of tubercolisis used for drug-screeing (https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.068). Also it will benefit the readers to add more details on studies that have specifically used the zebrafish to investigate viral outcomes

- One major pathway for neurodegenerative complications associated to COVID is transynaptic spreading from the olfactory epithelium down to brain regions (or more specifically to respiratory centers). Here it may be useful to discuss how the zebrafish can help to understand this process. Certainly, knowledge about the connectome at single cell resolution is worh mentionning (see https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4639)

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 3
May/June 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Zebrafish as a Translational Model: An Experimental Alternative to Study the Mechanisms Involved in Anosmia and Possible Neurodegenerative Aspects of COVID-19?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Zebrafish as a Translational Model: An Experimental Alternative to Study the Mechanisms Involved in Anosmia and Possible Neurodegenerative Aspects of COVID-19?
Karla C. M. Costa, Tamires A. V. Brigante, Gabriel G. Fernandes, Davi S. Scomparin, Franciele F. Scarante, Danielle P. de Oliveira, Alline C. Campos
eNeuro 5 May 2021, 8 (3) ENEURO.0027-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0027-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Zebrafish as a Translational Model: An Experimental Alternative to Study the Mechanisms Involved in Anosmia and Possible Neurodegenerative Aspects of COVID-19?
Karla C. M. Costa, Tamires A. V. Brigante, Gabriel G. Fernandes, Davi S. Scomparin, Franciele F. Scarante, Danielle P. de Oliveira, Alline C. Campos
eNeuro 5 May 2021, 8 (3) ENEURO.0027-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0027-21.2021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • COVID-19 and Society: The Urgent Need of a Rapid and Fast Animal Model
    • The Zebrafish CNS, Olfactory Pathway, and Its Possible Relevance in the Context of COVID-19
    • Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Neurologic Alterations through Zebrafish’s Behavior
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • anosmia
  • encephalitis
  • olfactory system
  • pandemic
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • zebrafish

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Review

  • My 50 Year Odyssey to Develop Behavioral Methods to Let Me See Quickly How Well Kittens See
  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing the Accuracy of Blood Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Ischemic Stroke in Adult and Elderly Populations
  • Neuroscientist’s Behavioral Toolbox for Studying Episodic-Like Memory
Show more Review

Novel Tools and Methods

  • My 50 Year Odyssey to Develop Behavioral Methods to Let Me See Quickly How Well Kittens See
  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing the Accuracy of Blood Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Ischemic Stroke in Adult and Elderly Populations
  • Neuroscientist’s Behavioral Toolbox for Studying Episodic-Like Memory
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods
  • Reviews
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.