Article Information
- Received January 12, 2021
- Revision received March 26, 2021
- Accepted March 30, 2021
- Published online May 7, 2021.
Author Information
- Rodrigo Sosa,
- Jesús Mata-Luévanos and
- Mario Buenrostro-Jáuregui
- 1Universidad Panamericana, Escuela de Pedagogía, 49 Álvaro del Portillo, Ciudad Granja, Zapopan, 45010, Mexico
- 2Universidad Iberoamericana, Laboratorio de Neurociencias, 880 Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma, Lomas de Santa Fé, Mexico City, 01219, Mexico
- Correspondence should be addressed to Rodrigo Sosa at rsosas{at}up.edu.mx or Mario Buenrostro-Jáuregui at mario.buenrostro{at}ibero.mx.
Author contributions
Author contributions: R.S., conceived the idea and outlined the paper; R.S., J.M.-L., and M.B.-J. wrote the paper to equal extent; R.S. and M.B.-J. worked out the figures; J.M.-L. formatted the manuscript.
Disclosures
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This work was supported by the Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI) grant for RS and MB-J, and by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) postdoctoral fellowship grant for J.M.-L.
↵1 Note that the minimal response to the target stimulus observed after extinction procedures is quite labile and responding is often susceptible to bounce back after a slight contextual change (Bouton et al., 2021), this is not accounted by the Rescorla–Wagner model.
↵2 This paradigm is more broadly known as Pavlovian conditioned inhibition; however, “conditioned inhibition” is also used to designate the process that the target stimulus undergoes (here termed “inhibitory learning”), as well as the empiric demonstration that such a process has taken place (Savastano et al. 1999); therefore, here we use the term “feature-negative discrimination” for the procedure and “inhibitory learning” for the process to avoid ambiguity.
Funding
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT)
Other Version
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
- previous version (May 07, 2021).
Article usage
In this issue
Jump to section
- Article
- Abstract
- Significance Statement
- Introduction
- Modeling the Dynamics of Acquisition and Extinction of Responding in Reward Learning
- Inducing, Testing, and Modeling Net Inhibitory Effects
- Dopamine Dips Propagate from Reward Omission to Events That Predict It
- Concurrent Reward Cues Contribute to Dopamine Dips and Their Propagation
- The LHb Promotes Stimulus-Specific and Response-Specific Inhibitory Effects
- The LHb Participates in Inhibitory Learning Even without Temporally Specific Reward Omission
- The Habenulo-Meso-Cortical Excitatory Pathway May Play a Role in Negative Reward Prediction Error
- Relevance of the LHb for Mental Health
- Directions for Moving the Field Forward
- Summary and Concluding Remarks
- Acknowledgments
- Footnotes
- References
- Synthesis
- Figures & Data
- Info & Metrics
- eLetters