Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Review, Sensory and Motor Systems

Review of Literatures: Physiology of Orofacial Pain in Dentistry

Nattapon Rotpenpian and Pankeaw Yakkaphan
eNeuro 5 April 2021, 8 (2) ENEURO.0535-20.2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0535-20.2021
Nattapon Rotpenpian
1Department of Oral Biology and Occlusion, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand 90110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nattapon Rotpenpian
Pankeaw Yakkaphan
2Department of Oral Diagnostic Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand 90110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The objective of this review of the literature is to summarize the physiology of orofacial pain in dentistry, particularly physiology of the pain pathway and molecular mechanisms on pathophysiology of pain, on account of new insights into classification of orofacial pain related diseases. This article will also focus on possible mechanisms of neuropathic orofacial pain which is distinguished from other types of pain.

  • dentistry
  • neurophysiology
  • orofacial pain
  • pain
  • sensation
  • sensory function

Introduction

Pain is a sensory modality that is an unpleasant and emotional experience (Pak et al., 2018). Painful sensation is subjective and biologically useful, necessary for survival, being a warning sign and response of damaged tissue in the body (John, 1990; Rivera-Morales, 1986). Pain in the facial area is the most common reason which brings patients to see a dentist (Piovesan et al., 2003). Orofacial pain is pain associated with the hard and soft tissues of the head, face, and oral cavity (Sessle, 1987). There are diverse and several mechanisms related to this pathology (Sessle, 1987). Therefore, orofacial pain physiology should be elucidated and applied to clinical practice in the future. This review will define the physiology of orofacial pain and classification of orofacial pain in dentistry. In this review, the strategy for the search in terms of pain, pathophysiology of pain, orofacial pain, dental pain, nociceptive pain, neuropathic pain, pain pathway, and the publication year is 1980–2021.

Physiology of the Orofacial Pain Pathway

The orofacial region is composed of the oral cavity (teeth, gingiva, and oral mucosa), face, jaw bone, and temporomandibular joint (Messlinger and Handwerker, 2015). Physiology of orofacial pain pathways includes primary afferent neurons, pathologic changes in trigeminal ganglion, brainstem nociceptive neurons, and higher brain function regulating orofacial nociception.

Primary Afferent Neurons and Pathologic Changes in Trigeminal Ganglion

The trigeminal nerve or cranial nerve V (CN V) is a sensory nerve which innervates this region. The trigeminal pain pathway from the orofacial area is represented in Figure 1. At the peripheral nociceptors in the orofacial region, after receiving repetitive noxious stimuli or an excessive uncontrollable inflammation, the first order neurons in the trigeminal nerve will develop increased pain signals that are projected to the trigeminal ganglia (Huff and Daly, 2020). The trigeminal ganglia is similar to the dorsal root ganglia (Armstrong and Herr, 2020).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Overview of orofacial pain physiology.

Brainstem Nociceptive Neurons

After that, the pain signals are sent to the second order neurons in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis located in the brainstem. The trigeminal nucleus caudalis is similar to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and contains second order neurons.

For the trigeminal nucleus, there are three groups of nuclei located inside the brainstem (Joseph, 1982; Rivera-Morales, 1986; John, 1990; Wilkinson, 2014). The first spinal nucleus of the CN V is the pars oralis and the second is the par interpolaris. Both of them convey a tactile sensation in the orofacial area. The third spinal nucleus of the CN V is the pars caudalis or trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Christoforou, 2018; Klasser et al., 2018) which carries the pain perception of this involved area. Then the signals will be further projected to the third order neurons in the thalamus via the ventral trigeminothalamic tract (Joseph, 1982; Rivera-Morales, 1986; John, 1990; Roberts, 1991; van der Bilt et al., 2006; Wilkinson, 2014; Badel et al., 2019).

Higher Brain Function Regulating Orofacial Nociception

In the everse mechanism, there is a descending pathway or pain modulation process from the somatosensory cortex to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sessle, 1987). Naturally, the brainstem perceives ascending sensory input and sends the signal to the thalamus and cortex respectively (Woolf and American Physiological Society, 2004). However, the neurons of the brainstem can also modulate the pain pathway by sending somatosensory signals through the periaqueductal gray, locus coeruleus and rostral ventromedial medulla. Periaqueductal gray is the central midbrain neurons and modulates pain pathways indirectly via other brainstem nucleus, including the locus coeruleus and rostral ventromedial medulla. The locus coeruleus is composed of noradrenergic neurons which are projected to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. The rostral ventromedial medulla is a large region of medulla which is placed by serotoninergic neurons (Arendt-Nielsen et al., 2018). The descending pathway sends signals to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Either serotonin and norepinephrine are released or enkephalin or opioid peptides are produced: this process leads to pain reduction (Fields, 1987; Espinosa-Sanchez et al., 2020). A clinical study reported that patients experiencing temporomandibular joint pain might have a decrease in neurons on both sides of the brainstem, especially at the rostral ventromedial, which is responsible for descending pain pathways or pain modulation. Therefore, the reduction of neurons in the descending pain modulation might increase pain sensation in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders (Wilcox et al., 2015).

Therefore, numerous studies supported that the pathophysiology of orofacial pain is related to the trigeminal nerve and trigeminal pathway leading to alter pain perception in the relevant area of the somatosensory cortex and associated somatosensory cortex.

Classification of Orofacial Pain and Possible Mechanisms

The classification of orofacial pain concerned by durations can be divided into acute pain and chronic pain. By causes, it can be categorized into nociceptive, inflammatory and neuropathic pain (Lee et al., 2005; Fig. 2)

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Classification of orofacial pain.

Acute orofacial pain is the sudden onset of pain related to physical sensations and possibly of limited duration as well as being temporary because of tissue injury causes. Chronic orofacial pain is long lasting pain beyond three months, which is the normal healing period of time (Bell, 1989; Buxbaum, 1994; Christopher, 1998; Monheim, 2019). The difference of acute and chronic orofacial pain is shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Difference in acute orofacial pain and chronic pain orofacial pain

Another classification of orofacial pain is classified by three causative groups; nociceptive, inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Nociceptive pain is pain that occurs when noxious stimuli such as heat, cold, intense mechanical force, and chemical irritants directly stimulate nociceptive sensory neurons. Then the nociceptors send signals to the central nervous system leading to pain response such as withdrawal reflex. Therefore, nociceptive pain mechanisms obviously act as a vital physiological sensation (Ananthan and Benoliel, 2020). Inflammatory pain is a pain caused by damaged tissues. Once tissues are injured, the release of inflammatory mediators subsequently occurs and activates pain perception (Shinoda et al., 2019). Neuropathic pain is a pain caused by defects in the peripheral or central nervous system (Fehér et al., 2019; Jaaskelainen, 2019). Thus, the differences between nociceptive, inflammatory and neuropathic pain are shown in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Difference between nociceptive, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain

Orofacial neuropathic pain originates from disorders of the somatosensory system. Results of injury to the nerves involved the pain pathway and maybe considered as chronic pain conditions (Jaaskelainen, 2004). The mechanisms of neuropathic pain are distinct from other types of orofacial pain (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

The possible mechanisms of neuropathic pain.

The possible mechanisms of orofacial neuropathic pain are distinguishable from nociceptive and inflammatory pain. After trigeminal nerves are damaged, the neuroma or injured axon around the damaged site proliferate heterotopic sodium channels such as voltage gated channel types 1.3, 1.7, and 1.8 (Allard et al., 2006; Hargus and Patel, 2007). The proliferation of sodium channels may cause lower stimulation thresholds and provoke ectopic discharges (Li et al., 2015). The spread of sodium channels triggers central sensitization at the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and leads to an enhanced barrage of nociceptive signals, which results in spontaneous pain and pain hypersensitivity (Piovesan et al., 2003; Bernal and Roza, 2018).

The alteration of the calcium channel in the primary afferent nociceptors leads to enhanced transmitters which are released into the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Li et al., 2019). In addition, AMPA receptors activate trigeminal nucleus caudalis neurons that are related to common responses to painful stimuli, but NMDA receptors are physiologically blocked by a magnesium ion. This blockage is likely removed by accumulation or repetitive depolarization from ectopic discharges. Alteration of the calcium channel results in an amplification and prolongation of the noxious input in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis inside the brainstem (Yam et al., 2018; Armstrong and Herr, 2019).

Furthermore, after nerve injury, the peripheral nerve lesion causes axon and myelin sheath degradation which is later followed by infiltration of macrophages and other types of immune cells such as neutrophils and T cells at the injured site (Spencer and Gremillion, 2007; Lebrilla and Mahal, 2009; Todd, 2010). Moreover, nerve damage subsequently generates functional modulation and modification of the central nervous system (Boadas-Vaello et al., 2017).

Functional modulation after nerve injury leads to increased posttranslational processing such as c-fos in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Moreover, the coupling between sympathetic postganglionic neurons and afferent neurons under pathophysiological conditions can occur to maintain pain. Modification after nerve injury is altered in connectivity and cell death by some adjacent uninjured nerve fibers which become excited because of non-synaptic or cross talk of electrical transfers called ephaptic transmission. Finally, this modulation and modification function causes an increase in central sensitization in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and subsequently the recruitment of secondary messenger pathways after central sensitization results in a rise of neuron excitability or nociceptors or pain signals to the thalamus and somatosensory cortex (Yam et al., 2018; Dolphin et al., 2020).

Non-injury state in the area of the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and dorsal horn of the spinal cord, Aβ fibers penetrate to the dorsal horn, travel ventrally and terminate in Lamina II and deeper into the spinal cord. However, after the peripheral nerve is damaged or injured (Nelson, 2019), there is c-fiber terminal atrophy and A fiber terminal sprouting into the superficial dorsal horn, which conducts easier stimulation of pain signals in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, and is the reason why non-painful stimulators can produce pain responsiveness in allodynia (Song et al., 2013).

In addition, after nerve injury, a loss of inhibition occurs because of dysfunction of GABA production and apoptosis of inhibitory interneurons resulting in reduction of inhibition pain signals (Tashiro et al., 2014). Lack of or a decrease in inhibition pain signals cause an increased excitability of neurons (Yin et al., 2018). Moreover, after prolonged nerve injury, there follows a decrease in pain modulation of descending pain pathways which result in more nociceptive signals in the pain pathway (Sessle, 2011).

Therefore, the possible pain mechanisms related to glia cell response after nerve injury are caused by microglial activation. Microglia can then release pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin 6, interleukin 1β, and tumor necrosis factor α, and activate astrocytes (Han et al., 2012; Won et al., 2012; Lemos et al., 2018). Activated astrocytes or reactive astrocytes directly trigger NMDA receptors (Zhou et al., 2019) leading to excess glutamate release to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and increase pain signaling projected to the brain and development of neuropathic pain (Jancalek, 2011; Mamoru et al., 2011; Eftekhari et al., 2015).

Chronic neuropathic orofacial pain manifests many distinct functions and possible mechanism apart from inflammatory pain (Tandon et al., 2003) Nevertheless, the differential diagnosis should be performed and defined these types of pain because of different pain management (Allegri et al., 2012).

Consequence, if orofacial pain (acute/chronic stages), which is not neuropathic pain, does not produce an ectopic discharge, structural reorganization and glia cell response. This process of inflammatory pain is sustained by chemical inflammation at the primary trigeminal afferents neuron such as substance P, bradykinin, and calcitonin related peptide proteins leading to peripheral sensitization of peripheral nociceptors at the lesion (Tandon et al., 2003; Allegri et al., 2012). However, repetitive stimulation of c-fibers via the inflammation or nerve injury stimulates a gradual increase of neuron excitability or winds them up, causing central sensitization. Evidence showed that blockading NMDA receptors could attenuate chronic inflammatory or neuropathic pain in animal models (Wong et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2019; Neyama et al., 2020). Subsequently, its mechanism can drive central hyper excitability by chemical mediators and other peptides that remove the magnesium-ion block of NMDA receptors at the trigeminal nucleus caudalis, which could possibly increase pain perception (Koichi et al., 2011).

Currently, there is another name of pain classification which called “nociplastic pain.” Nociplastic pain is meant an un-classification of pain or not properly covered by nociceptive pain or neuropathic pain. Therefore, nociplastic pain is caused by an altered nociceptive function but not inflammatory responses. An example of nocociplastic pain is persistent idiopathic dentoalveolar pain, previously known as atypical odontalgia. Persistent idiopathic dentoalveolar pain is a chronic pain condition that shows as a persistent tooth, alveolar bone, gingiva although undetectable pathology during clinical or radiologic examination (Aydede and Shriver, 2018). However, the pathophysiology of nociplastic pain is still unclear, further study about nociplastic pain should be investigated.

Conclusion

Orofacial pain has become more problematic among the general population. The anatomic complexity of the orofcial region contributes to challenging diagnosis and treatment for many clinicians. A better understanding of underlying physiological mechanisms on orofacial pain may support to improve a clinician’s clarification and perception in the aspect of non-odontogenic or dental pain origin.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Allard B, Magloire H, Couble ML, Maurin JC, Bleicher F (2006) Voltage-gated sodium channels confer excitability to human odontoblasts: possible role in tooth pain transmission. J Biol Chem 281:29002–29010. doi:10.1074/jbc.M601020200 pmid:16831873
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Allegri M, Clark MR, De Andrés J, Jensen TS (2012) Acute and chronic pain: where we are and where we have to go. Minerva Anestesiol 78:222–235. pmid:22095106
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Ananthan S, Benoliel R (2020) Chronic orofacial pain. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 127:575–588. doi:10.1007/s00702-020-02157-3 pmid:32130516
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Arendt-Nielsen L, Morlion B, Perrot S, Dahan A, Dickenson A, Kress HG, Wells C, Bouhassira D, Mohr Drewes A (2018) Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions. Eur J Pain 22:216–241. doi:10.1002/ejp.1140 pmid:29105941
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Armstrong SA, Herr MJ (2019) Physiology, nociception. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing LLC.
  6. ↵
    Armstrong SA, Herr MJ (2020) Physiology, nociception. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing LLC.
  7. ↵
    Aydede M, Shriver A (2018) Recently introduced definition of “nociplastic pain” by the International Association for the Study of Pain needs better formulation. Pain 159:1176–1177. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001184 pmid:29768305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Badel T, Zadravec D, Bašić Kes V, Smoljan M, Kocijan Lovko S, Zavoreo I, Krapac L, Anić Milošević S (2019) Orofacial pain - diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Acta Clin Croat 58:82–89.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Bell WE (1989) Orofacial pains; classification, diagnosis, management, Ed, 4. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc.
  10. ↵
    Bernal L, Roza C (2018) Hyperpolarization-activated channels shape temporal patterns of ectopic spontaneous discharge in C-nociceptors after peripheral nerve injury. Eur J Pain 22:1377–1387. doi:10.1002/ejp.1226
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    Boadas-Vaello P, Homs J, Reina F, Carrera A, Verdú E (2017) Neuroplasticity of supraspinal structures associated with pathological pain. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 300:1481–1501. doi:10.1002/ar.23587 pmid:28263454
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Buxbaum JD (1994) Dental management of orofacial pain. In: Hand book of pain management (Tollison CDSJ, Tollison JW, eds), 2nd Ed 2, pp 306–327. Baltimore: Williams and Wikins.
  13. ↵
    Christoforou J (2018) Neuropathic orofacial pain. Dent Clin North Am 62:565–584. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.05.005 pmid:30189983
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Christopher LB (1998) Applied oral physiology, Ed 2. London: Wright.
  15. ↵
    Dolphin AC, Insel PA, Blaschke TF, Meyer UA (2020) Introduction to the theme “ion channels and neuropharmacology: from the past to the future”. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 60:1–6. doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-082719-110050 pmid:31914892
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Eftekhari S, Salvatore CA, Johansson S, Chen TB, Zeng Z, Edvinsson L (2015) Localization of CGRP, CGRP receptor, PACAP and glutamate in trigeminal ganglion. Relation to the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res 1600:93–109. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.031 pmid:25463029
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Espinosa-Sanchez JM, Espinosa-Campos L, Batuecas-Caletrío Á (2020) From neuroanatomy to neurophysiology. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 303:1221–1231. doi:10.1002/ar.24190 pmid:31172670
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Fehér G, Nemeskéri Z, Pusch G, Zádori I, Bank G, Gurdán Z, Mészáros J, Mák K, Tibold A, Komoly S (2019) Chronic orofacial pain. Orv Hetil 160:1047–1056. doi:10.1556/650.2019.31432 pmid:31264469
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Han SR, Yang GY, Ahn MH, Kim MJ, Ju JS, Bae YC, Ahn DK (2012) Blockade of microglial activation reduces mechanical allodynia in rats with compression of the trigeminal ganglion. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 36:52–59. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.10.007 pmid:22019843
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Hargus NJ, Patel MK (2007) Voltage-gated Na+ channels in neuropathic pain. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 16:635–646. doi:10.1517/13543784.16.5.635 pmid:17461737
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Fields HL (1987) Pain. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  22. ↵
    Huff T, Daly DT (2020) Neuroanatomy, cranial nerve 5 (trigeminal). Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing LLC.
  23. ↵
    Jaaskelainen SK (2004) Clinical neurophysiology and quantitative sensory testing in the investigation of orofacial pain and sensory function. J Oro Pain 18:85–107.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Jaaskelainen SK (2019) Differential diagnosis of chronic neuropathic orofacial pain: role of clinical neurophysiology. J Clin Neurophysiol 36:422–429.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    Jancalek R (2011) Signaling mechanisms in mirror image pain pathogenesis. Ann Neurosci 18:123–127. doi:10.5214/ans.0972.7531.111810 pmid:25205938
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    John J (1990) The management of pain, Ed 2. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
  27. ↵
    Joseph G (1982) Correlative neuroanatomy and functional neurology, Ed 18. California: Lange Medical Publications.
  28. ↵
    Klasser GD, Almoznino G, Fortuna G (2018) Sleep and orofacial pain. Dent Clin North Am 62:629–656. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.06.005 pmid:30189987
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Koichi I, Yoshiki I, Kuniya H, Masamichi S (2011) Physiological mechanisms of neuropathic pain: the orofacial region. Int Rev Neurobiol 97:227–250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Lebrilla CB, Mahal LK (2009) Post-translation modifications. Curr Opin Chem Biol 13:373–374. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.08.002 pmid:19733502
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Lee Y, Lee CH, Oh U (2005) Painful channels in sensory neurons. Mol Cells 20:315–324. pmid:16404144
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Lemos GA, da Silva PLP, Batista AUD, Palomari ET (2018) Experimental model of temporomandibular joint arthritis: evaluation of contralateral joint and masticatory muscles. Arch Oral Biol 95:79–88. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.07.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Li G, Liu X, Du J, Chen J, She F, Wu C, Li C (2015) Positive shift of Nav1.8 current inactivation curve in injured neurons causes neuropathic pain following chronic constriction injury. Mol Med Rep 12:3583–3590. doi:10.3892/mmr.2015.3839 pmid:26005195
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Li XH, Miao HH, Zhuo M (2019) NMDA receptor dependent long-term potentiation in chronic pain. Neurochem Res 44:531–538. doi:10.1007/s11064-018-2614-8 pmid:30109556
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Lin W, Zhao Y, Cheng B, Zhao H, Miao L, Li Q, Chen Y, Zhang M (2019) NMDAR and JNK activation in the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis contributes to masseter hyperalgesia induced by stress. Front Cell Neurosci 13:495. doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00495 pmid:31798413
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Mamoru T, Shigeji M, Barry JS, Masamichi S, Koichi I (2011) Peripheral and central mechanisms of trigeminal neuropathic and inflammatory pain. J Oral Biosci 53:318–329.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Messlinger K, Handwerker HO (2015) Physiology of pain. Schmerz 29:522–530. doi:10.1007/s00482-015-0052-y pmid:26351125
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Monheim LM (2019) Analgesia in dentistry now and in the future. Anesth Prog 66:227–231. doi:10.2344/0003-3006-66.4.227 pmid:31891290
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Nelson TS (2019) Dorsal horn PKCγ interneurons mediate mechanical allodynia through 5-HT2AR-dependent structural reorganization. J Neurosci 39:6221–6223. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0291-19.2019 pmid:31391259
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Neyama H, Dozono N, Ueda H (2020) NR2A-NMDA receptor blockade reverses the lack of morphine analgesia without affecting chronic pain status in a fibromyalgia-like mouse model. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 373:103–112. doi:10.1124/jpet.119.262642 pmid:31941720
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Pak DJ, Yong RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD (2018) Chronification of pain: mechanisms, current understanding, and clinical implications. Curr Pain Headache Rep 22:9. doi:10.1007/s11916-018-0666-8 pmid:29404791
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Piovesan EJ, Kowacs PA, Oshinsky ML (2003) Convergence of cervical and trigeminal sensory afferents. Curr Pain Headache Rep 7:377–383. doi:10.1007/s11916-003-0037-x pmid:12946291
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Rivera-Morales WC (1986) Orofacial pains; classification, diagnosis, management, Ed 4. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc.
  44. ↵
    Roberts GJ (1991) A colour atlas of dental analgesia and sedation. London: Wolfe Publishing Ltd.
  45. ↵
    Sessle BJ (1987) Neurophysiology of orofacial pain. Dent Clin North Am 4:595–613.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    Sessle BJ (2011) Peripheral and central mechanisms of orofacial inflammatory pain. Int Rev Neurobiol 97:179–206. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385198-7.00007-2 pmid:21708311
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Shinoda M, Kubo A, Hayashi Y, Iwata K (2019) Peripheral and central mechanisms of persistent orofacial pain. Front Neurosci 13:1227. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01227 pmid:31798407
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Song Y, Zhang YM, Xu J, Wu JR, Qin X, Hua R (2013) [Effect of spontaneous firing of injured dorsal root ganglion neuron on excitability of wide dynamic range neuron in rat spinal dorsal horn.] Sheng Li Xue Bao 65:533–539.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Spencer CJ, Gremillion HA (2007) Neuropathic orofacial pain: proposed mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment considerations. Dent Clin North Am 51:209–224. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2006.09.006 pmid:17185067
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Tandon OP, Malhotra V, Tandon S, D’Silva I (2003) Neurophysiology of pain: insight to orofacial pain Indian. J Physiol Pharmacol 47: 247–269.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    Tashiro A, Bereiter DA, Thompson R, Nishida Y (2014) GABAergic influence on temporomandibular joint-responsive spinomedullary neurons depends on estrogen status. Neuroscience 259:53–62. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.053 pmid:24316475
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Todd AJ (2010) Neuronal circuitry for pain processing in the dorsal horn. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:823–836. doi:10.1038/nrn2947 pmid:21068766
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    van der Bilt A, Engelen L, Pereira LJ, van der Glas HW, Abbink JH (2006) Oral physiology and mastication. Physiol Behav 89:22–27. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.025 pmid:16564557
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Wilcox SL, Gustin SM, Macey PM, Peck CC, Murray GM, Henderson LA (2015) Anatomical changes within the medullary dorsal horn in chronic temporomandibular disorder pain. Neuroimage 117:258–266. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.014 pmid:25979666
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Wilkinson JL (2014) Neuroanatony for medical students. London: Wright.
  56. ↵
    Won KA, Kang YM, Lee MK, Park MK, Ju JS, Bae YC, Ahn DK (2012) Participation of microglial p38 MAPK in formalin-induced temporomandibular joint nociception in rats. J Orofac Pain 26:132–141. pmid:22558613
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    Wong H, Kang I, Dong XD, Christidis N, Ernberg M, Svensson P, Cairns BE (2014) NGF-induced mechanical sensitization of the masseter muscle is mediated through peripheral NMDA receptors. Neuroscience 269:232–244. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.03.054 pmid:24704516
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Woolf CJ, American Physiological Society (2004) Pain: moving from symptom control toward mechanism-specific pharmacologic management. Ann Intern Med 140:441–451. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-140-8-200404200-00010 pmid:15023710
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Yam MF, Loh YC, Tan CS, Khadijah Adam S, Abdul Manan N, Basir R (2018) General pathways of pain sensation and the major neurotransmitters involved in pain regulation. Int J Mol Sci 19:2164. doi:10.3390/ijms19082164
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. ↵
    Yin Y, Yi MH, Kim DW (2018) Impaired autophagy of GABAergic interneurons in neuropathic pain. Pain Res Manag 2018:9185368. doi:10.1155/2018/9185368 pmid:30356379
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Zhou LJ, Peng J, Xu YN, Zeng WJ, Zhang J, Wei X, Mai CL, Lin ZJ, Liu Y, Murugan M, Eyo UB, Umpierre AD, Xin WJ, Chen T, Li M, Wang H, Richardson JR, Tan Z, Liu XG, Wu LJ (2019) Microglia are indispensable for synaptic plasticity in the spinal dorsal horn and chronic pain. Cell Rep 27:3844–3859.e6. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.087 pmid:31242418
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Karen Szumlinski, University of California at Santa Barbara

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Yuichi Ogino.

After consultation with two expert reviewers, we have reached the decision of Revise-Rereview. This decision is based primarily on the comments of Reviewer 1, who expressed concerns regarding the organization of the review and the level of detail in each subsection. As no experiments are required, two months should be sufficient to revise the report. Should you require any extra time, please inform eNeuro and we can extend the time. Please find below the specific comments of both reviewers.

Reviewer 1:

n the present review author tried to rereviews the literature to have the better understanding of the Physiology of Orofacial Pain in dentistry.

Major:

1. Author tried to present the review on the Physiology of Orofacial Pain in dentistry. However, author must the describe the strategy for the search ie search terms...... Year of search ie 1990- 20121.

2. Authors must present the thorough review of the topic.

One of the major comment is that, there are no defined sections in the review to present the better understanding of the topic, to understand the central pathway or peripheral pathway or any markers what's latest and specific receptors are involved. For example:

Primary Afferent Neurons

Pathological Changes in Trigeminal Ganglion

Brainstem Nociceptive Neurons

Receptor Mechanisms of Trigeminal Primary Afferent Neurons

Higher Brain Function Regulating Orofacial Nociception

3. Authors are suggested to refer to few of the articles

J. Oral Biosci. 53(4):318-329, 2011; Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2003; 47 (3) : 247-269; Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology: November 2019 - Volume 36 - Issue 6 - p 422-429; International Review of Neurobiology Volume 97, 2011, Pages 227-250

Reviewer 2

This review manuscript is an easy-to-understand in pain field in dentistry with comprehensible figures and tables, that will help every dentist in clinical practice.

Minor:

Insert Abbreviation of cranial nerve at the first appearance: (CN).

Major:

As a review literature regarding orofacial pain in dentistry, it would be preferable to refer nociplastic pain (Aydede and Shriver. PAIN 2018). My recommendation is adding a short reference to the nociplastic pain in chronic pain section in your own manner, for example, PIDAP (persistent idiopathic dentoalveolar pain; 6.3 in International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition) previously known as atypical odontalgia.

Author Response

Response to reviewers

We thanks to raising point of two reviewers and revised followed these

recommendations

Reviewer 1:

the present review author tried to rereviews the literature to have the better

understanding of the Physiology of Orofacial Pain in dentistry.

Major:

1. Author tried to present the review on the Physiology of Orofacial Pain in

dentistry. However, author must the describe the strategy for the search ie

search terms...... Year of search ie 1990- 2021.

Response: We have added this points in page 1, paragraph 1 of subheading

introduction

2. Authors must present the thorough review of the topic.

One of the major comment is that, there are no defined sections in the review to

present the better understanding of the topic, to understand the central pathway

or peripheral pathway or any markers what's latest and specific receptors are

involved. For example:

Primary Afferent Neurons

Pathological Changes in Trigeminal Ganglion

Brainstem Nociceptive Neurons

Receptor Mechanisms of Trigeminal Primary Afferent Neurons

Higher Brain Function Regulating Orofacial Nociception

Response: We have changes followed the recommendation in blue color in text.

3. Authors are suggested to refer to few of the articles

J. Oral Biosci. 53(4):318-329, 2011; Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2003;

47 (3) : 247-269; Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology: November 2019 -

Volume 36 - Issue 6 - p 422-429; International Review of Neurobiology

Volume 97, 2011, Pages 227-250

Response: We have changes followed the recommendation in blue color in text2

Reviewer 2

This review manuscript is an easy-to-understand in pain field in dentistry with

comprehensible figures and tables, that will help every dentist in clinical

practice.

Minor:

Insert Abbreviation of cranial nerve at the first appearance: (CN).

Response: We insert abbreviation of cranial nerve at the first appearance in

page II, paragraph II (red color in text)

Major:

1. As a review literature regarding orofacial pain in dentistry, it would be

preferable to refer nociplastic pain (Aydede and Shriver. PAIN 2018). My

recommendation is adding a short reference to the nociplastic pain in chronic

pain section in your own manner, for example, PIDAP (persistent idiopathic

dentoalveolar pain; 6.3 in International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st

edition) previously known as atypical odontalgia.

Response: We thank to raising points. We have added in page 5 paragraph 3

(red color in text)

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 2
March/April 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Review of Literatures: Physiology of Orofacial Pain in Dentistry
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Review of Literatures: Physiology of Orofacial Pain in Dentistry
Nattapon Rotpenpian, Pankeaw Yakkaphan
eNeuro 5 April 2021, 8 (2) ENEURO.0535-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0535-20.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Review of Literatures: Physiology of Orofacial Pain in Dentistry
Nattapon Rotpenpian, Pankeaw Yakkaphan
eNeuro 5 April 2021, 8 (2) ENEURO.0535-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0535-20.2021
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Physiology of the Orofacial Pain Pathway
    • Primary Afferent Neurons and Pathologic Changes in Trigeminal Ganglion
    • Brainstem Nociceptive Neurons
    • Higher Brain Function Regulating Orofacial Nociception
    • Classification of Orofacial Pain and Possible Mechanisms
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • dentistry
  • neurophysiology
  • orofacial pain
  • pain
  • sensation
  • sensory function

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Review

  • P2X7 Receptor and Purinergic Signaling: Orchestrating Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Transcriptional Profile of the Developing Subthalamic Nucleus
  • TMS Does Not Increase BOLD Activity at the Site of Stimulation: A Review of All Concurrent TMS-fMRI Studies
Show more Review

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
  • Taste-odor association learning alters the dynamics of intra-oral odor responses in the posterior piriform cortex of awake rats
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Reviews

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.