Figure 1. Miniature PSC frequency is reduced, and size is increased by Dnm1Ftfl/Ftfl. A1, Diagram of the four motifs under study. Color scheme shown here is used throughout the paper. A2–A4, Model effects from GEEs assessing each parameter of interest. B1, Representative mEPSC recordings from WT (black) and Fitful (green) excitatory neurons. B2–B4, Boxplots comparing amplitude, decay, and frequency of mEPSCs in WT (white, N = 2, n = 27) and Fitful (green, N = 2, n = 31) neurons. Boxes define the range, median, and IQR of the distribution. Fliers are neurons falling >1.5× of the IQR. C1, Representative mEPSC recordings from WT (black) and Fitful (blue) inhibitory neurons. C2–C4, Boxplots comparing amplitude, decay, and frequency of mEPSCs in WT (white, N = 2, n = 23) and Fitful (green, N = 2, n = 23) neurons. Boxes define the range, median, and IQR of the distribution. Fliers are neurons falling >1.5× of the IQR. D1, Representative mIPSC recordings from WT (black) and Fitful (orange) excitatory neurons. D2–D4, Boxplots comparing amplitude, decay, and frequency of mIPSCs in WT (white, N = 2, n = 27) and Fitful (orange, N = 2, n = 29) neurons. Boxes define the range, median, and IQR of the distribution. Fliers are neurons falling >1.5× of the IQR. E1, Representative mIPSC recordings from WT (black, N = 2, n = 23) and Fitful (red, N = 2, n = 24) inhibitory neurons. E2–E4, Boxplots comparing amplitude, charge, decay, and frequency of mIPSCs in WT (white) and Fitful (red) neurons. Boxes define the range, median, and IQR of the distribution. Fliers are neurons falling >1.5× of the IQR; *pairwise comparison p < 0.05. For complete pairwise comparisons data, see Extended Data Figure 1-1.