Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Spatiotemporal Coding in the Macaque Supplementary Eye Fields: Landmark Influence in the Target-to-Gaze Transformation

Vishal Bharmauria, Amirsaman Sajad, Xiaogang Yan, Hongying Wang and John Douglas Crawford
eNeuro 14 December 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0446-20.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0446-20.2020
Vishal Bharmauria
1Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications (VISTA) Program, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amirsaman Sajad
1Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications (VISTA) Program, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
2Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaogang Yan
1Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications (VISTA) Program, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongying Wang
1Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications (VISTA) Program, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Douglas Crawford
1Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications (VISTA) Program, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
3Departments of Psychology, Biology and Kinesiology and Health Sciences, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Eye-centered (egocentric) and landmark-centered (allocentric) visual signals influence spatial cognition, navigation, and goal-directed action, but the neural mechanisms that integrate these signals for motor control are poorly understood. A likely candidate for egocentric/allocentric integration in the gaze control system is the supplementary eye fields (SEF), a mediofrontal structure with high-level “executive” functions, spatially tuned visual/motor response fields, and reciprocal projections with the frontal eye fields (FEF). To test this hypothesis, we trained two head-unrestrained monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to saccade toward a remembered visual target in the presence of a visual landmark that shifted during the delay, causing gaze end points to shift partially in the same direction. A total of 256 SEF neurons were recorded, including 68 with spatially tuned response fields. Model fits to the latter established that, like the FEF and superior colliculus (SC), spatially tuned SEF responses primarily showed an egocentric (eye-centered) target-to-gaze position transformation. However, the landmark shift influenced this default egocentric transformation: during the delay, motor neurons (with no visual response) showed a transient but unintegrated shift (i.e., not correlated with the target-to-gaze transformation), whereas during the saccade-related burst visuomotor (VM) neurons showed an integrated shift (i.e., correlated with the target-to-gaze transformation). This differed from our simultaneous FEF recordings (Bharmauria et al., 2020), which showed a transient shift in VM neurons, followed by an integrated response in all motor responses. Based on these findings and past literature, we propose that prefrontal cortex incorporates landmark-centered information into a distributed, eye-centered target-to-gaze transformation through a reciprocal prefrontal circuit.

  • frontal cortex
  • head-unrestrained
  • landmarks
  • macaques
  • neural response fields
  • reference frames

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Grant MOP-130444 and the Vision: Science to Applications (VISTA) Program, which is supported in part by the Canada first Research Excellence Fund. V.B., X.Y., and H.W. were supported by CIHR and VISTA. A.S. was supported by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship. J.D.C. is supported by the Canada Research Chair Program.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

View Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 1
January/February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spatiotemporal Coding in the Macaque Supplementary Eye Fields: Landmark Influence in the Target-to-Gaze Transformation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Spatiotemporal Coding in the Macaque Supplementary Eye Fields: Landmark Influence in the Target-to-Gaze Transformation
Vishal Bharmauria, Amirsaman Sajad, Xiaogang Yan, Hongying Wang, John Douglas Crawford
eNeuro 14 December 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0446-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0446-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Spatiotemporal Coding in the Macaque Supplementary Eye Fields: Landmark Influence in the Target-to-Gaze Transformation
Vishal Bharmauria, Amirsaman Sajad, Xiaogang Yan, Hongying Wang, John Douglas Crawford
eNeuro 14 December 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0446-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0446-20.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • frontal cortex
  • head-unrestrained
  • landmarks
  • macaques
  • neural response fields
  • reference frames

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • The Impact of Chemical Fixation on the Microanatomy of Mouse Organotypic Hippocampal Slices
  • Similarities and Distinctions between Cortical Neural Substrates That Underlie Generation of Malevolent Creative Ideas
  • The Antiarrhythmic Drug Flecainide Enhances Aversion to HCl in Mice
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Lateralization and time-course of cortical phonological representations during syllable production
  • Pupil size is sensitive to low-level stimulus features, independent of arousal-related modulation
  • The Antiarrhythmic Drug Flecainide Enhances Aversion to HCl in Mice
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.