Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Glycinergic Inhibition Targets Specific Off Cone Bipolar Cells in Primate Retina

Amanda J. McLaughlin, Kumiko A. Percival, Jacqueline Gayet-Primo and Teresa Puthussery
eNeuro 13 November 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0432-20.2020; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0432-20.2020
Amanda J. McLaughlin
1School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
2Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kumiko A. Percival
4Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline Gayet-Primo
1School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
2Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Teresa Puthussery
1School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
2Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
3Vision Science Graduate Program, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Teresa Puthussery
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Schematic showing glycinergic inhibition onto Off-CBCs through rod and cone pathways. Arrows indicate direction of signal flow and red crosses indicate site of action of pharmacological agents used herein. Under scotopic conditions, light signals from rods (R) are transmitted to rod bipolar cells (RBCs) via mGluR6 receptors. This synapse can be blocked with L-AP4 and activated with CPPG. RBCs transmit signals to AII-ACs (AII) via GYKI-sensitive AMPA receptors. AII-ACs inhibit Off-CBCs through glycinergic synapses (cyan arrows) that can be blocked with STR. Under photopic conditions (gray dotted box), cones (C) signal light increments to On-CBCs via mGluR6 receptors. On-CBCs drive AII-ACs via gap junctions (magenta arrow) and AII-ACs in turn inhibit Off-CBCs via glycinergic synapses. In both pathways, signals from Off-CBCs are relayed to Off-GCs (OFF GCs). AII-ACs can also signal directly to some OFF GC types.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Spontaneous inhibition is present in specific Off-CBC types. A, Spontaneous inhibitory events in representative FMB, DB1, DB2, DB3a, and DB3b cells. The stimulus was a series of depolarizing voltage steps from a holding potential of −70 mV (+5-mV increments, 16 steps). The red traces show currents at – 5 mV near the calculated excitatory reversal potential of −7 mV. B, Trend-subtracted currents during the step to –5 mV from the same cells shown in A. C, Bar graph showing average current variance in the different Off-CBCs during a voltage step to −5 mV. Number of cells for each type is indicated above bars. Data are mean ± SEM; *p < 0.01, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 with Tukey’s post hoc tests after one-way ANOVA.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Spontaneous inhibition in FMB cells is glycinergic and arises at the axon terminals. A, Example traces from an FMB cell showing the frequency of sIPSCs before, during, and after bath application of STR (0.5 μm). Events were recorded during a voltage step to −20 mV from a holding potential of −70 mV. B, Effect of STR on sIPSC frequency for a group of FMB cells (Ctrl and STR; n = 7 cells, washout; n = 2 cells, **p = 0.004, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Gray points indicate individual cells, black points indicate mean ± SEM. C, top panel, Example trace showing a lack of spontaneous events in an axotomized FMB cell during a voltage step to −20 mV from −70 mV. Bottom panel, Current response to a 20-ms puff application (red bar) of L-glutamate (1 mm) applied to the same cell. The presence of a glutamate-evoked inward current confirms the Off-type physiology of the axotomized midget cell. Holding potential is −70 mV.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Properties of sIPSCs in FMB and DB1 bipolar cells. Quantification of sIPSC events in FMB (A–E) and DB1 (F–J) bipolar cells. A, F, Example traces showing sIPSCs in an FMB (A) and DB1 (F) cell at the holding potentials indicated to the right of traces. B, G, Average sIPSC events extracted from the same bipolar cells shown in A, F using a matched template filter (average of 64–126 events per voltage for FMB, average of 70–130 events per voltage for DB1 cells). Gray shading shows SEM. Red traces show single exponential fits to event decay at −10 mV. C, H, I-V plots showing sIPSC amplitude as a function of voltage for a group of FMB (n = 20 cells; C) and DB1 cells (n = 7 cells; H). Note that events reverse close to the inhibitory reversal potential. D, I, Average sIPSC rise-time for the group of FMB (D) and DB1 (I) cells. E, J, Average sIPSC decay time constants for FMB (E) and DB1 (J) cells. All graphs show mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Inhibitory input to Off-CBCs is driven by the On-pathway. A, Example traces showing sIPSCs in an FMB cell before, during, and after bath-application of L-AP4 (10 μm). B, Effect of L-AP4 on sIPSC frequency for a group of FMB cells (Ctrl and L-AP4; n = 4 cells, washout; n = 1 cell, *p = 0.028, Wilcoxon test). Gray points represent individual cells, black points show mean ± SEM. C, Example traces showing effect of puffing CPPG (600 μm) in the OPL in the presence of bath-applied L-AP4. CPPG puffs increase the frequency of sIPSCs in FMB, DB1, and DB3a cells but not in DB2 and DB3b cells. D, Plots showing current variance before and after puff application of CPPG in the presence of L-AP4 for FMB/DB1 cells (left panel) and DB2/DB3a/DB3b cells (right panel). Data are from n = 3 FMB (gray), n = 2 DB1 (blue), n = 3 DB2 (red), n = 2 DB3a (green), and n = 2 DB3b (magenta); *p < 0.05 Wilcoxon rank test. Current traces in A, C are at a step to 0 mV. E, Example traces showing reduced frequency of sIPSCs in an FMB cell after bath application of the AMPA receptor antagonist, GYKI-53655 (10 μm). Holding potential is −60 mV. F, Effect of GYKI on sIPSC frequency for a group of five FMB cells (gray points) and one DB1 cell (blue point). Partial washout was obtained in n = 2 FMB cells; *p = 0.016 with Wilcoxon rank test. Black points show mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Voltage-gated currents in DB1 and DB2 bipolar cells. A–C, Average leak-subtracted voltage-gated currents in DB1 and DB2 cells. Voltage step protocols are shown in top panels, and resulting currents from DB1 and DB2 cells are shown in the middle and bottom panels, respectively. Timing scale bar in lower panels applies to both cell types. Note prominent A-type potassium current, T-type calcium current, and KIR and Ih currents in DB2 cells that is absent in DB1 cells. Data are normalized to max amplitudes. Gray shading in A–C shows ±1 SEM. D, Comparison of peak outward potassium current in DB1 (open circles, n = 11) and DB2 (solid circles, n = 19) cells measured at a fixed time point 1.8 ms after step onset. Measurement time points are indicated with corresponding symbols in A. E, Comparison of inward current in DB1 (open circles, n = 4) and DB2 (solid circles, n = 13) cells at timepoints indicated by same symbols shown above traces in B (4 ms after step onset). F, Comparison of average instantaneous (open triangle) and time-dependent inward current (black triangles) in DB2 cells (n = 13) and time-dependent current in DB1 cells (red triangles, n = 9). Instantaneous current was measured at a fixed time point (5.7 ms after step onset), time-dependent current is the difference between the minimum current amplitude and instantaneous current. Data are mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Voltage-gated ion channel subunits in primate DB1 and DB2 cells. A–F, Localization of the T-type calcium channel subunit, CaV3.1, in primate bipolar cells. CaV3.1 is absent from SCGN+ DB1 cells (A–C, arrows). D–F, A subset of GLT-1+ Off-bipolar cells express CaV3.1, consistent with expression in DB2 cells (arrows). G–L, The inward-rectifying potassium channel (KIR) subunit, Kir2.1, is absent from DB1 cells (G–I, arrows) but present in the soma, dendrites, and axon terminal boutons of GLT-1+ DB2 cells (J–L). Scale bar: 20 μm.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Summary of gene expression and physiological properties of macaque Off-bipolar cells. A, Dot-plots showing comparative gene expression of glycine receptor (GLRA), GABAA receptor (GABRA), and voltage-gated channel subunits in macaque peripheral bipolar cells. Dot color indicates expression level and dot diameter indicates the proportion of cells in the cluster in which the gene was detected. FMB and DB1 cells show higher levels of GLRA1 expression than other bipolar types. Raw data from Peng et al. (2019) plotted using the Broad Institute Single Cell Portal. B, Summary of primate bipolar cell morphology, inhibitory inputs, physiological properties, voltage-activated currents, GC partners, and putative mouse (Ms) bipolar homologs. *Based on data from Puthussery et al. (2013). Homology based on expression data from Peng et al. (2019).

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 1
January/February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glycinergic Inhibition Targets Specific Off Cone Bipolar Cells in Primate Retina
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Glycinergic Inhibition Targets Specific Off Cone Bipolar Cells in Primate Retina
Amanda J. McLaughlin, Kumiko A. Percival, Jacqueline Gayet-Primo, Teresa Puthussery
eNeuro 13 November 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0432-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0432-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Glycinergic Inhibition Targets Specific Off Cone Bipolar Cells in Primate Retina
Amanda J. McLaughlin, Kumiko A. Percival, Jacqueline Gayet-Primo, Teresa Puthussery
eNeuro 13 November 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0432-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0432-20.2020
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • bipolar cell
  • glycine receptors
  • ion channels
  • macaque
  • retina
  • rod pathway

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Release of extracellular matrix components after human traumatic brain injury
  • Action intentions reactivate representations of task-relevant cognitive cues
  • Functional connectome correlates of laterality preferences: Insights into Hand, Foot, and Eye Dominance Across the Lifespan
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Action intentions reactivate representations of task-relevant cognitive cues
  • Interference underlies attenuation upon relearning in sensorimotor adaptation
  • Rod Inputs Arrive at Horizontal Cell Somas in Mouse Retina Solely via Rod–Cone Coupling
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.