Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Integrative Systems

Parvalbumin Interneurons Are Differentially Connected to Principal Cells in Inhibitory Feedback Microcircuits along the Dorsoventral Axis of the Medial Entorhinal Cortex

Sabine Grosser, Federico J. Barreda, Prateep Beed, Dietmar Schmitz, Sam A. Booker and Imre Vida
eNeuro 2 February 2021, 8 (1) ENEURO.0354-20.2020; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0354-20.2020
Sabine Grosser
1Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federico J. Barreda
1Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
2Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin 10115, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prateep Beed
3Neurowissenschaftliches Forschungszentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin 10117, Germany
4Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 10178, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dietmar Schmitz
4Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 10178, Germany
5NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Berlin 10117, Germany
6DZNE-German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Berlin 10117, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sam A. Booker
1Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
7Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences
8Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain
9Patrick Wild Centre for Autism Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sam A. Booker
Imre Vida
1Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
5NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Berlin 10117, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Imre Vida
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Morphology and physiological signature of fast-spiking PV BCs in the dorsal and ventral mEC. A, Representative confocal images from the slices of the dorsal (left panel) and ventral mEC (right panel) immunostained for PV (in green pseudocolor) and counterstained by DAPI (grayscale). Higher-magnification images illustrate the superficial layers (L1–L3) of the mEC corresponding to the white rectangles in the overview images in the separate channels. B, C, Reconstructions of biocytin-filled fast-spiking PV BCs recorded in L2/3 of the dorsal (B) and ventral mEC (C). Soma and dendrites of the INs are depicted in black, axons in red; boundaries of the layers (L1–L3) are indicated by dotted lines. Insets on the right illustrate the PV immunoreactivity (in green) in the biocytin-filled somata of the INs (Bioc, grayscale). D, E, Voltage responses of the two visualized PV BCs to hyperpolarizing (−500 to −100 pA) and depolarizing current pulses (100 and 500 pA, 500 ms in duration, see inset in the middle). Note the fast-spiking non-accommodating AP discharge pattern in response to the strong depolarizing current pulse in both INs. F, G, Summary bar charts of the amplitude (F) and frequency of spontaneous EPSPs in dorsal (D, red bars) and ventral PV BCs (V, blue bars). Data from individual neurons are superimposed as open circles; numbers of recorded neurons are indicated in parenthesis under the bars.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Neuroanatomical properties of PV BCs in the dorsal and ventral mEC. A, D, Summary bar charts of the length of dendrites (A) and axons (D) of dorsal (D, red bars) and ventral PV BCs (V, blue bars). Data from individual neurons is superimposed as open circles; numbers of analyzed neurons are indicated in parenthesis under the bars. B, E, Sholl analysis of the dendritic (B) and axonal arbors (E) of dorsal (in red) and ventral PV BCs (in blue). Sholl radius was set to 25 μm, and significance was tested using Fischer’s exact test; asterisks indicate significant differences at the level of p = 0.05. C, F, Cumulative heat maps of the spatial densities of dendritic (C) and axonal distributions (F) for dorsal (left) and ventral PV BCs (right). Individual INs viewed in the plane of the slices were aligned with their somata to the middle of the plots. The color code for the density (in arbitrary units) is on the left. One-dimensional density plots on the right and bottom illustrate the spatial integrals of the densities along the x- and y-axes, respectively, for dorsal (in red) and ventral INs (in blue). G, A confocal image of axon collaterals of intracellularly-filled PV BCs displaying varicosities in the dorsal (left) and ventral mEC (right). H, Summary bar chart of the density of varicosities along axon collaterals of PV BCs from the dorsal (D, red bars) and ventral mEC (V, blue bars). Data from individual neurons are superimposed as open circles; numbers of analyzed neurons are indicated in parenthesis under the bars. Statistical significance: *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Connectivity of recorded IN-PrC pairs shows greater coupling probability in the dorsal mEC. A, Morphologic reconstructions of a dorsal and a ventral synaptically-coupled PV BC-PrC pair. PV BC somata and dendrites are in black, axons in red; for PrCs only soma and dendrites are shown (in cyan); boundaries of the L1–L3 are indicated by dotted lines. Insets on the bottom illustrate the PV immunoreactivity (in green pseudocolor) in the biocytin-filled somata of the BCs (Bioc, grayscale). B, Representative traces illustrate presynaptic APs evoked in PV BCs (upper traces) and short latency unitary IPSCs in concurrently recorded synaptically coupled PrCs (lower traces, averaged trace in black, individual IPSCs are superimposed in gray) in the dorsal (left) and ventral mEC (right). C, Summary bar chart of the connectivity of PV BCs onto PrCs in the dorsal (D, red bars) and ventral mEC (V, blue bars). D, Summary box plot of the unitary IPSC amplitudes in the dorsal (D, red bars) and ventral mEC (V, blue bars). Individual amplitude data from the pairs are superimposed as open circles on the bars. Numbers of analyzed simultaneous BC-PrC recordings are indicated in parenthesis under the bars. Statistical significance: **p < 0.01.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Reciprocal IN-PrC pairs in the mEC show higher excitation and lower inhibition than non-reciprocal pairs. A, Schemes and representative traces illustrating the observed connectivity patterns of BC-PrC pairs: a reciprocally connected pair (left panel), a unidirectionally connected pair (middle panel) displaying only a unitary EPSC in the BC (bottom left trace, in gray) and unidirectionally connected PrC-BC pair (right panel) displaying only unitary IPSC in the PrC (top right trace in cyan). The representative presynaptic APs and the evoked unitary synaptic responses (average of 10 traces) are illustrated side-by-side in the BCs (left traces, in gray) and PrCs (right traces, in cyan). B, Bar chart of the total number of connected PV BC and PrC pairs (reciprocal connections, in gray). C, Summary bar chart of the unitary IPSC and EPSC amplitudes for reciprocal and non-reciprocal connections. Individual peak amplitude data from the pairs are superimposed as open circles on the bars. D, Ratio of excitation and inhibition in non-reciprocal (NR, white bar) versus reciprocal pairs (R, gray bar). Statistical significance: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Properties of synaptic coupling of SCs and PCs to PV BCs. A, Voltage responses of a PC (top) and a SC (bottom) to hyperpolarizing (−500 to −100 pA, 500 ms in duration) and a suprathreshold depolarizing current pulse (500 pA). B, Dendrogram illustrates the separation of two subpopulations of PrCs corresponding to PCs (in cyan) and SCs (in ochre) by cluster analysis. C, E, Morphologic reconstructions of a synaptically-coupled PV BC-PC (C) and a PV BC-SC pair (E). PV BC somata and dendrites are in black, axons in red; for the PrCs only soma and dendrites are shown (PC in cyan; SC in ochre); boundaries of L1–L3 are indicated by dotted lines. Insets on the bottom illustrate the PV immunoreactivity (in green pseudocolor) in the biocytin-filled IN somata (Bioc, grayscale). D, Electrophysiological data from a reciprocally connected BC-PC pair. Representative trace illustrates presynaptic APs evoked in a PV BC (top trace) and the short latency unitary IPSCs in the concurrently recorded PC (upper middle trace, averaged response in black, individual IPSCs are superimposed in gray). Similarly, presynaptic APs evoked in the PC (lower middle trace) were followed by short latency unitary EPSCs in the concurrently recorded IN (bottom trace). F, Electrophysiological data from a reciprocally connected BC-SC pair as illustrated in D. G, Summary bar chart of the connection probabilities between PV BCs and PCs and SCs in the mEC. H, I, Bar charts of the amplitudes (H) and paired pulse ratios (I) of unitary IPSCs and EPSCs between PV BCs and synaptically coupled PCs and SCs. Individual values from the pairs are superimposed as open circles on the bars.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Passive and active physiological properties of dorsal and ventral PV BCs

    DorsalVentralp value
    Passive properties
        Resting membrane potential (mV)−66.0 ± 1.7 (25)−67.7 ± 1.6 (32)0.46
        Input resistance (MΩ)83.1 ± 8.0 (25)95.3 ± 8.0 (28)0.29
        Membrane time constant (ms)11.5 ± 1.5 (17)14.9 ± 2.7 (23)0.87
        Membrane capacitance (pF)16.7 ± 2.9 (13)13.1 ± 1.4 (16)0.28
    Active properties
        Rheobase (pA)205.3 ± 48.2 (11)164.7 ± 34.9 (15)0.50
        Voltage threshold (mV)−38.2 ± 1.0 (11)−40.8 ± 1.2 (15)0.10
        AP amplitude (mV)*53.5 ± 3.6 (11)64.4 ± 4.0 (15)0.07
        AP rise time (ms)0.99 ± 0.55 (11)0.33 ± 0.19 (14)0.57
        AP maximum rise rate (mV/ms)308.2 ± 27.2 (11)326.1 ± 16.1 (15)0.56
        AP maximum decay rate (mV/ms)185.1 ± 20.0 (11)161.1 ± 14.3 (15)0.96
        Half-height width (ms)0.44 ± 0.04 (11)0.49 ± 0.03 (15)0.22
        Fast AHP amplitude (mV)*−20.4 ± 0.94 (12)−21.1 ± 0.79 (15)0.58
        Discharge frequency at 1 nA (Hz)298.0 ± 30.9 (16)252.1 ± 17.5 (22)0.21
    Spontaneous synaptic input
        Spontaneous EPSC frequency (Hz)12.2 ± 6.8 (25)14.4 ± 7.6 (32)0.38
        Spontaneous EPSC amplitude (pA)−35.5 ± 25.7 (25)−38.3 ± 23.4 (32)0.73
    • Results shown as mean ± SEM; number of analyzed neurons are shown in parenthesis.

    • ↵* Measured from threshold.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Anatomical properties of dorsal and ventral PV BCs

    DorsalVentralp value
    Dendrites
        Total dendritic length (μm)4828.4 ± 328.6 (22)4357.8 ± 343.2 (21)0.29
        Lateral extent (μm)418.1 ± 25.2 (21)429.5 ± 27.5 (19)0.59
        Vertical extent (μm)425.9 ± 22.6 (21)402.5 ± 30.8 (19)0.46
        Dendritic field (μm2)184 609 ± 15 815 (21)181 726 ± 22 509 (19)0.92
    Axon
        Total axonal length (μm)12,919 ± 1737 (21)16,332 ± 2418 (19)0.35
        Lateral extent (μm)411.5 ± 31.0 (21)430.5 ± 30.9 (19)0.67
        Vertical extent (μm)377.4 ± 27.3 (21)421.3 ± 37.0 (19)0.34
        Axonal field (μm2)158,754 ± 14,854 (21)189,212 ± 22,513 (19)0.43
        Varicosity density (1/μm)0.41 ± 0.01 (10)0.30 ± 0.01 (10)<0.0001
    • Results shown as mean ± SEM; the numbers of analyzed neurons are shown in parenthesis.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Passive and active physiological properties of stellate and pyramidal PrCs

    SCsPCsp value
    Passive properties
        Resting membrane potential (mV)−59.4 ± 0.8 (22)−62.0 ± 1.2 (23)0.06
        Input resistance (MΩ)94.3 ± 11.6 (22)162.0 ± 20.0 (23)<0.01
        Membrane time constant (ms)13.3 ± 0.8 (21)23.7 ± 2.4 (20)<0.001
        Membrane capacitance (pF)185.7 ± 23.4 (20)209.5 ± 35.5 (21)0.51
    Active properties
        Rheobase (pA)90.9 ± 10.2 (22)89.1 ± 11.7 (23)0.91
        Voltage threshold (mV)−39.8 ± 0.8 (22)−41.7 ± 1.0 (23)0.28
        AP amplitude (mV)*78.1 ± 1.6 (22)83.8 ± 1.9 (23)<0.05
        AP maximum rise rate (mV/ms)346.1 ± 19.4 (22)433.3 ± 31.8 (23)<0.05
        AP maximum decay rate (mV/ms)111.1 ± 19.1 (22)81.8 ± 3.8 (23)0.15
        Half-height duration (ms)0.92 ± 0.03 (22)1.11 ± 0.05 (23)<0.05
        Fast AHP amplitude (mV)*−10.7 ± 0.4 (22)−10.4 ± 0.6 (23)0.65
        Discharge frequency at 250 pA (Hz)34.0 ± 2.9 (22)39.7 ± 2.6 (23)0.15
        Voltage sag (mV)**−9.2 ± 0.8 (38)−6.3 ± 0.8 (32)<0.05
        ISI ratio**0.36 ± 0.05 (38)0.61 ± 0.05 (32)<0.01
        dAP (mV)**2.4 ± 0.3 (38)1.6 ± 0.3 (32)0.13
        Latency to first AP at 205 pA (ms)**19.6 ± 3.3 (38)46.8 ± 8.4 (32)<0.01
    • Results shown as mean ± SEM, number of analyzed neurons shown in parenthesis. Parameters used for the principal component analysis are highlighted with a double asterisk.

    • ↵* Measured from threshold.

    • ↵** Parameter used for PCA. ISI ratio was calculated from the first and the second interval.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 1
January/February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Parvalbumin Interneurons Are Differentially Connected to Principal Cells in Inhibitory Feedback Microcircuits along the Dorsoventral Axis of the Medial Entorhinal Cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Parvalbumin Interneurons Are Differentially Connected to Principal Cells in Inhibitory Feedback Microcircuits along the Dorsoventral Axis of the Medial Entorhinal Cortex
Sabine Grosser, Federico J. Barreda, Prateep Beed, Dietmar Schmitz, Sam A. Booker, Imre Vida
eNeuro 2 February 2021, 8 (1) ENEURO.0354-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0354-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Parvalbumin Interneurons Are Differentially Connected to Principal Cells in Inhibitory Feedback Microcircuits along the Dorsoventral Axis of the Medial Entorhinal Cortex
Sabine Grosser, Federico J. Barreda, Prateep Beed, Dietmar Schmitz, Sam A. Booker, Imre Vida
eNeuro 2 February 2021, 8 (1) ENEURO.0354-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0354-20.2020
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • entorhinal cortex
  • feedback inhibition
  • GABAergic interneurons
  • microcircuit
  • morphology
  • synapse

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • A progressive ratio task with costly resets reveals adaptive effort-delay tradeoffs
  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
Show more Research Article: New Research

Integrative Systems

  • Frazzled/DCC Regulates Gap Junction Formation at a Drosophila Giant Synapse
  • A Single NPFR Neuropeptide F Receptor Neuron That Regulates Thirst Behaviors in Drosophila
  • Paclitaxel Chemotherapy Disrupts Circadian Gene Transcription and Function of the Suprachiasmatic Nuclei in Female Mice
Show more Integrative Systems

Subjects

  • Integrative Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.