Figure 6. Inhibition of MLCK, but not other CaM targets, differentially regulates evoked and spontaneous release from RBs. A1, Five-millisecond flashes of 470-nm LED were presented to stimulate ChR2-expressing RBs in Pcp2-cre::Ai32 mice. The mEPSCs (in gray background area) and eEPSCs in AIIs were recorded. Vhold = −80 mV. Individual traces showed that a specific MLCK inhibitor, ML-9 (100 μm) strongly increased mEPSC frequency and reduced eEPSC amplitude. A2, Average traces of eEPSCs recorded in the same AII in A1. A3, Statistics of the effects of 50 μm (n = 5) and 100 μm (n = 10) ML-9 on eEPSC amplitude. The amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. The data of 50 μm W-7 (adapted from Fig. 2B3, superimposed in magenta) were also included for direct comparison. B1, Statistics of the effects of 25 μm (n = 7), 50 μm (n = 13), and 100 μm (n = 10) ML-9 on mEPSC frequency. The frequencies were normalized to the frequency at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. The data of 50 μm W-7 (adapted from Fig. 2C1, superimposed in magenta) were also included for direct comparison. B2, Statistics of the effects of 25 μm (n = 7), 50 μm (n = 13), and 100 μm (n = 10) ML-9 on mEPSC amplitude. The amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. C1, Individual traces showing that ML-9 (100 μm) had no inhibitory effect on AMPA receptor-mediated currents recorded in an AII evoked by glutamate (1 mm) applied onto the AII dendrites at the border of the IPL and GCL. Vhold = −80 mV. C2, Magnification of the traces in the dashed line frames of C1, showing increase of mEPSC frequency by ML-9. C3, Statistics of the effects of 100 μm ML-9 (n = 4) on the amplitude of glutamate-evoked currents. The amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. D, Summary data showing the effects of bath application of W-7 (50 μm; full circles; adapted from Fig. 2E), ML-9 (100 μm; full down triangles), KN-62 (4 μm; empty circles), MMPX (40 μm; empty squares), and ascomycin (1 μm; empty up triangles), respectively, for 15 min on the amplitude of eEPSCs recorded in AIIs. In each group of data, the amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude before application of a drug in each cell before averaging across cells. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used (control vs W-7, n = 9, p = 0.0039; control vs ML-9, n = 10, p = 0.0020; control vs KN-62, n = 10, p = 0.0586; control vs MMPX, n = 8, p = 0.4609; control vs ascomycin, n = 8, p = 0.0078); **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not statistically different. E, Summary data showing the effects of bath application of W-7 (50 μm), ML-9 (100 μm), KN-62 (4 μm), MMPX (40 μm), and ascomycin (1 μm) for 15 min on mEPSC frequency. In each group of data, the frequencies were normalized to the frequency before application of a drug in each cell before averaging across cells. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used (control vs W-7, n = 15, p < 0.0001; control vs ML-9, n = 10, p = 0.0020; control vs KN-62, n = 11, p = 0.2139; control vs MMPX, n = 8, p = 0.3828; control vs ascomycin, n = 15, p = 0.3591); **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not statistically different.