Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
  • My alerts

eNeuro

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
Next
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Neuronal Excitability

Calmodulin Bidirectionally Regulates Evoked and Spontaneous Neurotransmitter Release at Retinal Ribbon Synapses

Chao-Qun Liang, Gong Zhang, Lei Zhang, Si-Yun Chen, Jun-Nan Wang, Ting-Ting Zhang, Joshua H. Singer and Jiang-Bin Ke
eNeuro 8 December 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0257-20.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0257-20.2020
Chao-Qun Liang
1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gong Zhang
1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lei Zhang
2Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Si-Yun Chen
1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun-Nan Wang
1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ting-Ting Zhang
1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua H. Singer
2Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiang-Bin Ke
1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jiang-Bin Ke
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Optogenetic study of transmission at RB→AII synapses. A, A diagram illustrating optogenetic study of synaptic transmission between RB cells and AII amacrine cells in the retinas of Pcp2-cre::Ai32 mice. After synaptic transmission between photoreceptors and bipolar cells is blocked with L-AP4 and ACET, 470-nm light flashes could stimulate light-sensitive ChR2 channels and thus directly activate ChR2-eYFP-expressing RBs and ON CB cells (green), and finally evoked responses in postsynaptic AII amacrine cells (magenta) could be recorded. B, A two-photon image showing ChR2-eYFP expression (green) in a retinal slice made from a Pcp2-cre::Ai32 mouse; an AII amacrine cell (magenta) was recorded and filled with Alexa Fluor 647 by a patch pipette (outlined by dashed lines). Scale bar: 10 μm. C, Representative traces showing ChR2-mediated currents recorded in an eYFP+ RB and an eYFP+ ON CB, but not in either eYFP– RB or eYFP– OFF CB, during brief flashes of 470-nm LED. Vhold = −60 mV. D, Representative traces showing ChR2-mediated current (voltage-clamp mode; Vhold = −60 mV) and membrane potential (voltage; current-clamp mode) changes recorded in an eYFP+ RB during brief (10 ms) and long (200 ms) light stimuli. E, During brief flashes, the eEPSCs recorded in AII amacrine cells postsynaptic to RBs were blocked almost completely by DNQX (20 μm). F, The eEPSCs recorded during brief flashes were only slightly influenced by the gap junction blocker, MFA (100 μm).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    CaM bidirectionally regulates evoked and spontaneous neurotransmitter release from RBs. A1, Confocal images showing immunofluorescence double labeling of CaM (green) and PKCα (magenta), a specific cell marker of RBs, in a frozen retinal slice. In the merged image (green + magenta), expression of CaM could be clearly seen in the axon terminals (arrow) and somata (asterisk) of RBs. Scale bar: 10 μm. ONL: outer nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; GCL: ganglion cell layer. A2, No labeling was observed in the negative control where the anti-CaM antibody was preincubated with the CaM immunopeptide. DAPI staining showed the three major cell body layers in the retina. Scale bar: 10 μm. A3, Preadsorption of the anti-CaM antibody with the CaBP5 immunopeptide did not change the staining pattern for CaM. Scale bar: 10 μm. B1, Two-millisecond flashes of 470-nm LED were presented to stimulate ChR2 in Pcp2-cre::Ai32 mice with L-AP4 and ACET in the bath to block synaptic transmission between photoreceptors and bipolar cells; all the inhibitory connections were also blocked. The evoked responses (eEPSCs) and the small responses induced by spontaneous release before light onset (mEPSCs; see gray background area) in AII amacrine cells were recorded. Vhold = −80 mV. Individual traces showed that the CaM antagonist, W-7 (50 μm) strongly increased mEPSC frequency and reduced eEPSC amplitude. B2, Average traces of eEPSCs recorded in the same AII in B1. B3, Statistics of the effects of 25 μm (n = 6) and 50 μm (n = 9) W-7 on eEPSC amplitude. The amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. C1, Statistics of the effects of 10 μm (n = 8), 25 μm (n = 13), and 50 μm (n = 15) W-7 on mEPSC frequency. The frequencies were normalized to the frequency at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. C2, Statistics of the effects of 10 μm (n = 8), 25 μm (n = 13), and 50 μm (n = 15) W-7 on mEPSC amplitude. The amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. D1, Individual traces showing that W-7 (50 μm) had no inhibitory effect on AMPA receptor-mediated currents recorded in an AII evoked by glutamate (1 mm) applied onto the AII dendrites at the border of the IPL and GCL. Vhold = −80 mV. D2, Magnification of the traces in the dashed line frames of D1, showing increase of mEPSC frequency by W-7. D3, Statistics of the effects of 50 μm W-7 (n = 7) on the amplitude of glutamate-evoked currents. The amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. E, Summary data showing the effects of 50 μm W-7 (circles), 100 μm CMZ (triangles), another CaM antagonist, and 1 μm CALP1 (squares), a CaM agonist, on eEPSC amplitude after bath application for 15 min. The amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used (control vs W-7, n = 9, p = 0.0039; control vs CMZ, n = 12, p = 0.0005; control vs CALP1, n = 5, p = 0.6250); **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns: not statistically different. Note that CMZ reduced eEPSC amplitude too, but CALP1 did not enhance eEPSC amplitude under control conditions. F, Summary data showing the effects of 50 μm W-7 (circles), 100 μm CMZ (triangles), and 1 μm CALP1 (squares) on mEPSC frequency. The frequencies were normalized to the frequency at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used (control vs W-7, n = 15, p < 0.0001; control vs CMZ, n = 12, p = 0.6377; control vs CALP1, n = 9, p = 0.0273); *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not statistically different. Note that CMZ did not change the mEPSC frequency, but activation of CaM by CALP1 slightly reduced mEPSC frequency.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    CaM is ubiquitously expressed at sites both near and away from ribbons in RB axon terminals. Confocal images showing immunofluorescence double labeling of CaM (green) and RIBEYE (magenta), a ribbon-specific protein, in the axon terminals of RBs. In the merged image (green + magenta), expression of CaM can be seen near ribbons (arrow) and away from ribbon sites. IPL: inner plexiform layer; GCL: ganglion cell layer. Scale bar: 10 μm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Inhibition of CaM strongly reduces evoked release from RBs by suppressing Ca2+ influx into their axon terminals. A1, Average traces showing that EPSCs recorded in an AII, evoked by puffing LY 341495 (LY), an mGluR6 antagonist, onto the dendrites of RBs located at the OPL, were strongly reduced by application of 50 μm W-7. Vhold = −80 mV. A2, LY-evoked EPSCs decreased over time with application of 50 μm W-7 (n = 7). The peak amplitudes and integrals of EPSCs were normalized to the amplitude and integral at time 0, respectively, in each cell before averaging across cells. B, LY-evoked EPSCs were completely abolished by removing extracellular Ca2+ (0 Ca). C, The EPSCs recorded in an AII, evoked by brief flashes of 470-nm LED in a Pcp2-cre::Ai32 mouse, were abolished completely by removing extracellular Ca2+ (0 Ca). D1, Average traces showing that W-7 (50 μm) strongly suppressed the voltage step-generated Ca currents (ICa) in an RB. D2, Statistics of the effects of 50 μm W-7 (n = 7) and DMSO control on the peak amplitude and integral of RB ICa. The suppression of ICa recorded in RBs was closely related to the inhibition of eEPSCs recorded in AIIs (data adapted from Fig. 2B3, superimposed in gray). E1, Calcium imaging pictures from a Pcp2-cre::Ai38 mouse showing that LY-evoked changes of Ca2+ signals in RB axon terminals (white frames), detected by the Ca2+ indicator GCaMP3, were reduced strongly by application of 50 μm W-7. Scale bar: 1 μm. E2, Representative ΔF/F0 traces showing suppression of Ca2+ signals in an RB axon terminal by 50 μm W-7. E3, Summary data showing that LY-evoked Ca2+ signals in RB axon terminals (n = 21 terminals from 3 retinal slices), measured as areas under the curve (AUCs) of ΔF/F0 traces, were strongly suppressed by 50 μm W-7 over time. All the data were illustrated as mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Both Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent spontaneous release are enhanced, but to different extents, when CaM is inhibited. A–D, Representative traces showing mEPSCs recorded in AIIs under four experimental conditions in different combinations of removal of extracellular calcium (0 Ca), 10 μm BAPTA-AM, 1 μm Tg, and 1 μm YM-58483 (YM). The traces showing mEPSCs after bath application of 50 μm W-7 for 15 min under each condition were also presented. E, Summary data for AII mEPSC frequency under four experimental conditions in A–D. The data under control and W-7 conditions (adapted from Fig. 2C1, empty and full up triangles, respectively) were also presented for direct comparison. The frequencies were normalized to the frequency under control condition in each cell before averaging across cells. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Paired Student’s t tests were used (0 Ca vs 0 Ca + W-7, n = 12, p = 0.0001; 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM vs 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM + W-7, n = 13, p = 0.0002; 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM + Tg vs 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM + Tg + W-7, n = 11, p = 0.0004; 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM + Tg + YM vs 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM + Tg + YM + W-7, n = 7, p = 0.0062) except for comparison of control and W-7 data by Wilcoxon signed-rank test (n = 15, p < 0.0001); **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. F, Summary data for the relative effect of W-7 on AII mEPSC frequency under control and four experimental conditions. The change in each cell was calculated as the ratio of mEPSC frequencies before and 15 min after application of W-7. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Mann–Whitney tests were used (W-7 vs 0 Ca + W-7, p = 0.0214; W-7 vs 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM + W-7, p = 0.0954; W-7 vs 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM + Tg + W-7, p = 0.0045; W-7 vs 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM + Tg + YM + W-7, p = 0.0262); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; ns: not statistically different.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Inhibition of MLCK, but not other CaM targets, differentially regulates evoked and spontaneous release from RBs. A1, Five-millisecond flashes of 470-nm LED were presented to stimulate ChR2-expressing RBs in Pcp2-cre::Ai32 mice. The mEPSCs (in gray background area) and eEPSCs in AIIs were recorded. Vhold = −80 mV. Individual traces showed that a specific MLCK inhibitor, ML-9 (100 μm) strongly increased mEPSC frequency and reduced eEPSC amplitude. A2, Average traces of eEPSCs recorded in the same AII in A1. A3, Statistics of the effects of 50 μm (n = 5) and 100 μm (n = 10) ML-9 on eEPSC amplitude. The amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. The data of 50 μm W-7 (adapted from Fig. 2B3, superimposed in magenta) were also included for direct comparison. B1, Statistics of the effects of 25 μm (n = 7), 50 μm (n = 13), and 100 μm (n = 10) ML-9 on mEPSC frequency. The frequencies were normalized to the frequency at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. The data of 50 μm W-7 (adapted from Fig. 2C1, superimposed in magenta) were also included for direct comparison. B2, Statistics of the effects of 25 μm (n = 7), 50 μm (n = 13), and 100 μm (n = 10) ML-9 on mEPSC amplitude. The amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. C1, Individual traces showing that ML-9 (100 μm) had no inhibitory effect on AMPA receptor-mediated currents recorded in an AII evoked by glutamate (1 mm) applied onto the AII dendrites at the border of the IPL and GCL. Vhold = −80 mV. C2, Magnification of the traces in the dashed line frames of C1, showing increase of mEPSC frequency by ML-9. C3, Statistics of the effects of 100 μm ML-9 (n = 4) on the amplitude of glutamate-evoked currents. The amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude at time 0 in each cell before averaging across cells. D, Summary data showing the effects of bath application of W-7 (50 μm; full circles; adapted from Fig. 2E), ML-9 (100 μm; full down triangles), KN-62 (4 μm; empty circles), MMPX (40 μm; empty squares), and ascomycin (1 μm; empty up triangles), respectively, for 15 min on the amplitude of eEPSCs recorded in AIIs. In each group of data, the amplitudes were normalized to the amplitude before application of a drug in each cell before averaging across cells. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used (control vs W-7, n = 9, p = 0.0039; control vs ML-9, n = 10, p = 0.0020; control vs KN-62, n = 10, p = 0.0586; control vs MMPX, n = 8, p = 0.4609; control vs ascomycin, n = 8, p = 0.0078); **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not statistically different. E, Summary data showing the effects of bath application of W-7 (50 μm), ML-9 (100 μm), KN-62 (4 μm), MMPX (40 μm), and ascomycin (1 μm) for 15 min on mEPSC frequency. In each group of data, the frequencies were normalized to the frequency before application of a drug in each cell before averaging across cells. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used (control vs W-7, n = 15, p < 0.0001; control vs ML-9, n = 10, p = 0.0020; control vs KN-62, n = 11, p = 0.2139; control vs MMPX, n = 8, p = 0.3828; control vs ascomycin, n = 15, p = 0.3591); **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001; ns: not statistically different.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Inhibition of MLCK strongly reduces evoked release by suppressing calcium currents in RBs. A1, Average traces showing that EPSCs recorded in an AII, evoked by puffing LY 341495 (LY), an mGluR6 antagonist, onto the dendrites of RBs located at the OPL, were strongly reduced by application of 100 μm ML-9. Vhold = −80 mV. A2, LY-evoked EPSCs decreased over time with bath application of 100 μm ML-9 (n = 5). The peak amplitudes and integrals of EPSCs were normalized to the amplitude and integral at time 0, respectively, in each cell before averaging across cells. All the data were illustrated as mean ± SEM. B1, Average traces showing that ML-9 (100 μm) strongly suppressed the voltage step-generated calcium currents (ICa) in an RB. B2, Statistics of the effects of 100 μm ML-9 (n = 10) on the peak amplitude and integral of RB ICa. The suppression of ICa recorded in RBs was closely related to the inhibition of eEPSCs recorded in AIIs (adapted from Fig. 6A3, superimposed in gray). All the data were illustrated as mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Both Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent spontaneous release are enhanced, but to different extents, when MLCK is inhibited. A, B, Representative traces showing AII mEPSCs under control, and different combinations of removal of extracellular calcium (0 Ca), 10 μm BAPTA-AM and 100 μm ML-9 conditions. C, Summary data for AII mEPSC frequency under two experimental conditions in A (empty and full circles) and B (empty and full squares). The data under control and ML-9 conditions (adapted from Fig. 6B1, empty and full triangles, respectively) were also presented for direct comparison. The frequencies were normalized to the frequency under control condition in each cell before averaging across cells. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used (control vs ML-9, n = 10, p = 0.0020; 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM vs 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM + ML-9, n = 9, p = 0.0039) except for comparison of 0 Ca and 0 Ca + ML-9 data by paired Student’s t test (n = 10, p = 0.0001); **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. D, Summary data for changes of AII mEPSC frequency after bath application of 100 μm ML-9 for 15 min under control and two experimental conditions. The change in each cell was calculated as the ratio of mEPSC frequencies before and 15 min after application of ML-9. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Mann–Whitney tests were used (ML-9 vs 0 Ca + ML-9, p = 0.0232; ML-9 vs 0 Ca + BAPTA-AM + ML-9, p =0.0030); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Inhibition of CaM occludes the effect of MLCK inhibition on spontaneous release. A, Representative traces showing that, after preincubation with 50 μm W-7, 100 μm ML-9 did not increase, but instead reduced, AII mEPSC frequency. B, Representative traces showing that, after preincubation with 50 μm W-7, AII mEPSC frequency decreased significantly after 10-min recording. C, Summary data for AII mEPSC frequency under three experimental conditions in A (empty and full circles), B (empty and full squares), and DMSO control (empty and full triangles). The frequencies were normalized to the frequency under control condition in each cell before averaging across cells. The data were also illustrated as mean ± SEM. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (control 1 vs ML-9, n = 13, p = 0.0002; control 2 vs no drug, n = 8, p = 0.0078; control 3 vs DMSO, n = 7, p = 0.0156) or unpaired Student’s t test (ML-9 vs no drug, p = 0.0001; no drug vs DMSO, p = 0.7337) were used for comparison; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns: not statistically significant.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    The effects of W-7 on AII mEPSC frequency under different conditions

    DataData structureType of testPowerMean ± SEMNumber of
    cells
    ControlNon-normal distribution1.00 ± 0.0015
    50 μm W-7Non-normal distribution5.95 ± 0.8615
    aControl vs W-7Wilcoxon
    signed-rank test
    p < 0.0001
    0 Ca2+ (experimental condition 1)Normal distribution0.28 ± 0.0312
    0 Ca2+ + W-7Normal distribution2.78 ± 0.4512
    b0 Ca2+ vs 0 Ca2+ + W-7Paired t testp = 0.0001
    0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM (experimental
    condition 2)
    Normal distribution0.32 ± 0.0513
    0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM + W-7Normal distribution2.73 ± 0.4913
    c0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM vs 0 Ca2+ +
    BAPTA-AM + W-7
    Paired t testp = 0.0002
    0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM + Tg (experimental
    condition 3)
    Normal distribution0.29 ± 0.0511
    0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM + Tg + W-7Normal distribution2.97 ± 0.5511
    d0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM + Tg vs 0 Ca2+ +
    BAPTA-AM + Tg + W-7
    Paired t testp = 0.0004
    0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM + Tg + YM
    (experimental condition 4)
    Normal distribution0.33 ± 0.057
    0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM + Tg + YM + W-7Normal distribution3.52 ± 0.787
    e0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM + Tg + YM vs 0 Ca2+ +
    BAPTA-AM + Tg + YM + W-7
    Paired t testp = 0.0062
    Relative effect of W-7 under different conditions
    W-7 effect under control conditionNon-normal distribution5.95 ± 0.8615
    W-7 effect under experimental condition 1Normal distribution11.41 ± 2.0312
    W-7 effect under experimental condition 2Normal distribution11.59 ± 2.1913
    W-7 effect under experimental condition 3Normal distribution11.05 ± 1.4511
    W-7 effect under experimental condition 4Normal distribution11.56 ± 1.987
    fW-7 (experimental condition 1) vs W-7
    (control condition)
    Mann–Whitney testp = 0.0214
    gW-7 (experimental condition 2) vs W-7
    (control condition)
    Mann–Whitney testp = 0.0954
    hW-7 (experimental condition 3) vs W-7
    (control condition)
    Mann–Whitney testp = 0.0045
    iW-7 (experimental condition 4) vs W-7
    (control condition)
    Mann–Whitney testp = 0.0262
    • 0 Ca2+: remove extracellular Ca2+; YM: YM-58483.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    The effects of inhibitors on AII eEPSC amplitude and mEPSC frequency

    DataData structureType of testPowerMean ± SEMNumber of cells
    Effect on AII eEPSC amplitude
    ControlNon-normal distribution1.00 ± 0.00
    50 μm W-7Normal distribution0.28 ± 0.059
    100 μm ML-9Non-normal distribution0.12 ± 0.0410
    4 μm KN-62Normal distribution0.85 ± 0.0710
    40 μm MMPXNon-normal distribution0.82 ± 0.168
    1 μm ascomycinNormal distribution0.73 ± 0.078
    aControl vs W-7Wilcoxon signed-rank testp = 0.00399
    bControl vs ML-9Wilcoxon signed-rank testp = 0.002010
    cControl vs KN-62Wilcoxon signed-rank testp = 0.058610
    dControl vs MMPXWilcoxon signed-rank testp = 0.46098
    eControl vs ascomycinWilcoxon signed-rank testp = 0.00788
    Effect on AII mEPSC frequency
    ControlNon-normal distribution1.00 ± 0.00
    50 μm W-7Non-normal distribution5.95 ± 0.8615
    100 μm ML-9Normal distribution7.19 ± 1.3210
    4 μm KN-62Normal distribution0.88 ± 0.0711
    40 μm MMPXNormal distribution1.35 ± 0.238
    1 μm ascomycinNormal distribution0.94 ± 0.1015
    fControl vs W-7Wilcoxon signed-rank testp < 0.000115
    gControl vs ML-9Wilcoxon signed-rank testp = 0.002010
    hControl vs KN-62Wilcoxon signed-rank testp = 0.213911
    iControl vs MMPXWilcoxon signed-rank testp = 0.38288
    jControl vs ascomycinWilcoxon signed-rank testp = 0.359115
    • View popup
    Table 3

    The effects of ML-9 on AII mEPSC frequency under different conditions

    DataData structureType of testPowerMean ± SEMNumber of cells
    ControlNon-normal distribution1.00 ± 0.0010
    100 μm ML-9Normal distribution7.19 ± 1.3210
    aControl vs ML-9Wilcoxon
    signed-rank test
    p = 0.0020
    0 Ca2+
    (experimental condition 1)
    Normal distribution0.28 ± 0.0710
    0 Ca2+ + ML-9Normal distribution3.35 ± 0.5710
    b0 Ca2+ vs 0 Ca2+ + ML-9paired t testp = 0.0001
    0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM
    (experimental condition 2)
    Normal distribution0.28 ± 0.079
    0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM + ML-9Non-normal distribution4.04 ± 0.859
    c0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM vs
    0 Ca2+ + BAPTA-AM + ML-9
    Wilcoxon
    signed-rank test
    p = 0.0039
    Relative effect of ML-9 under different
    conditions
    ML-9 effect under control conditionNormal distribution7.19 ± 1.3210
    ML-9 effect under experimental condition 1Non-normal distribution18.69 ± 4.6410
    ML-9 effect under experimental condition 2Non-normal distribution20.31 ± 5.129
    dML-9 (experimental condition 1) vs ML-9
    (control condition)
    Mann–Whitney testp = 0.0232
    eML-9 (experimental condition 2) vs ML-9
    (control condition)
    Mann–Whitney testp = 0.0030
    • 0 Ca2+: remove extracellular Ca2+.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 1
January/February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Calmodulin Bidirectionally Regulates Evoked and Spontaneous Neurotransmitter Release at Retinal Ribbon Synapses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Calmodulin Bidirectionally Regulates Evoked and Spontaneous Neurotransmitter Release at Retinal Ribbon Synapses
Chao-Qun Liang, Gong Zhang, Lei Zhang, Si-Yun Chen, Jun-Nan Wang, Ting-Ting Zhang, Joshua H. Singer, Jiang-Bin Ke
eNeuro 8 December 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0257-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0257-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Calmodulin Bidirectionally Regulates Evoked and Spontaneous Neurotransmitter Release at Retinal Ribbon Synapses
Chao-Qun Liang, Gong Zhang, Lei Zhang, Si-Yun Chen, Jun-Nan Wang, Ting-Ting Zhang, Joshua H. Singer, Jiang-Bin Ke
eNeuro 8 December 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0257-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0257-20.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • AII amacrine cell
  • calmodulin
  • myosin light chain kinase
  • neurotransmitter release
  • retinal rod bipolar cell
  • ribbon synapse

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Context Memory Encoding and Retrieval Temporal Dynamics Are Modulated by Attention across the Adult Lifespan
  • Neural correlates of vocal auditory feedback processing: Unique insights from electrocorticography recordings in a human cochlear implant user
  • Group II Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Modulate Sound Evoked and Spontaneous Activity in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus
Show more Research Article: New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • NMDA receptors enhance the fidelity of synaptic integration
  • Sub-optimal Discontinuous Current-Clamp switching rates lead to deceptive mouse neuronal firing
  • Subunit-specific photocontrol of glycine receptors by azobenzene-nitrazepam photoswitcher
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.