Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

The Effect of Inclusion Criteria on the Functional Properties Reported in Mouse Visual Cortex

Natalia Mesa, Jack Waters and Saskia E. J. de Vries
eNeuro 28 January 2021, 8 (1) ENEURO.0188-20.2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0188-20.2021
Natalia Mesa
1Allen Institute, Seattle, WA 98109
2University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Waters
1Allen Institute, Seattle, WA 98109
2University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jack Waters
Saskia E. J. de Vries
1Allen Institute, Seattle, WA 98109
2University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Tuning characteristics in published studies. A, Mean preferred TF tuning of seven visual areas reported in five published studies. B, C, Same as in A but reporting the OSI and the DSI.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Example cells that pass inclusion criteria exclusively. A, All DF/F responses to the preferred stimulus condition (TF and direction) of a cell that passes all published inclusion criteria. B, Heatmap of mean %DF/F responses to each stimulus condition (TF × direction). C, Mean %DF/F responses (± SEM) to stimuli of different grating directions in the same example cell. D–F, Same as in A but with a cell that passes most criteria, but not Study 2. G–I, Same as in A but with a cell that only passes Study 1 criteria.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Most studies select for neurons along similar axes of the data. A, Six density plots of the mean response at the preferred stimulus condition (%DF/F) against the SD of the responses at the preferred stimulus condition where each point represents a single neuron. For each study, colored neurons are those selected for by inclusion criteria. Heatmap represents the density of neurons. B–D, Tuning characteristics after inclusion criteria are applied to Allen Brain Observatory. B, Mean TF tuning of six visual areas when different inclusion criteria are applied. C, D, show the mean OSI and DSI of six visual areas, respectively. E, Venn Diagram of neurons that were selected for by each inclusion criteria. Area of circles represents the number of neurons. Letters indicate example neurons from Figure 2.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Tuning characteristics of neurons based on robustness. A, E, I, Mean TF, OSI, and DSI tuning of neurons in V1, AL, and PM based on what percentage of most robust cells (cells with low CV) are included in the analysis. Shaded regions indicate SEM. The minimum percentage most robust cells displayed is 5%. B, Distribution of TF tuning of 10% least robust cells. C, Distribution of TF tuning of 10% most robust cells. F, G, J, K, Same as in B, C but with OSI and DSI. D, H, L, Mean TF, OSI, and DSI tuning of neurons in all visual areas comparing the 10% most robust neurons to the entire population of neurons. M, Heat map displaying p values for Mann–Whitney U test comparing the 10% most robust neurons and the entire population of neurons. The color scale is centered at p = 0.05/6 to account for Bonferroni correction. N, Mean DSI calculated for neurons selected to match the mean CV for each the neurons selected by each criterion, for each area, compared with the mean DSI for the neurons selected by that criteria and area. O, P, Same as in M but for OSI and TF.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Tuning characteristics of neurons based on robustness with cross-validated metrics. A, E, I, Mean TF, OSI, and DSI tuning of neurons in V1, AL, and PM based on what percentage of neurons are included in the analysis, starting with the most robust neurons. Shaded regions indicate SEM. The minimum percentage most robust cells displayed is 5%. B, Distribution of TF tuning of 10% least robust neurons. C, Distribution of TF tuning of 10% most robust neurons. F, G, J, K, Same as in B, C but with OSI and DSI. D, H, L, Mean TF, OSI, and DSI tuning of neurons in all visual areas in 10% most robust neurons versus the entire population of neurons.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    How trial number changes tuning metrics and CV. A, Mean CV calculated at the preferred condition using different numbers of trials and the cross-validation method. B, Mean peak response at the preferred condition versus SD at the preferred condition using only four trials and the cross validation method. C, Same as in B but using 14 trials. D–F, OSI, TF, and DSI calculated using the cross-validation method as a function of the number of trials used in the analysis.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Summary of the experimental conditions and inclusion criteria used in published studies

    PaperAnesthesiaIndicatorStimulusStimulus repetitionsResponsiveness criteriaPercentage of responsive cells# Cells Allen Brain Observatory
    Study 1
    Sun et al. (2016)
    NoneGCaMP6s12-s full-field square grating
    TF: 0.5, 1 Hz
    SF 0.05cpd
    8–16 directions
    10Mean ΔF/F > 10%49% (n = 1279/2609)17.5% (n = 2962/16923)
    Study 2
    Roth et al. (2012)
    UrethaneOGB-15-s full-field sine wave grating
    TF: 0.5, 1, 2, 4 Hz
    SF: 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16cpd
    8 directions
    4In 50% of trials, mean ΔF/F >baseline + 3σ
    Mean response > 5%
    44% (n = 399/973)6.3% (n = 1068/16923)
    Study 3
    Andermann et al. (2011)
    NoneGCaMP340° sine wave grating patches
    TF: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 24 Hz
    SF: 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.32cpd
    Direction: upward
    9–28t test comparing grating response with blank sweep with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05/n)8% (n = 28/340)29.6% (n = 5015/16923)
    Study 4
    Marshel et al. (2011)
    IsofluoraneOGB-14-s full-field sine wave gratings
    SF: 0.04 cpd
    TF: 0.5,1, 2, 4, 8 Hz
    8 directions
    5Mean ΔF/F > 6%
    Reliability >1(see Materials and Methods)
    42% (n = 586/1395)7.8% (n = 1068/16923)
    Study 5
    Tohmi et al. (2014)
    UrethaneFura-25-s ramping square and sine wave gratings
    SF 0.05 and 0.1cpd
    8 directions
    28–124Max ΔF/F > 5%41.2% (n = 142/347)94.7 (n = 16,033/16,923)
    • Last column shows the number of neurons selected from the Allen Brain Observatory.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 1
January/February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effect of Inclusion Criteria on the Functional Properties Reported in Mouse Visual Cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The Effect of Inclusion Criteria on the Functional Properties Reported in Mouse Visual Cortex
Natalia Mesa, Jack Waters, Saskia E. J. de Vries
eNeuro 28 January 2021, 8 (1) ENEURO.0188-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0188-20.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
The Effect of Inclusion Criteria on the Functional Properties Reported in Mouse Visual Cortex
Natalia Mesa, Jack Waters, Saskia E. J. de Vries
eNeuro 28 January 2021, 8 (1) ENEURO.0188-20.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0188-20.2021
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • calcium imaging
  • data analysis
  • inclusion criteria
  • neurophysiology
  • visual cortex

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Characterization of the Tau Interactome in Human Brain Reveals Isoform-Dependent Interaction with 14-3-3 Family Proteins
  • The Mobility of Neurofilaments in Mature Myelinated Axons of Adult Mice
  • Capacity Limits Lead to Information Bottlenecks in Ongoing Rapid Motor Behaviors
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Taste-odor association learning alters the dynamics of intra-oral odor responses in the posterior piriform cortex of awake rats
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.