Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Asparagine Endopeptidase (δ Secretase), an Enzyme Implicated in Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology, Is an Inhibitor of Axon Regeneration in Peripheral Nerves

Arthur W. English, Xia Liu, Olivia C. Mistretta, Patricia J. Ward and Keqiang Ye
eNeuro 15 December 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0155-20.2020; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0155-20.2020
Arthur W. English
1Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Arthur W. English
Xia Liu
2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivia C. Mistretta
1Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia J. Ward
1Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Patricia J. Ward
Keqiang Ye
2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A, Immunoblots of extracts of sciatic nerves from intact mice and from nerves cut and repaired one week earlier. IR to AEP (top) is noted by the band at 37 kDa, representing enzymatically active AEP. IR to the AEP-cleaved fragment of Tau (Tau N368) and to full-length Tau (Tau 5) are shown below. B, Quantitative analysis of differences in expression of Tau N368 and Tau 5 between intact nerves and cut and repaired nerves, relative to β actin controls, are shown for a group of male and female mice as mean fold (±SEM) intensities. The horizontal dashed line at unity marks the amount of IR found in intact mice. C, Changes in AEP IR are shown at different times after sciatic nerve transection and repair in WT and AEP KO mice. D, Quantitative analysis of AEP expression in sciatic nerves at different times after nerve transection and repair. Mean (±SEM) fold expression of AEP IR, relative to that found in AEP KO mice at the same postinjury times are shown. The horizontal dashed line at unity marks the amount of IR found in AEP KO mice.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    A, Immunoblots of extracts of sciatic nerves from intact mice and from nerves cut and repaired one week earlier. IR to an antibody recognizing the product of APP produced by AEP cleavage, APP N585 (top), and full-length APP (bottom) are shown. B, Quantitative analysis of differences in expression of full-length APP (left) and APP N585 (right) between intact nerves and cut and repaired nerves, relative to β actin controls, are shown for a group of male and female mice as mean fold (±SEM) intensities. The horizontal dashed line at unity marks the amount of IR found in Intact mice. C, Time course of expression of APP N585 in cut and repaired sciatic nerves. The horizontal dashed line at unity marks the amount of IR found in AEP KO mice.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Neurite length was increased in cultured neurons from AEP−/− mice. A, Examples of neurons cultured from AEP+/+ (top) and AEP−/− (bottom) mice. The identity of longest neurites of individual neurons is indicated by arrows. Scale bar: 100 μm. B, Mean (±SEM) length of the longest neurites in cultures of adult DRG neurons from AEP+/+, AEP+/−, and AEP−/− mice measured at 72 h in vitro.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Elongation of regenerating axons is enhanced in AEP KO mice. A, Examples of confocal images of sciatic nerves in SLICK-A mice that had been cut and repaired two weeks earlier with a segment of nerve harvested from a littermate that did not express YFP. Note more longer axons are found in the SLICK-A/AEP−/− mouse (top). B, Distributions of YFP+ regenerating axon profile lengths in male and female SLICK-A/AEP−/− mice (KO:KO) and SLICK-A/AEP+/+ (WT:WT) mice measured two weeks after sciatic nerve transection and repair are shown as cumulative frequency histograms (left). Data from nerves from WT (SLICK-A/AEP+/+) mice repaired with grafts from AEP−/− mice (WT:KO) in comparison to those from WT:WT nerves are shown in the graph on the right. Each set of symbols represents mean values in each bin (N = 5 except for WT:KO, where N = 4). Vertical dashed lines mark the lengths at the 50th percentile, the median for each distribution. C, Average (±SEM) median lengths of regenerating axon profiles two weeks after sciatic nerve transection and repair in mice in which neither, both, or one copy of the gene for AEP had been knocked out, and when WT nerves were repaired with grafts from KO mice (mixed). D, Mean (±SEM) sprouting index in mice of the three genotypes studied and mixed repair nerves. No significant differences were observed.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Recovery of evoked muscle responses is accelerated in AEP KO mice. A, Examples of full wave rectified maximal direct muscle (M) responses to sciatic nerve stimulation recorded from GAST muscles at different times after transection and repair of the sciatic nerve. Traces on the left are from a single WT mouse. Those on the right are from a single AEP KO mouse. B, Maximum amplitude M responses were measured in GAST (left) and TA (right) at different times after sciatic nerve transection and repair. Data were fit with linear least-square regression lines. Regression and correlation coefficients are shown for each fitted line. C, Amplitudes of recorded responses in B were scaled to preinjury values in each mouse and re-plotted. Regression and correlation coefficients are shown for each fitted line.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    A, Effects of ES on recovery of direct muscle (M) response amplitude in AEP KO mice. Mean (±SEM) scaled M response amplitudes recorded from GAST (left) and TA (right) muscles four weeks after sciatic nerve transection and repair. Both AEP KO mice and WT mice were studied. Mice of each genotype either were treated at the time of nerve repair with 1 h of 20-Hz ES of the proximal nerve stump or left untreated. B, Effects of ES on BDNF-TrkB expression in WT and AEP KO mice. Immunoblots from sciatic nerves 7 d following nerve transection and repair were probed for two markers of BDNF-TrkB signaling: phosphorylation of the TrkB receptor at Y816 and phosphorylation of the downstream effector, AKT. IR to both is increased in ES mice relative to untreated (UT) controls in both WT and AEP KO animals. C, Effects of ES on AEP cleavage of APP and Tau. Immunoblots from animals used in panel C were probed with antibodies to AEP, full-length APP and Tau, and the AEP cleavage products of these two proteins, APP N585 and Tau N368. The solid arrow points to the greater amount of IR to inactive AEP in the ES mouse.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 8 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 8, Issue 1
January/February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Asparagine Endopeptidase (δ Secretase), an Enzyme Implicated in Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology, Is an Inhibitor of Axon Regeneration in Peripheral Nerves
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Asparagine Endopeptidase (δ Secretase), an Enzyme Implicated in Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology, Is an Inhibitor of Axon Regeneration in Peripheral Nerves
Arthur W. English, Xia Liu, Olivia C. Mistretta, Patricia J. Ward, Keqiang Ye
eNeuro 15 December 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0155-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0155-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Asparagine Endopeptidase (δ Secretase), an Enzyme Implicated in Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology, Is an Inhibitor of Axon Regeneration in Peripheral Nerves
Arthur W. English, Xia Liu, Olivia C. Mistretta, Patricia J. Ward, Keqiang Ye
eNeuro 15 December 2020, 8 (1) ENEURO.0155-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0155-20.2020
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • APP
  • asparagine endopeptidase
  • mouse
  • nerve
  • regeneration
  • tau

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • A progressive ratio task with costly resets reveals adaptive effort-delay tradeoffs
  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • The PDGFBB-PDGFRβ Pathway and Laminins in Pericytes Are Involved in the Temporal Change of AQP4 Polarity during Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Pathogenesis
  • The Ventral Pallidum Innervates a Distinct Subset of Midbrain Dopamine Neurons
  • Rethinking Alzheimer's: Harnessing Cannabidiol to Modulate IDO and cGAS Pathways for Neuroinflammation Control
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.