Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Editorial

On Fallacies in Neuroscience

Christophe Bernard
eNeuro 10 December 2020, 7 (6) ENEURO.0491-20.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0491-20.2020
Christophe Bernard
Roles: Editor-in-Chief
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christophe Bernard
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

DOI 
https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0491-20.2020
PubMed 
33303561
Published By 
Society for Neuroscience
History 
  • Published online December 10, 2020.
Copyright & Usage 
Copyright © 2020 Bernard This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Author Information

  1. Christophe Bernard, Editor-in-Chief
  1. Correspondence should be addressed to Christophe Bernard at eneuroeditor{at}sfn.org.
View Full Text

Author contributions

Disclosures

Online Impact

 

Article usage

Select a custom date range for the past year
E.g., 2023-04-01
to
E.g., 2023-04-01

Article usage: December 2020 to March 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Dec 20206203435543
Total 20206203435543
Jan 20214401355222
Feb 20216753784
Mar 20215141063
Apr 20212423331
May 20211316513
Jun 20211322830
Jul 2021810719
Aug 20211213727
Sep 202179623
Oct 202126114112
Nov 2021248325
Dec 2021109820
Total 20216953563669
Jan 20221013322
Feb 20221071486272
Mar 20221923948
Apr 20223421837
May 20221317219
Jun 2022121088
Jul 2022109521
Aug 20226717
Sep 202237325
Oct 202278524
Nov 2022510839
Dec 202279612
Total 20222332884534
Jan 202349930
Feb 20234677
Mar 20231669
Total 2023923246
Total1557101141792
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 6
November/December 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
On Fallacies in Neuroscience
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
On Fallacies in Neuroscience
Christophe Bernard
eNeuro 10 December 2020, 7 (6) ENEURO.0491-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0491-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
On Fallacies in Neuroscience
Christophe Bernard
eNeuro 10 December 2020, 7 (6) ENEURO.0491-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0491-20.2020
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Two Examples of Fallacies
    • Why Does It Happen at All?
    • Can We Improve Things?
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Stop Reproducing the Reproducibility Crisis
  • Everything You Always Wanted to Say about Science (But Were Afraid to Publish)
  • Doing Socially Responsible Science in the Age of Selfies and Immediacy
Show more Editorial

Subjects

  • Experimental Bias
  • Editorials

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.