Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleOpinion, Disorders of the Nervous System

Glucose-Sparing Action of Ketones Boosts Functions Exclusive to Glucose in the Brain

Yuri Zilberter and Tanya Zilberter
eNeuro 9 November 2020, 7 (6) ENEURO.0303-20.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0303-20.2020
Yuri Zilberter
1Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix-Marseille Universite, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité Mixte de Recherche 1106, Marseille 13385, France
3Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290, Pushchino, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tanya Zilberter
2Infotonic Consultancy, Marseille 13009, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The ketogenic diet (KD) has been successfully used for a century for treating refractory epilepsy and is currently seen as one of the few viable approaches to the treatment of a plethora of metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases. Empirical evidence notwithstanding, there is still no universal understanding of KD mechanism(s). An important fact is that the brain is capable of using ketone bodies for fuel. Another critical point is that glucose’s functions span beyond its role as an energy substrate, and in most of these functions, glucose is irreplaceable. By acting as a supplementary fuel, ketone bodies may free up glucose for its other crucial and exclusive function. We propose that this glucose-sparing effect of ketone bodies may underlie the effectiveness of KD in epilepsy and major neurodegenerative diseases, which are all characterized by brain glucose hypometabolism.

  • aerobic glycolysis
  • antioxidant system
  • glucose metabolism
  • glycogen
  • ketogenic diet
  • ketosis

Significance Statement

The ketogenic diet (KD) was created in the 1920s as a therapy for refractory epilepsy. Since then, evidence accumulated showing its potential for other major neurodegenerative disorders. The exact mechanism of KD’s protective activity still remains unknown, nonetheless. In the brain, ketone bodies can be used for cellular energy, at least partially substituting glucose as brain fuel. However, glucose has essential functions beyond those of just energy supply that cannot be provided by alternative substrates. We propose that the glucose-sparing effect of ketone bodies may underlie the effectiveness of KD in epilepsy and other major neurodegenerative diseases which are all characterized by brain glucose hypometabolism.

Introduction

There is no universally accepted definition of ketogenic diets (KDs). Moreover, there is a tendency to relax previous quantitative criteria (Zilberter and Zilberter, 2018) introduced almost a century ago (Wilder and Winter, 1922) that were based on macronutrient composition. Perhaps the most practical notion of whether a diet can be considered to be ketogenic is made by Seyfried (2012): it is “as long as the individual has reduced blood glucose and is producing ketones.” Although protein is included in the ketogenic ratio equation (Shaffer, 1921), glucose, ketone bodies, and their interplay determine the dominating metabolic mode: whether the predominant energy supply is glucose or ketone bodies (Westman et al., 2003). The current data allow us to conclude that the functional interaction between glucose and ketone bodies is not a binary winner-take-all process. Here, we attempt to describe more intricate relationships between them.

Glycolytic ATP Production

In the case of acute energy demand such as during intense network activity, the brain is able to intensify glycolytic ATP production for rapid supply. Aerobic glycolysis (when glucose is partially converted to lactate in the presence of oxygen, producing two ATP molecules) is disproportionate to the oxygen consumption of glucose utilization when the oxygen delivery is adequate (Dienel and Cruz, 2016). In the resting brain, glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation rates appear well-matched, indicating nearly complete oxidation of glucose. However, in the activated brain at physiological conditions, e.g., during sensory stimulation and mental testing, aerobic glycolysis has been observed in various brain regions (Dienel and Cruz, 2016; Dienel, 2019a). The cellular contribution to aerobic glycolysis is yet unclear and is a matter of debate (Dienel and Cruz, 2016; Barros et al., 2020). As lactate (in addition to pyruvate) is the end-product of the glycolytic pathway during aerobic glycolysis, it can either be cleared out from the brain or partially consumed as supplementary fuel for neurons (Pellerin and Magistretti, 2012; Dienel and Cruz, 2016). Indeed, aerobic glycolysis as an ATP production mechanism, while low-capacity, is rapid, ensuring fast ATP resupply in neurons where the dynamic demand for energy is highest (Yellen, 2018). The notion of fast ATP synthesis (aerobic glycolysis) is supported by an immediate rise in extracellular lactate and reduction in glucose levels during brief visual stimulation coincident with spiking activity (Li and Freeman, 2015).

Neurons are rich in mitochondria, a major source of ATP (Hall et al., 2012). However, for some of the neuronal functions, aerobic glycolysis may be the preferential method of fuel generation, for instance, for fast axonal vesicle transport (Zala et al., 2013). Although synaptic transmission is a very energy-demanding process, many presynaptic nerve terminals lack mitochondria (Devine and Kittler, 2018; Tourigny et al., 2019), although mitochondria can migrate to and/or ATP can diffuse into the presynaptic boutons during enhanced synaptic activity (Chamberlain and Sheng, 2019; Rossi and Pekkurnaz, 2019). Recent studies indicate that presynaptic transmission is dependent on activity-induced glycolysis (Ashrafi and Ryan, 2017), while presynapses can use ATP produced by both glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation to sustain neurotransmission (Ashrafi and Ryan, 2017; Chamberlain and Sheng, 2019; Rossi and Pekkurnaz, 2019). Moreover, dendritic spines that receive most excitatory synaptic inputs have been shown to contain no mitochondria (Kasthuri et al., 2015), despite being sites of intense energy utilization. Although some ATP might diffuse to spine heads from nearby dendritic mitochondria, it is conceivable that spines are reliant on glycolysis instead (Kasthuri et al., 2015). Glycolytic ATP alone, with its limited production capacity, is unlikely to be sufficient to power ion pumping required for the maintenance of ion gradient and membrane potential (Hall et al., 2012), but it may nevertheless play an important role in fast refueling. For instance, the preferential role of glycolytic energy supply was demonstrated for Na/K-ATPase in fast-twitch skeletal muscle (Okamoto et al., 2001) and cardiac Purkinje cells (Glitsch and Tappe, 1993). Aerobic glycolysis during KD has not been studied yet. However, unlike glucose, ketones cannot be involved in aerobic glycolysis, and thus they contribute to ATP production via oxidative phosphorylation only (Cunnane et al., 2020).

The Cytoplasmic Antioxidant System

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) in brain cells originate from multiple sources and most of them are generated as byproducts of metabolic reactions. Intracellular ROS come mainly from NADPH oxidase (NOX), xanthine oxidase, nitric oxide synthase, and mitochondria. NOX is the only enzyme with the primary function of generating ROS (Bedard and Krause, 2007; Koju et al., 2019) that are mostly used for the “host defense” (e.g., microbial killing) in organisms. NOX enzymes are predominantly expressed in the cellular plasma membrane (Ma et al., 2017). The enzyme consists of a membrane-bound catalytic core and several cytosolic regulatory subunits (Bedard and Krause, 2007). There are seven known isoforms of NOX with NOX1, NOX2, and NOX4 expressed in multiple brain regions including the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum, hypothalamus, midbrain, and/or striatum (Hou et al., 2020). These NOX variants are the most prominent isoforms detected in a variety of brain cell types (Cahill-Smith and Li, 2014; Rastogi et al., 2016; Hou et al., 2020), with NOX2 the dominant form expressed by microglia, neurons, and astrocytes. Activation of NOX results in an increase of extracellular H2O2 levels followed by H2O2 entry into the cells via aquaporins (Bienert and Chaumont, 2014). Under “resting conditions” in the brain, NOX is normally dormant and therefore its contribution to the total cellular ROS production under resting or physiological conditions is not clear (Brown and Borutaite, 2012). In pathology, when NOX is activated by specific stimulation (Rastogi et al., 2016), its cytosolic subunits translocate to the membrane and associate to the functioning complex. Under these conditions, mitochondria and NOX are the major ROS producers (Tarafdar and Pula, 2018; Barua et al., 2019). However, before its diffusion to the cytoplasm, the internal consumption of H2O2 in mitochondria is much higher than originally anticipated (Munro and Pamenter, 2019) and during oxidative stress, mitochondria may be victims rather than producers of oxidative damage (Gandhi and Abramov, 2012). Indeed, in AD models, the effects of mitochondrial ROS were found to be much smaller compared with those of NOX-produced ROS (Angelova and Abramov, 2018).

In the cytoplasm, an efficient anti-oxidative system based largely on the glycolysis-associated pentose-phosphate pathway strictly regulates ROS levels to avoid any oxidative injury (Bolaños and Almeida, 2010; Franco et al., 2019; Cherkas et al., 2020). Thus, brain cells use glucose as an energy provider as well as the substrate for cytoplasmic ROS detoxification mechanisms. The combination of ROS overproduction with inadequate antioxidant defenses (such as when glucose utilization is inhibited) results in oxidative stress and consequent damages, e.g., neural cell death and neurodegeneration (Avery, 2011; Tarafdar and Pula, 2018).

An extreme example of the importance of glucose-based antioxidant defense for cellular function was reported by us when glucose in artificial CSF (ACSF) was exchanged for pyruvate in hippocampal slices (Malkov et al., 2014, 2019). The substitution resulted in oxidative stress leading to massive network depolarization (analogous to spreading depression; Pietrobon and Moskowitz, 2014) together with a “metabolic collapse.” Importantly, we obtained similar results replacing glucose with other mitochondrial fuels such as lactate or β-hydroxybutyrate (unpublished), indicating again the unique importance of glucose.

KD improves antioxidant defense by stimulating the endogenous antioxidant system. Mild oxidative stress following KD onset drives nuclear translocation of transcription factor Nrf2, leading to increased synthesis of glutathione which is one of the major components of the antioxidant defense (Pinto et al., 2018; Camberos-Luna and Massieu, 2020).

Glycogen Production in Astrocytes

The major energy reserve in the brain is glycogen, a macromolecular storage form of glucose (Dienel, 2019b). Found mostly in astrocytes (Dienel and Carlson, 2019; neurons can store less significant amounts; Saez et al., 2014), glycogen is a dynamic participant in brain activity and is regulated by neurotransmitters. Dysregulation of glycogen turnover may cause severe consequences, e.g., Lafora disease with progressive neurodegeneration and epilepsy leading to death in early adulthood (Duran et al., 2019). During intense brain activity, glycogen converted to lactate and released from astrocytes can be used by neurons as mitochondrial fuel. Meanwhile, rapid glycogenolytic generation of ATP may be important for astrocytic energy demands (Dienel and Rothman, 2019), and thus glycogenolysis, by reducing the astrocytic requirement for blood-borne glucose, can spare an equivalent amount of glucose for neuronal utilization (Dienel, 2019a; DiNuzzo et al., 2019). The estimated glucose equivalent of glycogen concentration in astrocytes is up to 40–100 mM. Considering the high rate of glycogenolysis, the amount of glucose that can be released via glycogen breakdown is very significant (Dienel, 2019a; DiNuzzo et al., 2019). Unfortunately, glycogen levels in the human brain during KD have yet to be investigated. In rats, one study reported increased inbound glucose (reflecting glycogen content; DeVivo et al., 1978) under KD, while no change in glycogen content was found in another study (Al-Mudallal et al., 1995) or glycogen was decreased (Bough et al., 2006). Carbohydrate intake does not affect brain glycogen content, while in both muscle and liver it does significantly correlate with glycogen levels (Soya et al., 2018).

Production of Major Neurotransmitters

Glucose fuels de novo synthesis of major neurotransmitters. Precursors for glutamate or GABA are synthesized by astrocytes and then transferred to neurons in the glutamine–glutamate/GABA cycle (Dienel, 2019a). The transmitters released during synaptic activity are transported back to astrocytes, where a fraction (∼25%) is degraded with the remainder released and reused by the neurons. The process is very intense, consuming up to 75% of the entire glucose consumption in the cortex (Schousboe et al., 2013; Hertz and Rothman, 2016). Glucose metabolism is required for the synthesis of glutamate from glutamine in glutamatergic neurons (Bak et al., 2006; Lund et al., 2009; Chowdhury et al., 2014; Hertz and Rothman, 2016), but in GABAergic neurons, β-hydroxybutyrate is capable of replacing glucose for GABA production (Hertz and Rothman, 2016).

Glucose Utilization in the Brain during Ketosis

The KD is an efficient clinical treatment used for over a century to decrease brain hyperexcitability and seizures via a yet unclear mechanism. Carbohydrate limitation in KD led to a popular notion that glycolysis inhibition may partially reproduce the effects of KD. However, this hypothesis ignores the important fact that glycolysis inhibition a priori results in energy deprivation; meanwhile, no energy deficiency occurs under KD [in rats on KD, the brain ATP level was found either unchanged (Al-Mudallal et al., 1996; Bough et al., 2006) or increased (DeVivo et al., 1978; Nakazawa et al., 1983)]. However, do ketones inhibit glycolysis [as, for instance, does 2-deoxy-d-glucose (Pajak et al., 2019) or iodoacetate (Schmidt and Dringen, 2009)] or do they just compete with glucose as mitochondrial fuel? The NMR study of Valente-Silva et al. (2015) is often cited as evidence of glycolysis inhibition. There are a number of important flaws in this study, however: (1) the 400-μm-thick brain slices were superfused with oxygenated ACSF at 3 ml/min rate that results in anoxic conditions within the tissue (Ivanov and Zilberter, 2011), making oxidative phosphorylation impossible; and (2) the authors used 4-AP to induce network activity, while epileptiform activity induced by 4-AP was itself shown to be a strong inhibitor of glycolysis (Malkov et al., 2018). To the best of our knowledge, there are no other reports on ketones’ direct inhibitory action on glycolysis.

There have been many attempts to estimate brain glucose utilization under KD, with variable results. In awake animals, glucose utilization either increased (Yudkoff et al., 2005), did not change (Al-Mudallal et al., 1995) or decreased (Melø et al., 2006), while brain glucose levels either increased (Melø et al., 2006), did not change (DeVivo et al., 1978; Yudkoff et al., 2005) or decreased (Samala et al., 2011). Utilization of the fluorodeoxyglucose (18F)-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) technique in animals requires anesthesia that introduces a brain state quite different from an awake one. Nevertheless, under anesthesia, glucose utilization either increased (Pifferi et al., 2011; Roy et al., 2012), remained unchanged (Yudkoff et al., 2005), or decreased (LaManna et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2013). The variability of the results may be explained by the presence of confounding factors such as, e.g., the use of anesthesia, significant age difference and the relatively high interindividual variation in plasma ketones during KD (Pifferi et al., 2011; Roy et al., 2012).

Interestingly, in healthy young/middle age humans, cerebral glucose utilization evaluated by arteriovenous difference was decreased under acute hyperketonemia (a blood infusion of β-hydroxybutyrate; Hasselbalch et al., 1996) or following 3 d of fasting (Hasselbalch et al., 1994). Recent studies using the FDG-PET technique confirmed these results reporting decreased brain glucose utilization in healthy humans under KD (Courchesne-Loyer et al., 2017) or acute hyperketonemia (Svart et al., 2018). Importantly and however, similar recordings during ketogenic intervention in humans suffering mild cognitive impairment (Fortier et al., 2019) or mild-moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD; Croteau et al., 2018b) revealed no change in brain glucose utilization, while brain ketone metabolism was found to be normal (Castellano et al., 2015; Croteau et al., 2018a). Notably, glucose hypometabolism is a hallmark of AD pathogenesis (Caminiti et al., 2018; Gordon et al., 2018; Butterfield and Halliwell, 2019). Indeed, disrupted glucose metabolism associated with oxidative stress is the common feature of major neurodegenerative diseases (Zilberter and Zilberter, 2017; Cunnane et al., 2020; Tang, 2020) and epilepsy (Pearson-Smith and Patel, 2017; Zilberter and Zilberter, 2017; Patel, 2018). For instance, AD pathology occurs well before (up to two decades prior) the onset of clinical symptoms (Caminiti et al., 2018; Gordon et al., 2018; Butterfield and Halliwell, 2019) with dysfunctional glucose metabolism as one earliest manifestation. In human epilepsy, clinical tests using FDG-PET imaging have established that decreased brain glucose utilization during quiescent (interictal) periods is a widely recognized biomarker of epileptogenesis (Sarikaya, 2015; Lotan et al., 2020). Since glucose utilization underlies vital brain functions such as energy supply and antioxidant defense (see above), it is not surprising that disturbances in glucose metabolism can lead to a chain of harmful consequences, and thus likely represent a major underlying cause of disease initiation and progression (Pearson-Smith and Patel, 2017; Zilberter and Zilberter, 2017; Butterfield and Halliwell, 2019). Therefore, as also suggested previously (Cunnane et al., 2016a; Croteau et al., 2018b), it is logical to conclude that in a normal brain, where glucose can fully cover energy needs, the addition of ketones as mitochondrial fuel competitors reduces the need for a part of glucose function and the total glucose utilization goes down. In pathology, when glucose utilization is impaired leading to energy deficiency, ketone bodies compensate at least partially this energy gap, leaving more glucose available for its other vital functions such as mentioned above.

In fact, the glucose-sparing effect may be dominant in ketone’s beneficial therapeutic function ensemble. Clinical effects of KD are mostly known regarding epilepsy as childhood epilepsy has been successfully treated with KD since the 1920s (Wilder, 1921). Recently, however, the KD began to be used in preclinical studies of other disorders, including neurodegenerative, psychiatric, and brain injury (McDonald and Cervenka, 2018; Camberos-Luna and Massieu, 2020; Kraeuter et al., 2020), demonstrating promising efficiency that has also been confirmed in clinical trials in mild cognitive impairment, AD, and Parkinson’s disease patients (for review, see Cunnane et al., 2020). Meanwhile, it has been noted that the efficacy of KD in an array of disorders with distinct pathophysiologies may indicate shared underlying pathologic mechanisms (Kraeuter et al., 2020). In the case of major neurodegenerative diseases, one such mechanism is glucose hypometabolism (Zilberter and Zilberter, 2017; Cunnane et al., 2020; Tang, 2020). Definitely, impaired glucose metabolism may lead to energy deficiency that ketones can partially compensate by boosting mitochondrial oxidation. Here, it is interesting to note that in the case of early AD stages, neither cerebral oxygen consumption (Hoyer et al., 1988; Hoyer, 1992) nor mitochondrial ability for ketone utilization changed (Castellano et al., 2015; Croteau et al., 2018a), suggesting normal mitochondrial functioning (Cunnane et al., 2016b, 2020), despite pronounced glucose hypometabolism. Indeed, we demonstrated recently in hippocampal slices that amyloid-β (Malkov et al., 2020) as well as epileptiform activity (Malkov et al., 2018) strongly inhibited glycolysis while mitochondrial function remained normal or even upregulated, potentially as a compensatory mechanism. This therefore suggests that glucose metabolism deficiency mostly affects functions not related to oxidative phosphorylation and thus ketones possibly leave more glucose available for other vital functions (Fig. 1) that may be especially important for the therapeutic effects of KD. The potential importance of the glucose-sparing effect of ketones has been noted previously in reports considering neurodegenerative diseases (Cunnane et al., 2016a, 2020).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Roles of glucose and ketone bodies in brain cells: parallel, converging, and exclusive. Red: ketone bodies’ pathway to mitochondria. Blue: glucose pathway to mitochondria. Purple: the point of convergence. Green: exclusive roles of glucose.

Conclusions

Glucose does not share some of its functions in the brain with other metabolic substrates, which makes it an exclusive neurometabolite. The frequent claim that ketones directly inhibit the process of glycolysis is not supported by experimental evidence and seems theoretically unlikely. Moreover, glycolysis inhibition modifies a number of cellular functions that lead to unpredictable variations of network excitability, and in the long-run has been shown to result in epileptogenesis (Samokhina et al., 2017, 2020). In pathology, ketones are capable of partially taking over the glucose’s energy fuel role in mitochondria and presumably spare glucose for its other exclusive functions. Here, we summarized the evidence and offer a non-antagonistic view of the ketone bodies-glucose interplay during metabolic shifting. The glucose-sparing effect of ketone bodies may determine the efficiency of the ketogenic regime and is especially important in epilepsy and major neurodegenerative diseases characterized by significantly impaired brain glucose utilization.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements: This study was supported by the RSF Grant 20-65-46035 to Y.Z.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Al-Mudallal AS, Levin BE, Lust WD, Harik SI (1995) Effects of unbalanced diets on cerebral glucose metabolism in the adult rat. Neurology 45:2261–2265. doi:10.1212/wnl.45.12.2261 pmid:8848204
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Al-Mudallal AS, LaManna JC, Lust WD, Harik SI (1996) Diet-induced ketosis does not cause cerebral acidosis. Epilepsia 37:258–261. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00022.x pmid:8598184
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Angelova PR, Abramov AY (2018) Role of mitochondrial ROS in the brain: from physiology to neurodegeneration. FEBS Lett 592:692–702. doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12964 pmid:29292494
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Ashrafi G, Ryan TA (2017) Glucose metabolism in nerve terminals. Curr Opin Neurobiol 45:156–161. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2017.03.007 pmid:28605677
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Avery SV (2011) Molecular targets of oxidative stress. Biochem J 434:201–210. doi:10.1042/BJ20101695 pmid:21309749
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Bak LK, Schousboe A, Sonnewald U, Waagepetersen HS (2006) Glucose is necessary to maintain neurotransmitter homeostasis during synaptic activity in cultured glutamatergic neurons. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26:1285–1297. doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600281 pmid:16467783
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Barros LF, Felipe Barros L, Ruminot I, Martín AS, Lerchundi R, Fernández-Moncada I, Baeza-Lehnert F (2020) Aerobic glycolysis in the brain: Warburg and Crabtree contra Pasteur. Neurochem Res. Advance online publication. Retrieved Jan 24, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11064-020-02964-w.
  8. ↵
    Barua S, Kim JY, Yenari MA, Lee JE (2019) The role of NOX inhibitors in neurodegenerative diseases. IBRO Rep 7:59–69. doi:10.1016/j.ibror.2019.07.1721 pmid:31463415
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Bedard K, Krause KH (2007) The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev 87:245–313. doi:10.1152/physrev.00044.2005 pmid:17237347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Bienert GP, Chaumont F (2014) Aquaporin-facilitated transmembrane diffusion of hydrogen peroxide. Biochim Biophys Acta 1840:1596–1604. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.09.017 pmid:24060746
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Bolaños JP, Almeida A (2010) The pentose-phosphate pathway in neuronal survival against nitrosative stress. IUBMB Life 62:14–18. doi:10.1002/iub.280 pmid:19937972
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Bough KJ, Wetherington J, Hassel B, Pare JF, Gawryluk JW, Greene JG, Shaw R, Smith Y, Geiger JD, Dingledine RJ (2006) Mitochondrial biogenesis in the anticonvulsant mechanism of the ketogenic diet. Ann Neurol 60:223–235. doi:10.1002/ana.20899 pmid:16807920
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Brown GC, Borutaite V (2012) There is no evidence that mitochondria are the main source of reactive oxygen species in mammalian cells. Mitochondrion 12:1–4. doi:10.1016/j.mito.2011.02.001 pmid:21303703
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Butterfield DA, Halliwell B (2019) Oxidative stress, dysfunctional glucose metabolism and Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 20:148–160. doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0132-6 pmid:30737462
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Cahill-Smith S, Li JM (2014) Oxidative stress, redox signalling and endothelial dysfunction in ageing-related neurodegenerative diseases: a role of NADPH oxidase 2. Br J Clin Pharmacol 78:441–453. doi:10.1111/bcp.12357 pmid:25279404
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Camberos-Luna L, Massieu L (2020) Therapeutic strategies for ketosis induction and their potential efficacy for the treatment of acute brain injury and neurodegenerative diseases. Neurochem Int 133:104614. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2019.104614 pmid:31785349
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Caminiti SP, Ballarini T, Sala A, Cerami C, Presotto L, Santangelo R, Fallanca F, Vanoli EG, Gianolli L, Iannaccone S, Magnani G, Perani D, Parnetti L, Eusebi P, Frisoni G, Nobili F, Picco A, Scarpini E, BIOMARKAPD Project (2018) FDG-PET and CSF biomarker accuracy in prediction of conversion to different dementias in a large multicentre MCI cohort. Neuroimage Clin 18:167–177. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.019
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    Castellano CA, Nugent S, Paquet N, Tremblay S, Bocti C, Lacombe G, Imbeault H, Turcotte E, Fulop T, Cunnane SC (2015) Lower brain 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake but normal 11C-acetoacetate metabolism in mild Alzheimer’s disease dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 43:1343–1353. doi:10.3233/JAD-141074 pmid:25147107
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Chamberlain KA, Sheng ZH (2019) Mechanisms for the maintenance and regulation of axonal energy supply. J Neurosci Res 97:897–913. doi:10.1002/jnr.24411 pmid:30883896
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Cherkas A, Holota S, Mdzinarashvili T, Gabbianelli R, Zarkovic N (2020) Glucose as a major antioxidant: when, what for and why it fails? Antioxidants (Basel) 9:140.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    Chowdhury GMI, Jiang L, Rothman DL, Behar KL (2014) The contribution of ketone bodies to basal and activity-dependent neuronal oxidation in vivo. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34:1233–1242. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.77 pmid:24780902
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Courchesne-Loyer A, Croteau E, Castellano CA, St-Pierre V, Hennebelle M, Cunnane SC (2017) Inverse relationship between brain glucose and ketone metabolism in adults during short-term moderate dietary ketosis: a dual tracer quantitative positron emission tomography study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37:2485–2493. doi:10.1177/0271678X16669366
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    Croteau E, Castellano CA, Fortier M, Bocti C, Fulop T, Paquet N, Cunnane SC (2018a) A cross-sectional comparison of brain glucose and ketone metabolism in cognitively healthy older adults, mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Gerontol 107:18–26.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Croteau E, Castellano C-A, Richard MA, Fortier M, Nugent S, Lepage M, Duchesne S, Whittingstall K, Turcotte ÉE, Bocti C, Fülöp T, Cunnane SC (2018b) Ketogenic medium chain triglycerides increase brain energy metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 64:551–561. doi:10.3233/JAD-180202 pmid:29914035
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Cunnane SC, Courchesne-Loyer A, St-Pierre V, Vandenberghe C, Pierotti T, Fortier M, Croteau E, Castellano CA (2016a) Can ketones compensate for deteriorating brain glucose uptake during aging? Implications for the risk and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 1367:12–20. doi:10.1111/nyas.12999 pmid:26766547
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Cunnane SC, Vandenberghe C, Fortier M, Hennebelle M, Croteau E, Bocti C, Fulop T, Castellano CA (2016b) Can ketones help rescue brain fuel supply in later life? Implications for cognitive health during aging and the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Mol Neurosci 9:53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Cunnane SC, Trushina E, Morland C, Prigione A, Casadesus G, Andrews ZB, Beal MF, Bergersen LH, Brinton RD, de la Monte S, Eckert A, Harvey J, Jeggo R, Jhamandas JH, Kann O, la Cour CM, Martin WF, Mithieux G, Moreira PI, Murphy MP, et al. (2020) Brain energy rescue: an emerging therapeutic concept for neurodegenerative disorders of ageing. Nat Rev Drug Discov 19:609–633. doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0072-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    Devine MJ, Kittler JT (2018) Mitochondria at the neuronal presynapse in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 19:63–80. doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.170
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    DeVivo DC, Leckie MP, Ferrendelli JS, McDougal DB Jr. (1978) Chronic ketosis and cerebral metabolism. Ann Neurol 3:331–337. doi:10.1002/ana.410030410 pmid:666275
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Dienel GA (2019a) Brain glucose metabolism: integration of energetics with function. Physiol Rev 99:949–1045. doi:10.1152/physrev.00062.2017 pmid:30565508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Dienel GA (2019b) Does shuttling of glycogen‐derived lactate from astrocytes to neurons take place during neurotransmission and memory consolidation? J Neurosci Res 97:863–882. doi:10.1002/jnr.24387 pmid:30667077
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Dienel GA, Cruz NF (2016) Aerobic glycolysis during brain activation: adrenergic regulation and influence of norepinephrine on astrocytic metabolism. J Neurochem 138:14–52. doi:10.1111/jnc.13630 pmid:27166428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Dienel GA, Carlson GM (2019) Major advances in brain glycogen research: understanding of the roles of glycogen have evolved from emergency fuel reserve to dynamic, regulated participant in diverse brain functions. Adv Neurobiol 23:1–16.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    Dienel GA, Rothman DL (2019) Glycogenolysis in cerebral cortex during sensory stimulation, acute hypoglycemia, and exercise: impact on astrocytic energetics, aerobic glycolysis, and astrocyte-neuron interactions. Adv Neurobiol 23:209–267.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    DiNuzzo M, Walls AB, Öz G, Seaquist ER, Waagepetersen HS, Bak LK, Nedergaard M, Schousboe A (2019) State-dependent changes in brain glycogen metabolism. Adv Neurobiol 23:269–309.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    Duran J, Gruart A, López-Ramos JC, Delgado-García JM, Guinovart JJ (2019) Glycogen in astrocytes and neurons: physiological and pathological aspects. Adv Neurobiol 23:311–329.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Fortier M, Castellano CA, Croteau E, Langlois F, Bocti C, St-Pierre V, Vandenberghe C, Bernier M, Roy M, Descoteaux M, Whittingstall K, Lepage M, Turcotte ÉE, Fulop T, Cunnane SC (2019) A ketogenic drink improves brain energy and some measures of cognition in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement 15:625–634. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.12.017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Franco R, Navarro G, Martínez-Pinilla E (2019) Antioxidant defense mechanisms in erythrocytes and in the central nervous system. Antioxidants (Basel) 8:46. doi:10.3390/antiox8020046
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    Gandhi S, Abramov AY (2012) Mechanism of oxidative stress in neurodegeneration. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012:428010. doi:10.1155/2012/428010 pmid:22685618
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Glitsch HG, Tappe A (1993) The Na+/K+ pump of cardiac Purkinje cells is preferentially fuelled by glycolytic ATP production. Pflugers Arch 422:380–385. doi:10.1007/BF00374294 pmid:8382364
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Gordon BA, Blazey TM, Su Y, Hari-Raj A, Dincer A, Flores S, Christensen J, McDade E, Wang G, Xiong C, Cairns NJ, Hassenstab J, Marcus DS, Fagan AM, Jack CR, Hornbeck RC, Paumier KL, Ances BM, Berman SB, Brickman AM, et al. (2018) Spatial patterns of neuroimaging biomarker change in individuals from families with autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol 17:241–250. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30028-0 pmid:29397305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Hall CN, Klein-Flügge MC, Howarth C, Attwell D (2012) Oxidative phosphorylation, not glycolysis, powers presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms underlying brain information processing. J Neurosci 32:8940–8951. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0026-12.2012 pmid:22745494
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Hasselbalch SG, Knudsen GM, Jakobsen J, Hageman LP, Holm S, Paulson OB (1994) Brain metabolism during short-term starvation in humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 14:125–131. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1994.17
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Hasselbalch SG, Madsen PL, Hageman LP, Olsen KS, Justesen N, Holm S, Paulson OB (1996) Changes in cerebral blood flow and carbohydrate metabolism during acute hyperketonemia. Am J Physiol 270:E746–E751. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1996.270.5.E746 pmid:8967461
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Hertz L, Rothman DL (2016) Glucose, lactate, β-hydroxybutyrate, acetate, GABA, and succinate as substrates for synthesis of glutamate and GABA in the glutamine–glutamate/GABA cycle. Adv Neurobiol 13:9–42.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    Hou L, Zhang L, Hong J-S, Zhang D, Zhao J, Wang Q (2020) Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase and neurodegenerative diseases: mechanisms and therapy. Antioxid Redox Signal 33:374–393.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    Hoyer S (1992) Oxidative energy metabolism in Alzheimer brain. Studies in early-onset and late-onset cases. Mol Chem Neuropathol 16:207–224. doi:10.1007/BF03159971 pmid:1418218
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Hoyer S, Oesterreich K, Wagner O (1988) Glucose metabolism as the site of the primary abnormality in early-onset dementia of Alzheimer type? J Neurol 235:143–148. doi:10.1007/BF00314304 pmid:3367161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Ivanov A, Zilberter Y (2011) Critical state of energy metabolism in brain slices: the principal role of oxygen delivery and energy substrates in shaping neuronal activity. Front Neuroenergetics 3:9. doi:10.3389/fnene.2011.00009 pmid:22232599
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Kasthuri N, Hayworth KJ, Berger DR, Schalek RL, Conchello JA, Knowles-Barley S, Lee D, Vázquez-Reina A, Kaynig V, Jones TR, Roberts M, Morgan JL, Tapia JC, Seung HS, Roncal WG, Vogelstein JT, Burns R, Sussman DL, Priebe CE, Pfister H, et al. (2015) Saturated reconstruction of a volume of neocortex. Cell 162:648–661. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.054 pmid:26232230
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Koju N, Taleb A, Zhou J, Lv G, Yang J, Cao X, Lei H, Ding Q (2019) Pharmacological strategies to lower crosstalk between nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase and mitochondria. Biomed Pharmacother 111:1478–1498. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.11.128 pmid:30841463
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Kraeuter AK, Phillips R, Sarnyai Z (2020) Ketogenic therapy in neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders: from mice to men. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 101:109913. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109913 pmid:32151695
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    LaManna JC, Salem N, Puchowicz M, Erokwu B, Koppaka S, Flask C, Lee Z (2009) Ketones suppress brain glucose consumption. Adv Exp Med Biol 645:301–306. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85998-9_45 pmid:19227486
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Li B, Freeman RD (2015) Neurometabolic coupling between neural activity, glucose, and lactate in activated visual cortex. J Neurochem 135:742–754. doi:10.1111/jnc.13143 pmid:25930947
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Lotan E, Friedman KP, Davidson T, Shepherd TM (2020) Brain 18F-FDG-PET: utility in the diagnosis of dementia and epilepsy. Isr Med Assoc J 22:178–184.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    Lund TM, Risa O, Sonnewald U, Schousboe A, Waagepetersen HS (2009) Availability of neurotransmitter glutamate is diminished when beta-hydroxybutyrate replaces glucose in cultured neurons. J Neurochem 110:80–91. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06115.x pmid:19457063
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Ma MW, Wang J, Zhang Q, Wang R, Dhandapani KM, Vadlamudi RK, Brann DW (2017) NADPH oxidase in brain injury and neurodegenerative disorders. Mol Neurodegener 12:7. doi:10.1186/s13024-017-0150-7 pmid:28095923
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Malkov A, Ivanov AI, Popova I, Mukhtarov M, Gubkina O, Waseem T, Bregestovski P, Zilberter Y (2014) Reactive oxygen species initiate a metabolic collapse in hippocampal slices: potential trigger of cortical spreading depression. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34:1540–1549. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.121 pmid:25027308
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Malkov A, Ivanov AI, Buldakova S, Waseem T, Popova I, Zilberter M, Zilberter Y (2018) Seizure-induced reduction in glucose utilization promotes brain hypometabolism during epileptogenesis. Neurobiol Dis 116:28–38. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2018.04.016 pmid:29705187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Malkov A, Ivanov AI, Latyshkova A, Bregestovski P, Zilberter M, Zilberter Y (2019) Activation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase is the primary trigger of epileptic seizures in rodent models. Ann Neurol 85:907–920. doi:10.1002/ana.25474 pmid:30937971
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Malkov A, Popova I, Ivanov A, Jang SS, Yoon SY, Osypov A, Huang Y, Zilberter Y, Zilberter M (2020) Aβ-induced NOX2 activation underlies oxidative stress leading to brain hypometabolism and hyperactivity in Alzheimer’s disease. bioRxiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.12.248492.
  62. ↵
    McDonald TJW, Cervenka MC (2018) Ketogenic diets for adult neurological disorders. Neurotherapeutics 15:1018–1031. doi:10.1007/s13311-018-0666-8 pmid:30225789
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    Melø TM, Nehlig A, Sonnewald U (2006) Neuronal-glial interactions in rats fed a ketogenic diet. Neurochem Int 48:498–507. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2005.12.037 pmid:16542760
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    Munro D, Pamenter ME (2019) Comparative studies of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in animal longevity: technical pitfalls and possibilities. Aging Cell 18:e13009. doi:10.1111/acel.13009 pmid:31322803
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Nakazawa M, Kodama S, Matsuo T (1983) Effects of ketogenic diet on electroconvulsive threshold and brain contents of adenosine nucleotides. Brain Dev 5:375–380. doi:10.1016/s0387-7604(83)80042-4 pmid:6638394
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    Okamoto KEN, Wang W, Rounds JAN, Chambers EA, Jacobs DO (2001) ATP from glycolysis is required for normal sodium homeostasis in resting fast-twitch rodent skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281:E479–E488. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.3.E479 pmid:11500303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    Pajak B, Siwiak E, Sołtyka M, Priebe A, Zieliński R, Fokt I, Ziemniak M, Jaśkiewicz A, Borowski R, Domoradzki T, Priebe W (2019) 2-Deoxy-d-glucose and its analogs: from diagnostic to therapeutic agents. Int J Mol Sci 21:234.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    Patel M (2018) A metabolic paradigm for epilepsy. Epilepsy Curr 18:318–322. doi:10.5698/1535-7597.18.5.318 pmid:30464734
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Pearson-Smith JN, Patel M (2017) Metabolic dysfunction and oxidative stress in epilepsy. Int J Mol Sci 18:2365.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    Pellerin L, Magistretti PJ (2012) Sweet sixteen for ANLS. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32:1152–1166. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.149 pmid:22027938
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA (2014) Chaos and commotion in the wake of cortical spreading depression and spreading depolarizations. Nat Rev Neurosci 15:379–393. doi:10.1038/nrn3770 pmid:24857965
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    Pifferi F, Tremblay S, Croteau E, Fortier M, Tremblay-Mercier J, Lecomte R, Cunnane SC (2011) Mild experimental ketosis increases brain uptake of 11C-acetoacetate and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose: a dual-tracer PET imaging study in rats. Nutr Neurosci 14:51–58. doi:10.1179/1476830510Y.0000000001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    Pinto A, Bonucci A, Maggi E, Corsi M, Businaro R (2018) Anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of ketogenic diet: new perspectives for neuroprotection in Alzheimer’s disease. Antioxidants (Basel) 7:63. doi:10.3390/antiox7050063
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  74. ↵
    Rastogi R, Geng X, Li F, Ding Y (2016) NOX activation by subunit interaction and underlying mechanisms in disease. Front Cell Neurosci 10:301. doi:10.3389/fncel.2016.00301 pmid:28119569
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    Rossi MJ, Pekkurnaz G (2019) Powerhouse of the mind: mitochondrial plasticity at the synapse. Curr Opin Neurobiol 57:149–155. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.02.001 pmid:30875521
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    Roy M, Nugent S, Tremblay-Mercier J, Tremblay S, Courchesne-Loyer A, Beaudoin JF, Tremblay L, Descoteaux M, Lecomte R, Cunnane SC (2012) The ketogenic diet increases brain glucose and ketone uptake in aged rats: a dual tracer PET and volumetric MRI study. Brain Res 1488:14–23. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.10.008 pmid:23063891
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    Saez I, Duran J, Sinadinos C, Beltran A, Yanes O, Tevy MF, Martínez-Pons C, Milán M, Guinovart JJ (2014) Neurons have an active glycogen metabolism that contributes to tolerance to hypoxia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34:945–955. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.33 pmid:24569689
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    Samala R, Klein J, Borges K (2011) The ketogenic diet changes metabolite levels in hippocampal extracellular fluid. Neurochem Int 58:5–8. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2010.10.011 pmid:21070829
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    Samokhina E, Popova I, Malkov A, Ivanov AI, Papadia D, Osypov A, Molchanov M, Paskevich S, Fisahn A, Zilberter M, Zilberter Y (2017) Chronic inhibition of brain glycolysis initiates epileptogenesis. J Neurosci Res 95:2195–2206. doi:10.1002/jnr.24019 pmid:28150440
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    Samokhina E, Malkov A, Samokhin A, Popova I (2020) Selective hippocampal cell damage and mossy fiber sprouting induced by chronic intracerebral injections of 2-deoxy-D-glucose. Gen Physiol Biophys 39:99–106. doi:10.4149/gpb_2019048 pmid:32039829
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    Sarikaya I (2015) PET studies in epilepsy. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 5:416–430. pmid:26550535
    OpenUrlPubMed
  82. ↵
    Schmidt MM, Dringen R (2009) Differential effects of iodoacetamide and iodoacetate on glycolysis and glutathione metabolism of cultured astrocytes. Front Neuroenergetics 1:1. doi:10.3389/neuro.14.001.2009 pmid:19584905
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    Schousboe A, Bak LK, Waagepetersen HS (2013) Astrocytic control of biosynthesis and turnover of the neurotransmitters glutamate and GABA. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 4:102. doi:10.3389/fendo.2013.00102 pmid:23966981
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    Seyfried T (2012) Cancer as a metabolic disease: on the origin, management, and prevention of cancer. Hoboken: Wiley.
  85. ↵
    Shaffer PA (1921) Antiketogenesis. I. An in vitro analogy. J Biol Chem 47:433.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    Soya M, Matsui T, Shima T, Jesmin S, Omi N, Soya H (2018) Hyper-hippocampal glycogen induced by glycogen loading with exhaustive exercise. Sci Rep 8:1285. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19445-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  87. ↵
    Svart M, Gormsen LC, Hansen J, Zeidler D, Gejl M, Vang K, Aanerud J, Moeller N (2018) Regional cerebral effects of ketone body infusion with 3-hydroxybutyrate in humans: reduced glucose uptake, unchanged oxygen consumption and increased blood flow by positron emission tomography. A randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One 13:e0190556. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190556 pmid:29489818
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    Tang BL (2020) Glucose, glycolysis, and neurodegenerative diseases. J Cell Physiol 235:7653–7662. doi:10.1002/jcp.29682
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  89. ↵
    Tarafdar A, Pula G (2018) The role of NADPH oxidases and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative disorders. Int J Mol Sci 19:3824.
    OpenUrl
  90. ↵
    Tourigny DS, Karim MKA, Echeveste R, Kotter MRN, O’Neill JS (2019) Energetic substrate availability regulates synchronous activity in an excitatory neural network. PLoS One 14:e0220937. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220937
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  91. ↵
    Valente-Silva P, Lemos C, Köfalvi A, Cunha RA, Jones JG (2015) Ketone bodies effectively compete with glucose for neuronal acetyl-CoA generation in rat hippocampal slices. NMR Biomed 28:1111–1116. doi:10.1002/nbm.3355
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  92. ↵
    Westman EC, Mavropoulos J, Yancy WS, Volek JS (2003) A review of low-carbohydrate ketogenic diets. Curr Atheroscler Rep 5:476–483. doi:10.1007/s11883-003-0038-6 pmid:14525681
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    Wilder RM (1921) The effects of ketonemia on the course of epilepsy. Mayo Clin Proc 2:307–308.
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    Wilder RM, Winter MD (1922) The threshold of ketogenesis. J Biol Chem 52:393–401.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  95. ↵
    Yellen G (2018) Fueling thought: management of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation in neuronal metabolism. J Cell Biol 217:2235–2246. doi:10.1083/jcb.201803152 pmid:29752396
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  96. ↵
    Yudkoff M, Daikhin Y, Nissim I, Horyn O, Lazarow A, Luhovyy B, Wehrli S, Nissim I (2005) Response of brain amino acid metabolism to ketosis. Neurochem Int 47:119–128. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2005.04.014 pmid:15888376
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    Zala D, Hinckelmann MV, Yu H, Lyra da Cunha MM, Liot G, Cordelières FP, Marco S, Saudou F (2013) Vesicular glycolysis provides on-board energy for fast axonal transport. Cell 152:479–491. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.029 pmid:23374344
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    Zhang Y, Kuang Y, Xu K, Harris D, Lee Z, LaManna J, Puchowicz MA (2013) Ketosis proportionately spares glucose utilization in brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 33:1307–1311. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2013.87 pmid:23736643
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    Zilberter Y, Zilberter M (2017) The vicious circle of hypometabolism in neurodegenerative diseases: ways and mechanisms of metabolic correction. J Neurosci Res 95:2217–2235. doi:10.1002/jnr.24064 pmid:28463438
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    Zilberter T, Zilberter Y (2018) Ketogenic ratio determines metabolic effects of macronutrients and prevents interpretive bias. Front Nutr 5:75. doi:10.3389/fnut.2018.00075 pmid:30214902
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Michael Michaelides, NIDA-NIH

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Leandro Vendruscolo, Corinde Wiers.

Reviewer 1

In this opinion manuscript, the authors address a controversial topic about brain fuel use during ketosis and offer an explanation for a glucose-sparing effect.

The authors offered their opinion about a controversial topic. They suggest that the beneficial effect of ketosis in some neurodegenerative and neurological disorders is related to a glucose-sparing effect so that glucose is available for exclusive roles of glucose when ketone bodies are available as a source of energy. They provide a very clear and informative figure on the roles of glucose and ketone bodies in brain cells. Except for very few typographical errors (e.g., “flow” in page 3, last line) and use of abbreviations that were not spelled out (e.g., “FDG” in page 4), this is a very well-written and timely manuscript. This reviewer has no concerns.

Reviewer 2

The manuscript provides a good overview of the functions of glucose and ketones in metabolism, but often lacks arguments to back up the opinion statements

The authors submitted an opinion piece on ketone bodies supporting glucose as an alternative energy fuel in the brain. Although the topic is of great interest, the manuscript tends to be a bit chaotic at times and arguments made in the manuscript do not always appear to follow from cited work.

Specific comments to the text:

- The significance statement is identical to the abstract.

- The introduction is rather vague and contains hardly any references. E.g., what does it mean that “the dietary landscape is rapidly changing", or “The fat-dominating ketogenic diets (KD) are taking health-conscious populations by storm thanks to social networks and the grassroots movement”?

- The authors provide functions of glucose that are beyond energy production, including (1) glycolytic ATP production, (2) cytoplasmic antioxidant system, and (3) glycogen production in astrocytes. For these three first functions, however, the author provides no mentioning of how these functions occur or change during ketosis. This to me is strange given this is the main topic of the opinion piece.

- For function (4) Production of major neurotransmitters: Could the authors provide a reference for the “fact”: “Glucose metabolism is required for the synthesis of glutamate from glutamine in glutamatergic neurons, but in GABAergic neurons, β-hydroxybutyrate is capable of replacing glucose for this function.”?

- Also, why is the following paragraph added to the paragraph of neurotransmitters? “while measurements in awake rats suggested that only about 50% of active brain’s energy requirements can be supplemented by β-hydroxybutyrate even at saturating plasma concentrations (17mM) -- the rest has to derive from glucose oxidation (Chowdhury et al., 2014). The last conclusion was also confirmed in long-lasting-fasted humans (Owen et al., 1967) and in rats on the ketogenic diet (Zhang et al., 2013a).”

- In the next paragraph, (5) glucose utilization in the brain during ketosis, the authors state “there is no energy deficiency during KD”. How is this argument congruent with the beforementioned paragraph that only 50% of the brain’s energy requirements can be supplemented by ketones?

- Are there important flows or flaws in the Valente-Silva et al study?

- “In awake animals, glucose utilization either did not change (al-Mudallal et al., 1995) or increased (Yudkoff et al., 2005), while brain glucose levels did not change (DeVivo et al., 1978; Yudkoff et al., 2005) or decreased (Samala et al., 2011)”. Yudkoff et al (2015) showed lower plasma glucose levels in KD and argue that “label in 1-13C glucose and 13C lactate were higher in ketotic animals reflecting the fact that the isotope was administered into a peripheral blood glucose pool that is lower in the experimental group.” They did, however, not conclude that brain glucose utilization is higher perse.

- Glucose utilization increased in the study of Roy et al (2012) were performed in aged animals using PET FDG, whereas the other studies cited in the same sentence were done in normally aged rats using PET (LaManna et al, 2009; Zhang et al, 2013b) or using mass spectrometry (Zhang et al, 2013a). Could the authors provide more details to the studies summed up in one sentence? The age and methods used likely very much influence the findings. That is, both PET studies in young rats confirmed decreased glucose uptake in KD.

- Why is a 20% glucose reduction considered small after a 4-day KD? (re: “only”?)

- Why is it “most likely” that ketones’ substitution of glucose in mitochondria spares glucose for vital functions such as antioxidant defense and fast glycolytic ATP production? I don’t see good arguments for this. Which decrease in glucose utilization would you expect for the inhibition of glycolysis?

Author Response

Response to Reviewers.

Reviewer #1

Thank you very much for the comments. The opinion text has been substantially modified, all changes are in blue.

Reviewer #2

Thank you very much for the valuable comments. The opinion text has been substantially modified, all changes are in blue.

- The significance statement is identical to the abstract.

The significance statement was changed.

- The introduction is rather vague and contains hardly any references. E.g., what does it mean that “the dietary landscape is rapidly changing", or “The fat-dominating ketogenic diets (KD) are taking health-conscious populations by storm thanks to social networks and the grassroots movement”?

The introduction was renewed completely.

- The authors provide functions of glucose that are beyond energy production, including (1) glycolytic ATP production, (2) cytoplasmic antioxidant system, and (3) glycogen production in astrocytes. For these three first functions, however, the author provides no mentioning of how these functions occur or change during ketosis. This to me is strange given this is the main topic of the opinion piece.

We provided short notes considering KD at the end of each function description.

- For function (4) Production of major neurotransmitters: Could the authors provide a reference for the “fact”: “Glucose metabolism is required for the synthesis of glutamate from glutamine in glutamatergic neurons, but in GABAergic neurons, β-hydroxybutyrate is capable of replacing glucose for this function.”?

This issue is discussed in detail in a comprehensive review of Hertz and Rothman (Hertz and Rothman, 2016). In short, both glutamate and GABA are produced from glutamine delivered by astrocytes. In glutamatergic neurons, all glutamate formed from glutamine first enters mitochondria and then is returned to cytosol in a complex process, which requires simultaneous glucose metabolism. In GABAergic neurons, a part of GABA is formed directly in cytosol from glutamine-produced glutamate, while the production of another part from mitochondria-delivered glutamate requires acetyl CoA, which can be supplied by either glucose or β -hydroxybutyrate. This makes the GABA synthesis much less sensitive to the replacement of glucose with

β-hydroxybutyrate than the synthesis of glutamate. The reference is included in the text.

- Also, why is the following paragraph added to the paragraph of neurotransmitters? “while measurements in awake rats suggested that only about 50% of active brain’s energy requirements can be supplemented by β-hydroxybutyrate even at saturating plasma concentrations (17mM) -- the rest has to derive from glucose oxidation (Chowdhury et al., 2014). The last conclusion was also confirmed in long-lasting-fasted humans (Owen et al., 1967) and in rats on the ketogenic diet (Zhang et al., 2013a).”

This text has been removed.

- In the next paragraph, (5) glucose utilization in the brain during ketosis, the authors state “there is no energy deficiency during KD”. How is this argument congruent with the beforementioned paragraph that only 50% of the brain’s energy requirements can be supplemented by ketones?

The references confirming the statement “there is no energy deficiency during KD” are inserted in the new text. Ketones are able to substitute glucose efficiently in mitochondria but they cannot substitute ATP generated in aerobic glycolysis. During KD, however, both ketones and glucose present in the brain that presumably maintains aerobic glycolysis efficient enough.

- Are there important flows or flaws in the Valente-Silva et al study?

Corrected.

- “In awake animals, glucose utilization either did not change (al-Mudallal et al., 1995) or increased (Yudkoff et al., 2005), while brain glucose levels did not change (DeVivo et al., 1978; Yudkoff et al., 2005) or decreased (Samala et al., 2011)”. Yudkoff et al (2015) showed lower plasma glucose levels in KD and argue that “label in 1-13C glucose and 13C lactate were higher in ketotic animals reflecting the fact that the isotope was administered into a peripheral blood glucose pool that is lower in the experimental group.” They did, however, not conclude that brain glucose utilization is higher perse.

We agree with your remark. Note, however, that in Table 3, both brain glucose and lactate are increased in ketotic animals, and the lactate increase is problematic to interpret otherwise than the result of enhanced glycolysis.

- Glucose utilization increased in the study of Roy et al (2012) were performed in aged animals using PET FDG, whereas the other studies cited in the same sentence were done in normally aged rats using PET (LaManna et al, 2009; Zhang et al, 2013b) or using mass spectrometry (Zhang et al, 2013a). Could the authors provide more details to the studies summed up in one sentence? The age and methods used likely very much influence the findings. That is, both PET studies in young rats confirmed decreased glucose uptake in KD.

This is correct and the text has been modified accordingly.

- Why is a 20% glucose reduction considered small after a 4-day KD? (re: “only”?)

Corrected.

- Why is it “most likely” that ketones’ substitution of glucose in mitochondria spares glucose for vital functions such as antioxidant defense and fast glycolytic ATP production? I don’t see good arguments for this. Which decrease in glucose utilization would you expect for the inhibition of glycolysis?

The text has been modified considerably for making our hypothesis more clear and substantiated. We have included the human data indicating that under ketogenic intervention the brain glucose utilization goes down but only in healthy recipients, while it is unchanged in patients with AD pathology characterized by pronounced glucose hypometabolism. Please see the details in the text in blue.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 6
November/December 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glucose-Sparing Action of Ketones Boosts Functions Exclusive to Glucose in the Brain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Glucose-Sparing Action of Ketones Boosts Functions Exclusive to Glucose in the Brain
Yuri Zilberter, Tanya Zilberter
eNeuro 9 November 2020, 7 (6) ENEURO.0303-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0303-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Glucose-Sparing Action of Ketones Boosts Functions Exclusive to Glucose in the Brain
Yuri Zilberter, Tanya Zilberter
eNeuro 9 November 2020, 7 (6) ENEURO.0303-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0303-20.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Glycolytic ATP Production
    • The Cytoplasmic Antioxidant System
    • Glycogen Production in Astrocytes
    • Production of Major Neurotransmitters
    • Glucose Utilization in the Brain during Ketosis
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • aerobic glycolysis
  • antioxidant system
  • glucose metabolism
  • glycogen
  • ketogenic diet
  • ketosis

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Opinion

  • Promoting and Optimizing the Use of 3D-Printed Objects in Spontaneous Recognition Memory Tasks in Rodents: A Method for Improving Rigor and Reproducibility
  • Exposure to Sleep, Rest, or Exercise Impacts Skill Memory Consolidation but so Too Can a Challenging Practice Schedule
  • Toward Standardized Guidelines for Investigating Neural Circuit Control of Behavior in Animal Research
Show more Opinion

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Synaptic integration in CA1 pyramidal neurons is intact despite deficits in GABAergic transmission in the Scn1a haploinsufficiency mouse model of Dravet syndrome
  • Inhibition of Crmp1 phosphorylation at Ser522 ameliorates motor function and neuronal pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis model mice
  • Bisphenol A Exposure Induces Sensory Processing Deficits in Larval Zebrafish During Neurodevelopment
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Opinion

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.