Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Neuronal Excitability

Geometry and the Organizational Principle of Spine Synapses along a Dendrite

Laxmi Kumar Parajuli, Hidetoshi Urakubo, Ai Takahashi-Nakazato, Roberto Ogelman, Hirohide Iwasaki, Masato Koike, Hyung-Bae Kwon, Shin Ishii, Won Chan Oh, Yugo Fukazawa and Shigeo Okabe
eNeuro 27 October 2020, 7 (6) ENEURO.0248-20.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0248-20.2020
Laxmi Kumar Parajuli
1Department of Cellular Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
2Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hidetoshi Urakubo
3Department of Systems Science, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ai Takahashi-Nakazato
1Department of Cellular Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Ogelman
4Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roberto Ogelman
Hirohide Iwasaki
1Department of Cellular Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
5Department of Anatomy, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hirohide Iwasaki
Masato Koike
2Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Masato Koike
Hyung-Bae Kwon
6Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL 33458
7Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shin Ishii
3Department of Systems Science, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Won Chan Oh
4Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
6Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL 33458
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yugo Fukazawa
8Division of Brain Structure and Function, Research Center for Child Mental Development, Life Science Advancement Program, University of Fukui, Fukui 910-1193, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yugo Fukazawa
Shigeo Okabe
1Department of Cellular Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shigeo Okabe
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Structural diversity of dendritic spines in the brain. Membrane contours of presynaptic boutons (b), dendrites (d), and spines (s) can be clearly visualized in FIB/SEM images from the cortex (A) and CB (B). PSDs (indicated by black arrows and delimited by two vertical red bars) and ER (blue arrowheads) are also visible. 3D reconstructions of dendrite (orange), spines (violet), and PSDs (red) in the CA1 PSR (an oblique dendrite, C), CA1 PSR (a large-caliber dendrite, D), CA1 SLM (E), cortex (F), striatum (G), and CB (H) show that spines of various morphologies protrude from the same dendrite. Panels I–R show spines of various morphologies. Panel J shows an example of a perforated PSD. Spine heads, spine necks, and PSDs are denoted by violet, blue, and red color, respectively. The bar graph in S shows the proportion of surface area occupied by spine head, PSD, spine neck, and dendritic shaft. Dendritic spines occupy ∼50% of surface area in the CA1 PSR and striatum, 40% in CA1 SLM, 45% in the cortex, and 80% in CB. Scale bars: 500 nm (A, B). Scale cubes: 0.5 μm on each side for all reconstructions except for the CA3 thorny excrescence spine (1 μm on each side).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Morphometric analysis of dendritic spines in multiple brain regions. Box and whiskers plots show that the spine head volume (A), spine neck length (B), and spine neck diameter (C) are highly variable, and there exists a significant overlap in their dimensions across different brain regions. Note that, compared with other brain regions, the dendritic spines in CB display much less variability in spine head volume. D, The bar graph shows that the ratio of PSD area to neck length is not significantly different between spines in the CA1 PSR and CB. Error bars indicate SEM. E, 3D plot shows that the dendrites from CA1 PSR, CA1 SLM, cortex, striatum, and CB are not easily distinguishable from each other based on the analysis of the average neck diameter, average PSD area, and average neck length of their spines. F, Box and whiskers plot shows that the spine density is high in the CB, moderate in the CA1 PSR and striatum, and low in the CA1 SLM and cortex. Mean values are indicated by + mark in A–C, F. The box shows 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the dataset. In each graph, a significant difference exists in the spine dimensions between any pair of brain regions not designated as n.s. (not significant). Extended Data Figure 2-1 shows that the spine head volume correlates strongly with the PSD area, but only weakly with the neck length. A linear positive correlation between the amplitude of uEPSC and the spine head volume is shown in Extended Data Figure 2-2. A scatter plot in Extended Data Figure 2-3 shows that the dendrites in the CA1 PSR can be grouped in two distinct populations based on their dendritic diameter.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Spines are organized in a regulated manner in the dendrites. A, PSD area unit dendritic length shows a significant positive correlation with the dendritic diameter in the CA1 PSR, cortex, and CB (see also Extended Data Fig. 3-1). However, in the striatum, the PSD area unit dendritic length does not correlate with dendritic diameter. B, Neck length unit dendritic length is positively correlated with the dendritic diameter in the CA1 PSR. The data from CA1 PSR, cortex, and striatum are plotted in reference to the left vertical axis, and the data from CB are plotted in reference to the right vertical axis in panels A, B. Average PSD area (C), and average neck length (D) show a positive correlation with the dendritic diameter in the CA1 PSR. Scatter plots in Extended Data Figure 3-2 show that the ratio of the total PSD area to total neck length (A), and the average neck diameter (B) do not correlate with the dendritic diameter in the CA1 PSR. Extended Data Figure 3-3 shows that the synaptic constancy enables effective information transfer from the dendrite to the soma.[enu-eN-NWR-0248-20-s06.tif]

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Spine neck strongly filters membrane potential on CA1 pyramidal neurons. A, Two-photon image of a dendritic segment showing the spines (blue crosses: spines of similar head size, but different neck length; red crosses: spines of different head size, but similar neck length) receiving glutamate uncaging stimulus. uEPSPs were evoked by glutamate uncaging test pulses (5–10 trials at 0.1 Hz). Blue and red traces are representative uEPSPs from blue and red targets, respectively. B, Quantitative analyses of the estimated spine volume, spine length to width ratio, and uEPSPs of long (filled bars) and short (open bars) neck spines (n = 35 spines in each group, 6 cells). Error bars indicate SEM; n.s., not significant. See Extended Data Figure 4-1 for the relationship of the uEPSP amplitude with the spine neck length and the head width.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Intrapair synapse sizes are similar in axon-coupled spine pairs. A, 3D reconstruction of a cortical axon (medium slate blue) that makes synaptic contacts with spines from multiple dendrites. B, An example of an axon in the CA1 PSR that makes synaptic contacts with two spines (shown by white arrows) from the same dendrite. C, An example of a parallel fiber in CB making synaptic contacts with three different spines from the same dendrite. D, An example of a climbing fiber in CB making synaptic contacts with seven different spines (turquoise protrusions from the dendrite) from the same dendrite. PSD areas of axon-coupled spine pairs are positively correlated in the CA1 PSR (E) and CB (F). Scale cubes: 0.5 μm for each side.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Distribution of ER in dendrites and spines. 3D reconstruction showing ER (green) and mitochondria (turquoise) in an oblique dendrite in the CA1 PSR (A), cortical dendrite (B), striatal dendrite (C), large-caliber dendrite in the CA1 PSR (D), and Purkinje cell dendrite in the CB (E). ER (green) is a continuous structure along the dendrite (orange) and extends into spines in all the brain regions. Dendrites, spines, PSDs (red), ER (green), and mitochondria (turquoise) are shown on the left-hand side, and only ER (green) and mitochondria (red) for the same dendrite are shown on the right-hand side in each panel in A–E. TEM images showing immunoreactivity for IP3R1 in the dendrites (d) and spines (s) of the cortex (F), striatum (G), and CB (H–J). The schematic diagram in K shows that the ER (blue line) is continuous along the dendrite and extends into spines. Panel L shows that in >50% of the cases, ER-containing spines are located next to one another in the CA1 PSR, cortex, and striatum. Scale cubes: 0.5 μm (A–E, for each side). Scale bars: 500 nm (F–J).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Frequency of filopodia, perforated spines, spinules, stubby spines, and branched spines in different brain regions

    Brain regionFilopodia (%)Perforated spines (%)Spinules (%)Stubby spines (%)Branched spines (%)Number of spines in branches
    (range)
    CA1 PSR1.782.723.262.907.972
    CA1 SLM0.0050.008.571.430.00– –
    Cortex3.078.600.902.269.502–4
    Striatum5.844.474.710.0013.402–3
    CB4.190.000.610.0012.622–5
    • Filopodia lack synaptic contacts with the presynaptic terminals.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Dimensions of spine head and spine neck in different brain regions

    Brain regionSpines Dendrites (n)Spine density (mean ± SD)Head volume (mean ± SD, ratio, CV)Neck length (mean ± SD, ratio, CV)Neck diameter (mean ± SD)Ratio of PSD area to neck length (mean ± SD)
    CA1 PSR552
    23
    3.04 ± 0.8250.05 ± 0.045
    124, 0.94
    0.46 ± 0.246
    38, 0.54
    0.20 ± 0.0870.19 ± 0.193
    CA1 SLM70
    12
    0.75 ± 0.3600.12 ± 0.086
    35, 0.71
    0.49 ± 0.289
    15, 0.59
    0.25 ± 0.1270.32 ± 0.323
    CA3 PSR8
    —
    —1.66 ± 1.988
    155, 1.20
    ———
    Cortex221
    19
    1.14 ± 0.7230.08 ± 0.101
    159, 1.26
    1.09 ± 0.561
    20, 0.52
    0.23 ± 0.1210.13 ± 0.169
    Striatum403
    21
    1.94 ± 0.6210.07 ± 0.109
    204, 1.66
    1.12 ± 0.556
    106, 0.50
    0.26 ± 0.1040.11 ± 0.204
    CB824
    11
    7.10 ± 1.6930.13 ± 0.035
    11, 0.27
    0.74 ± 0.300
    27, 0.40
    0.27 ± 0.0540.17 ± 0.130
    • Units: spine density, spines/μm; head volume, μm3; neck length, μm; neck diameter, μm.

    • Only the small-diameter dendrites (diameter < 1 μm) are included for the spine density analysis in the CA1 PSR. Out of 23 dendrites analyzed, 16 dendrites fulfilled this criterion. All the spines, regardless of the dendritic diameter of their parent dendrites, are included for head volume, neck length and neck diameter analysis.

    • Ratio of head volume indicates the fold difference between the largest and smallest spine heads. Ratio of neck length indicates the fold difference between the longest and shortest spine necks. CV, coefficient of variation.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    PSD area unit dendritic length and the neck length unit dendritic length in different brain regions

    Brain regionDendritic diameter (mean ± SD)PSD area unit dendritic length (mean ± SD)Neck length unit dendritic length (mean ± SD)Ratio of total PSD area to total neck length in dendrites (mean ± SD)
    CA1 PSR0.59 ± 0.1040.18 ± 0.0551.35 ± 0.4420.14 ± 0.018
    CA1 SLM0.58 ± 0.0970.08 ± 0.0310.37 ± 0.2680.27 ± 0.112
    Cortex0.65 ± 0.1410.11 ± 0.0461.25 ± 1.2050.12 ± 0.082
    Striatum0.77 ± 0.0960.15 ± 0.0572.16 ± 0.9060.08 ± 0.029
    CB1.02 ± 0.2260.77 ± 0.2215.29 ± 1.5390.15 ± 0.024
    • Units: dendritic diameter, μm; PSD area unit dendritic length, μm; PSD area unit neck length, μm.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Frequency of axon-coupled spines in different brain regions

    Brain regionSpines observed (n)Axon-coupled spines (n)Number of spines in a dendrite making synaptic contacts with the same axon (range)
    CA1 PSR55226 (4.7%)2
    CA1 SLM7018 (25.7%)2
    Cortex22112 (5.4%)2
    Striatum40336 (8.9%)2
    CB824215 (26.1%)2–4
    • Note that all the 824 spines studied in CB make synaptic contacts with the parallel fiber terminals.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Distribution of ER in spines

    Brain regionSpines observed (n)ER-containing spines (%)Head volume
    (mean ± SD)
    Neck length
    (mean ± SD)
    Neck diameter
    (mean ± SD)
    ER+ER–ER+ER–ER+ER–
    CA1 PSR55213.60.11 ± 0.0730.04 ± 0.030***0.46 ± 0.2290.46 ± 0.2490.25 ± 0.1010.19 ± 0.082***
    CA1 SLM7015.70.18 ± 0.0770.11 ± 0.084*0.55 ± 0.2330.48 ± 0.3000.34 ± 0.0900.23 ± 0.127**
    Cortex22140.30.15 ± 0.1310.04 ± 0.023***1.03 ± 0.5661.13 ± 0.5570.30 ± 0.1430.19 ± 0.075***
    Striatum40355.10.10 ± 0.1370.02 ± 0.017***1.15 ± 0.5841.09 ± 0.5180.29 ± 0.1050.21 ± 0.085***
    CB824100——————
    • Units: head volume, μm3; neck length, μm; neck diameter, μm.

    • Asterisks denote statistical significance in the dimensions of head volume and neck diameter between ER-containing (ER+) and ER-lacking spines (ER–) in each brain region.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Extended Data Figure 2-1

    Spine head volume correlates strongly with the PSD area but only weakly with the neck length. Scatter plots show a significant positive correlation between head volume and PSD area in the CA1 PSR (A), CA1 SLM (B), cortex (C), striatum (D), and CB (E). Scatter plots show that there is no significant correlation between head volume and neck length in the CA1 PSR (F), CA1 SLM (G), and cortex (H). A significant negative correlation is observed between head volume and neck length in the striatum (I) and CB (J). Head volume in F–J is expressed on a logarithmic scale. Download Figure 2-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 2-2

    The amplitude of uEPSC positively correlates with the spine head volume. A, Two-photon image of a CA1 pyramidal neuron from an acute hippocampal slice recorded in whole-cell voltage-clamp mode. uEPSCs (blue trace) from target spines were evoked by the application of glutamate uncaging test pulses (7–10 trials at 0.1 Hz) and recorded from the CA1 pyramidal cell soma maintained at a holding potential of –65 mV. B, Two-photon image of a dendritic segment (corresponding to the region shown by the red square in A) showing locations of glutamate uncaging (blue crosses). C, Amplitude of uEPSCs plotted against individual spine volume (open circles, n = 140 spines, 33 dendrites, 12 cells). Note that the uEPSC amplitudes recorded at the soma show a significant positive correlation with the estimated spine volume. On average, four spines per dendrite were examined. Download Figure 2-2, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 2-3

    CA1 PSR dendrites can be grouped into two distinct populations based on the dendritic diameter. Dendrites in the CA1 PSR can be grouped into two populations based on their dendritic diameters. Dendrites with a diameter <1 μm likely represent the oblique dendrites. However, the large-diameter dendrites (>1.4 μm) can either be the main apical shafts or the segments of oblique dendrites near to the branch points. Download Figure 2-3, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 3-1

    Spine density is positively correlated with the dendritic diameter in the CA1 PSR. Scatter plots of spine density against dendritic diameter in the CA1 PSR (A), cortex (B), and CB (C). A significant positive correlation is detected between the spine density and the dendritic diameter in the CA1 PSR. Download Figure 3-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 3-2

    Neither the ratio of PSD area to neck length, nor the average neck diameter correlates with the dendritic diameter in the CA1 PSR. Scatter plots show that neither the ratio of total PSD area to total neck length (A), nor the average neck diameter (B) correlates with the dendritic diameter in the CA1 PSR. Download Figure 3-2, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 3-3

    Synaptic constancy enables effective information transfer from the dendrite to the soma. A, Schematic representation of a two-layer neuron model. A dendritic branch receives inputs from 250 different synapses. Dendritic spikes from twenty branches were integrated at the soma for somatic spiking. B, Case 1 shows that the synaptic strength in all the branches obeys single lognormal distribution, and thus, the dendrites are of similar synaptic strength. Case 2 shows that the synaptic strength in each branch obeys a lognormal distribution, but the mean synaptic strengths (μe) differs across branches. The mean μe was chosen from the Gaussian distribution N(−6, 0.4). C, MI between the synaptic inputs and the occurrence of dendritic spikes. The synaptic input from the strongest synapse was compared with the characteristics of the resultant dendritic spike. D, MI between the synaptic inputs and somatic spikes. C, D, Left MI plots are based on the data from case 1, and the right MI plots are based on the data from case 2. Download Figure 3-3, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 4-1

    The amplitudes of uEPSPs negatively correlate with the spine neck lengths. A, B, Plots of the uncaging potentials (peak amplitude) versus spine neck lengths. The same plot in A is plotted in B by assigning a value of 0.2 μm to all the neck lengths shorter than 0.2 μm. The red circle indicates the average EPSPs of the spines whose neck lengths were shorter than 0.2 μm. C, Plot of the uncaging potentials (peak amplitude) versus head widths. Each circle in A–C represents dendritic spines (n = 70 spines, 22 dendrites, 6 cells). Lines are linear fit (Spearman’s rank order test). Download Figure 4-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 6
November/December 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Geometry and the Organizational Principle of Spine Synapses along a Dendrite
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Geometry and the Organizational Principle of Spine Synapses along a Dendrite
Laxmi Kumar Parajuli, Hidetoshi Urakubo, Ai Takahashi-Nakazato, Roberto Ogelman, Hirohide Iwasaki, Masato Koike, Hyung-Bae Kwon, Shin Ishii, Won Chan Oh, Yugo Fukazawa, Shigeo Okabe
eNeuro 27 October 2020, 7 (6) ENEURO.0248-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0248-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Geometry and the Organizational Principle of Spine Synapses along a Dendrite
Laxmi Kumar Parajuli, Hidetoshi Urakubo, Ai Takahashi-Nakazato, Roberto Ogelman, Hirohide Iwasaki, Masato Koike, Hyung-Bae Kwon, Shin Ishii, Won Chan Oh, Yugo Fukazawa, Shigeo Okabe
eNeuro 27 October 2020, 7 (6) ENEURO.0248-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0248-20.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • dendritic spine
  • electron microscopy
  • FIB/SEM
  • glutamate uncaging
  • postsynaptic density
  • simulation

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Long-Term Effects of Preterm Birth on Children’s Brain Structure: An Analysis of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study
  • Sex and Estrous Cycle Stage Shape Left-Right Asymmetry in Chronic Hippocampal Seizures in Mice
  • Dual Roles for Nucleus Accumbens Core Dopamine D1-Expressing Neurons Projecting to the Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata in Limbic and Motor Control in Male Mice
Show more Research Article: New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • Subregional Differences in Medium Spiny Neuron Intrinsic Excitability Properties between Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell in Male Rats
  • Syngap1 Disruption Induced by Recombination between Inverted loxP Sites Is Associated with Hippocampal Interneuron Dysfunction
  • Responses of Cortical Neurons to Intracortical Microstimulation in Awake Primates
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.