Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: Confirmation, Development

Grp94 Regulates the Recruitment of Aneural AChR Clusters for the Assembly of Postsynaptic Specializations by Modulating ADF/Cofilin Activity and Turnover

Zora Chui-Kuen Chan, Linyan Deng and Chi Wai Lee
eNeuro 3 August 2020, 7 (5) ENEURO.0025-20.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0025-20.2020
Zora Chui-Kuen Chan
School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linyan Deng
School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chi Wai Lee
School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chi Wai Lee
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Temperature stress-modulated expression and pharmacological inhibition of HSP90 regulate the formation and stability of aneural AChR clusters. A, Representative images showing the inhibition of aneural AChR cluster formation in cultured Xenopus muscle cells treated with lower temperatures. Tubulin immunostaining indicated that cytoskeletal structures were largely unaffected in muscle cells cultured at different temperatures, ranging from 10–22°C. B, Quantification showing the percentage of cultured muscle cells with bottom aneural AChR clusters at different culturing temperatures over 4 d; n = 150 cells in each condition from three independent experiments. C, Quantification showing the relative mRNA levels of HSP90α, HSP90β, Grp94, and TRAP-1 in 2-d-old Xenopus muscle cells cultured at different temperatures; n = 3 independent experiments. D, E, Western blot analysis (D) and quantification (E) showing the protein expression level of HSP90β and Grp94 in Xenopus muscle cells cultured at 22°C or 10°C for 2 d. β-Tubulin was used as the loading control for normalization. F, Quantification showing the dose-dependent effects of 17-AAG on aneural AChR cluster formation in cultured Xenopus muscle cells; n = 191 (Control), n = 198 (0.25 nm 17-AAG), n = 199 (0.5 nm 17-AAG), and n = 200 (1 nm 17-AAG) muscle cells from four independent experiments. G, Representative images showing the organization and intensity of aneural AChR clusters in response to 17-AAG treatment. 8-bit pseudo-color images highlight the relative fluorescence intensity of AChR clusters in different conditions. H, Quantification showing the effects of 17-AAG on the intensity and complexity of aneural AChR clusters; n = 55 (Control) and n = 44 (17-AAG) muscle cells from three independent experiments for fluorescence intensity measurement (left y-axis); n = 76 (Control) and n = 48 (17-AAG) muscle cells from four independent experiments for cluster complexity measurement (right y-axis). I, Schematic diagram illustrating the differential labeling procedure to identify preexisting (red) and newly inserted (green) AChRs with BTX conjugated with different fluorophores. J, Representative sets of time-lapse images showing the topological changes and fluorescence intensity of pre-existing (left panels) and newly inserted (right panels) AChRs at aneural clusters in control (top panels) or 17-AAG-treated (bottom panels) muscle cells. Arrows indicate the progressive reduction of perforated area in aneural AChR clusters. 8-bit pseudo-color images highlight the change in the fluorescence intensity of the same aneural AChR clusters over 48 h with or without 17-AAG treatment. K, L, Individual value plots showing the percentage change in the fluorescence intensity of pre-existing (K) and newly inserted (L) AChRs in the same aneural AChR clusters at different time-points between control and 17-AAG-treated cells; n = 46 (Control) and n = 41 (17-AAG) muscle cells from three independent experiments. Scale bars: 10 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (B, C, E, F, H) or mean ± SD (K, L). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (B, C), Student’s t test (E, H), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (F), and two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (K, L). *, **, and **** represent p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.0001, respectively. n.s.: non-significant.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    HSP90 regulates AChR recruitment from aneural clusters to agrin-induced clusters. A, Representative images showing the differential contribution of diffuse and aneurally clustered AChRs to agrin bead-induced synaptic AChR clusters in control or 17-AAG-treated muscle cells using laser-based photobleaching approach. Green boxes indicate the magnified view of muscle cells with agrin bead contacts at different time-points for clarity. Yellow dotted-line boxes indicate the photobleaching region of aneural AChR clusters before agrin bead stimulation. Dotted lines highlight the periphery of muscle cells. 8-bit pseudo-color images highlight the relative fluorescence intensity of preexisting (old) and newly inserted (new) AChR signals in muscle cells contacted by agrin beads for 1 and 3 d. B, C, Quantification showing the fluorescence intensity of preexisting (B) and newly inserted (C) AChR signals at agrin bead-muscle contacts in control or 17-AAG-treated muscle cells, either with or without photobleaching of aneural AChR clusters before agrin bead stimulation; n = 11 (control, without photobleaching), n = 16 (control, photobleaching of aneural AChR clusters), n = 17 (17-AAG-treated, without photobleaching), and n = 21 (17-AAG-treated, photobleaching of aneural AChR clusters) muscle cells from three independent experiments. Scale bars: 10 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * and ** represent p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. n.s.: non-significant.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Grp94 knock-down inhibits agrin bead-induced AChR clustering by modulating ADF/cofilin localization. A, B, Western blot analysis (A) and quantification (B) showing the expression level of Grp94 in WT, Control MO, and Grp94 MO embryos. β-Tubulin was used as the loading control for normalization. C, Representative images showing the intensity and complexity of aneural AChR clusters in response to Grp94 knock-down. 8-bit pseudo-color images highlight the relative fluorescence intensity of AChR clusters in control versus Grp94 knock-down muscle cells. Insets show the fluorescent dextran (Dex) signals, indicating the presence of MO. D, Quantification showing the effects of MO-mediated Grp94 knock-down on the formation of aneural AChR clusters in cultured muscles; n = 150 (WT), n = 143 (Control MO), and n = 150 (Grp94 MO) muscle cells from three independent experiments. E, Quantification showing the effects of MO-mediated Grp94 knock-down on the intensity and complexity of aneural AChR clusters; n = 64 (WT), n = 47 (Control MO), and n = 52 (Grp94 MO) muscle cells from four independent experiments for fluorescence intensity measurement (left y-axis); n = 44 (WT), n = 42 (Control MO), and n = 44 (Grp94 MO) muscle cells from four independent experiments for cluster complexity measurement (right y-axis). F, Representative sets of time-lapse images showing the effects of Grp94 knock-down on GFP-XAC localization in association with the dispersal of aneural AChR clusters (left panels) and with the formation of agrin bead-induced AChR clusters (right panels). 8-bit pseudo-color images highlight the change in fluorescence intensity of aneural AChR clusters after agrin bead stimulation for 4 h. G, H, Individual value plots showing the percentage change in the fluorescence intensities of AChRs (G) and GFP-XAC (H) in the same aneural AChR clusters among different conditions after agrin bead stimulation for 4 h; n = 12 (GFP-XAC alone), n = 9 (Control MO + GFP-XAC), and n = 11 (Grp94 MO + GFP-XAC) muscle cells from three independent experiments. I, Quantification showing the effects of Grp94 knock-down on agrin bead-induced AChR clustering (left y-axis) and GFP-XAC localization (right y-axis); n = 24 (GFP-XAC alone), n = 24 (Control MO + GFP-XAC), and n = 21 (Grp94 MO + GFP-XAC) muscle cells from four independent experiments. Scale bars: 5 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (B, D, E, I) or mean ± SD (G, H). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (B, E), two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (D), two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test (G, H) and one-way ANOVA with Turkey’s multiple comparison test (I). *, **, ***, and **** represent p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001, respectively. n.s.: non-significant.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    HSP90 inhibition accelerates ADF/cofilin turnover at different regions of aneural AChR clusters. A, Representative time-lapse TIRF images showing the fluorescence recovery of GFP-XAC signals after photobleaching the region of aneural AChR clusters (yellow rectangles, which are magnified in bottom rows with multiple timepoints) in control or 17-AAG-treated muscle cells. 8-bit pseudo-color images highlight the relative fluorescence intensity of GFP-XAC signals. B, C, Quantification showing the FRAP curves (B) and the calculated recovery half-time (C) of GFP-XAC signals at perforated and AChR-rich regions within aneural AChR clusters in control versus 17-AAG-treated muscle cells; n = 12 (Control) and n = 7 (17-AAG) muscle cells from three independent experiments. Scale bars: 5 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Student’s t test. * and ** represent p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Postsynaptic Grp94 knock-down impairs synaptic structures and functions at developing NMJs. A, Representative images showing the effects of muscle Grp94 knock-down on nerve-induced AChR clustering. Fluorescent dextran signals indicate the presence of MO. Arrows indicate sites of nerve-muscle contacts. B, C, Quantification showing the effects of muscle Grp94 knock-down on the percentage of nerve-muscle contacts with AChR clusters (B) and the fluorescence intensity of nerve-induced AChR clusters (C) in 1-d-old Xenopus nerve-muscle co-cultures; n = 150 (WT), n = 146 (Control MO), and n = 191 (Grp94 MO) nerve-muscle contacts from three independent experiments for quantifying the percentage of nerve-muscle contacts with synaptic AChR clusters (B); n = 33 (WT), n = 31 (Control MO), and n = 33 (Grp94 MO) nerve-muscle contacts from three independent experiments for measuring AChR fluorescence intensity (C). D, Representative images showing the whole-cell patch-clamp recording on a Grp94 MO muscle cell innervated by a WT spinal neuron. Fluorescent dextran signals indicate the presence of MO. E, Representative electrophysiological recording traces of SSCs recorded from WT, Control MO, or Grp94 MO muscles that were innervated by WT spinal neurons. F, G, Quantification showing the effects of muscle Grp94 knock-down on the amplitude (F) and frequency (G) of SSCs. H–J, Cumulative distribution plots of the inter-event interval (H), 10–90% rise time (I), and decay time (J) of SSCs recorded from WT, Control MO, or Grp94 MO muscles innervated by WT spinal neurons. n = 10 (WT), n = 9 (Control MO), and n = 9 (Grp94 MO) nerve-muscle pairs from three independent experiments (F–J). Scale bars: 10 μm. “M”: muscle; “N”: neuron. Data are represented as mean ± SEM (B, C) and mean ± SD (F, G). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (B, C). Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA test with Dunn's multiple comparison test (F, G). * and *** represent p ≤ 0.05 and 0.001, respectively.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Temperature stress-induced Grp94 inhibition affects AChR recruitment from aneural to synaptic clusters by modulating ADF/cofilin phosphorylation and activity. To allow AChR redistribution during neuromuscular synaptogenesis, modulation of actin dynamics at the cell cortex and at the PLS are required for mobilizing AChR molecules and facilitating vesicular trafficking of AChR molecules at aneural clusters, respectively. Our findings suggest that temperature stress-induced Grp94 inhibition promotes phosphorylation or suppress dephosphorylation of ADF/cofilin at perforated and AChR-rich regions of aneural clusters, thereby stabilizing them against agrin-induced dispersal and recruitment to the postsynaptic sites.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Summary of statistical analyses

    FiguresComparisonStatistical testp valueF, Dfn, Dfd
    1B 1 d22°C vs 15°CTwo-way ANOVA, Turkey'smultiple comparison test0.0163Interaction: 15.96, 6, 18; time point:71.17, 3, 18; temperature: 142.8, 2, 6
    22°C vs 10°C0.0019
    2 d22°C vs 15°C0.0001
    22°C vs 10°C0.0001
    3 d22°C vs 15°C0.0001
    22°C vs 10°C0.0001
    4 d22°C vs 15°C0.0001
    22°C vs 10°C0.0001
    1C HSP90α22°C vs 15°CTwo-way ANOVA, Turkey'smultiple comparison test0.5097Interaction: 11.22, 6, 24; Gene: 38.81,3, 24; temperature: 43.31, 2, 24
    22°C vs 10°C0.159
    15°C vs 10°C0.0155
    HSP90β22°C vs 15°C0.0489
    22°C vs 10°C0.0024
    15°C vs 10°C0.4152
    Grp9422°C vs 15°C<0.0001
    22°C vs 10°C<0.0001
    15°C vs 10°C0.0012
    TRAP-122°C vs 15°C0.2602
    22°C vs 10°C0.1889
    15°C vs 10°C0.9793
    1E HSP90β22°C vs 10°CUnpaired t test with Welch'scorrection0.74214.39, 2, 2
    Grp9422°C vs 10°C0.00353.03, 2, 2
    1F  Control vs 0.25 nm One-way ANOVA, Turkey'smultiple comparison test0.006775.47, 3, 12
    Control vs 0.5 nm <0.0001
    Control vs 1 nm <0.0001
    1H Normalized AChR intensity cluster regionControl vs 17-AAGUnpaired t test0.04034.762, 2, 2
    AChR-poor perforations/AChR cluster areaUnpaired t test0.022.462, 3, 3
    1K 24 hControl vs 17-AAGTwo-way ANOVA, Sidak'smultiple comparison test0.0274Interaction: 0.02911, 1, 85; treatment:151.1, 1, 85; time point: 6.856, 1, 85
    48 h0.0385
    1L 24 hControl vs 17-AAGTwo-way ANOVA, Sidak'smultiple comparison test0.9726Interaction: 0.5439, 1, 86; treatment:80.21, 1, 86; time point: 6.856, 1, 85
    48 h0.4136
    1-1B Polar metabolitesControl vs 17-AAGUnpaired t testListed in ExtendedData Table 1-1 N/A
    1-1D Fatty acidsUnpaired t testListed in ExtendedData Table 1-2 N/A
    1-1F  Control vs CHXOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett'smultiple comparison test0.01429.046, 2, 6
    Control vs 17-AAG0.8498
    1-1H  Control vs 17-AAGUnpaired t test with Welch'scorrection0.37471.388, 32, 41
    2B 1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAGTwo-way ANOVA, Turkey'smultiple comparison test0.0198Interaction: 6.99, 3, 6; treatment:6.916, 1, 2; time point: 10.88, 3, 6
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Without photobleaching:Control0.6093
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG0.0318
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 1 d, Photobleachingof aneural AChR cluster:Control0.0069
    1 d, Without photobleachingControl vs 1 d, Photobleachingof aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.004
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Photobleachingof aneural AChR cluster:Control0.0011
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.0018
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Without photobleaching:Control0.126
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG0.9991
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.8927
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.5569
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.0818
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.1828
    3 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG0.2166
    3 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneuralAChR cluster:Control0.0356
    3 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.018
    3 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.004
    3 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.007
    3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.6672
    3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.3446
    3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.0487
    3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs
    3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG
    0.1064
    1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.9916
    1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.3032
    1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.6183
    1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.6054
    1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.9315
    3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.9898
    2C 1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAGTwo-way ANOVA, Turkey'smultiple comparison test>0.9999Interaction: 0.293, 3, 6; treatment:0.2994, 1, 2; time point: 11.74, 3, 6
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Without photobleaching:Control0.406
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG0.6936
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChRcluster:Control>0.9999
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChRcluster:17-AAG>0.9999
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChRcluster:Control0.832
    1 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.9999
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Without photobleaching:Control0.4594
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG0.7563
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChRcluster:Control>0.9999
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG>0.9999
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.8826
    1 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG>0.9999
    3 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG0.9968
    3 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChRcluster:Control0.4322
    3 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.4267
    3 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.9722
    3 d, Without photobleaching:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.5671
    3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.7253
    3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.7188
    3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control>0.9999
    3 d, Without photobleaching:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.8595
    1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control vs 1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG>0.9999
    1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.8583
    1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG>0.9999
    1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control0.853
    1 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG>0.9999
    3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:Control vs 3 d, Photobleaching of aneural AChR cluster:17-AAG0.9511
    3B  WT vs Control MOOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett'smultiple comparison test0.138321.35, 2,
    WT vs Grp94 MO0.0089
    3D TopWT vs Control MOTwo-way ANOVA, Turkey'smultiple comparison test0.7282Interaction: 4.283, 4, 18; treatment:127.9, 2, 18; Cluster type:80.22, 2, 18
    WT vs Grp94 MO0.0002
    Control MO vs Grp94 MO0.0008
    BottomWT vs Control MO0.1487
    WT vs Grp94 MO0.0013
    Control MO vs Grp94 MO<0.0001
    TotalWT vs Control MO0.974
    WT vs Grp94 MO<0.0001
    Control MO vs Grp94 MO<0.0001
    3E Normalized intensity of AChRat cluster regionWT vs Control MOOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett'smultiple comparison test0.74166.557, 2, 9
    WT vs Grp94 MO0.0141
    Ratio of perforated area/entireAChR cluster areaWT vs Control MO0.816631.46, 2, 9
    WT vs Grp94 MO0.0002
    3G  GFP-XAC vs
    GFP-XAC + Control MO
    Two-way ANOVA, Sidak'smultiple comparison test0.6801Interaction: 6.469, 2, 45; treatment:80.39, 1, 45; time point: 6.469, 2, 45
    GFP-XAC vs
    GFP-XAC + Grp94 MO
    0.0162
    3I Normalized intensity of AChR at bead contactsGFP-XAC alone vs
    GFP-XAC + Control MO
    One-way ANOVA, Turkey'smultiple comparison test0.89266.716, 2, 9
    GFP-XAC alone vs
    GFP-XAC + Grp94 MO
    0.0201
    GFP-XAC + Control MO vs
    GFP-XAC + Grp94 MO
    0.0409
    Ratio of GFP-XAC intensity at bead/non-bead contact regionGFP-XAC alone vs
    GFP-XAC + Control MO
    0.34884.59, 2, 9
    GFP-XAC alone vs
    GFP-XAC + Grp94 MO
    0.0345 
    GFP-XAC + Control MO vs
    GFP-XAC + Grp94 MO
    0.3109 
    3H 0 hGFP-XAC alone vs
    Control MO + GFP-XAC
    Two-way ANOVA, Sidak'smultiple comparison test0.9862Interaction: 2.583, 2, 29; treatment:18.65, 1, 29; time point: 4.2, 2, 29
    GFP-XAC alone vs
    Grp94 MO + GFP-XAC
    0.0038
    4 hGFP-XAC alone vs
    Control MO + GFP-XAC
    0.7729
    GFP-XAC alone vs
    Grp94 MO + GFP-XAC
    0.9996
    GFP-XAC alone0 h vs 4 h0.0012
    Control MO + GFP-XAC0.0299
    Grp94 MO + GFP-XAC0.8305
    3-1B XACWT vs Control MOOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett'smultiple comparison test0.195512.16, 2, 9
    WT vs Grp94 MO0.0016
    3-1C p34-ArcWT vs Control MO0.96677.445, 2, 6
    WT vs Grp94 MO0.0242
    3-1D VinculinWT vs Control MO0.85515.924, 2, 6
    WT vs Grp94 MO0.0331
    4C Perforated regionControl vs 17-AAGUnpaired t test with Welch'scorrection0.002511.1, 11, 5
    AChR-rich regionControl vs 17-AAG0.04911.64, 10, 5
    4-1C Perforated regionGFP-XAC vs GFP-XAC (S3A)One-way ANOVA, Turkey'smultiple comparison test0.119516.04, 2, 27
    GFP-XAC vs GFP-XAC (S3E)0.0015
    GFP-XAC (S3A) vs GFP-XAC (S3E)<0.0001
    AChR-rich regionGFP-XAC vs GFP-XAC (S3A)0.002516.9, 2, 27
    GFP-XAC vs GFP-XAC (S3E)0.0497
    GFP-XAC (S3A) vs GFP-XAC (S3E)<0.0001
    5B  WT vs Control MOOne-way ANOVA, Turkey'smultiple comparison test0.51144.59, 2, 6
    WT vs Grp94 MO0.0003
    Control MO vs Grp94 MO0.0007
    5C  WT vs Control MOOne-way ANOVA, Turkey'smultiple comparison test0.90228.63, 2, 6
    WT vs Grp94 MO0.0351
    Control MO vs Grp94 MO0.0211
    5F  WT vs Control MOKruskal–Wallis ANOVA testwith Dunn's multiplecomparison testN/AN/A
    WT vs Grp94 MO
    Control MO vs Grp94 MO
    5G  WT vs Control MOKruskal–Wallis ANOVA testwith Dunn's multiplecomparison test
    WT vs Grp94 MO
    Control MO vs Grp94 MO
    5-1B  Control vs 17-AAGOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett'smultiple comparison test0.000913.85, 4, 11
    Control vs PU-WS130.0074
    Control vs Control MO0.8996
    Control vs Grp94 MO0.0004
    5-1C  Control vs 17-AAG0.01955.745, 4, 11
    Control vs PU-WS130.0233
    Control vs Control MO0.9971
    Control vs Grp94 MO0.0329
    5-2B 0.5 hControl vs 17-AAGOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett'smultiple comparison test0.00019.548, 2, 74
    Control vs PU-WS130.0154
    4 hControl vs 17-AAG0.000120.28, 2, 73
    Control vs PU-WS130.0001

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Extended Data Figure 1-1

    HSP90 inhibition does not cause non-specific, global changes in cell metabolism and protein expression in cultured muscle cells. A, B, PCA (A) and heat map comparison (B) showing a panel of different polar metabolites between control and 17-AAG-treated cultured Xenopus muscle cells. Control (green circles) and 17-AAG-treated (red circles) samples were not clearly distinguished in the first principal component axis (x-axis); n = 3 biological samples; p values of each polar metabolite examined were shown in Extended Data Table 1-1. C, D, PCA (C) and heat map comparison (D) showing a panel of different fatty acids between control and 17-AAG-treated cultured Xenopus muscle cells. Control (green circles) and 17-AAG-treated (red circles) samples were not clearly distinguished in the first principal component axis (x-axis); n = 3 biological samples; p values of each fatty acid examined were shown in Extended Data Table 1-2. E, Representative images showing no significant change in the amount of nascent peptides/proteins between control and 17-AAG-treated muscle cells, as shown by OPP signals. F, Quantification showing the fluorescence intensity of OPP signals in muscle cells at different experimental groups; n = 237 (control), n = 245 (CHX), and n = 251 (17-AAG) muscle cells from three independent experiments. G, Representative images showing a similar density of quantum dot-labeled single AChR molecules in membrane surface between control and 17-AAG-treated muscle cells. H, Quantification showing the number of single AChR molecules in membrane surface per unit area between control and 17-AAG-treated muscle cells; n = 42 (control) and n = 33 (17-AAG) muscle cells from three independent experiments. Scale bars: 100 μm (E) or 10 μm (G). Data are shown as mean ± SEM (F) or mean ± SD (H). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (F) and Student’s t test (H). * represents p ≤ 0.05. n.s.: non-significant. Download Figure 1-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 2-1

    No photo-dissipation of illuminated aneural AChR clusters was observed in cultured Xenopus muscle cells labeled with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated BTX. Representative images showing no photo-dissipation effects on illuminated aneural AChR clusters in cultured Xenopus muscle cells labeled with either Rh-BTX (left panels) or 594-BTX (right panels). Newly synthesized and inserted AChRs were labeled with 488-BTX at 6 and 24 h after photobleaching. Yellow boxes indicate the photobleaching region covering the entire aneural AChR clusters, while the yellow dotted line box indicates the photobleaching region covering a part of aneural AChR clusters. The recovery of either Rh-BTX or 594-BTX signals was observed at 6 and 24 h after photobleaching the entire (arrows) or partial (arrowheads) region of AChR clusters, respectively. Scale bar: 10 μm. Download Figure 2-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 2-2

    HSP90 inhibition stabilizes aneural AChR clusters and their associated rapsyn localization. Representative images showing the stabilization of rapsyn-associated aneural AChR clusters (left panels) and the inhibition of agrin bead-induced synaptic AChR cluster formation (right panels) by 17-AAG treatment. After 4–8 h of agrin bead stimulation, reduced rapsyn signals were detected at dispersing AChR clusters in control muscle cells. In contrast, rapsyn was highly localized at stabilized aneural AChR clusters in 17-AAG-treated muscle cells. At the agrin bead-muscle contacts, agrin-induced AChR clusters were associated with rapsyn localization in control muscle cells but not in 17-AAG-treated muscle cells. Scale bars: 5 μm. Download Figure 2-2, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 3-1

    Grp94 knock-down affects PLS localization at aneural AChR clusters. A, Representative images showing the effects of Grp94 knock-down on the spatial localization of PLS core markers (XAC and p34-Arc) and cortex marker (vinculin) at aneural AChR clusters. B, Quantification showing the spatial enrichment of XAC at aneural AChR cluster versus non-AChR regions in the same muscle cells; n = 44 (WT), n = 43 (Control MO), and n = 38 (Grp94 MO) muscle cells from four independent experiments. C, Quantification showing the spatial enrichment of p34-Arc at aneural AChR cluster versus non-AChR regions in the same muscle cells; n = 27 (WT), n = 29 (Control MO), and n = 32 (Grp94 MO) muscle cells from three independent experiments. D, Quantification showing the spatial enrichment of vinculin at aneural AChR cluster versus non-AChR regions in the same muscle cells; n = 39 (WT), n = 33 (Control MO), and n = 33 (Grp94 MO) muscle cells from three independent experiments. Scale bars: 10 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. * and ** represent p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. Download Figure 3-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 4-1

    ADF/cofilin phosphorylation mutants exhibit differential turnover rates at aneural AChR clusters. A, B, Quantification showing the FRAP curves of GFP-XAC signals at perforated (A) and AChR-rich (B) regions within aneural AChR clusters in cultured muscle cells over-expressing WT or serine-3 phosphorylation mutant forms (S3A and S3E) of GFP-XAC; n = 13 (GFP-XAC), n = 8 [GFP-XAC(S3A)], and n = 12 [GFP-XAC(S3E)] muscle cells from three independent experiments. (C) Quantification showing the calculated recovery half time of GFP-XAC signals at perforated and AChR-rich regions within aneural AChR clusters in cultured muscle cells over-expressing WT or serine-3 phosphorylation mutant forms of GFP-XAC; n = 13 (GFP-XAC), n = 8 [GFP-XAC(S3A)], and n = 12 [GFP-XAC(S3E)] muscle cells from three independent experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * and ** represent p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. n.s.: non-significant. Download Figure 4-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 5-1

    HSP90 inhibition or Grp94 knock-down suppresses nerve-induced synaptic AChR clusters with reduced rapsyn localization. A, Representative images showing the effects of HSP90 inhibition or muscle Grp94 knock-down on nerve-induced AChR clustering and rapsyn localization at nerve-muscle contact sites. Dotted lines indicate nerve-muscle contacts. Insets show fluorescent dextran signals as cell-lineage tracer. “M”: muscle; “N”: neuron. B, C, Quantifications showing the fluorescence intensity of synaptic AChR clusters (B) and rapsyn (C) along the nerve-muscle contacts in 1-d-old Xenopus nerve-muscle co-cultures in the presence or absence of 17-AAG or PU-WS13 and in the chimeric co-cultures of WT neurons and muscle cells with Control MO or Grp94 MO; n = 26 (Control), n = 9 (17-AAG), n = 10 (PU-WS13), n = 18 (Control MO), and n = 14 (Grp94 MO) from four independent experiments. Scale bar: 10 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. *, **, and *** represent p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively. n.s.: non-significant. Download Figure 5-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 5-2

    Grp94 inhibition reduces the amount of AChR vesicles at aneural clusters in agrin-stimulated muscle cells. A, Representative images showing the effects of 17-AAG or PU-WS13 on AChR internalization at aneural clusters upon agrin stimulation. Images of aneural AChR clusters were taken from a single focal plane (surface AChR), while the maximal projection of intracellular AChR signals was constructed of a stack of 11 images at 0.2 μm per frame (internal AChR). B, Quantification showing the effects of 17-AAG or PU-WS13 on AChR internalization at aneural clusters upon agrin stimulation for 0.5 or 4 h; n = 27 (Control, 0.5 h), n = 28 (17-AAG, 0.5 h), n = 23 (PU-WS13, 0.5 h), n = 19 (Control, 4 h), n = 28 (17-AAG, 4 h), and n = 29 (PU-WS13, 4 h) muscle cells from three independent experiments. Scale bar: 5 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. * and **** represent p ≤ 0.05 and 0.0001, respectively. Download Figure 5-2, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Table 1-1

    A list of p values in comparing the relative amount of polar metabolites between control and 17-AAG-treated muscle cells. Download Table 1-1, DOCX file.

  • Extended Data Table 1-2

    A list of p values in comparing the relative amount of fatty acids between control and 17-AAG-treated muscle cells. Download Table 1-2, DOCX file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 5
September/October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Grp94 Regulates the Recruitment of Aneural AChR Clusters for the Assembly of Postsynaptic Specializations by Modulating ADF/Cofilin Activity and Turnover
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Grp94 Regulates the Recruitment of Aneural AChR Clusters for the Assembly of Postsynaptic Specializations by Modulating ADF/Cofilin Activity and Turnover
Zora Chui-Kuen Chan, Linyan Deng, Chi Wai Lee
eNeuro 3 August 2020, 7 (5) ENEURO.0025-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0025-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Grp94 Regulates the Recruitment of Aneural AChR Clusters for the Assembly of Postsynaptic Specializations by Modulating ADF/Cofilin Activity and Turnover
Zora Chui-Kuen Chan, Linyan Deng, Chi Wai Lee
eNeuro 3 August 2020, 7 (5) ENEURO.0025-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0025-20.2020
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • acetylcholine receptor
  • ADF/cofilin
  • Grp94
  • heat shock protein
  • neuromuscular junction
  • temperature stress

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: Confirmation

  • Glycolytic System in Axons Supplement Decreased ATP Levels after Axotomy of the Peripheral Nerve
  • Manipulating the Rapid Consolidation Periods in a Learning Task Affects General Skills More than Statistical Learning and Changes the Dynamics of Learning
  • Emergent Low-Frequency Activity in Cortico-Cerebellar Networks with Motor Skill Learning
Show more Research Article: Confirmation

Development

  • Ontogeny and Trophic Factor Sensitivity of Gastrointestinal Projecting Vagal Sensory Cell Types
  • Heterozygous Dab1 null mutation disrupts neocortical and hippocampal development
  • The Mobility of Neurofilaments in Mature Myelinated Axons of Adult Mice
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.