Number of songs | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 0.328 0.005 1.855 | 0.728 0.944 0.206 | ICo Miss PAG | 8.5 –23.4 25.2 | 95 CI [–6.67; 22.3] 95 CI [–9.83; 140] 95 CI [–9.83; 140] |
Time spentsinging | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 0.574 0.130 1.359 | 0.581 0.726 0.301 | ICo Miss PAG | 24.6 –117 230 | 95 CI [–58.9; 89.3] 95 CI [–229; –20.2] 95 CI [–56.5; 1240] |
Average songduration | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 0.662 0.164 0.626 | 0.537 0.694 0.554 | ICo Miss PAG | –0.88 0.089 0.256 | 95 CI [–3.34; 1.35] 95 CI [–1.06; 1.55] 95 CI [–1.56; 1.77] |
Average intersonginterval | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 0.757 0.0 0.2 | 0.494 0.985 0.822 | ICo Miss PAG | –13.6 9.61 39 | 95 CI [–153; 43.4] 95 CI [–147; 166] 95 CI [–180; 203] |
Average songelements | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 0.747 0.407 0.354 | 0.499 0.538 0.710 | ICo Miss PAG | 1 –0.661 1.3 | 95 CI [–1.78; 6.86] 95 CI [–14; 14] 95 CI [–1.89; 6.2] |
Average energy | Cannula placement | 2 | 0.607 | 0.564 | ICo | 0.0002 | 95 CI [0.00004; 0.0006] |
| Treatment interaction | 1 | 0.001 | 0.989 | Miss | –0.000008 | 95 CI [–0.0009; 0.0001] |
|
| 2 | 2.541 | 0.128 | PAG | –0.0003 | 95 CI [–0.0009; 0.0001] |
Average peak topeak amplitude | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 1.12 0.753 2.616 | 0.372 0.411 0.134 | ICo Miss PAG | 0.014 0.003 –0.037 | 95 CI [0.001; 0.038] 95 CI [–0.014; 0.026] 95 CI [–0.083; 0.008] |
Average RMS | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 0.485 0.312 4.828 | 0.629 0.589 0.034* | ICo Miss PAG | 0.528 0.796 –2.43 | 95 CI [–0.002; 1.52] 95 CI [–0.942; 2.31] 95 CI [–5.19; 0.123] |
Average entropy | Cannula placement | 2 | 0.007 | 0.993 | ICo | 0.0009 | 95 CI [–0.010; 0.008] |
| Treatment interaction | 1 | 1.683 | 0.224 | Miss | –0.0009 | 95 CI [–0.007; 0.002] |
|
| 2 | 0.171 | 0.845 | PAG | 0.0004 | 95 CI [–0.014; 0.012] |
Max. fundamentalfrequency | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 0.385 1.274 0.014 | 0.690 0.285 0.986 | ICo Miss PAG | –52.4 –80 –44.3 | 95 CI [–363; 225] 95 CI [–221; 85.2] 95 CI [–613; 614] |
Max. bandwidth | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 0.343 0.084 0.747 | 0.718 0.778 0.498 | ICo Miss PAG | 110 –43.4 –79.4 | 95 CI [–129; 495] 95 CI [–286; 37] 95 CI [–348; 271] |
Max. peakamplitude | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 0.641 0.512 2.214 | 0.547 0.491 0.160 | ICo Miss PAG | 0.332 0.15 –2.88 | 95 CI [–1.94; 2.43] 95 CI [–3.64; 2.84] 95 CI [–6.2; –0.045] |
Max. peakfrequency | Cannula placement Treatment interaction | 2 1 2 | 1.033 1.184 0.236 | 0.391 0.302 0.794 | ICo Miss PAG | 7.83 –182 –148 | 95 CI [–217; 149] 95 CI [–749; 45.9] 95 CI [–730; 492] |