Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Cognition and Behavior

Orbitofrontal Cortex Encodes Preference for Alcohol

John S. Hernandez and David E. Moorman
eNeuro 13 July 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0402-19.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0402-19.2020
John S. Hernandez
1Neuroscience and Behavior Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David E. Moorman
1Neuroscience and Behavior Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003
2Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A, Experimental timeline. B, Rats received 12-d homecage intermittent access to EtOH. Consumption escalated significantly over days. C, Operant task diagram. Rats nosepoked to receive cues predicting sucrose or EtOH. Outcomes were consumed by licking a spigot in a reward port below the nosepoke. D, Rats acquired significantly more sucrose (blue) than 10% EtOH (purple) or 20% EtOH (red) rewards. E, Rats consumed significantly more sucrose than 20% EtOH based on duration of reward consumption; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    A, Recording sites in the OFC (black circles) based on lesions made postrecording. B, Example activity from OFC neuron recorded during a sucrose session. Rasters (bottom) and 50-ms bin histogram (top) show the prominent inhibition during cue presentation followed by excitation during reward seeking and inhibition during reward consumption. C, Z-scored average OFC activity with standard error confidence intervals (CIs) across all neurons aligned on cue presentation in sucrose (blue CI), 10% EtOH (purple CI), and 20% EtOH (red CI) sessions. D, Numbers of neurons significantly excited or inhibited during each epoch in sucrose (blue), 10% EtOH (purple), and 20% EtOH (red) sessions.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Index calculations for individual OFC neuron activity during cue presentation (left column), reward seeking (middle column), and reward consumption (right column) during sucrose (top row), 10% EtOH (middle row), and 20% EtOH (bottom row) sessions. Indices calculated as in Materials and Methods. Beh = behavioral epoch; Base = baseline epoch. NS not significant; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Rats were separated into HDs and LDs based on homecage EtOH consumption (see Materials and Methods). A, HD rats exhibited significant escalation over the course of homecage intermittent access to EtOH whereas LD rats did not. B, HD rats (filled bars) completed significantly more rewarded trials for 20% EtOH (red) than LD rats (open bars), but there were no differences for sucrose (blue) or 10% EtOH (purple) rewarded trials. C, HD rats consumed significantly more 20% EtOH than LD rats, measured by lick duration, but there were no differences in consumption of sucrose or 10% EtOH. D, OFC neuronal activity in HD versus LD rats was similar during sucrose cues, seeking, and consumption but was significantly different during cues, seeking, and consumption of 10% EtOH (E) and during cues and seeking of 20% EtOH (F). Overall strength of OFC signaling (either excitation or inhibition) was suppressed in LD rats relative to HD rats in EtOH sessions; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    OFC neuronal activity was recorded during interleaved trials of 20% EtOH and sucrose. A, During interleaved sessions, HD (filled bars) and LD (open bars) rats completed similar numbers of sucrose (blue) and 20% EtOH (red) trials. B, However, LD rats consumed significantly less 20% EtOH than HD rats. C, Example of activity from a single neuron in sucrose (top) and 20% EtOH (bottom) conditions. D–F, Sucrose/EtOH index profiles for individual neurons recorded during interleaved trials of sucrose and 20% EtOH seeking. Recording the same neuron in both conditions allowed characterization of sucrose/EtOH index profiles for each neuron. Indices were calculated as in blocked conditions. Each dot represents sucrose/20% EtOH index combination for each neuron during cue (D, n = 156 neurons), seeking (E, n = 137 neurons), and reward (F, n = 137 neurons). Only neurons in which seeking and consumption trials were performed for both sucrose and 20% EtOH were included in seeking and reward plots; r and p values indicate significant correlations across all neurons in sucrose and EtOH trials, despite a bias toward significant selectivity in encoding of one versus another outcome. Blue, red, black, and gray dots represent neurons significantly activated/inhibited during sucrose conditions only, 20% EtOH only, both, and neither condition, respectively. Although a subset of neurons exhibited significant modulation in both sucrose and EtOH trials (black dots: 8 in response to cue, 17 during seeking, and 29 during consumption), the majority of significantly-influenced neurons exhibited selectivity for sucrose (blue dots: 14 cue, 16 seeking, and 58 consumption) or EtOH (red dots: 15 cue, 22 seeking, and 19 consumption). Numbers in each quadrant indicate numbers of neurons falling within that quadrant. Neurons with an index of 0 in one axis were not counted in quadrant totals. Most neurons showed inhibition during sucrose and EtOH cues, excitation during sucrose and EtOH seeking, and inhibition during sucrose and EtOH consumption, in line with patterns observed during blocked conditions. G, H, OFC activity was similar in sucrose (G) and 20% EtOH (H) trials in HD rats, but activity of OFC neurons in LD rats was again suppressed relative to activity of those in HD rats. This was true for neuronal responses to the cue, during reward seeking, and during sucrose/EtOH consumption; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Distribution of response profiles across neurons during blocked sucrose, 10% EtOH, and 20% EtOH recording sessions

    Sucrose10% EtOH20% EtOH
    CueSeekingReward# NsCueSeekingReward# NsCueSeekingReward# Ns
    01–14300–137–10020
    00–130–1101700–111
    –1–1–12001–1710010
    0–1–116–10–150019
    01012–1–1040109
    1008–11–121118
    –1014–10010115
    –11–140–1–110–114
    –10–13100110–13
    –11021101–10–12
    0–1021012
    –1001–1–111
    00111–111
    0111
    10–11
    000140001800050
    • Neuron populations are ordered from those containing most to least members. Category of response to cue, seeking, or reward is demarcated by −1 (significant inhibition during that epoch), +1 (significant excitation during that epoch), or 0 (no significant activity during that epoch). At the bottom of each section is the number of non-responsive neurons [0,0,0]. Any combination of responses not shown in this table was not observed during recording.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Distribution of response profiles across neurons during interleaved sucrose, 10% EtOH, and 20% EtOH recording sessions

    Sucrose20% EtOH
    CueSeekingRewardCueSeekingReward# Ns
    00–100028
    00–101010
    00–100–19
    01–10008
    0000114
    1111114
    00–1–1103
    01–100–13
    0100103
    –10–1–1002
    –10–100–12
    00–1–10–12
    00–1–1002
    00–10112
    0010012
    01–10102
    1000012
    1001012
    1101112
    –10–1–10–11
    –100–1001
    –1000001
    –1000011
    0–1–1–1–101
    0–1–1–1001
    0–1–100–11
    0–100–1–11
    0–1000–11
    0–101–1–11
    0–110–1–11
    000–1001
    0000–1–11
    00000–11
    0000011
    0000101
    01–10111
    0100111
    0101001
    1000001
    1100001
    1100111
    1110111
    00000019
    • Format is the same as Table 1, except that the same neurons were recorded in sucrose/20% EtOH interleaved sessions and neurons are categorized based on responses in both trial types.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 4
July/August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Orbitofrontal Cortex Encodes Preference for Alcohol
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Orbitofrontal Cortex Encodes Preference for Alcohol
John S. Hernandez, David E. Moorman
eNeuro 13 July 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0402-19.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0402-19.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Orbitofrontal Cortex Encodes Preference for Alcohol
John S. Hernandez, David E. Moorman
eNeuro 13 July 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0402-19.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0402-19.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • alcohol use disorder
  • dependence
  • electrophysiology
  • instrumental
  • orbital cortex
  • prefrontal cortex

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Opponent Learning with Different Representations in the Cortico-Basal Ganglia Circuits
  • Cardiac and Gastric Interoceptive Awareness Have Distinct Neural Substrates
  • Nonspiking Interneurons in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe Exhibit Spatially Restricted Activity
Show more Research Article: New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Hippocampal neuronal activity preceding stimulus predicts later memory success
  • Absence of VGLUT3 expression leads to impaired fear memory in mice
  • Gender impacts the relationship between mood disorder symptoms and effortful avoidance performance
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.